Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:04 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:No Smoking wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Got to ask why wait for him to die before making these allegations ? The man cannot defend himself now, And what are the alleged victims going to get from it apart from the obvious "money"
You got one associate who now says he saw him take a 12 year old girl to his roomFFS if that was true he would of stopped it. Some saying he was all to powerfull to do anything about it, he hasn't been powerfull since the 80s so that don't hold up.
But now there is only one person he has to answer to and he is either in peace or in hell.
But if true those that knew and said nothing should be in the dock.
The victims can have closure and a sense of justice in fact that he will be knows as a paedo for all eternity rather than the saint he was portrayed to be.
But he is not here to defend himself. It just isn't right to convict someone when they are dead. If it was indeed true, and those that knew about it !! They should hold there heads in shame.
Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:09 pm
No Smoking wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:No Smoking wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Got to ask why wait for him to die before making these allegations ? The man cannot defend himself now, And what are the alleged victims going to get from it apart from the obvious "money"
You got one associate who now says he saw him take a 12 year old girl to his roomFFS if that was true he would of stopped it. Some saying he was all to powerfull to do anything about it, he hasn't been powerfull since the 80s so that don't hold up.
But now there is only one person he has to answer to and he is either in peace or in hell.
But if true those that knew and said nothing should be in the dock.
The victims can have closure and a sense of justice in fact that he will be knows as a paedo for all eternity rather than the saint he was portrayed to be.
But he is not here to defend himself. It just isn't right to convict someone when they are dead. If it was indeed true, and those that knew about it !! They should hold there heads in shame.
So hitler wasn't guilty either in your eyes and not a bad word should be spoken about him?
Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:12 pm
No Smoking wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:No Smoking wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Got to ask why wait for him to die before making these allegations ? The man cannot defend himself now, And what are the alleged victims going to get from it apart from the obvious "money"
You got one associate who now says he saw him take a 12 year old girl to his roomFFS if that was true he would of stopped it. Some saying he was all to powerfull to do anything about it, he hasn't been powerfull since the 80s so that don't hold up.
But now there is only one person he has to answer to and he is either in peace or in hell.
But if true those that knew and said nothing should be in the dock.
The victims can have closure and a sense of justice in fact that he will be knows as a paedo for all eternity rather than the saint he was portrayed to be.
But he is not here to defend himself. It just isn't right to convict someone when they are dead. If it was indeed true, and those that knew about it !! They should hold there heads in shame.
So hitler wasn't guilty either in your eyes and not a bad word should be spoken about him?
Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:15 pm
Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:23 pm
No Smoking wrote:I think tens of witness statements and victims not to mention friends testimonials is pretty damning... Don't you?
Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:39 pm
scotsjack wrote:No Smoking wrote:I think tens of witness statements and victims not to mention friends testimonials is pretty damning... Don't you?
Quite probably(let's ignore the Hitler comparison), but the point remains, why did these testimonials only surface now? Reading Esther Rantzen yesterday made my blood boil, this is the woman behind worthy causes such as childline sitting there saying that she should have said something before? FFS, too right she should have. As for that Paul Gambaccini "I've been waiting for this to come out for 30 years!!!", why didn't he expose it?
If there is any truth in this (Which seems likely judging by the media reaction) then there are a lot of people who should be taking a long hard look at themselves right now. Why did they wait till he was gone? "Oh, he held a lot of power!" Not good enough sorry!
Tue Oct 02, 2012 2:30 pm
Tue Oct 02, 2012 2:50 pm
Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:42 pm
No Smoking wrote:scotsjack wrote:No Smoking wrote:I think tens of witness statements and victims not to mention friends testimonials is pretty damning... Don't you?
Quite probably(let's ignore the Hitler comparison), but the point remains, why did these testimonials only surface now? Reading Esther Rantzen yesterday made my blood boil, this is the woman behind worthy causes such as childline sitting there saying that she should have said something before? FFS, too right she should have. As for that Paul Gambaccini "I've been waiting for this to come out for 30 years!!!", why didn't he expose it?
If there is any truth in this (Which seems likely judging by the media reaction) then there are a lot of people who should be taking a long hard look at themselves right now. Why did they wait till he was gone? "Oh, he held a lot of power!" Not good enough sorry!
I was making the point that a trial isn't necessary to be pretty sure someone is guilty.
There is no excuse as far as everyone being quiet apart from cowardice. They didn't want to be the ones responsible for millions of pounds drying up to needy charities especially with no guarantee he would be found guilty as tends to be the case with this kind of crime. As for the bbc, he was their cash cow back then, it would have been a major blow for their company.
Awful really.
Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:54 pm
Tue Oct 02, 2012 4:50 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:It's frightening they say 1/20 of us live next door to a peadophilewell not me !! I live next door to a 14 year old girl with a cracking pair of tits
Tue Oct 02, 2012 4:55 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:It's frightening they say 1/20 of us live next door to a peadophilewell not me !! I live next door to a 14 year old girl with a cracking pair of tits
Tue Oct 02, 2012 5:26 pm
Tue Oct 02, 2012 6:05 pm
Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:28 pm
Overthemoon wrote:I'd be careful what you type about this subject chaps, as his family may well end up seeing this thread!
I'm not sure if he still has family in the area, but I remember his brother used to be a DJ at East Glamorgan hospital many years ago!
Of course you don't have to live in any specific area to be able to read messages on the internet and it's a very sensitive issue!
As he has never been convicted of any alleged offences, you could well end up being persued through a civil court!
Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:30 pm
scotsjack wrote:No Smoking wrote:I think tens of witness statements and victims not to mention friends testimonials is pretty damning... Don't you?
Quite probably(let's ignore the Hitler comparison), but the point remains, why did these testimonials only surface now? Reading Esther Rantzen yesterday made my blood boil, this is the woman behind worthy causes such as childline sitting there saying that she should have said something before? FFS, too right she should have. As for that Paul Gambaccini "I've been waiting for this to come out for 30 years!!!", why didn't he expose it?
If there is any truth in this (Which seems likely judging by the media reaction) then there are a lot of people who should be taking a long hard look at themselves right now. Why did they wait till he was gone? "Oh, he held a lot of power!" Not good enough sorry!
Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:10 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:It's frightening they say 1/20 of us live next door to a peadophilewell not me !! I live next door to a 14 year old girl with a cracking pair of tits
Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:10 pm
Roathblue33 wrote:Like Jimmy Saville...
Wed Oct 03, 2012 12:11 pm
jtc wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:It's frightening they say 1/20 of us live next door to a peadophilewell not me !! I live next door to a 14 year old girl with a cracking pair of tits
![]()
![]()