Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:08 pm
Stan-QPR wrote:Do you think any supporters wearing the new red shirts will get any grief?
From reading this board the last 2 weeks I can well see it happening myself.
Both sides seem quite vociferous over the whole thing.
Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:10 pm
Forever Red wrote:Tongue in cheek username aside, I wonder what people will buy next year - the blue kit is not as nice as last year's and the badge, well....bloody hell.
Looks like the CCFC retro section will be having a lot of sales maybe? God knows what I'll do, maybe get a red shirt for the novelty value (in a few years time it may have "retro" / infamy appeal - IE Arsenal away 1991!!) but make a point of wearing a blue fleece / coat / jacket over it whenever I fo wear it. The 2011/12 shirt will have to last a few years yet I think!!
Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:13 pm
Stan-QPR wrote:Do you think any supporters wearing the new red shirts will get any grief?
From reading this board the last 2 weeks I can well see it happening myself.
Both sides seem quite vociferous over the whole thing.
Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:20 pm
Stan-QPR wrote:Do you think any supporters wearing the new red shirts will get any grief?
From reading this board the last 2 weeks I can well see it happening myself.
Both sides seem quite vociferous over the whole thing.
Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:21 pm
LutonBluebird wrote:Stan-QPR wrote:Do you think any supporters wearing the new red shirts will get any grief?
From reading this board the last 2 weeks I can well see it happening myself.
Both sides seem quite vociferous over the whole thing.
I think unfortunately it will cause trouble, hope not but can see it.
Beer involved somewhere along the line but yeah trouble ahead I believe.
Imagine a red shirt walking past a fan who's had a few
On many occasions away supporters wearing their club colours walked to the CCS without a hint of trouble.In fact when one 'so called' City supporter took exception to a visiting supporter and had a go at him and he was soon 'bought in to line'.The GENERAL view of other clubs fans is that Cardiff go looking for trouble.....when in fact they are not bullies but will stand their ground if needed. TIMES HAVE MOVED ON as I am sure you are only too aware
Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:27 pm
Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:29 pm
Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:47 pm
Stan-QPR wrote:Do you think any supporters wearing the new red shirts will get any grief?
From reading this board the last 2 weeks I can well see it happening myself.
Both sides seem quite vociferous over the whole thing.
Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:58 pm
Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:00 pm
Blueboys1927 wrote:Just seen the new kit home and away that the club now have in the club shop on two mannequin dummies, the badge looks truly awful, it looks cheap and nasty, the kits look okay if the blue kit was home and the away kit was away, but its going to look mighty strange with the"Bluebirds" running out in a red kit next season now i have just seen the kit in the flesh so to speak, i think people will wonder which way we are playing for quite a few games.
i am afraid with "that" badge on the kit, it looks what it is, rushed, cheap and nasty, oh well i guess though now we are in red we are bound to romp through this league and spend tens of millions on top players ...NOT![]()
![]()
Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:20 pm
Taffs Well Blue wrote:Blueboys1927 wrote:Just seen the new kit home and away that the club now have in the club shop on two mannequin dummies, the badge looks truly awful, it looks cheap and nasty, the kits look okay if the blue kit was home and the away kit was away, but its going to look mighty strange with the"Bluebirds" running out in a red kit next season now i have just seen the kit in the flesh so to speak, i think people will wonder which way we are playing for quite a few games.
i am afraid with "that" badge on the kit, it looks what it is, rushed, cheap and nasty, oh well i guess though now we are in red we are bound to romp through this league and spend tens of millions on top players ...NOT![]()
![]()
As some one who is reluctantly prepared for change, I hope nobody buys the red kit and that only old blue kits are worn at games
Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:27 pm
Taffs Well Blue wrote:As some one who is reluctantly prepared for change, I hope nobody buys the red kit and that only old blue kits are worn at games
Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:27 pm
sam salim wrote:Here it is on show boy'os!
Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:56 pm
castleblue wrote:Blueboys1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Simon, Is it true what I am hearing the Red kit will be For Sale end of July, but no date yet for the Blue Kit ?
I have seen the kits, they are without doubt an Embarrassment to our club and that badge is the lowest of the low, No way can surely anyone buy that kit with that Brains Brewery Beer mat on it.![]()
Simon, you were a Director of Cardiff City during the Rick Wright era, whats your honest views on all this ?
Annis,
I am not 100% sure if the blue kits come out at the same time as the red kits at the end of July, however i will say this, after over 30 years in marketing and being a director of a local marketing company, i think the club have dropped a massive one on all this re branding, you can not re brand history and tradition, Cardiff City are the Bluebirds, they play in Blue and there badge should be a Bluebird, we never have been or never will be (I hope ) the Dragons, we are not red we are blue.
Cities in general have a colour, that there sporting teams adopt, such as there football and Rugby teams, Cardiff as a City is Blue, Like Leeds is White, and Newcastle is Black, Sunderland Red, the only time this changes is if you have more than one team in your City, and even then you have for instance the Red half and the Blue half of Mersyside, or Manchester or Sheffield for example.
The whole sorry state of affairs could have been handled far more profesionaly and alot better, the badge i am afraid is nothing more thatn a sad joke, a laughing stock of modern day football.![]()
![]()
Funny you identify Leeds with "White" as that is not their original colour and not "The Whites" is not their original nickname.
Leeds Utd were "Rebranded" in 1961 when their the manager Don Revie changed their yellow & blue kits to the all white because he wanted to "emulate" Real Madrid, the club also dropped it's then nickname "The Peacocks". The club crest was also dropped and no crest was worn on the shirts and 3 years later a crest with an "Owl" was introduced before later being replaced simply by L.U.F.C, then a crest which became known as the smiley crest, then a disc with and there have 5 different versions since.
Although the change was not well supported at the time this was followed by a period of indifference then the club started climbing the league and no one gave a toss. Plastic supporters eh, but it is an object lesson that a football club can rebrand and those changes can be embraced by the club supporters.
Just like our supporters will in my opinion.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Mon Jun 18, 2012 10:29 pm
castleblue wrote:Stan-QPR wrote:Do you think any supporters wearing the new red shirts will get any grief?
From reading this board the last 2 weeks I can well see it happening myself.
Both sides seem quite vociferous over the whole thing.
I think it's about personal choice Stan and some will buy Red, some Blue and others maybe neither as a protest. Whilst there is always a risk the odd fan may take things to far in my opinion the vast majority will respect other fans decision.
I wasn't going to buy a shirt but know I have decided to buy a Red one but my guess is this season there will be more Blue on view, next season if we get the design right and the club crest right there will be a lot more red and it will increase season on season.
I will however not be changing my username to Castlered sounds to much like a cheap Aussie beer and no amount of marketing could sell that.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:46 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:castleblue wrote:Blueboys1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Simon, Is it true what I am hearing the Red kit will be For Sale end of July, but no date yet for the Blue Kit ?
I have seen the kits, they are without doubt an Embarrassment to our club and that badge is the lowest of the low, No way can surely anyone buy that kit with that Brains Brewery Beer mat on it.![]()
Simon, you were a Director of Cardiff City during the Rick Wright era, whats your honest views on all this ?
Annis,
I am not 100% sure if the blue kits come out at the same time as the red kits at the end of July, however i will say this, after over 30 years in marketing and being a director of a local marketing company, i think the club have dropped a massive one on all this re branding, you can not re brand history and tradition, Cardiff City are the Bluebirds, they play in Blue and there badge should be a Bluebird, we never have been or never will be (I hope ) the Dragons, we are not red we are blue.
Cities in general have a colour, that there sporting teams adopt, such as there football and Rugby teams, Cardiff as a City is Blue, Like Leeds is White, and Newcastle is Black, Sunderland Red, the only time this changes is if you have more than one team in your City, and even then you have for instance the Red half and the Blue half of Mersyside, or Manchester or Sheffield for example.
