LANGSTON DEAL OFF??

Slow news day

would all these people stop coming on here with their 100% reliable HIDDEN SOURCE bullshit and inciting needless panic.

Seems to me that once again the Malaysians have talked the talk and not walked the walk. When are some of you going to realise that these lot are just as bad as previous owners..?

maybe so but at moment not done anything against city except put money in! anything else is just speculation from people who dont have clue whats going to happen in future again easy to speculate without having facts

Forgot about this then..?

In 2009 TG became involved and about 2010 (early part) joined our board and became our Chairman about May 2010.
Said we would be run as a business, " run on a sound/financial footing " We are today more double in debt than then, now more than £72 mill in debt and is rising daily, with interest charged by them at 7%.

July 2011, they promised to convert it in to shares, as of yet not happened.

2012
Carl said we were £72 mill in debt, Feb just gone, snipers laughed at Carl, yet accounts show it.
Malaysians lend us £1.2 mil a month, snipers once again laughed, Doug Lee finance director said it 2 weeks ago

i have merely asked someone that would know if theres any truth in it.....ive never claimed i have "sources" or anything like it.

Slow news day

would all these people stop coming on here with their 100% reliable HIDDEN SOURCE bullshit and inciting needless panic.

I agree ............. I said about my contact , but he is 50% at best. He may work in the club but he has no given right to info.

We are all jumping the gun , our contacts know what's going on but we don't.

Let's all calm down , que sere sera

i have merely asked someone that would know if theres any truth in it.....ive never claimed i have "sources" or anything like it.

YOU know its off thats what happens people claim you need a source , the same reason i put up what i put up in my post in here its the truth. THEY THINK ITS ALL OVER IT IS NOW. Maybe in 6months they will sit down again unless theres a drastic u turn soon.
The malaysians are not to be trusted and thats that, something ive been saying all season yet got bashed for it.

Seems to me that once again the Malaysians have talked the talk and not walked the walk. When are some of you going to realise that these lot are just as bad as previous owners..?

maybe so but at moment not done anything against city except put money in! anything else is just speculation from people who dont have clue whats going to happen in future again easy to speculate without having facts

Forgot about this then..?

In 2009 TG became involved and about 2010 (early part) joined our board and became our Chairman about May 2010.
Said we would be run as a business, " run on a sound/financial footing " We are today more double in debt than then, now more than £72 mill in debt and is rising daily, with interest charged by them at 7%.

July 2011, they promised to convert it in to shares, as of yet not happened.

2012
Carl said we were £72 mill in debt, Feb just gone, snipers laughed at Carl, yet accounts show it.
Malaysians lend us £1.2 mil a month, snipers once again laughed, Doug Lee finance director said it 2 weeks ago

know all that do read boards they are things that did or didnt happen, so why are they with city loseing 15mil a year like anser to that?? do you know whats happening?? sorry shouldnt ask as all you do is put negative responces to anything anyone writes mine was just a statement about people speculating on future events also reason we are where we are is sam and riddler ect ect ripping us off! if believe you vt is screwing city for millions and millions so can sell off assets we have which are not worth 70mill or whatever we owe!!! silly season again!!!

Seems to me that once again the Malaysians have talked the talk and not walked the walk. When are some of you going to realise that these lot are just as bad as previous owners..?

maybe so but at moment not done anything against city except put money in! anything else is just speculation from people who dont have clue whats going to happen in future again easy to speculate without having facts

Forgot about this then..?

In 2009 TG became involved and about 2010 (early part) joined our board and became our Chairman about May 2010.
Said we would be run as a business, " run on a sound/financial footing " We are today more double in debt than then, now more than £72 mill in debt and is rising daily, with interest charged by them at 7%.

July 2011, they promised to convert it in to shares, as of yet not happened.

2012
Carl said we were £72 mill in debt, Feb just gone, snipers laughed at Carl, yet accounts show it.
Malaysians lend us £1.2 mil a month, snipers once again laughed, Doug Lee finance director said it 2 weeks ago

know all that do read boards they are things that did or didnt happen, so why are they with city loseing 15mil a year like anser to that?? do you know whats happening?? sorry shouldnt ask as all you do is put negative responces to anything anyone writes mine was just a statement about people speculating on future events also reason we are where we are is sam and riddler ect ect ripping us off! if believe you vt is screwing city for millions and millions so can sell off assets we have which are not worth 70mill or whatever we owe!!! silly season again!!!

