Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:28 am
wez 1927 wrote:what aload of shit ,time to move on now lads ,youve read the statement from vt why we are being rebranded,if they leave we are in shit worse than rangers cause we play in the english league under the welsh fawe will be playing in the league of wales if you go under so all this talk about 10 point deduction get our club back is bollocks time to wise up and follow CARDIFF CITY ! WHAT EVER COLOURS WE PLAY IN WE WILL ALWAYS BE CARDIFF CITY FACT !
Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:30 am
Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:33 am
bluebird1977 wrote:Some answers to why we are going red and what have we gained by doing it would be nice in this thread because as we stand we are in no better position than the start of last season in being served with LOANS but all this for what???? somebody tell us what we are going to gain from this because as i see it we have lost more than gained rite now as im typing this.
Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:39 am
Occasional Violins wrote:Deano1 wrote:I just don't get it.......The club have said that the change WILL happen this season. Even the most hard-nosed anti-red fan can surely see that the logistics of not going ahead with the change are impossible for this season now. Talks have been announced with fans regarding the implementation of future plans, the badge etc. Someone would surely mention that some fans are not happy with the change of colour during them talks. I don't see the need for another group. Especially one that is advocating withdrawing all financial input from fans.
If anyone's interested, I'm forming a group of fans who are reluctantly willing to give change a chance. We will be called 'Cardiff City Fans' and meet at all home games. There will be no committee and no agendas, just enjoy the great value your season tickets give you, wear your colours with pride, red or blue, and have a great day out supporting our team, Cardiff City, as we head for the Premier League.....you don't have to buy the beer though!
We all know we are playing in red next season. We intend to make it the ONLY season, no red seats, no permanent damage that would cost a stack of cash to implement and then a lot more cash to reverse.
Your stance is fair enough, you obviously feel that the changes have tilted the balance in a favourable way for the club as a whole and are content. Your entitlement.![]()
I feel personally that we are being asked to give up everything that I supported the club for in the first place and being charged 6% interest for the privilege, on the gamble that we reach the premier league, which means spending more on players, on wages etc, to get there and pay rises, bonuses and a continual squad improvement needed to stay there. Portsmouth spent years in the Premier League, received parachute payments, won the FA Cup and played in Europe and look where they are.
The premiership dream is just fuelling my belief that some people just turn up to watch the opposition. If they turned up to support Cardiff City then we would've had a much larger attendance for games against Leyton Orient and Bournemouth when the same eleven players played for Cardiff as the ones who knocked Manchester City out of the FA cup.
Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:39 am
Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:42 am
Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:43 am
caerdydd_78 wrote:Rangers owed HMRC ridiculous amounts, thats where the CVA failed. We owe HMRC nothing.
If we took a 10 point hit and got our club and badge back then so be it.
Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:47 am
Robbiwee wrote:Keep Cardiff blue
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:06 am
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:10 am
CraigCCFC wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:Rangers owed HMRC ridiculous amounts, thats where the CVA failed. We owe HMRC nothing.
If we took a 10 point hit and got our club and badge back then so be it.
Craig, its not as simple as taking a simple 10 point hit.
Read up on administration its very serious, Tan would never allow that he would lose millions.
The HMRC are just a creditor, they like any company can request a company to go into compulsory liquidation if they break any terms of agreement.
Langstone for example can request the same with us, its just with Rangers the HMRC were owed the most.
Admin is not the answer to this.
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:12 am
The Mystery wrote:50 fans eh? I'm sure the club are bricking it.
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:14 am
The Mystery wrote:50 fans eh? I'm sure the club are bricking it.
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:18 am
caerdydd_78 wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:Rangers owed HMRC ridiculous amounts, thats where the CVA failed. We owe HMRC nothing.
If we took a 10 point hit and got our club and badge back then so be it.
Craig, its not as simple as taking a simple 10 point hit.
Read up on administration its very serious, Tan would never allow that he would lose millions.
The HMRC are just a creditor, they like any company can request a company to go into compulsory liquidation if they break any terms of agreement.
Langstone for example can request the same with us, its just with Rangers the HMRC were owed the most.
Admin is not the answer to this.
I agree admin isnt the answer......but why is changing our colours and badge?
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:19 am
Forever Blue wrote:Bluebirds fans form group to oppose change to red home kit
By Simon Gaskell, WalesOnlineJun 20 2012
keepcardiffblue@mail.com
Cardiff City fans opposed to radical changes to the club’s colours and badge have set up a campaign group to fight the change.
The group, called Keep Cardiff Blue, was founded at a private meeting at the Ninian Pub on Monday evening.
A group of 50 fans were invited to discuss their response to changes linked to a £100m rebranding sanctioned by the club following its proposal by Malaysian backer Malaysian Vincent Tan.
Out of the discussion Keep Cardiff Blue was formed and long-time supporters Mike Roderick, Clive Fussell, Scott Thomas and Mark Watkins were nominated to co-ordinate the group’s activities.
Mr Roderick, 55, who has supported the club since he was nine, said they hoped to promote a “menu” of activity to put pressure on the club’s owners to revert back to blue.
Mr Roderick said: “What we want to do is try to appeal to those people who have reluctantly accepted the red and explain to them there’s no earthly reason why we should do this.
