Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:36 am

Over last 9 seasons Cardiff total average 160,097 divided by 9 = 17,788
Over last 9 seasons Swansea total average 121,186 divided by 9 = 13,465

Not similar at all, averaging 4,000 more per game over nine years, that is a big difference. :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:[/quote]

I'm not sure if you are deliberately being an idiot or just trolling. But I'll bite.

Over the last 9 years we have been in the championship while they have been mostly been at a lower level than the championship. The point of comparing those is what exactly? There isn't one.

YOU want to compare our 5th, 6th and 7th season in the champ with their 1st, 2nd and 3rd essentially .... Yes we are in the same league but had an extra 5-7 years to build the fan base, hardly a fair comparison.

FAIRNESS suggests not only should we compare when in he same league but also the same stage of establishment in that league. Swansea were only there for 3 years so that's all we have to go on. They averaged 15,300 in comparison to our 13,100 when in our first 3 years. It took us another 3 years to get out of that average to attendances we are used to today, who's to say Swansea wouldn't have done the same?

Instead they got promoted and have packed thir stadium to bursting pont every week.

As for the 4000 fans, that was his opinion and you said spot on. Although the stats suggest it may be 4000 but in favour of the jacks should there be no restriction in boh capacities.[/quote]

What you forget to mention, is their first three seasons in the championship( while we were at NP) coincides with moving into their new stadium. You really are a troll. :?
Lets compare first seasons in the championship in respective new stadiums then? No,? Here they are >>>

Them in a new stadium, us in Ninian Park

2005/06 (Championship) - 11,802 Swansea 14,112 (new stadium syndrome)

2006/07 (Championship) - 15,224 Swansea 12,720

2007/08 (Championship) - 13,939 Swansea 12,993

Even when in a new stadium and us at Ninian Park they could only get better crowds the first season.

Us in a new stadium

09-10 Cardiff 20,717 Swansea 15,407

10-11 Cardiff 23,194 Swansea 15,507

11-12 Cardiff 22,100 Swansea 19,946

Have a nice day, keep trying to wriggle and twist the figures about.
Their average attendance year by year over the last ten years has only bettered ours once and that was due to a new stadium.
Irrespective of success, because that's what got us the crowds, success in cups etc.
Keep on trolling! :D

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:45 am

Again I'm not sure if your trolling or genuinelly think what you are writing makes sense.

You still want to compare a newly promoted Swansea attendance to an established Cardiff one. It's useless, pointless, irrelevant.

The capacity of ninian park was 21,500... Bigger than the liberty so your point is mute.

In Swanseas time in the championship they averaged 15,300, in the direct comparison in terms of newly promoted Cardiff to the championship, we averaged 13,100 over the same initial first 3 years..

Since then we have established ourselves and they have been promoted. We currently get 21,000 and they get 20,000 with a severely restricted supply in terms of demand.

They Re facts,

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:57 am

cityone wrote:Once again a very good/fair response, (shame the other knuckle heads/jacks don't post the same way) yes our stadium can be increased very quickly, it can go up to 35,000 in a matter of a couple of months, (summer) the main structure of the stadium was built to hold 60,000 which could be achieved over a 12 month period if required, the one thing i dissagree with is if we got to the premiership, our 35,000 would not be big enough for the demand, now that may well level out after a period of sustained top level football, but at first it certainly would'nt be big enough.


There are certainly spikes over a season, and yes, the first season in the Premier League would see huge attendances but over time they will even out. Lets say for example, Swansea are playing Man Utd, I think we would easily sell around 40,000 tickets, possibly for one or two other games as well, but the rest of the time, we would end up with 10,000 empty seats and it would be the same for yourselves. It's a balancing act and a fine line for sure.

Here's an example for you, whisper it, but there are still a few tickets available for tomorrows match with Reading, not really the Swans fault as Reading have returned some at the last minute and they will sell out by the end of today, but it shows that the demand is slightly dropping off already.

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:11 pm

No Smoking wrote:Again I'm not sure if your trolling or genuinelly think what you are writing makes sense.