Got to be honest - I struggled to understand any of that! But allI can see Adam doing here is stating some facts and figures? hardly negative, just keeping it real. (on this occasion!)

As I said , I only get second hand rumours , but my (not reliable source , a bloke in work) reckons a deal has been offered. He aint the nicest of people but his romours have around 50% accuracy

50% accracy rate fair play that made me chuckle Take a guess more like

Yea I had a laugh at that one to, although if he is 50% right all the time it could mean PMG have been paid and Langston not

Seems to me that once again the Malaysians have talked the talk and not walked the walk. When are some of you going to realise that these lot are just as bad as previous owners..?

maybe so but at moment not done anything against city except put money in! anything else is just speculation from people who dont have clue whats going to happen in future again easy to speculate without having facts

Forgot about this then..?

In 2009 TG became involved and about 2010 (early part) joined our board and became our Chairman about May 2010.
Said we would be run as a business, " run on a sound/financial footing " We are today more double in debt than then, now more than £72 mill in debt and is rising daily, with interest charged by them at 7%.

July 2011, they promised to convert it in to shares, as of yet not happened.

2012
Carl said we were £72 mill in debt, Feb just gone, snipers laughed at Carl, yet accounts show it.
Malaysians lend us £1.2 mil a month, snipers once again laughed, Doug Lee finance director said it 2 weeks ago

know all that do read boards they are things that did or didnt happen, so why are they with city loseing 15mil a year like anser to that?? do you know whats happening?? sorry shouldnt ask as all you do is put negative responces to anything anyone writes mine was just a statement about people speculating on future events also reason we are where we are is sam and riddler ect ect ripping us off! if believe you vt is screwing city for millions and millions so can sell off assets we have which are not worth 70mill or whatever we owe!!! silly season again!!!

Got to be honest - I struggled to understand any of that! But allI can see Adam doing here is stating some facts and figures? hardly negative, just keeping it real. (on this occasion!)

maybe so but why are people slagging off the people who are effectively keeping the club afloat?, sorry about not putting in punctuations ect, being lazy

Last edited by pembroke allan on Thu May 31, 2012 6:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

I dont see him slagging anyone off in that post?

i have merely asked someone that would know if theres any truth in it.....ive never claimed i have "sources" or anything like it.

Yes you did.

You said you had heard whispers from within the club , not just rumour from down the pub.

So either someone senior in the club is risking their future employment by providing you with these whispers or they are from a source that is so junior that they couldn`t possibly know such things , which makes your "whispers" worthless.

Why do people still insist on bragging about connections within the club when they must fall into one of the above two categories?

And if there really are "sources" within the club still leaking confidential information , are they really so stupid that they haven`t learned from the recent salutory lesson of the consequences of telling people things "in confidence"?

I dont see him slagging anyone off in that post?

didnt say he was slagging anyone off, just said he is always negative when comes to vt/tg! and was generalising about people who constantly think malasians are bad for club!!

Craig, Langston agreed to do a deal at approx £10 mill, but of course wanted it in full, VT then changed the deal to drip feeding the £10 mill, so there was no point Sam agreeing it, may as well hold out for about £28 mill incl all the add ons.

So at this current moment deal off.

PMG want money, not any more shares.

i have merely asked someone that would know if theres any truth in it.....ive never claimed i have "sources" or anything like it.

Yes you did.

You said you had heard whispers from within the club , not just rumour from down the pub.

So either someone senior in the club is risking their future employment by providing you with these whispers or they are from a source that is so junior that they couldn`t possibly know such things , which makes your "whispers" worthless.

Why do people still insist on bragging about connections within the club when they must fall into one of the above two categories?

And if there really are "sources" within the club still leaking confidential information , are they really so stupid that they haven`t learned from the recent salutory lesson of the consequences of telling people things "in confidence"?

i said "whispers from the club" not within the club.........

I class all of us as part of the club..........so....

I dont see him slagging anyone off in that post?

didnt say he was slagging anyone off, just said he is always negative when comes to vt/tg! and was generalising about people who constantly think malasians are bad for club!!