The whole sorry state of affairs could have been handled far more profesionaly and alot better, the badge i am afraid is nothing more thatn a sad joke, a laughing stock of modern day football.![]()
![]()
Funny you identify Leeds with "White" as that is not their original colour and not "The Whites" is not their original nickname.
Leeds Utd were "Rebranded" in 1961 when their the manager Don Revie changed their yellow & blue kits to the all white because he wanted to "emulate" Real Madrid, the club also dropped it's then nickname "The Peacocks". The club crest was also dropped and no crest was worn on the shirts and 3 years later a crest with an "Owl" was introduced before later being replaced simply by L.U.F.C, then a crest which became known as the smiley crest, then a disc with and there have 5 different versions since.
Although the change was not well supported at the time this was followed by a period of indifference then the club started climbing the league and no one gave a toss. Plastic supporters eh, but it is an object lesson that a football club can rebrand and those changes can be embraced by the club supporters.
Just like our supporters will in my opinion.![]()
![]()
![]()
That right CB, the rebranding worked for Leeds......nothing to do with the manager they had then?
Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:12 am
Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:18 am
Tue Jun 19, 2012 11:32 am
Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:14 pm
Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:37 pm
DWQPR wrote:This is without doubt an ego trip on behalf of Tan. Extremely wealthy people do tend to come with ego's of a similar size and for him to do this is nothing more than massaging his own ego. Originally when the idea was put to bed a statement came out which amounted to nothing more than 'If I'm not allowed to be the striker and score all the goals then I am taking my ball home'. He then comes back and decides that he really doesn't give a monkey's about the feelings of the supporters (well most anyway, those whose integrity outweigh the desire for Premier League football). And Tan won't stop here either, once the new colours and badge have been 'bedded in' then will come the name change, Cardiff Dragons, make my words it will happen, and eventually he may even drop the name 'Cardiff'. He has certainly surrounded himself with 'yes' men as far as Cardiff is concerned and the excuse for the change of colours is pure bollox. As our own Malaysian owner recently said in an interview when talking about promoting QPR in Asia, it is all about the product and not the colour of the shirt, which we for one, will not be changing. All Tan has achieved is a division of the supporters and I for one cannot believe the grief that Annis has got on this board especially with regards to the information he has provided for supporters over the years. The guy deserves a bit more respect than some are according him. He has his beliefs about the matter, which includes a huge passion for what Cardiff City stands for, and I believe that he is 100% spot on with his concerns.
Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:13 pm
Overthemoon wrote:DWQPR wrote:This is without doubt an ego trip on behalf of Tan. Extremely wealthy people do tend to come with ego's of a similar size and for him to do this is nothing more than massaging his own ego. Originally when the idea was put to bed a statement came out which amounted to nothing more than 'If I'm not allowed to be the striker and score all the goals then I am taking my ball home'. He then comes back and decides that he really doesn't give a monkey's about the feelings of the supporters (well most anyway, those whose integrity outweigh the desire for Premier League football). And Tan won't stop here either, once the new colours and badge have been 'bedded in' then will come the name change, Cardiff Dragons, make my words it will happen, and eventually he may even drop the name 'Cardiff'. He has certainly surrounded himself with 'yes' men as far as Cardiff is concerned and the excuse for the change of colours is pure bollox. As our own Malaysian owner recently said in an interview when talking about promoting QPR in Asia, it is all about the product and not the colour of the shirt, which we for one, will not be changing. All Tan has achieved is a division of the supporters and I for one cannot believe the grief that Annis has got on this board especially with regards to the information he has provided for supporters over the years. The guy deserves a bit more respect than some are according him. He has his beliefs about the matter, which includes a huge passion for what Cardiff City stands for, and I believe that he is 100% spot on with his concerns.
