Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:23 pm
cityone wrote:SCFC wrote:cityone wrote:SCFC wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:well I had to find out who these people wwere that you had signed because it was so important it was posted on our forum. Neither are the eventual captain of the GB Olympic side and former welsh captain, Asias hottest young prospect or one of the best young strikers in Europe but my life has been enhanced by the fact that you have wasted a million pounds on someone who couldn't get a game for Arsenal when all their other full backs were injured. The bigger picture might be that Taylor is going and you have bough a replacement on the cheap don't you think?
He was out on loan at the time of the injury crisis, and he's a centre back. Typical of you to put a negative slant on it and try and say he's replacing a first teamer when the reality is that he's back up to Williams and Chico
I see the retard is back on line.
Honestly, you can't think of a more original or suitable insult than retard?
Go on then, tell me what in that post is wrong then.
Who mentioned your post?? i,m just on about you in general.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:24 pm
NJ73 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:
wow - lucky you. Who is he again?
He's a Premier League player.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:24 pm
pembroke allan wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:
wow - lucky you. Who is he again?
He's a Premier League player.
dont you mean hes at premier league team?? surplus to requirements?? ( not good enough)![]()
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:29 pm
NJ73 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:
wow - lucky you. Who is he again?
He's a Premier League player.
dont you mean hes at premier league team?? surplus to requirements?? ( not good enough)![]()
No.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:30 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:31 pm
Damned Yank wrote:NJ73 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:
wow - lucky you. Who is he again?
He's a Premier League player.
dont you mean hes at premier league team?? surplus to requirements?? ( not good enough)![]()
No.
Let's face it jack, he'd still be there otherwise.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:31 pm
jinks-rct wrote:Four jack posters in about 7minsProbably one jack c*nt with a few names
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:31 pm
no!! well he must be surplus or they wouldnt be getting rid of him!NJ73 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:
wow - lucky you. Who is he again?
He's a Premier League player.
dont you mean hes at premier league team?? surplus to requirements?? ( not good enough)![]()
No.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:34 pm
NJ73 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:NJ73 wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:
He's a Premier League player.
dont you mean hes at premier league team?? surplus to requirements?? ( not good enough)![]()
No.
Let's face it jack, he'd still be there otherwise.
He's still at a Premier League team in case you'd forgotten
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:37 pm
pembroke allan wrote:no!! well he must be surplus or they wouldnt be getting rid of him!NJ73 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:
wow - lucky you. Who is he again?
He's a Premier League player.
dont you mean hes at premier league team?? surplus to requirements?? ( not good enough)![]()
No.![]()
thats ok then by the way ive never heared of him but sure hes half decent well arsen had him there !![]()
and way things are at your club may well be replacement shortly!!
being serious for moment whilst your owners are stingy with money ( they get premium for the profits made) not stupid are they? it is also dangerous game to play as saying goes pay peanuts get >>>>>>? you need to bring in quality to sustain place that is fact other teams tried it on cheap didnt work!
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:37 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:39 pm
Damned Yank wrote:My point stands.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:41 pm
The Douce wrote:Sinclaires off too
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:44 pm
NJ73 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:My point stands.
Indeed, but it's not much of a point. Player not good enough for top 4 Prem team is considered good enough for mid table Prem team shock.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:44 pm
Bluebird For Life wrote:SCFC wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:
wow - lucky you. Who is he again?
He's a Premier League player.
oh right - thanks for the update. I'm sure he'll be very happy in his caravan with some spanish guy who was good at the same time as Vincente. I'm happy with our Premier League signings too, but have I come on your message board to tell you. No, because you couldn't give a f**k, just like I can't about your signings, so please go away.
Only on Saturday here were some comments by your fans on Kyle Bartley:
"BARTLEY NOW THATS A GREAT OMEN IF THERE EVER WAS ONE! ..... SIGN HIM UP MALKY! .... WILSON IS WATCHING OVER US!"
"Yes please, just the type of defender we need, he has pace."