>>>>>> OK - I read that and assumed >>>

maybe so but why are people slagging off the people who are effectively keeping the club afloat?, sorry about not putting in punctuations ect, being lazy

My apologies.

Craig, Langston agreed to do a deal at approx £10 mill, but of course wanted it in full, VT then changed the deal to drip feeding the £10 mill, so there was no point Sam agreeing it, may as well hold out for about £28 mill incl all the add ons.

So at this current moment deal off.

PMG want money, not any more shares.

So it was right info i was told.......thx for clearing it up.

i have merely asked someone that would know if theres any truth in it.....ive never claimed i have "sources" or anything like it.

Yes you did.

You said you had heard whispers from within the club , not just rumour from down the pub.

So either someone senior in the club is risking their future employment by providing you with these whispers or they are from a source that is so junior that they couldn`t possibly know such things , which makes your "whispers" worthless.

Why do people still insist on bragging about connections within the club when they must fall into one of the above two categories?

And if there really are "sources" within the club still leaking confidential information , are they really so stupid that they haven`t learned from the recent salutory lesson of the consequences of telling people things "in confidence"?

i said "whispers from the club" not within the club.........

I class all of us as part of the club..........so....

From the club? don't class me as a part of that!

Craig, Langston agreed to do a deal at approx £10 mill, but of course wanted it in full, VT then changed the deal to drip feeding the £10 mill, so there was no point Sam agreeing it, may as well hold out for about £28 mill incl all the add ons.

So at this current moment deal off.

PMG want money, not any more shares.

How does VT plan on turning any debt payments on the drip, into equity annis? can that even be done.....

Craig, Langston agreed to do a deal at approx £10 mill, but of course wanted it in full, VT then changed the deal to drip feeding the £10 mill, so there was no point Sam agreeing it, may as well hold out for about £28 mill incl all the add ons.

So at this current moment deal off.

PMG want money, not any more shares.

So it was right info i was told.......thx for clearing it up.

Yes sadly your right regarding this info Craig.

Craig, Langston agreed to do a deal at approx £10 mill, but of course wanted it in full, VT then changed the deal to drip feeding the £10 mill, so there was no point Sam agreeing it, may as well hold out for about £28 mill incl all the add ons.

So at this current moment deal off.

PMG want money, not any more shares.

So Craig's 'Whispers' were correct

May be old '62 will now appologise?

Craig, Langston agreed to do a deal at approx £10 mill, but of course wanted it in full, VT then changed the deal to drip feeding the £10 mill, so there was no point Sam agreeing it, may as well hold out for about £28 mill incl all the add ons.

So at this current moment deal off.

PMG want money, not any more shares.

So Craig's 'Whispers' were correct

May be old '62 will now appologise?

I wont hold my breath, it was something i heard and thought with Annis (who i thought was on hols) or Gwyn who have Sam's ear would be able to shed some light on.....esp with Gwyns post this morning of doubting the malaysians for the first time it seemed to add up.

Gwyn without being dis-respectful because I know you done so much for the club. as soon as Sam isnt getting his way with Malaysians you seem to have gone a bit "iffy" on them.......Do u love Sam more than CCFC???

Craig, Langston agreed to do a deal at approx £10 mill, but of course wanted it in full, VT then changed the deal to drip feeding the £10 mill, so there was no point Sam agreeing it, may as well hold out for about £28 mill incl all the add ons.

So at this current moment deal off.

PMG want money, not any more shares.

So Craig's 'Whispers' were correct

May be old '62 will now appologise?

I wont hold my breath, it was something i heard and thought with Annis (who i thought was on hols) or Gwyn who have Sam's ear would be able to shed some light on.....esp with Gwyns post this morning of doubting the malaysians for the first time it seemed to add up.

Gwyn without being dis-respectful because I know you done so much for the club. as soon as Sam isnt getting his way with Malaysians you seem to have gone a bit "iffy" on them.......Do u love Sam more than CCFC???

wooohooo somebody else who says how it is ive said this all along craig in many many posts he was red all the way yet now sams not getting payed hes doubting the malaysians for the first time , a few weeks back he said "who do the fans think they" in the media over the rebrand now hes questioning them in his own thread hes made for the 1st time viewtopic.php?f=2&t=82027
Some people turn fast for other reasons not because it this was for the best of the club as hes always put it across or the scaremongering that intailed.

