Thu Nov 08, 2012 9:56 pm
rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:pembroke allan wrote:No Smoking wrote:Do we not learn?
1) tan is not a billionaire, not even close.
2) investment means loans, why is everyone so desperate to riddle the club with crippling debt?
mmm 800 mil is close!!!
First of all, that's not close. Are you close to having 200 million?... No
Second of all, it's not 800 mil, as of march it was 751 mil and since then £125m has been wiped off his shares and he's put £30m into us which has not held its value, which currently puts him at £596m.
and you know the investment will be a loan?? mmmm you didnt like annis pretending to be in the know! but you are saying you are in the know if we get new invester they will loan us money!!1 ffs couldnt make it up???
when have I ever said I don't like annis to pretend to be in the know? You are either lying or have confused me with someone else. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
As for knowing the investment will be a loan.... You do understand the word investment right? Or are you confusing it with the word charity or gift?
so you dont know you are speculating, thats what it is called when dont know facts!!!!
yes I do know, he wants to invest... That means put money in and then get it back and more.
anyway dont bother replying (roath) as you will have anser as always and i cant be bothered to be on merrygoround with you tonite!!
you don't want me to reply because I will have an answer.... How bizarre![]()
First of all clever clogs a British billion is 1 million million, therefore we are referring to us millions. Which is the currency most countries trade in 'the dollar' mute point but if tan is a billionaire it would be in foreign currency and not ours. In any case 751 millions pounds is a lot of money, loan all of that out at 7% and what's your return?
Thu Nov 08, 2012 9:57 pm
rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:pembroke allan wrote:No Smoking wrote:Do we not learn?
1) tan is not a billionaire, not even close.
2) investment means loans, why is everyone so desperate to riddle the club with crippling debt?
mmm 800 mil is close!!!
First of all, that's not close. Are you close to having 200 million?... No
Second of all, it's not 800 mil, as of march it was 751 mil and since then £125m has been wiped off his shares and he's put £30m into us which has not held its value, which currently puts him at £596m.
and you know the investment will be a loan?? mmmm you didnt like annis pretending to be in the know! but you are saying you are in the know if we get new invester they will loan us money!!1 ffs couldnt make it up???
when have I ever said I don't like annis to pretend to be in the know? You are either lying or have confused me with someone else. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
As for knowing the investment will be a loan.... You do understand the word investment right? Or are you confusing it with the word charity or gift?
so you dont know you are speculating, thats what it is called when dont know facts!!!!
yes I do know, he wants to invest... That means put money in and then get it back and more.
anyway dont bother replying (roath) as you will have anser as always and i cant be bothered to be on merrygoround with you tonite!!
you don't want me to reply because I will have an answer.... How bizarre![]()
First of all clever clogs a British billion is 1 million million, therefore we are referring to us millions. Which is the currency most countries trade in 'the dollar' mute point but if tan is a billionaire it would be in foreign currency and not ours. In any case 751 millions pounds is a lot of money, loan all of that out at 7% and what's your return?
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:00 pm
rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:pembroke allan wrote:No Smoking wrote:Do we not learn?
1) tan is not a billionaire, not even close.
2) investment means loans, why is everyone so desperate to riddle the club with crippling debt?
mmm 800 mil is close!!!
First of all, that's not close. Are you close to having 200 million?... No
Second of all, it's not 800 mil, as of march it was 751 mil and since then £125m has been wiped off his shares and he's put £30m into us which has not held its value, which currently puts him at £596m.
and you know the investment will be a loan?? mmmm you didnt like annis pretending to be in the know! but you are saying you are in the know if we get new invester they will loan us money!!1 ffs couldnt make it up???
when have I ever said I don't like annis to pretend to be in the know? You are either lying or have confused me with someone else. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
As for knowing the investment will be a loan.... You do understand the word investment right? Or are you confusing it with the word charity or gift?
so you dont know you are speculating, thats what it is called when dont know facts!!!!
yes I do know, he wants to invest... That means put money in and then get it back and more.
anyway dont bother replying (roath) as you will have anser as always and i cant be bothered to be on merrygoround with you tonite!!
you don't want me to reply because I will have an answer.... How bizarre![]()
First of all clever clogs a British billion is 1 million million, therefore we are referring to us millions. Which is the currency most countries trade in 'the dollar' mute point but if tan is a billionaire it would be in foreign currency and not ours. In any case 751 millions pounds is a lot of money, loan all of that out at 7% and what's your return?