"would be a good signing"
"Would be a great signing"
"Would be a top signing"
Your comments were based on the fact you could sign him on loan for the season and we've signed him permanantly for just £1 million, and now all of a sudden he's crap
I asked because I have no idea who he is, so I certainly didn't say sign him up Malky or any other comment on the subject, therefore really your argument falls down at the first hurdle. You may well think he is worth a million pounds but from what I understand he never played for Arsenal even when Sagna and Gibbs were long term injured and he wasn't deemd worthy of a million pound bid from 3rd divison Rangers. And before you say they couldn't afford him, they spent a million pounds on Sandanza last weekend...
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:45 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:46 pm
cityone wrote:NJ73 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:My point stands.
Indeed, but it's not much of a point. Player not good enough for top 4 Prem team is considered good enough for mid table Prem team shock.
But how do you know?? he,s never kicked a ball in anger in the premiership.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:50 pm
NJ73 wrote:cityone wrote:NJ73 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:My point stands.
Indeed, but it's not much of a point. Player not good enough for top 4 Prem team is considered good enough for mid table Prem team shock.
But how do you know?? he,s never kicked a ball in anger in the premiership.
The fact we've signed him means he is considered good enough for a mid table Premier League team.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:51 pm
NJ73 wrote:cityone wrote:NJ73 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:My point stands.
Indeed, but it's not much of a point. Player not good enough for top 4 Prem team is considered good enough for mid table Prem team shock.
But how do you know?? he,s never kicked a ball in anger in the premiership.
The fact we've signed him means he is considered good enough for a mid table Premier League team.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:52 pm
pembroke allan wrote:NJ73 wrote:cityone wrote:NJ73 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:My point stands.
Indeed, but it's not much of a point. Player not good enough for top 4 Prem team is considered good enough for mid table Prem team shock.
But how do you know?? he,s never kicked a ball in anger in the premiership.
The fact we've signed him means he is considered good enough for a mid table Premier League team.
were you mid table?? thought you finished about 17th ? mid is 7th to 14th
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:54 pm
NJ73 wrote:cityone wrote:NJ73 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:My point stands.
Indeed, but it's not much of a point. Player not good enough for top 4 Prem team is considered good enough for mid table Prem team shock.
But how do you know?? he,s never kicked a ball in anger in the premiership.
The fact we've signed him means he is considered good enough for a mid table Premier League team.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:55 pm
NJ73 wrote:cityone wrote:NJ73 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:My point stands.
Indeed, but it's not much of a point. Player not good enough for top 4 Prem team is considered good enough for mid table Prem team shock.
But how do you know?? he,s never kicked a ball in anger in the premiership.
The fact we've signed him means he is considered good enough for a mid table Premier League team.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:57 pm
cityone wrote:NJ73 wrote:cityone wrote:NJ73 wrote:Damned Yank wrote:My point stands.
Indeed, but it's not much of a point. Player not good enough for top 4 Prem team is considered good enough for mid table Prem team shock.
But how do you know?? he,s never kicked a ball in anger in the premiership.
The fact we've signed him means he is considered good enough for a mid table Premier League team.
No other mid table premier team has come in for him so it,s only you lot that think he his good enough. A couple of my pals up here are Rangers season ticket holders, (still are) although he was injured and missing for a lot of games they thought bartley was crap and glad he went back to Arsenal, time will tell on him.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:58 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:19 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:21 pm
Bluebird For Life wrote:but they didn't offer £10 after a season long loan and they were still in the SPL then - dohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:23 pm
5 nil over two legsBluebird For Life wrote:don't you understand the question - seems fairly straight forward to me.I have no idea where you finished or how many points you got, but I bet every one of you obsessed inbreds can say where we finished and what the score v West Ham was. Probably the attendance for each leg too. I'll guess and say 14th - see as much as it hurts you lot - your in the prem and nobody in Wales outside townhill gives a shit![]()
Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:24 pm
Stan-QPR wrote:He's shit
Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:44 pm
Fri Aug 17, 2012 12:00 am