You still want to compare a newly promoted Swansea attendance to an established Cardiff one. It's useless, pointless, irrelevant.
No its not irrelevant, it's proof we have a better average attendance year on year.

The capacity of ninian park was 21,500... Bigger than the liberty so your point is mute.
No it's not, all clubs have an increase in crowds in the first season with a new stadium. FACT! So that's why they had the ONE year better than us.

In Swanseas time in the championship they averaged 15,300, in the direct comparison in terms of newly promoted Cardiff to the championship, we averaged 13,100 over the same initial first 3 years.. Not direct comparison with a new stadium though is it. It has a massive effect. Do you deny that?
So do a comparison with our new stadium years to theirs....pffttt!

Since then we have established ourselves and they have been promoted. We currently get 21,000 and they get 20,000 with a severely restricted supply in terms of demand. Still, every little helps us beat them year on year eh? :D

They Re fiction,


This is the fact, year on year, they have failed to beat us on average (apart from one) over the last nine years, regardless of other teams circumstances/league position' ARE YOU DISPUTING THAT?

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:12 pm

jesus christ!!!!!


who even gives a f**k!

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:14 pm

SBF1 wrote:
No Smoking wrote:Again I'm not sure if your trolling or genuinelly think what you are writing makes sense.

You still want to compare a newly promoted Swansea attendance to an established Cardiff one. It's useless, pointless, irrelevant.
No its not irrelevant, it's proof we have a better average attendance year on year.

The capacity of ninian park was 21,500... Bigger than the liberty so your point is mute.
No it's not, all clubs have an increase in crowds in the first season with a new stadium. FACT! So that's why they had the ONE year better than us.

In Swanseas time in the championship they averaged 15,300, in the direct comparison in terms of newly promoted Cardiff to the championship, we averaged 13,100 over the same initial first 3 years.. Not direct comparison with a new stadium though is it. It has a massive effect. Do you deny that?
So do a comparison with our new stadium years to theirs....pffttt!

Since then we have established ourselves and they have been promoted. We currently get 21,000 and they get 20,000 with a severely restricted supply in terms of demand. Still, every little helps us beat them year on year eh? :D

They Re fiction,


This is the fact, year on year, they have failed to beat us on average (apart from one) over the last nine years, regardless of other teams circumstances/league position' ARE YOU DISPUTING THAT?


I'm disputing the relevance yes.

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:19 pm

No Smoking wrote:
SBF1 wrote:
No Smoking wrote:Again I'm not sure if your trolling or genuinelly think what you are writing makes sense.

You still want to compare a newly promoted Swansea attendance to an established Cardiff one. It's useless, pointless, irrelevant.
No its not irrelevant, it's proof we have a better average attendance year on year.

The capacity of ninian park was 21,500... Bigger than the liberty so your point is mute.
No it's not, all clubs have an increase in crowds in the first season with a new stadium. FACT! So that's why they had the ONE year better than us.

In Swanseas time in the championship they averaged 15,300, in the direct comparison in terms of newly promoted Cardiff to the championship, we averaged 13,100 over the same initial first 3 years.. Not direct comparison with a new stadium though is it. It has a massive effect. Do you deny that?
So do a comparison with our new stadium years to theirs....pffttt!

Since then we have established ourselves and they have been promoted. We currently get 21,000 and they get 20,000 with a severely restricted supply in terms of demand. Still, every little helps us beat them year on year eh? :D

They Re fiction,


This is the fact, year on year, they have failed to beat us on average (apart from one) over the last nine years, regardless of other teams circumstances/league position' ARE YOU DISPUTING THAT?


I'm disputing the relevance yes.



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Keep on trucking! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 12:26 pm

Not sure what that means.

If it means keep giving facts and taking bias out if the equation then.... I intend to :ayatollah:

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:09 pm

No Smoking wrote:Not sure what that means.

If it means keep giving facts and taking bias out if the equation then.... I intend to :ayatollah:

Adam Morgan of Ammanford you'd have a bit more credability if you argued your point as a Swans fan :ayatollah:

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:16 pm

cf63bluebirds wrote:
No Smoking wrote:Not sure what that means.