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:01 pm
pembroke allan wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:pembroke allan wrote:No Smoking wrote:Do we not learn?
1) tan is not a billionaire, not even close.
2) investment means loans, why is everyone so desperate to riddle the club with crippling debt?
mmm 800 mil is close!!!
First of all, that's not close. Are you close to having 200 million?... No
Second of all, it's not 800 mil, as of march it was 751 mil and since then £125m has been wiped off his shares and he's put £30m into us which has not held its value, which currently puts him at £596m.
and you know the investment will be a loan?? mmmm you didnt like annis pretending to be in the know! but you are saying you are in the know if we get new invester they will loan us money!!1 ffs couldnt make it up???
when have I ever said I don't like annis to pretend to be in the know? You are either lying or have confused me with someone else. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
As for knowing the investment will be a loan.... You do understand the word investment right? Or are you confusing it with the word charity or gift?
so you dont know you are speculating, thats what it is called when dont know facts!!!!
yes I do know, he wants to invest... That means put money in and then get it back and more.
anyway dont bother replying (roath) as you will have anser as always and i cant be bothered to be on merrygoround with you tonite!!
you don't want me to reply because I will have an answer.... How bizarre![]()
First of all clever clogs a British billion is 1 million million, therefore we are referring to us millions. Which is the currency most countries trade in 'the dollar' mute point but if tan is a billionaire it would be in foreign currency and not ours. In any case 751 millions pounds is a lot of money, loan all of that out at 7% and what's your return?
hes chanceller of exchequer didnt you know!! knows all things financial especially to do with city!!my point was he doesnt know anything about investors,
how they will invest what terms ect ect so its speculation what else can you call it???
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:01 pm
rb1976 wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:pembroke allan wrote:No Smoking wrote:Do we not learn?
1) tan is not a billionaire, not even close.
2) investment means loans, why is everyone so desperate to riddle the club with crippling debt?
mmm 800 mil is close!!!
First of all, that's not close. Are you close to having 200 million?... No
Second of all, it's not 800 mil, as of march it was 751 mil and since then £125m has been wiped off his shares and he's put £30m into us which has not held its value, which currently puts him at £596m.
and you know the investment will be a loan?? mmmm you didnt like annis pretending to be in the know! but you are saying you are in the know if we get new invester they will loan us money!!1 ffs couldnt make it up???
when have I ever said I don't like annis to pretend to be in the know? You are either lying or have confused me with someone else. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
As for knowing the investment will be a loan.... You do understand the word investment right? Or are you confusing it with the word charity or gift?
so you dont know you are speculating, thats what it is called when dont know facts!!!!
yes I do know, he wants to invest... That means put money in and then get it back and more.
anyway dont bother replying (roath) as you will have anser as always and i cant be bothered to be on merrygoround with you tonite!!
you don't want me to reply because I will have an answer.... How bizarre![]()
First of all clever clogs a British billion is 1 million million, therefore we are referring to us millions. Which is the currency most countries trade in 'the dollar' mute point but if tan is a billionaire it would be in foreign currency and not ours. In any case 751 millions pounds is a lot of money, loan all of that out at 7% and what's your return?
Just out of interest how much is your chairman worth?
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:02 pm
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:03 pm
No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:pembroke allan wrote:No Smoking wrote:Do we not learn?
1) tan is not a billionaire, not even close.
2) investment means loans, why is everyone so desperate to riddle the club with crippling debt?
mmm 800 mil is close!!!
First of all, that's not close. Are you close to having 200 million?... No
Second of all, it's not 800 mil, as of march it was 751 mil and since then £125m has been wiped off his shares and he's put £30m into us which has not held its value, which currently puts him at £596m.
and you know the investment will be a loan?? mmmm you didnt like annis pretending to be in the know! but you are saying you are in the know if we get new invester they will loan us money!!1 ffs couldnt make it up???
when have I ever said I don't like annis to pretend to be in the know? You are either lying or have confused me with someone else. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
As for knowing the investment will be a loan.... You do understand the word investment right? Or are you confusing it with the word charity or gift?
so you dont know you are speculating, thats what it is called when dont know facts!!!!
yes I do know, he wants to invest... That means put money in and then get it back and more.
anyway dont bother replying (roath) as you will have anser as always and i cant be bothered to be on merrygoround with you tonite!!
you don't want me to reply because I will have an answer.... How bizarre![]()
First of all clever clogs a British billion is 1 million million, therefore we are referring to us millions. Which is the currency most countries trade in 'the dollar' mute point but if tan is a billionaire it would be in foreign currency and not ours. In any case 751 millions pounds is a lot of money, loan all of that out at 7% and what's your return?
