Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:25 pm
aj1927 wrote:Langston in bits ...
Tans Doubts....
Now Malky can't move players in until Earnie Deek and Gerrard are shipped out.
And no I'm not RoathMagic
Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:29 pm
aj1927 wrote:For f**k sake mun!!!!!!!
Do me a favour trail through the posts over the last day or two and find a post called
DEAL REACHED-LANGSTON
THEN READ IT PROPERLY!!!!!!
Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:37 pm
BluebirdJM wrote:aj1927 wrote:For f**k sake mun!!!!!!!
Do me a favour trail through the posts over the last day or two and find a post called
DEAL REACHED-LANGSTON
THEN READ IT PROPERLY!!!!!!
i did actually and actually had a civilised convo with you in it when you werent acting a tw*t, but answer me in one word without getting into a CAPS LOCK RAGE! did you put the post the no deal langston thread based on facts or were you bullshitting?
Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:38 pm
Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:42 pm
aj1927 wrote:JM I have a condition called KeyboardTorreteSyndrome... And I'm trying to cure it but it will TAKE TIME...
I'm gonna PM you simply because I MIGHT OFFEND SOMEONE OR UPSET THEM!!
Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:43 pm
BluebirdJM wrote:aj1927 wrote:For f**k sake mun!!!!!!!
Do me a favour trail through the posts over the last day or two and find a post called
DEAL REACHED-LANGSTON
THEN READ IT PROPERLY!!!!!!
i did actually and actually had a civilised convo with you in it when you werent acting a tw*t, but answer me in one word without getting into a CAPS LOCK RAGE! did you put the post the no deal langston thread based on facts or were you bullshitting?
Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:45 pm
cakey-8t7 wrote:aj1927 wrote:Langston in bits ...
Tans Doubts....
Now Malky can't move players in until Earnie Deek and Gerrard are shipped out.
And no I'm not RoathMagic
Trouble waters tonight isit when last night you was saying Maynard could be on his way and lee Novak? Hmm
Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:46 pm
timdog80 wrote:BluebirdJM wrote:aj1927 wrote:For f**k sake mun!!!!!!!
Do me a favour trail through the posts over the last day or two and find a post called
DEAL REACHED-LANGSTON
THEN READ IT PROPERLY!!!!!!
i did actually and actually had a civilised convo with you in it when you werent acting a tw*t, but answer me in one word without getting into a CAPS LOCK RAGE! did you put the post the no deal langston thread based on facts or were you bullshitting?
Ever played poker or bragg??
What he's been doing is putting a little something out there to bluff others who are "in the know" into showing there hand {pun intended} and either contesting/giving away what they do know!
yesterday he posts "langston deal dead" (50-50 chance of being right as it was the supposed deadline day)................Next thing Carl comes out and backs it up that a deal wasnt reached
![]()
This thread hes put a few bits of info together off the forum (langston deal not done/carl confirmed, malky must sell to buy/annis's thread = tan doubt) and created a presumtion to get someone "in the know" to confirm or deny his statement and to clarify whats going on
Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:47 pm
timdog80 wrote:BluebirdJM wrote:aj1927 wrote:For f**k sake mun!!!!!!!
Do me a favour trail through the posts over the last day or two and find a post called
DEAL REACHED-LANGSTON
THEN READ IT PROPERLY!!!!!!
i did actually and actually had a civilised convo with you in it when you werent acting a tw*t, but answer me in one word without getting into a CAPS LOCK RAGE! did you put the post the no deal langston thread based on facts or were you bullshitting?
Ever played poker or bragg??
What he's been doing is putting a little something out there to bluff others who are "in the know" into showing there hand {pun intended} and either contesting/giving away what they do know!
yesterday he posts "langston deal dead" (50-50 chance of being right as it was the supposed deadline day)................Next thing Carl comes out and backs it up that a deal wasnt reached
![]()
This thread hes put a few bits of info together off the forum (langston deal not done/carl confirmed, malky must sell to buy/annis's thread = tan doubt) and created a presumtion to get someone "in the know" to confirm or deny his statement and to clarify whats going on
Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:55 pm
BlueBonez wrote:timdog80 wrote:BluebirdJM wrote:aj1927 wrote:For f**k sake mun!!!!!!!
Do me a favour trail through the posts over the last day or two and find a post called
DEAL REACHED-LANGSTON
THEN READ IT PROPERLY!!!!!!
i did actually and actually had a civilised convo with you in it when you werent acting a tw*t, but answer me in one word without getting into a CAPS LOCK RAGE! did you put the post the no deal langston thread based on facts or were you bullshitting?
Ever played poker or bragg??
What he's been doing is putting a little something out there to bluff others who are "in the know" into showing there hand {pun intended} and either contesting/giving away what they do know!
yesterday he posts "langston deal dead" (50-50 chance of being right as it was the supposed deadline day)................Next thing Carl comes out and backs it up that a deal wasnt reached
![]()
This thread hes put a few bits of info together off the forum (langston deal not done/carl confirmed, malky must sell to buy/annis's thread = tan doubt) and created a presumtion to get someone "in the know" to confirm or deny his statement and to clarify whats going on
A cracking psychological analysis mate fairplay