“We should be suggesting various actions people can take to put pressure on the owners to come back to blue.
“What we want to do is put together a menu of action people can take – the entry level is if you go to games make sure you wear blue.
“We would also suggest people don’t buy anything from the club shop, don’t spend any money at the stadium on food and drink – those kind of actions that anybody can take.
“For the more serious among us, we would encourage them to ask for a refund on their season ticket, ask them not to renew their season ticket.
“All of these actions are suggested as ways we can put pressure on people to return to blue.”
By yesterday, the group already had a central email address keepcardiffblue@mail.com and a website is expected imminently.
Scott Thomas, of Keep Cardiff Blue, said the formation of the group was the first chance fans had to have their say since the rebranding was leaked six weeks ago.
He said: “It’s an umbrella organisation to channel what I would say is pretty strong opposition.
“I think, to a certain extent, the support has spent time being a little bit shell-shocked and let the club get on the front foot.
“Monday night was the first chance for various strands of support to talk about things.”
Read More http://www.walesonline.co.uk/cardiffonl ... z1yJfUkggM
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:19 am
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:20 am
bluebird1977 wrote:The Mystery wrote:50 fans eh? I'm sure the club are bricking it.
Well I doubt you could get 1000s of fans in the ninian pub(and it could have been) which was where the meeting was at plus it was a selected pick of people so obviously you know nothing about it or how it started.
CraigCCFC wrote:The Mystery wrote:50 fans eh? I'm sure the club are bricking it.
It was started to get some ideas together and to see where we go. There are plenty more people who will register their interest.
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:22 am
thomas9990 wrote:so realisticly they are trying to tur us against our owners
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:24 am
The Mystery wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:The Mystery wrote:50 fans eh? I'm sure the club are bricking it.
Well I doubt you could get 1000s of fans in the ninian pub(and it could have been) which was where the meeting was at plus it was a selected pick of people so obviously you know nothing about it or how it started.
It was in the Ninian Pub? Thanks for clearing that up. I'm heartbroken that I wasn't invited to an elitist nobhead meeting.CraigCCFC wrote:The Mystery wrote:50 fans eh? I'm sure the club are bricking it.
It was started to get some ideas together and to see where we go. There are plenty more people who will register their interest.
No doubt. But on the basis that people wanting to return to red flooded to the club in their thousands, this wont concern them.
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:24 am
The Mystery wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:The Mystery wrote:50 fans eh? I'm sure the club are bricking it.
Well I doubt you could get 1000s of fans in the ninian pub(and it could have been) which was where the meeting was at plus it was a selected pick of people so obviously you know nothing about it or how it started.
It was in the Ninian Pub? Thanks for clearing that up. I'm heartbroken that I wasn't invited to an elitist nobhead meeting.CraigCCFC wrote:The Mystery wrote:50 fans eh? I'm sure the club are bricking it.
It was started to get some ideas together and to see where we go. There are plenty more people who will register their interest.
No doubt. But on the basis that people wanting to return to red flooded to the club in their thousands, this wont concern them.
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:25 am
thomas9990 wrote:so realisticly they are trying to tur us against our owners
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:28 am
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:33 am
CraigCCFC wrote:thomas9990 wrote:so realisticly they are trying to tur us against our owners
The aim is not to turn against the malaysians, the group is NOT anti malaysian one bit. The aim is via peaceful protest and talking with the club to hopefully get Tan and co to understand what we feel they have done to our club....trampled on our history. Im sure they didnt mean it and didnt realise what colours and a badge mean to some of the supporters. You dont feel that way, that is your right. This is my right.
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:35 am
CraigCCFC wrote:The Mystery wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:The Mystery wrote:50 fans eh? I'm sure the club are bricking it.
Well I doubt you could get 1000s of fans in the ninian pub(and it could have been) which was where the meeting was at plus it was a selected pick of people so obviously you know nothing about it or how it started.
It was in the Ninian Pub? Thanks for clearing that up. I'm heartbroken that I wasn't invited to an elitist nobhead meeting.CraigCCFC wrote:The Mystery wrote:50 fans eh? I'm sure the club are bricking it.
It was started to get some ideas together and to see where we go. There are plenty more people who will register their interest.
No doubt. But on the basis that people wanting to return to red flooded to the club in their thousands, this wont concern them.
You think it doesnt concern them.....
Why did Tan release a statement outlining his "intentions?"
Why have the club agreed to meet season ticket holders who want a refund?
Its not about the 50 of us that were there, its about people now have an outlet of like minded people who feel the same as us. You dont agree, its up to you, dont knock those who do
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:54 am
Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:56 am
Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:19 am
Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:24 am
Nuclearblue wrote:
Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:43 am
Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:45 am
Overthemoon wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:
The problem is Nukes, that you only read what you want to on here and if you'd been paying attention, you'd realise that this is their away kit!
Wed Jun 20, 2012 12:01 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:I have got no gripe with those who are oppossed to the rebrand forming an action group with a view to changing back, indeed that is my long term goal to see the Blue shirts return.
However, this 'menu' thing can't have anything in it that would hurt the club or supporters who openly embrace the change. I would also add that before this goes anywhere, the group will have to explain an alternative plan to finance the club which doesn't involve administration.