Just out of interest how much is your chairman worth?
Who is my chairman? And I'll gladly answer.
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:07 pm
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:07 pm
No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:pembroke allan wrote:No Smoking wrote:Do we not learn?
1) tan is not a billionaire, not even close.
2) investment means loans, why is everyone so desperate to riddle the club with crippling debt?
mmm 800 mil is close!!!
First of all, that's not close. Are you close to having 200 million?... No
Second of all, it's not 800 mil, as of march it was 751 mil and since then £125m has been wiped off his shares and he's put £30m into us which has not held its value, which currently puts him at £596m.
and you know the investment will be a loan?? mmmm you didnt like annis pretending to be in the know! but you are saying you are in the know if we get new invester they will loan us money!!1 ffs couldnt make it up???
when have I ever said I don't like annis to pretend to be in the know? You are either lying or have confused me with someone else. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
As for knowing the investment will be a loan.... You do understand the word investment right? Or are you confusing it with the word charity or gift?
so you dont know you are speculating, thats what it is called when dont know facts!!!!
yes I do know, he wants to invest... That means put money in and then get it back and more.
anyway dont bother replying (roath) as you will have anser as always and i cant be bothered to be on merrygoround with you tonite!!
you don't want me to reply because I will have an answer.... How bizarre![]()
First of all clever clogs a British billion is 1 million million, therefore we are referring to us millions. Which is the currency most countries trade in 'the dollar' mute point but if tan is a billionaire it would be in foreign currency and not ours. In any case 751 millions pounds is a lot of money, loan all of that out at 7% and what's your return?
so we are talking foreign money... Right ok.
I'm a billionaire too then. In fact I've just put 1.5 billion into my savings account today.... Indonesian rupiahs but but still, a billion is a billion right?![]()
10k by the way...
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:08 pm
carlccfc wrote:Bluebina wrote:thomasblue wrote:just had a very intresting conversation with a mate who has been hearing rumours of new investors from the middle east joining the city board ? one is supposedly a sultan , wasnt there a sultan at the watford game as guest of honour ?
can anybody shed any light on this as to whether its true or not ?
The sultan was Malysian I believe, sultan of an area of Malasia or Aisa.......
He was the Sultan of Johor
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:09 pm
llan bluebird wrote:uncle Huw
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:11 pm
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:12 pm
rb1976 wrote:
The point was dick the measure of billionaire is irrelevant as in the context of billionaire globally this generally refers to dollars
, do you get my point? Oil by the barrel given in what currency etc.
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:12 pm
Bluebina wrote:carlccfc wrote:Bluebina wrote:thomasblue wrote:just had a very intresting conversation with a mate who has been hearing rumours of new investors from the middle east joining the city board ? one is supposedly a sultan , wasnt there a sultan at the watford game as guest of honour ?
can anybody shed any light on this as to whether its true or not ?
The sultan was Malysian I believe, sultan of an area of Malasia or Aisa.......
He was the Sultan of Johor
Nice one yes that was him, heard he is minted and pretty influential in Malaysia, according to this Malaysian, if he was come on board this would be massive news over there, and raise our profile, which is high anyway even further.
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:16 pm
BracklaBlue72 wrote:First of all clever clogs a British billion is 1 million million, therefore we are referring to us millions. Which is the currency most countries trade in 'the dollar' mute point but if tan is a billionaire it would be in foreign currency and not ours. In any case 751 millions pounds is a lot of money, loan all of that out at 7% and what's your return?
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:19 pm
No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:
The point was dick the measure of billionaire is irrelevant as in the context of billionaire globally this generally refers to dollars
, do you get my point? Oil by the barrel given in what currency etc.
Euros, pounds, australian dollars... It makes little difference.
£591m is not a billion in any of them. Sorry to burst your bubble and all.
