ARE WE STRONG ENOUGH WITHOUT BELLAMY AND MAYNARD?

The injury prone is only downside to me. But he can be a handful

To be honest I would be more concerned if either Taylor
Or Mcnaughton got injured, apart from Big Ben our Defensive cover is poor. No point banging in the goals then if we are leaking them at the back!!

I'm concerned about tommorow, malky rates helguson (I dont know why) he is not a goal scorer, and joe mason in attack also worries me, at the level he is not a game altering player, such as maynard & bellamy,

craig noone isn't a big goal scorer, if whitts doesn't chip in with a couple or hudson/turner/connoly,
we will struggle to score goals, not just tommorow but all season

You are an idiot !... Complete idiot !!!

Have we won any games without both of them playing this season??

Yes.

That doesn't answer the question, and the answer to the question is no we are not strong enough
without both of them.

We may have won games without both of them, but over the course of a season, missing both of them (Maynard out for season, Bellamy injury prone) will surely have a detrimental effect on out ability to challenge for the top 2.

God forbid, Craig Noone or Whitts should get injured aswell.

Over the course of a season definitely we would not be strong enough, though I think we
could still limp into the play-offs..Velikonja and Kim Bo would come good I reckon. But we
could afford to lose both Maynard and CB39 and still be stronger than say Burnley without
Charlie Austin. We have a very very good squad now. But yeh, take BOTH our best players out
and we'd be less of a force