If it means keep giving facts and taking bias out if the equation then.... I intend to :ayatollah:

Adam Morgan of Ammanford you'd have a bit more credability if you argued your point as a Swans fan :ayatollah:


:? Think you are barking up the wrong tree mate :lol:

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:20 pm

No Smoking wrote:Not sure what that means.

If it means keep giving facts and taking bias out if the equation then.... I intend to :ayatollah:



See thread above. :?

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 1:28 pm

SBF1 wrote:
No Smoking wrote:Not sure what that means.

If it means keep giving facts and taking bias out if the equation then.... I intend to :ayatollah:



See thread above. :?


Watford ticket... :?

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:01 pm

cf63bluebirds wrote:
No Smoking wrote:Not sure what that means.

If it means keep giving facts and taking bias out if the equation then.... I intend to :ayatollah:

Adam Morgan of Ammanford you'd have a bit more credability if you argued your point as a Swans fan :ayatollah:


Exactly. I'm amazed he still think anyone thinks otherwise. He's so tiresome I have nothing but pity for him

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:06 pm

:lol: is it just me who has never heard of this fella? I'm happy to be him though whoever he is.

That's two Adams I am now brown and Morgan. Maybe we can incorporate both names Adam browny moggs?

:lol:

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:21 pm

No Smoking wrote::lol: is it just me who has never heard of this fella? I'm happy to be him though whoever he is.

That's two Adams I am now brown and Morgan. Maybe we can incorporate both names Adam browny moggs?

:lol:


Even if you're not (doubtful) you post exactly like him so it's the same sad, boring result. Not sure what's worse a reappearance of the same old roath or a copycat wannabe.

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:23 pm

Carpe Diem wrote:
No Smoking wrote::lol: is it just me who has never heard of this fella? I'm happy to be him though whoever he is.

That's two Adams I am now brown and Morgan. Maybe we can incorporate both names Adam browny moggs?

:lol:


Even if you're not (doubtful) you post exactly like him so it's the same sad, boring result. Not sure what's worse a reappearance of the same old roath or a copycat wannabe.


Nope still no ideawhat the hell your talking about. You seem to be calling me about 5 different people and not only am I supposed to not be confused by it, I'm supposed to know who they are.

Roath magic I am aware of.

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:29 pm

No Smoking wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
No Smoking wrote::lol: is it just me who has never heard of this fella? I'm happy to be him though whoever he is.

That's two Adams I am now brown and Morgan. Maybe we can incorporate both names Adam browny moggs?

:lol:


Even if you're not (doubtful) you post exactly like him so it's the same sad, boring result. Not sure what's worse a reappearance of the same old roath or a copycat wannabe.


Nope still no ideawhat the hell your talking about. You seem to be calling me about 5 different people and not only am I supposed to not be confused by it, I'm supposed to know who they are.

Roath magic I am aware of.


A wannabe then. Same result.

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:34 pm

Really? I'm sure there's more than one person that talks sense on here, I'm sure we don't have to label them as all the same person.

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:36 pm

No Smoking wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
No Smoking wrote::lol: is it just me who has never heard of this fella? I'm happy to be him though whoever he is.

That's two Adams I am now brown and Morgan. Maybe we can incorporate both names Adam browny moggs?

:lol:


Even if you're not (doubtful) you post exactly like him so it's the same sad, boring result. Not sure what's worse a reappearance of the same old roath or a copycat wannabe.


Nope still no ideawhat the hell your talking about. You seem to be calling me about 5 different people and not only am I supposed to not be confused by it, I'm supposed to know who they are.

Roath magic I am aware of.


Roath magic = Adam Morgan = You

It's exactly the same every time, with each one of your aliases.

"why pick on the jacks? They're so much better than us, it's cringeworthy."

Next time, change it up a bit.

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:39 pm

Damned Yank wrote:
No Smoking wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
No Smoking wrote::lol: is it just me who has never heard of this fella? I'm happy to be him though whoever he is.

