Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Brenda Rogers

Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:04 pm

nerd wrote:
waddle wrote:
nerd wrote:
waddle wrote:no he won't for this season apparently theres an agreement in place with swans and liverpool

but if he did ash is definitely good enough


Uh-huh.

Like Jenkins' agreement with Taylor? Wasn't that a release fee which Jenkins then claimed was really a fee to actually just talk to him?

Not that any such agreement would be legally enforceable.


bringing up taylor sort of backs my argument doesn't it ? he wanted out he had a contract he didn't go


Not really - shows Huw is disingenuous when it comes to contract interpretations.

Taylor's stance was more driven by his agent to get a better contract with you mugs.


Fair play, you have an answer for everything. :lol:

Re: Brenda Rogers

Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:06 pm

nerd wrote:
waddle wrote:
nerd wrote:
waddle wrote:
billy ronson wrote:Gylfi is not a Jack so I guess he can go where he likes...

Sorry but if a player wants to leave Swansea then are they really going to stop them ? The player's agent will do what is best for their client.

Unfortunately contracts don't seem to mean anything in football


players are under contract so yes swansea will stop them if the money isn't right , if the money is right well that's another matter , our players are worth a lot of money at the moment so we will have to see


Are they? How many bids have been made?


are they what ? under contract , well yes they are

i don't know what offers have been made by whom or for how much but they're still under contract :?


Was referring to "worth a lot of money" claim.


joe allen is already being touted at the 10mil mark

ashley williams 14 clean sheets , young , premier league proven

vorm one of best keepers in the prem

so yes if people came calling now we would make a hefty pile of cash

Re: Brenda Rogers

Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:08 pm

nerd wrote:
waddle wrote:
nerd wrote:
waddle wrote:no he won't for this season apparently theres an agreement in place with swans and liverpool

but if he did ash is definitely good enough


Uh-huh.

Like Jenkins' agreement with Taylor? Wasn't that a release fee which Jenkins then claimed was really a fee to actually just talk to him?

Not that any such agreement would be legally enforceable.


bringing up taylor sort of backs my argument doesn't it ? he wanted out he had a contract he didn't go


Not really - shows Huw is disingenuous when it comes to contract interpretations.

Taylor's stance was more driven by his agent to get a better contract with you mugs.


yes huw jenkins is a mug isn't he :roll:

how is he a mug my friend

Re: Brenda Rogers

Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:16 pm

Huw Jenkins is anything but a mug, I doubt there is a sharper chairman in the business.

But he is going to pick a dog sometime......... hopefully next.

Re: Brenda Rogers

Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:25 pm

llan bluebird wrote:Huw Jenkins is anything but a mug, I doubt there is a sharper chairman in the business.

But he is going to pick a dog sometime......... hopefully next.


you wish !! ;)

in huw we trust

Re: Brenda Rogers

Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:33 pm

waddle wrote:
llan bluebird wrote:Huw Jenkins is anything but a mug, I doubt there is a sharper chairman in the business.

But he is going to pick a dog sometime......... hopefully next.


you wish !! ;)

in huw we trust



I know FA about Graeme Jones, but a return to the Martinez era who in my opinion DNA's is still the reason behind your revival appears to be a shrewd move. What's he going to do with all that money ?

Re: Brenda Rogers

Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:37 pm

Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
nerd wrote:
waddle wrote:
nerd wrote:
waddle wrote:no he won't for this season apparently theres an agreement in place with swans and liverpool

but if he did ash is definitely good enough


Uh-huh.

Like Jenkins' agreement with Taylor? Wasn't that a release fee which Jenkins then claimed was really a fee to actually just talk to him?

Not that any such agreement would be legally enforceable.


bringing up taylor sort of backs my argument doesn't it ? he wanted out he had a contract he didn't go


Not really - shows Huw is disingenuous when it comes to contract interpretations.

Taylor's stance was more driven by his agent to get a better contract with you mugs.


Fair play, you have an answer for everything. :lol:


well he hasn't answered how a chairman who has taken us from admin to the premier league with a new stadium and £10's of millions of players , how every manager he has employed has taken us higher than the last without getting us into any debt whatsoever

who also in the last 10yrs has only taken a wage in the last 2 is a mug i can't wait for this one , come on nerd

Re: Brenda Rogers

Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:40 pm

llan bluebird wrote:
waddle wrote:
llan bluebird wrote:Huw Jenkins is anything but a mug, I doubt there is a sharper chairman in the business.

But he is going to pick a dog sometime......... hopefully next.


you wish !! ;)

in huw we trust



I know FA about Graeme Jones, but a return to the Martinez era who in my opinion DNA's is still the reason behind your revival appears to be a shrewd move. What's he going to do with all that money ?


apparently things are starting to cool with jones ( all rumour obviously)so don't really have a clue whats going on at the moment

Re: Brenda Rogers

Fri Jun 01, 2012 7:33 pm

247654_3713513670027_105295157_n.jpg
282643_10150837884426721_486107301_n.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.