mark bridger case

Sick b*stard he done it alright

thats that then....no need to bother with a trial

Sticking up for that nonce again Craig

not quite sure what you mean?

ive stuck up for him?
and stuck up for him before??

None of us know the evidence so none of us can say 100% whether he is guilty or not

Agreed, but would you put money on him being innocent?
You'd be a sill man if you did.

I have no faith in the Police from past experience and I have heard they thoroughly inspected the van and didn't find a single hair in there which belonged to April. It does make you wonder.

I have no faith in the Police from past experience and I have heard they thoroughly inspected the van and didn't find a single hair in there which belonged to April. It does make you wonder.

Where have you heard that from then? The police mus have something to have held him that long and be willing to charge them. The police force is nowhere near as bad as it used to be for fixing people up to fit the crime

im not for one minute saying he didnt do it, nor am i saying he did as ive not seen the evidence.....Only because of the media portraying him as guilty everyone thinks he is. Remember the Joanna Yeates murder in Bristol. Everyone was so sure it was the landlord.

The media can destroy people.

I have no faith in the Police from past experience and I have heard they thoroughly inspected the van and didn't find a single hair in there which belonged to April. It does make you wonder.

Although she was actually in the vehicle a few days earlier. (from what I had heard on Sky news I think?)
It could be a deep clean had been done since.
A lot more to this than we know.

im not for one minute saying he didnt do it, nor am i saying he did as ive not seen the evidence.....Only because of the media portraying him as guilty everyone thinks he is. Remember the Joanna Yeates murder in Bristol. Everyone was so sure it was the landlord.

The media can destroy people.

The guy has been in court and charged. People need to be patient and wait until he is convicted.....that of course is if he is guilty.

From what I am reading the chances are he will go down for abduction and not murder. It is feared the body has been washed out to sea and as mentioned above it is highly unlikely a murder charge will be given.

If I was a betting man I would say he was guilty of murder but will get away with that crime because you can bet his solicitor will be playing the law game. It comes as no surprise to me that this guy has not told the police where he last saw the body. He has most likely been advised by his solicitor not to say in the hope they will drop the murder charge because they cannot find the body. The solicitor most likely knows he is as guilty as hell but will claim he is only doing his job. The law can be an arse and certain solicitors will use that.

Defence lawyers in such cases are as sick as the individuals they defend.

I hope they all rot in hell.

Not one person, even his own family, have come out to defend him and say theyve got the wrong man.

Strange that he should be crying in court the other day, if he's innocent.

That poor little girl. Terrible case.

well if you wanted to argue it, you could say hes worried about being found guilty for something he didnt do? and also, even if he didnt do it his life is now over.

he wouldnt make eye contact with anyone thats not the actions of an innocent man.

If you were innocent and being accused of sych crimes youd be screaming / pleading

he was actually crying throughout the short hearing.

not the actions of a pyschotic child killer you could argue

Yawn

any reason ur turning back to being a tw*t again?

Just because im seeing the other side of the debate you begin acting like a petulant child.

As ive said, i have no idea if hes guilty or not, just the same as you. Your opinion is hes guilty, thats not fact though

any reason ur turning back to being a tw*t again?

Just because im seeing the other side of the debate you begin acting like a petulant child.

Craig the only tw*t is you. Trying on this thread, and my Sick Bastards thread, to say the opposite to general consenus just to be controversial.

Tedious.

any reason ur turning back to being a tw*t again?

Just because im seeing the other side of the debate you begin acting like a petulant child.

Craig the only tw*t is you. Trying on this thread, and my Sick Bastards thread, to say the opposite to general consenus just to be controversial.

Tedious.

holy shit, well stone me for not following the general consensus.

Im sorry for believing in innocent till proven guilty. If hes found guilty, he should be killed, he hasnt though.

Im sorry for not wanting to kill him on no evidence whatsoever.



Polo, maybe you should move to Iran, i think you'd be more suited there.

any reason ur turning back to being a tw*t again?

Just because im seeing the other side of the debate you begin acting like a petulant child.

Craig the only tw*t is you. Trying on this thread, and my Sick Bastards thread, to say the opposite to general consenus just to be controversial.

Tedious.

holy shit, well stone me for not following the general consensus.

Im sorry for believing in innocent till proven guilty. If hes found guilty, he should be killed, he hasnt though.

Im sorry for not wanting to kill him on no evidence whatsoever.



Polo, maybe you should move to Iran, i think you'd be more suited there.

As I said two posts ago:

YAWN

How dare I not follow what the mighty Polo thinks

How dare I not follow what the mighty Polo thinks

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

It does seem they have the right Man. Don't know why !! Maybe blood on him which would lead them to say it was a murder investigation. Or he may have admitted it but is not saying where she is. But its no longer a missing investigation which says they know. But for reasons it isn't being released.
But it still is the case innocent until proven guilty !! unless he has confessed.

We all know as much as each other, and that is simply f**k all. If I had to put money down I'd say he's a very guilty man. That's purely based on his arrest for murder. Pretty strong words if the police are clutching at straws. Either way it's very tragic!!

We all know as much as each other, and that is simply f**k all. If I had to put money down I'd say he's a very guilty man. That's purely based on his arrest for murder. Pretty strong words if the police are clutching at straws. Either way it's very tragic!!

it does make you wonder what they know.

Personally ive heard a few things, and it sounds like he is guilty and not giving up the location of the body.


out of interest, does anyone know if an admission of Murder is enough to convict someone regardless of evidence?