That's two Adams I am now brown and Morgan. Maybe we can incorporate both names Adam browny moggs?

:lol:


Even if you're not (doubtful) you post exactly like him so it's the same sad, boring result. Not sure what's worse a reappearance of the same old roath or a copycat wannabe.


Nope still no ideawhat the hell your talking about. You seem to be calling me about 5 different people and not only am I supposed to not be confused by it, I'm supposed to know who they are.

Roath magic I am aware of.



Roath magic = Adam Morgan = You

It's exactly the same every time, with each one of your aliases.

"why pick on the jacks? They're so much better than us, it's cringeworthy."

Next time, change it up a bit.

Right so Adam Morgan is roath magic. I understand now.

So who's Adam brown?

And am I both or just one?

As for my posts, I just speak unbiased sense... Deal with it :lol:
Last edited by No Smoking on Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:40 pm

Damned Yank wrote:
No Smoking wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
No Smoking wrote::lol: is it just me who has never heard of this fella? I'm happy to be him though whoever he is.

That's two Adams I am now brown and Morgan. Maybe we can incorporate both names Adam browny moggs?

:lol:


Even if you're not (doubtful) you post exactly like him so it's the same sad, boring result. Not sure what's worse a reappearance of the same old roath or a copycat wannabe.


Nope still no ideawhat the hell your talking about. You seem to be calling me about 5 different people and not only am I supposed to not be confused by it, I'm supposed to know who they are.

Roath magic I am aware of.


Roath magic = Adam Morgan = You

It's exactly the same every time, with each one of your aliases.

"why pick on the jacks? They're so much better than us, it's cringeworthy."

Next time, change it up a bit.


That would take intelligence and imagination, both sadly lacking with him. Truly boring.

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:41 pm

Carpe Diem wrote:
Damned Yank wrote:
No Smoking wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
No Smoking wrote::lol: is it just me who has never heard of this fella? I'm happy to be him though whoever he is.

That's two Adams I am now brown and Morgan. Maybe we can incorporate both names Adam browny moggs?

:lol:


Even if you're not (doubtful) you post exactly like him so it's the same sad, boring result. Not sure what's worse a reappearance of the same old roath or a copycat wannabe.


Nope still no ideawhat the hell your talking about. You seem to be calling me about 5 different people and not only am I supposed to not be confused by it, I'm supposed to know who they are.

Roath magic I am aware of.


Roath magic = Adam Morgan = You

It's exactly the same every time, with each one of your aliases.

"why pick on the jacks? They're so much better than us, it's cringeworthy."

Next time, change it up a bit.


That would take intelligence and imagination, both sadly lacking with him. Truly boring.


Don't need imagination to speak the truth.

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:46 pm

No Smoking wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
Damned Yank wrote:
No Smoking wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
No Smoking wrote::lol: is it just me who has never heard of this fella? I'm happy to be him though whoever he is.

That's two Adams I am now brown and Morgan. Maybe we can incorporate both names Adam browny moggs?

:lol:


Even if you're not (doubtful) you post exactly like him so it's the same sad, boring result. Not sure what's worse a reappearance of the same old roath or a copycat wannabe.


Nope still no ideawhat the hell your talking about. You seem to be calling me about 5 different people and not only am I supposed to not be confused by it, I'm supposed to know who they are.

Roath magic I am aware of.


Roath magic = Adam Morgan = You

It's exactly the same every time, with each one of your aliases.

"why pick on the jacks? They're so much better than us, it's cringeworthy."

Next time, change it up a bit.


That would take intelligence and imagination, both sadly lacking with him. Truly boring.


Don't need imagination to speak the truth.

You don't speak the truth though, you're a Jack and you're being bias

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:47 pm

Where don't I speak the truth? All my figures are spot on.

And it's biased not bias,

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:51 pm

No Smoking wrote:
Damned Yank wrote:
No Smoking wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
No Smoking wrote::lol: is it just me who has never heard of this fella? I'm happy to be him though whoever he is.

