Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:48 pm
djwayne wrote:ngriffiths wrote:No we havent,the investment is still happening,all agreed,its just the debt to equity wont happen till they settle with sam.
Ok if you are so sure that the investment is happening please quote your source.
Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:48 pm
Dreamlike or Chic wrote:I guess there are very few here who actually WANT to go red. When the decision appeared to be Red or No Club, I'm not surprised there was little resistance the rebrand. But as we now know, our CEO has said there was never a threat that our investors would walk.
This makes me wonder ....
IF no agreement is reached with Langston ....
If the current indebtedness to VT is NOT converted to share capital ....
If the rumoured new investment is not forthcoming or is just added to the current debt burden ....
Won't we have let our identity be ditched for nothing?
Shouldn't we be campaigning to resist the rebrand now before it's too late?
Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:52 pm
jinks-rct wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:Jinks there good IFS and i see you cannot answer them just say its anti branding questions, will they not effect you if these IFS do happen because they will affect us all at the end of the day but theres a million IFS rite now
Fans clinging on to IFS.. We dont have a crystal ball its just people assuming again..
Tue Jun 12, 2012 3:54 pm
ngriffiths wrote:djwayne wrote:ngriffiths wrote:No we havent,the investment is still happening,all agreed,its just the debt to equity wont happen till they settle with sam.
Ok if you are so sure that the investment is happening please quote your source.
Steve borley on twitter.
Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:09 pm
djwayne wrote:ngriffiths wrote:djwayne wrote:ngriffiths wrote:No we havent,the investment is still happening,all agreed,its just the debt to equity wont happen till they settle with sam.
Ok if you are so sure that the investment is happening please quote your source.
Steve borley on twitter.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The whole point is people believing the things the club are saying without having any evidence that any of it will actually happen except the change of shirt color and badge.
Borley and the club are going to say the investment is coming etc etc as its what they are PAID to say.
Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:15 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:Dreamlike or Chic wrote:I guess there are very few here who actually WANT to go red. When the decision appeared to be Red or No Club, I'm not surprised there was little resistance the rebrand. But as we now know, our CEO has said there was never a threat that our investors would walk.
This makes me wonder ....
IF no agreement is reached with Langston ....
If the current indebtedness to VT is NOT converted to share capital ....
If the rumoured new investment is not forthcoming or is just added to the current debt burden ....
Won't we have let our identity be ditched for nothing?
Shouldn't we be campaigning to resist the rebrand now before it's too late?
Welcome to the forum.Too many if s in your argument for me.2 posts and a sticky eh?Perhaps your not so new after all but welcome anyway
Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:15 pm
BigGwynram wrote:djwayne wrote:ngriffiths wrote:djwayne wrote:ngriffiths wrote:No we havent,the investment is still happening,all agreed,its just the debt to equity wont happen till they settle with sam.
Ok if you are so sure that the investment is happening please quote your source.
Steve borley on twitter.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The whole point is people believing the things the club are saying without having any evidence that any of it will actually happen except the change of shirt color and badge.
Borley and the club are going to say the investment is coming etc etc as its what they are PAID to say.
Mate, read some posts, they are spending it as we speak, they are working on the training ground they are negotiating with players, it's happening.
Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:18 pm
djwayne wrote:BigGwynram wrote:djwayne wrote:ngriffiths wrote:djwayne wrote:ngriffiths wrote:No we havent,the investment is still happening,all agreed,its just the debt to equity wont happen till they settle with sam.
Ok if you are so sure that the investment is happening please quote your source.
Steve borley on twitter.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The whole point is people believing the things the club are saying without having any evidence that any of it will actually happen except the change of shirt color and badge.
Borley and the club are going to say the investment is coming etc etc as its what they are PAID to say.
Mate, read some posts, they are spending it as we speak, they are working on the training ground they are negotiating with players, it's happening.
Will believe it when i see it Gwyn not before
Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:19 pm
BigGwynram wrote:[qBigGwynram wrote:djwayne wrote:ngriffiths wrote:djwayne wrote:ngriffiths wrote:No we havent,the investment is still happening,all agreed,its just the debt to equity wont happen till they settle with sam.
Ok if you are so sure that the investment is happening please quote your source.
Steve borley on twitter.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The whole point is people believing the things the club are saying without having any evidence that any of it will actually happen except the change of shirt color and badge.
Borley and the club are going to say the investment is coming etc etc as its what they are PAID to say.
Mate, read some posts, they are spending it as we speak, they are working on the training ground they are negotiating with players, it's happening.
Will believe it when i see it Gwyn not before
Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:04 pm
BigGwynram wrote:djwayne wrote:ngriffiths wrote:No we havent,the investment is still happening,all agreed,its just the debt to equity wont happen till they settle with sam.
Ok if you are so sure that the investment is happening please quote your source.
Ask anyone at the club, they are working on the training ground, they are making offers and doing deals, who's money do you think that is?