Aren't Man City's owner's massaging their ego(s) as well then? I can't see any of their fans complaining about the money that has been and is being spent there and if their owners suddenly decided that they needed to change their shirt colour and badge, their fans probably wouldn't give a monkey's, as long as they kept on finishing above their nearby rival!
You probably mean well here mate, but it's easy to talk about integrity and Premier League football in the same breath, when you already have it!
Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:47 pm
DWQPR wrote:Overthemoon wrote:DWQPR wrote:This is without doubt an ego trip on behalf of Tan. Extremely wealthy people do tend to come with ego's of a similar size and for him to do this is nothing more than massaging his own ego. Originally when the idea was put to bed a statement came out which amounted to nothing more than 'If I'm not allowed to be the striker and score all the goals then I am taking my ball home'. He then comes back and decides that he really doesn't give a monkey's about the feelings of the supporters (well most anyway, those whose integrity outweigh the desire for Premier League football). And Tan won't stop here either, once the new colours and badge have been 'bedded in' then will come the name change, Cardiff Dragons, make my words it will happen, and eventually he may even drop the name 'Cardiff'. He has certainly surrounded himself with 'yes' men as far as Cardiff is concerned and the excuse for the change of colours is pure bollox. As our own Malaysian owner recently said in an interview when talking about promoting QPR in Asia, it is all about the product and not the colour of the shirt, which we for one, will not be changing. All Tan has achieved is a division of the supporters and I for one cannot believe the grief that Annis has got on this board especially with regards to the information he has provided for supporters over the years. The guy deserves a bit more respect than some are according him. He has his beliefs about the matter, which includes a huge passion for what Cardiff City stands for, and I believe that he is 100% spot on with his concerns.
Aren't Man City's owner's massaging their ego(s) as well then? I can't see any of their fans complaining about the money that has been and is being spent there and if their owners suddenly decided that they needed to change their shirt colour and badge, their fans probably wouldn't give a monkey's, as long as they kept on finishing above their nearby rival!
You probably mean well here mate, but it's easy to talk about integrity and Premier League football in the same breath, when you already have it!
Overthemoon, if you trawl through some previous postings of mine you will find that me and the PL are not the dearest of friends. The PL is the worst 'sporting competition' in the world, it is fixed in favour of the big clubs and if financial fair play ever hits the PL then this fixing gets more biased. The Man City owners have certainly shown that they respect the history of the club and nothing has changed in terms of the colours or badge, yet they have been in residence for approximately the same time as the Malaysians at Cardiff City. In fact, if anything they are proud to inherit the history of Man City and certainly honour the past players. But for me, if QPR had owners that wanted to change the club beyond recognition I would be out and I suspect that I would speak for the majority of supporters at the club. We had one lunatic running the show, Briatore, he came in, spent some dosh and changed the badge, but at least with his attempt at a badge, which many supporters still do not like, he tried to incorporate previous incarnations and put in everything that QPR stood for, i.e. blue and white hoops etc. But he also wanted to create a 'boutique club', a club where the rich and famous would flock to, and if we, the average supporter wanted to be part of it, then we had to pay for it in terms of inflated season ticket/match day tickets, which did leave a lot of supporters alienated and priced out. Indeed there were plenty of protests against Briatore and on one occasion he could not get out the ground. I would rather watch an AFCQPR than a franchised attempt that has been stolen from the supporters. I would rather watch a team in blue and white hoops playing the likes of Hayes and Yeading rather than watch a team in all red/black/indigo/orange/pink playing under the guise of QPR FC. And I know that one day, with owners who treat it like their own plaything, they like children get bored with the toys they are playing with and toss the whole damn thing away.
What people are forgetting is that Cardiff City is not the owners of the club it is the supporters and it is the history, that is what makes Cardiff City FC what it is, nothing else, and what you have now is owners that are totally ignoring this. If the club went bust without them, then there would still be a Cardiff City, if your near neighbours Newport County, a club so much smaller than yourselves could get back to the Conference then Cardiff City would do exactly the same and beyond in a quarter of the time.