That's two Adams I am now brown and Morgan. Maybe we can incorporate both names Adam browny moggs?

:lol:


Even if you're not (doubtful) you post exactly like him so it's the same sad, boring result. Not sure what's worse a reappearance of the same old roath or a copycat wannabe.


Nope still no ideawhat the hell your talking about. You seem to be calling me about 5 different people and not only am I supposed to not be confused by it, I'm supposed to know who they are.

Roath magic I am aware of.



Roath magic = Adam Morgan = You

It's exactly the same every time, with each one of your aliases.

"why pick on the jacks? They're so much better than us, it's cringeworthy."

Next time, change it up a bit.


I admit I was Roath Magic and am also Adam Morgan.


The funniest thing is that you thought cardiff fans would find it even minutely plausible that one of their own would be so sympathetic towards the jacks, even if it was in some sort of strange attempt to be 'realistic'.

That's basically what i'm saying. Mix it up a bit, make it more difficult. I mean, lakey usually sniffs you out with you first post these days.

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:55 pm

Damned Yank wrote:
No Smoking wrote:
Damned Yank wrote:
No Smoking wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
No Smoking wrote::lol: is it just me who has never heard of this fella? I'm happy to be him though whoever he is.

That's two Adams I am now brown and Morgan. Maybe we can incorporate both names Adam browny moggs?

:lol:


Even if you're not (doubtful) you post exactly like him so it's the same sad, boring result. Not sure what's worse a reappearance of the same old roath or a copycat wannabe.


Nope still no ideawhat the hell your talking about. You seem to be calling me about 5 different people and not only am I supposed to not be confused by it, I'm supposed to know who they are.

Roath magic I am aware of.



Roath magic = Adam Morgan = You

It's exactly the same every time, with each one of your aliases.

"why pick on the jacks? They're so much better than us, it's cringeworthy."

Next time, change it up a bit.


I admit I was Roath Magic and am also Adam Morgan.


I admit I am will smith and am also Charlie sheen.


It's nothing to do with being sympathetic, it's about being realistic and accurate. What the point of a biased view? There isn't one.

As for what people think of me or who they think I am... I'm happy to be whoever people think I am whether it be roath magic, Morgan, brown, angry man, daya, Adam ant... Why would I care? It's an anonymous forum and I know for a fact nobody has any idea who I am. :D

And who the hell is lakey :lol:

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:07 pm

Damned Yank wrote:
No Smoking wrote:
Damned Yank wrote:
No Smoking wrote:
Carpe Diem wrote:
No Smoking wrote::lol: is it just me who has never heard of this fella? I'm happy to be him though whoever he is.

That's two Adams I am now brown and Morgan. Maybe we can incorporate both names Adam browny moggs?

:lol:


Even if you're not (doubtful) you post exactly like him so it's the same sad, boring result. Not sure what's worse a reappearance of the same old roath or a copycat wannabe.


Nope still no ideawhat the hell your talking about. You seem to be calling me about 5 different people and not only am I supposed to not be confused by it, I'm supposed to know who they are.

Roath magic I am aware of.



Roath magic = Adam Morgan = You

It's exactly the same every time, with each one of your aliases.

"why pick on the jacks? They're so much better than us, it's cringeworthy."

Next time, change it up a bit.


I admit I was Roath Magic and am also Adam Morgan.


I admit I am will smith and am also Charlie sheen.


It's nothing to do with being sympathetic, Uit's about being realistic and accurate. What the point of a biased view? There isn't one.

As for what people think of me or who they think I am... I'm happy to be whoever people think I am whether it be roath magic, Morgan, brown, angry man, daya, Adam ant... Why would I care? It's an anonymous forum and I know for a fact nobody has any idea who I am. :D

And who the hell is lakey :lol:[/quote]

Did you go to the brummie game then?

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:08 pm

Nope

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:13 pm

No Smoking wrote:Nope


:lol:

Re: FAO No Smoking.. CARDIFF /SWANSEA THE FACTS

Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:15 pm

:?