Why are we loosing 1m a month?

So....the investment isn't from their pockets?

So to speak yes but in loans some people think these malaysians are jesus but there not in it for us there in it to try make money with or without the fans views

Well, I'm more than grateful for them saving the club. As you know, I'm accepting the re-branding and me and you have had alot of arguements about it.

However, I only backed it for the £100mil and the potential of the Asian market. If they don't "invest" £100mil in to the club I'd be rather annoyed and eat humble pie.

So....the investment isn't from their pockets?

So to speak yes but in loans some people think these malaysians are jesus but there not in it for us there in it to try make money with or without the fans views

Well, I'm more than grateful for them saving the club. As you know, I'm accepting the re-branding and me and you have had alot of arguements about it.

However, I only backed it for the £100mil and the potential of the Asian market. If they don't "invest" £100mil in to the club I'd be rather annoyed and eat humble pie.

The £100m includes £40m already invested (including the loans which they say they will turn into equity), probably £40m earmarked for building projects which leaves £20m. As you know we lose £12m a year so it's actually like a new investment of up to £8m but they need to pay off Langston out of this and give Malky his war chest.

So....the investment isn't from their pockets?

So to speak yes but in loans some people think these malaysians are jesus but there not in it for us there in it to try make money with or without the fans views

Well, I'm more than grateful for them saving the club. As you know, I'm accepting the re-branding and me and you have had alot of arguements about it.

However, I only backed it for the £100mil and the potential of the Asian market. If they don't "invest" £100mil in to the club I'd be rather annoyed and eat humble pie.

The £100m includes £40m already invested (including the loans which they say they will turn into equity), probably £40m earmarked for building projects which leaves £20m. As you know we lose £12m a year so it's actually like a new investment of up to £8m but they need to pay off Langston out of this and give Malky his war chest.

So....they're actually investing £60mil?

So....the investment isn't from their pockets?

So to speak yes but in loans some people think these malaysians are jesus but there not in it for us there in it to try make money with or without the fans views

Well, I'm more than grateful for them saving the club. As you know, I'm accepting the re-branding and me and you have had alot of arguements about it.

However, I only backed it for the £100mil and the potential of the Asian market. If they don't "invest" £100mil in to the club I'd be rather annoyed and eat humble pie.

The £100m includes £40m already invested (including the loans which they say they will turn into equity), probably £40m earmarked for building projects which leaves £20m. As you know we lose £12m a year so it's actually like a new investment of up to £8m but they need to pay off Langston out of this and give Malky his war chest.

So....they're actually investing £60mil?

Yes, that's been quite widely accepted from the start. Although the conversion of 26m debt into equity is effectively like taking it up to 86m but it's money that has already been spent.

Last edited by bspark on Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

So....the investment isn't from their pockets?

So to speak yes but in loans some people think these malaysians are jesus but there not in it for us there in it to try make money with or without the fans views

Well, I'm more than grateful for them saving the club. As you know, I'm accepting the re-branding and me and you have had alot of arguements about it.

However, I only backed it for the £100mil and the potential of the Asian market. If they don't "invest" £100mil in to the club I'd be rather annoyed and eat humble pie.

The £100m includes £40m already invested (including the loans which they say they will turn into equity), probably £40m earmarked for building projects which leaves £20m. As you know we lose £12m a year so it's actually like a new investment of up to £8m but they need to pay off Langston out of this and give Malky his war chest.

So....they're actually investing £60mil?

Yes, that's been quite widely accepted from the start.

Ah, I thought it was £100mil, but I'm still happy with £60mil.

The £100m includes £40m already invested (including the loans which they say they will turn into equity), probably £40m earmarked for building projects which leaves £20m. As you know we lose £12m a year so it's actually like a new investment of up to £8m but they need to pay off Langston out of this and give Malky his war chest.

So....they're actually investing £60mil?

Yes, that's been quite widely accepted from the start.

Ah, I thought it was £100mil, but I'm still happy with £60mil.

But I suppose that new £60m could be as loans, they have only said they will convert the existing loans to equity. They haven't said what form the new money will take.

The £100m includes £40m already invested (including the loans which they say they will turn into equity), probably £40m earmarked for building projects which leaves £20m. As you know we lose £12m a year so it's actually like a new investment of up to £8m but they need to pay off Langston out of this and give Malky his war chest.

So....they're actually investing £60mil?

Yes, that's been quite widely accepted from the start.

Ah, I thought it was £100mil, but I'm still happy with £60mil.

But I suppose that new £60m could be as loans, they have only said they will convert the existing loans to equity. They haven't said what form the new money will take.

Better not be f*cking loans, that'd put us in even bigger debt.