Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:41 am
CF14-SE14 wrote:GarethBrad wrote:Adapt or die.
How is changing your colours, for no reason that makes sense, adapting?
I don't want to be bullied by someone just because they have money.
If we're spending too much money, then stop spending money we don't have.
The debt has grown dramatically recently and that's due to bad management, and the board are looking for an easy escape.
Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:51 am
Bluebird64 wrote:Wayne S wrote:In respects to customers shopping elsewhere, I meant from this point forward. Those with ST's wanting a refund have the rights you mention, obviously.
That would be a lot of potential refunds as we have sold (I think) 16000 thus far.
Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:54 am
Wayne S wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Wayne S wrote:In respects to customers shopping elsewhere, I meant from this point forward. Those with ST's wanting a refund have the rights you mention, obviously.
That would be a lot of potential refunds as we have sold (I think) 16000 thus far.
I think the potential would be no higher than 1% of the 16,000 figure.
Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:00 am
Bluebird64 wrote:Wayne S wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Wayne S wrote:In respects to customers shopping elsewhere, I meant from this point forward. Those with ST's wanting a refund have the rights you mention, obviously.
That would be a lot of potential refunds as we have sold (I think) 16000 thus far.
I think the potential would be no higher than 1% of the 16,000 figure.
You know what they say about making assumptions.
Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:02 am
Wayne S wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Wayne S wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Wayne S wrote:In respects to customers shopping elsewhere, I meant from this point forward. Those with ST's wanting a refund have the rights you mention, obviously.
That would be a lot of potential refunds as we have sold (I think) 16000 thus far.
I think the potential would be no higher than 1% of the 16,000 figure.
You know what they say about making assumptions.
Who said assume. You said POTENTIAL of 16,000, is said POTENTIAL of 160.
But I'm quite happy for it to make an ass of you and me.
Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:19 pm
Tue Jun 05, 2012 12:28 pm
Tue Jun 05, 2012 1:16 pm
Bluebird64 wrote:Wayne S wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:The Malaysians assured us in writing that that we will be playing in blue for the forthcoming season and that we would keep our bluebirds badge. Being so called honourable men, I would expect them to abide by this statement.
Did they commit to no badge change? Also remember they hold the purse strings we are just customers free to shop elsewhere.
Yes they agreed to keep the bluebird. And no we are not free to shop elsewhere. Most paying customers have consumer rights in this country.
Tue Jun 05, 2012 1:58 pm
T-G-I-ROBINFRIDAY wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Wayne S wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:The Malaysians assured us in writing that that we will be playing in blue for the forthcoming season and that we would keep our bluebirds badge. Being so called honourable men, I would expect them to abide by this statement.
Did they commit to no badge change? Also remember they hold the purse strings we are just customers free to shop elsewhere.
Yes they agreed to keep the bluebird. And no we are not free to shop elsewhere. Most paying customers have consumer rights in this country.
Think again bright spark consumer rights go out the window when the shop goes into adminstratiion which was caused because the business was hemorrhaging large amounts of money on a monthlyu basis!.![]()
Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:18 pm
Lawnmower wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:But Langston has not been paid of so the so called investment is Imaterial. But the debt i suppose would just shift over to the Malaysians at a guess. So if they ever pull out we will owe them !! Is that right?
No.
IF its INVESTMENT then it will be in the form of shares, therefore paying off debts we owe (mainly to them). Hopefully also some new cash for stadium work, players etc..
Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:10 pm
Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:10 pm