DWQPR wrote:Overthemoon wrote:DWQPR wrote:This is without doubt an ego trip on behalf of Tan. Extremely wealthy people do tend to come with ego's of a similar size and for him to do this is nothing more than massaging his own ego. Originally when the idea was put to bed a statement came out which amounted to nothing more than 'If I'm not allowed to be the striker and score all the goals then I am taking my ball home'. He then comes back and decides that he really doesn't give a monkey's about the feelings of the supporters (well most anyway, those whose integrity outweigh the desire for Premier League football). And Tan won't stop here either, once the new colours and badge have been 'bedded in' then will come the name change, Cardiff Dragons, make my words it will happen, and eventually he may even drop the name 'Cardiff'. He has certainly surrounded himself with 'yes' men as far as Cardiff is concerned and the excuse for the change of colours is pure bollox. As our own Malaysian owner recently said in an interview when talking about promoting QPR in Asia, it is all about the product and not the colour of the shirt, which we for one, will not be changing. All Tan has achieved is a division of the supporters and I for one cannot believe the grief that Annis has got on this board especially with regards to the information he has provided for supporters over the years. The guy deserves a bit more respect than some are according him. He has his beliefs about the matter, which includes a huge passion for what Cardiff City stands for, and I believe that he is 100% spot on with his concerns.
Aren't Man City's owner's massaging their ego(s) as well then? I can't see any of their fans complaining about the money that has been and is being spent there and if their owners suddenly decided that they needed to change their shirt colour and badge, their fans probably wouldn't give a monkey's, as long as they kept on finishing above their nearby rival!
You probably mean well here mate, but it's easy to talk about integrity and Premier League football in the same breath, when you already have it!
Overthemoon, if you trawl through some previous postings of mine you will find that me and the PL are not the dearest of friends. The PL is the worst 'sporting competition' in the world, it is fixed in favour of the big clubs and if financial fair play ever hits the PL then this fixing gets more biased. The Man City owners have certainly shown that they respect the history of the club and nothing has changed in terms of the colours or badge, yet they have been in residence for approximately the same time as the Malaysians at Cardiff City. In fact, if anything they are proud to inherit the history of Man City and certainly honour the past players. But for me, if QPR had owners that wanted to change the club beyond recognition I would be out and I suspect that I would speak for the majority of supporters at the club. We had one lunatic running the show, Briatore, he came in, spent some dosh and changed the badge, but at least with his attempt at a badge, which many supporters still do not like, he tried to incorporate previous incarnations and put in everything that QPR stood for, i.e. blue and white hoops etc. But he also wanted to create a 'boutique club', a club where the rich and famous would flock to, and if we, the average supporter wanted to be part of it, then we had to pay for it in terms of inflated season ticket/match day tickets, which did leave a lot of supporters alienated and priced out. Indeed there were plenty of protests against Briatore and on one occasion he could not get out the ground. I would rather watch an AFCQPR than a franchised attempt that has been stolen from the supporters. I would rather watch a team in blue and white hoops playing the likes of Hayes and Yeading rather than watch a team in all red/black/indigo/orange/pink playing under the guise of QPR FC. And I know that one day, with owners who treat it like their own plaything, they like children get bored with the toys they are playing with and toss the whole damn thing away.
What people are forgetting is that Cardiff City is not the owners of the club it is the supporters and it is the history, that is what makes Cardiff City FC what it is, nothing else, and what you have now is owners that are totally ignoring this. If the club went bust without them, then there would still be a Cardiff City, if your near neighbours Newport County, a club so much smaller than yourselves could get back to the Conference then Cardiff City would do exactly the same and beyond in a quarter of the time.
Tue Jun 19, 2012 2:30 pm
sam salim wrote:Here it is on show boy'os!
Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:10 pm
DWQPR wrote:Overthemoon wrote:DWQPR wrote:This is without doubt an ego trip on behalf of Tan. Extremely wealthy people do tend to come with ego's of a similar size and for him to do this is nothing more than massaging his own ego. Originally when the idea was put to bed a statement came out which amounted to nothing more than 'If I'm not allowed to be the striker and score all the goals then I am taking my ball home'. He then comes back and decides that he really doesn't give a monkey's about the feelings of the supporters (well most anyway, those whose integrity outweigh the desire for Premier League football). And Tan won't stop here either, once the new colours and badge have been 'bedded in' then will come the name change, Cardiff Dragons, make my words it will happen, and eventually he may even drop the name 'Cardiff'. He has certainly surrounded himself with 'yes' men as far as Cardiff is concerned and the excuse for the change of colours is pure bollox. As our own Malaysian owner recently said in an interview when talking about promoting QPR in Asia, it is all about the product and not the colour of the shirt, which we for one, will not be changing. All Tan has achieved is a division of the supporters and I for one cannot believe the grief that Annis has got on this board especially with regards to the information he has provided for supporters over the years. The guy deserves a bit more respect than some are according him. He has his beliefs about the matter, which includes a huge passion for what Cardiff City stands for, and I believe that he is 100% spot on with his concerns.
Aren't Man City's owner's massaging their ego(s) as well then? I can't see any of their fans complaining about the money that has been and is being spent there and if their owners suddenly decided that they needed to change their shirt colour and badge, their fans probably wouldn't give a monkey's, as long as they kept on finishing above their nearby rival!
You probably mean well here mate, but it's easy to talk about integrity and Premier League football in the same breath, when you already have it!
Overthemoon, if you trawl through some previous postings of mine you will find that me and the PL are not the dearest of friends. The PL is the worst 'sporting competition' in the world, it is fixed in favour of the big clubs and if financial fair play ever hits the PL then this fixing gets more biased. The Man City owners have certainly shown that they respect the history of the club and nothing has changed in terms of the colours or badge, yet they have been in residence for approximately the same time as the Malaysians at Cardiff City. In fact, if anything they are proud to inherit the history of Man City and certainly honour the past players. But for me, if QPR had owners that wanted to change the club beyond recognition I would be out and I suspect that I would speak for the majority of supporters at the club. We had one lunatic running the show, Briatore, he came in, spent some dosh and changed the badge, but at least with his attempt at a badge, which many supporters still do not like, he tried to incorporate previous incarnations and put in everything that QPR stood for, i.e. blue and white hoops etc. But he also wanted to create a 'boutique club', a club where the rich and famous would flock to, and if we, the average supporter wanted to be part of it, then we had to pay for it in terms of inflated season ticket/match day tickets, which did leave a lot of supporters alienated and priced out. Indeed there were plenty of protests against Briatore and on one occasion he could not get out the ground. I would rather watch an AFCQPR than a franchised attempt that has been stolen from the supporters. I would rather watch a team in blue and white hoops playing the likes of Hayes and Yeading rather than watch a team in all red/black/indigo/orange/pink playing under the guise of QPR FC. And I know that one day, with owners who treat it like their own plaything, they like children get bored with the toys they are playing with and toss the whole damn thing away.
What people are forgetting is that Cardiff City is not the owners of the club it is the supporters and it is the history, that is what makes Cardiff City FC what it is, nothing else, and what you have now is owners that are totally ignoring this. If the club went bust without them, then there would still be a Cardiff City, if your near neighbours Newport County, a club so much smaller than yourselves could get back to the Conference then Cardiff City would do exactly the same and beyond in a quarter of the time.
Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:24 pm
Forever Blue wrote:DannyboyBluebirds wrote:Annis say in 10 years we were still playing in red. Would you buy a redshirt?
Danny,
NO & PLEASE REMEMBER I SAID THAT![]()
Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:54 pm
Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:04 pm
Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:44 pm
Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:44 pm