I dont see him slagging anyone off in that post?

didnt say he was slagging anyone off, just said he is always negative when comes to vt/tg! and was generalising about people who constantly think malasians are bad for club!!

>>>>>> OK - I read that and assumed >>>

maybe so but why are people slagging off the people who are effectively keeping the club afloat?, sorry about not putting in punctuations ect, being lazy

My apologies.

accepted, wasnt my best english!!!

i have merely asked someone that would know if theres any truth in it.....ive never claimed i have "sources" or anything like it.

Yes you did.

You said you had heard whispers from within the club , not just rumour from down the pub.

So either someone senior in the club is risking their future employment by providing you with these whispers or they are from a source that is so junior that they couldn`t possibly know such things , which makes your "whispers" worthless.

Why do people still insist on bragging about connections within the club when they must fall into one of the above two categories?

And if there really are "sources" within the club still leaking confidential information , are they really so stupid that they haven`t learned from the recent salutory lesson of the consequences of telling people things "in confidence"?

i said "whispers from the club" not within the club.........

I class all of us as part of the club..........so....

So you are now claiming that "whispers from the club" could include virtually anyone?

Then why didn`t your original post say you have heard something from a mate , or a fellow fan , or a bloke down the pub or whoever it was and clarify that your source of information was not from within the football club itself? That would have at least made the veracity of your rumour a little clearer for the reader.

Then why didn`t your original post say you have heard something from a mate , or a fellow fan , or a bloke down the pub or whoever it was and clarify that your source of information was not from within the football club itself? That would have at least made the veracity of your rumour a little clearer for the reader.

What diffrence does it make weather craig put VT told him or the guy at the cattle market its the truth,

i have merely asked someone that would know if theres any truth in it.....ive never claimed i have "sources" or anything like it.

Yes you did.

You said you had heard whispers from within the club , not just rumour from down the pub.

So either someone senior in the club is risking their future employment by providing you with these whispers or they are from a source that is so junior that they couldn`t possibly know such things , which makes your "whispers" worthless.

Why do people still insist on bragging about connections within the club when they must fall into one of the above two categories?

And if there really are "sources" within the club still leaking confidential information , are they really so stupid that they haven`t learned from the recent salutory lesson of the consequences of telling people things "in confidence"?

i said "whispers from the club" not within the club.........

I class all of us as part of the club..........so....

So you are now claiming that "whispers from the club" could include virtually anyone?

Then why didn`t your original post say you have heard something from a mate , or a fellow fan , or a bloke down the pub or whoever it was and clarify that your source of information was not from within the football club itself? That would have at least made the veracity of your rumour a little clearer for the reader.

Does it really matter? Craig was proved right and you trying pick petty holes really doesn't add anything to the debate.

facebook shares crash,langstone deal off.A lot of RED & BLUE faces there.

i have merely asked someone that would know if theres any truth in it.....ive never claimed i have "sources" or anything like it.

Yes you did.

You said you had heard whispers from within the club , not just rumour from down the pub.

So either someone senior in the club is risking their future employment by providing you with these whispers or they are from a source that is so junior that they couldn`t possibly know such things , which makes your "whispers" worthless.

Why do people still insist on bragging about connections within the club when they must fall into one of the above two categories?

And if there really are "sources" within the club still leaking confidential information , are they really so stupid that they haven`t learned from the recent salutory lesson of the consequences of telling people things "in confidence"?

i said "whispers from the club" not within the club.........

I class all of us as part of the club..........so....

So you are now claiming that "whispers from the club" could include virtually anyone?

Then why didn`t your original post say you have heard something from a mate , or a fellow fan , or a bloke down the pub or whoever it was and clarify that your source of information was not from within the football club itself? That would have at least made the veracity of your rumour a little clearer for the reader.

I asked for something i heard to be cleared up by someone that would know.......it makes no difference whether Johnny Briggs told me or Alan bloody Whitely.

I would never divulge where i heard something or who i heard it off just to make myself come across more reliable....i dont care for that label.

I bet gwyn the cameleon is taking a double dose of blood pressure tabs as we speak

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/footballna ... -31082068/