Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:04 pm
nerd wrote:waddle wrote:nerd wrote:waddle wrote:no he won't for this season apparently theres an agreement in place with swans and liverpool
but if he did ash is definitely good enough
Uh-huh.
Like Jenkins' agreement with Taylor? Wasn't that a release fee which Jenkins then claimed was really a fee to actually just talk to him?
Not that any such agreement would be legally enforceable.
bringing up taylor sort of backs my argument doesn't it ? he wanted out he had a contract he didn't go
Not really - shows Huw is disingenuous when it comes to contract interpretations.
Taylor's stance was more driven by his agent to get a better contract with you mugs.
Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:06 pm
nerd wrote:waddle wrote:nerd wrote:waddle wrote:billy ronson wrote:Gylfi is not a Jack so I guess he can go where he likes...
Sorry but if a player wants to leave Swansea then are they really going to stop them ? The player's agent will do what is best for their client.
Unfortunately contracts don't seem to mean anything in football
players are under contract so yes swansea will stop them if the money isn't right , if the money is right well that's another matter , our players are worth a lot of money at the moment so we will have to see
Are they? How many bids have been made?
are they what ? under contract , well yes they are
i don't know what offers have been made by whom or for how much but they're still under contract
Was referring to "worth a lot of money" claim.
Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:08 pm
nerd wrote:waddle wrote:nerd wrote:waddle wrote:no he won't for this season apparently theres an agreement in place with swans and liverpool
but if he did ash is definitely good enough
Uh-huh.
Like Jenkins' agreement with Taylor? Wasn't that a release fee which Jenkins then claimed was really a fee to actually just talk to him?
Not that any such agreement would be legally enforceable.
bringing up taylor sort of backs my argument doesn't it ? he wanted out he had a contract he didn't go
Not really - shows Huw is disingenuous when it comes to contract interpretations.
Taylor's stance was more driven by his agent to get a better contract with you mugs.
Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:16 pm
Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:25 pm
llan bluebird wrote:Huw Jenkins is anything but a mug, I doubt there is a sharper chairman in the business.
But he is going to pick a dog sometime......... hopefully next.
Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:33 pm
waddle wrote:llan bluebird wrote:Huw Jenkins is anything but a mug, I doubt there is a sharper chairman in the business.
But he is going to pick a dog sometime......... hopefully next.
you wish !!![]()
in huw we trust
Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:37 pm
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:nerd wrote:waddle wrote:nerd wrote:waddle wrote:no he won't for this season apparently theres an agreement in place with swans and liverpool
but if he did ash is definitely good enough
Uh-huh.
Like Jenkins' agreement with Taylor? Wasn't that a release fee which Jenkins then claimed was really a fee to actually just talk to him?
Not that any such agreement would be legally enforceable.
bringing up taylor sort of backs my argument doesn't it ? he wanted out he had a contract he didn't go
Not really - shows Huw is disingenuous when it comes to contract interpretations.
Taylor's stance was more driven by his agent to get a better contract with you mugs.
Fair play, you have an answer for everything.
Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:40 pm
llan bluebird wrote:waddle wrote:llan bluebird wrote:Huw Jenkins is anything but a mug, I doubt there is a sharper chairman in the business.
But he is going to pick a dog sometime......... hopefully next.
you wish !!![]()
in huw we trust
I know FA about Graeme Jones, but a return to the Martinez era who in my opinion DNA's is still the reason behind your revival appears to be a shrewd move. What's he going to do with all that money ?
Fri Jun 01, 2012 7:33 pm