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:20 pm
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:21 pm
rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:
The point was dick the measure of billionaire is irrelevant as in the context of billionaire globally this generally refers to dollars
, do you get my point? Oil by the barrel given in what currency etc.
Euros, pounds, australian dollars... It makes little difference.
£591m is not a billion in any of them. Sorry to burst your bubble and all.
So is a US billion 100 million?
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:21 pm
No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:
The point was dick the measure of billionaire is irrelevant as in the context of billionaire globally this generally refers to dollars
, do you get my point? Oil by the barrel given in what currency etc.
Euros, pounds, australian dollars, australian dollars... It makes little difference.
£591 is not a billion in any of them. Sorry to burst your bubble and all.
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:22 pm
rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:
The point was dick the measure of billionaire is irrelevant as in the context of billionaire globally this generally refers to dollars
, do you get my point? Oil by the barrel given in what currency etc.
Euros, pounds, australian dollars... It makes little difference.
£591m is not a billion in any of them. Sorry to burst your bubble and all.
So is a US billion 100 million?
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:24 pm
No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:
The point was dick the measure of billionaire is irrelevant as in the context of billionaire globally this generally refers to dollars
, do you get my point? Oil by the barrel given in what currency etc.
Euros, pounds, australian dollars... It makes little difference.
£591m is not a billion in any of them. Sorry to burst your bubble and all.
So is a US billion 100 million?
If it is its the most pointless measurement of money ever.
Tan has 591m English pounds. Thats not a billion in the currency we use. The rest is just ego massaging.
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:26 pm
No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:
The point was dick the measure of billionaire is irrelevant as in the context of billionaire globally this generally refers to dollars
, do you get my point? Oil by the barrel given in what currency etc.
Euros, pounds, australian dollars... It makes little difference.
£591m is not a billion in any of them. Sorry to burst your bubble and all.
So is a US billion 100 million?
If it is its the most pointless measurement of money ever.
Tan has 591m English pounds. Thats not a billion in the currency we use. The rest is just ego massaging.
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:26 pm
SBF1 wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:
The point was dick the measure of billionaire is irrelevant as in the context of billionaire globally this generally refers to dollars
, do you get my point? Oil by the barrel given in what currency etc.
Euros, pounds, australian dollars... It makes little difference.
£591m is not a billion in any of them. Sorry to burst your bubble and all.
So is a US billion 100 million?
1,000,000,000 (number), one thousand million
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:27 pm
SBF1 wrote:No smoking.
We have all heard your thoughts.
We are in debt.
badly
Our owners are not as bright as you. They don't know what they are doing.
interesting opinion
They are so bad at making money, you have made far more.
i didn't say either of those things. But making money doesn't necessarily mean to the benefit of the club, in fact it is often the opposite
I bet there is not one accountant working for them. Cripes they are shit eh?
dont need an accountant to know we are losing £2m a month and have over invested in a club worth £15m by £85m and rising
They are that bad at it, they are even putting circa £1mil a month into it.
£2m
They must be doing that by accident?
im sure they mean to, otherwise the club gets wound up.
Yes, that must be it, it is some banking error paying all our bills.
its an error for us because every bill they pay, we owe them that amount and 7%
When you can prove that you are better at investing money than them, I will take note.
again you are confusing being good at investing money and improving a football club. They could destroy us and still make money, in fact it's probably the most likely outcome.
Perhaps you should call them and give them the benefit of your wisdom?
im sure they are well aware of what they are doing.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:27 pm
pembroke allan wrote:No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:
The point was dick the measure of billionaire is irrelevant as in the context of billionaire globally this generally refers to dollars
, do you get my point? Oil by the barrel given in what currency etc.
Euros, pounds, australian dollars... It makes little difference.
£591m is not a billion in any of them. Sorry to burst your bubble and all.
So is a US billion 100 million?
If it is its the most pointless measurement of money ever.
Tan has 591m English pounds. Thats not a billion in the currency we use. The rest is just ego massaging.
and you are manipulating figures to suite you! so there!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:29 pm
SBF1 wrote:No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:No Smoking wrote:rb1976 wrote:
The point was dick the measure of billionaire is irrelevant as in the context of billionaire globally this generally refers to dollars
, do you get my point? Oil by the barrel given in what currency etc.