Police are giving nothing away. But APPARENTLY, he has not denied picking the little
girl up ONCE. He has refuted NOTHING. He is stonewalling. Best guess is that the foul
c**t will keep this up for months hoping the coppers offer HIM something for telling them
where the little girl is.

Your all entitled to your opinions of course.

if he is guilty he should never be allowed out of prision.


even if hes not guilty, his life is ruined.

We all know as much as each other, and that is simply f**k all. If I had to put money down I'd say he's a very guilty man. That's purely based on his arrest for murder. Pretty strong words if the police are clutching at straws. Either way it's very tragic!!

it does make you wonder what they know.

Personally ive heard a few things, and it sounds like he is guilty and not giving up the location of the body.


out of interest, does anyone know if an admission of Murder is enough to convict someone regardless of evidence?

I dont see why not if they admit to it. I would only think it wouldnt count is if they had evidence and doubt to say it was someonelse

We all know as much as each other, and that is simply f**k all. If I had to put money down I'd say he's a very guilty man. That's purely based on his arrest for murder. Pretty strong words if the police are clutching at straws. Either way it's very tragic!!

it does make you wonder what they know.

Personally ive heard a few things, and it sounds like he is guilty and not giving up the location of the body.


out of interest, does anyone know if an admission of Murder is enough to convict someone regardless of evidence?

If he said he committed the murder, and circumstances show he had the means, (depends on how he said he did it) the motive, (he's a pedo/sicko and if they have some evidence of that from say a doctor or his computer) and opportunity (can't prove he was anywhere else at the time) and some minor forensics, with his confession.
I think should be enough to put him away.

assuming he is actually guilty

they wouldnt have charged him if the evidence they had against him didnt stand up...

That is an absurd statement. There are many, many occasions of Police charging the wrong person.

any reason ur turning back to being a tw*t again?

Just because im seeing the other side of the debate you begin acting like a petulant child.

Craig the only tw*t is you. Trying on this thread, and my Sick Bastards thread, to say the opposite to general consenus just to be controversial.

Tedious.

Craig is right here. Polo you are being a bit of an arse and part of the reason why people are going off this board.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion even if it is against the consensus.

any reason ur turning back to being a tw*t again?

Just because im seeing the other side of the debate you begin acting like a petulant child.

Craig the only tw*t is you. Trying on this thread, and my Sick Bastards thread, to say the opposite to general consenus just to be controversial.

Tedious.

Craig is right here. Polo you are being a bit of an arse and part of the reason why people are going off this board.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion even if it is against the consensus.

Hardly surprising you quote that last line considering you are the only person east of Swansea who backs Chris Coleman.

The police here definitely know he did it and he's a marked man. The pier has been covered in police and its normally a town with very little police around. They are obviously protecting him to stop vigilante attacks. At the end of my street there was 3 riot vans and 4 police cars the other night that were just parked up. The media have flooded the town and have been doing everyone's head in asking questions. Even had a Daily Star reporter ask me, a student, if I knew anything. How the heck would I know

The police station has had the BBC and ITV vans around it and camera's set up for days now and the whole town is littered with emergency service vehicles.

Not one person, even his own family, have come out to defend him and say theyve got the wrong man.

Im with Polo on this one. If they didn't have a case why would they spend thousands of the police budget protecting him and pushing through a trial against him? Obviously their case is pretty damning for them to be moving him around like that constantly and they want to push through the trial because it will look good on them as a police force if they find the perpetrator.

I will say, the police response here has been phenomenal and they deserve massive credit for the way they have gone about this.

The guy had a hearing here in Aber and he accepted the charges brought against him. If I was in his shoes and I was innocent I would just say no I do not accept or understand these frigging charges against me because I am innocent. I would not accept a thing. I would fight it until my last breath.

In my opinion he is guilty and unfortunately I believe he has come to terms with the fact he is going to prison and now his only form of defence is the location of the body. Sad but I believe its true.

I thought you live in aber JB why would you be in Machynlleth? Serious question not having a dig

I Hope they can convict the person who committed this terrible crime and if the poor girl has been murdered I hope they can find her body to give the family some kind of closure. Moving forward we need a radical change in policy on convicted child molesters. These people who find 5 year olds sexualy attractive are sick, and cannot be cured.They must be locked up for life or given the option of a death sentence.

any reason ur turning back to being a tw*t again?

Just because im seeing the other side of the debate you begin acting like a petulant child.

Craig the only tw*t is you. Trying on this thread, and my Sick Bastards thread, to say the opposite to general consenus just to be controversial.

Tedious.

Craig is right here. Polo you are being a bit of an arse and part of the reason why people are going off this board.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion even if it is against the consensus.

Hardly surprising you quote that last line considering you are the only person east of Swansea who backs Chris Coleman.

Where does Gary Speed's Dad live?

I Hope they can convict the person who committed this terrible crime and if the poor girl has been murdered I hope they can find her body to give the family some kind of closure. Moving forward we need a radical change in policy on convicted child molesters. These people who find 5 year olds sexualy attractive are sick, and cannot be cured.They must be locked up for life or given the option of a death sentence.

In America they have a specialised prison or mental unit however you look at it. Where they round up all the convicted paedophiles and treat them under a mental illness and "cure" them of their urges and the need to prey on children. Dont know whether it would work or if it would be enough for them.

Defence lawyers in such cases are as sick as the individuals they defend.

I hope they all rot in hell.

It's their job. They can't not do their job.