Euros, pounds, australian dollars... It makes little difference.
£591m is not a billion in any of them. Sorry to burst your bubble and all.
So is a US billion 100 million?
If it is its the most pointless measurement of money ever.
Tan has 591m English pounds. Thats not a billion in the currency we use. The rest is just ego massaging.
He is not English though, why would he count his cash in English pounds? Doh!
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:30 pm
No Smoking wrote:SBF1 wrote:No smoking.
We have all heard your thoughts.
We are in debt.
badly
Our owners are not as bright as you. They don't know what they are doing.
interesting opinion
They are so bad at making money, you have made far more.
i didn't say either of those things. But making money doesn't necessarily mean to the benefit of the club, in fact it is often the opposite
I bet there is not one accountant working for them. Cripes they are shit eh?
dont need an accountant to know we are losing £2m a month and have over invested in a club worth £15m by £85m and rising
They are that bad at it, they are even putting circa £1mil a month into it.
£2m
They must be doing that by accident?
im sure they mean to, otherwise the club gets wound up.
Yes, that must be it, it is some banking error paying all our bills.
its an error for us because every bill they pay, we owe them that amount and 7%
When you can prove that you are better at investing money than them, I will take note.
again you are confusing being good at investing money and improving a football club. They could destroy us and still make money, in fact it's probably the most likely outcome.
Perhaps you should call them and give them the benefit of your wisdom?
im sure they are well aware of what they are doing.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:34 pm
pembroke allan wrote:No Smoking wrote:SBF1 wrote:No smoking.
We have all heard your thoughts.
We are in debt.
badly
Our owners are not as bright as you. They don't know what they are doing.
interesting opinion
They are so bad at making money, you have made far more.
i didn't say either of those things. But making money doesn't necessarily mean to the benefit of the club, in fact it is often the opposite
I bet there is not one accountant working for them. Cripes they are shit eh?
dont need an accountant to know we are losing £2m a month and have over invested in a club worth £15m by £85m and rising
They are that bad at it, they are even putting circa £1mil a month into it.
£2m
They must be doing that by accident?
im sure they mean to, otherwise the club gets wound up.
Yes, that must be it, it is some banking error paying all our bills.
its an error for us because every bill they pay, we owe them that amount and 7%
When you can prove that you are better at investing money than them, I will take note.
again you are confusing being good at investing money and improving a football club. They could destroy us and still make money, in fact it's probably the most likely outcome.
Perhaps you should call them and give them the benefit of your wisdom?
im sure they are well aware of what they are doing.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
curious how can they destroy us and make money we only have players as assets!! no ground (cannot be sold) no land either at present 100mil debt ffs gets worse!
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:38 pm
Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:39 pm
No Smoking wrote:pembroke allan wrote:No Smoking wrote:SBF1 wrote:No smoking.
We have all heard your thoughts.
We are in debt.
badly
Our owners are not as bright as you. They don't know what they are doing.
interesting opinion
They are so bad at making money, you have made far more.
i didn't say either of those things. But making money doesn't necessarily mean to the benefit of the club, in fact it is often the opposite
I bet there is not one accountant working for them. Cripes they are shit eh?
dont need an accountant to know we are losing £2m a month and have over invested in a club worth £15m by £85m and rising
They are that bad at it, they are even putting circa £1mil a month into it.
£2m
They must be doing that by accident?
im sure they mean to, otherwise the club gets wound up.
Yes, that must be it, it is some banking error paying all our bills.
its an error for us because every bill they pay, we owe them that amount and 7%
When you can prove that you are better at investing money than them, I will take note.
again you are confusing being good at investing money and improving a football club. They could destroy us and still make money, in fact it's probably the most likely outcome.
Perhaps you should call them and give them the benefit of your wisdom?
im sure they are well aware of what they are doing.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
curious how can they destroy us and make money we only have players as assets!! no ground (cannot be sold) no land either at present 100mil debt ffs gets worse!
Floating us on the stock exchange then not investing the ones coming in.
Using us as advertising for other businesses until they have had their investment worth, advertising is not cheap.
Asset stripping to some degree.
All these if do e in co binational would probably make their cash back. And after it we would be liquidated. What do you honestly honk their intentions are ffs, they know we don't make a lot of money and they know we can't pay them back and the compan is losing them £24m per year.
They aren't stupid.