Wed May 09, 2012 9:15 pm
WelshBluebird wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:TBH WelshBluebird I have already answered most of the points you have rehashed. I repeat making assumptions (which you continue to do) is not helpful and totally destroys your argument.
I have to add though that inferring that the Malaysians are 'daft' is a bit rich considering he is a $ billionaire
So you are allowed to randomly put a line in the sand at where you feel would be going too far, yet I can't?
You feel every but the name is fine to be changed. Fair enough, that is your opinion.
But a lot of us disagree and think changing a large amount of our club identity is too far.
I did not imply they are daft. But I do think they should have seen the backlash against the plans coming, and it is a bit of a joke how it is all come about (leaked via a message board and then explained to some fans in a hastily arranged meeting, still with the club not officially saying anything at all to the rest of us). And I don't see what him being very successful has to do with it - everyone makes mistakes at some point.
Wed May 09, 2012 9:16 pm
WelshBluebird wrote:Again sorry for the double post.
You suggest that me making assumptions about what may happen in the future is not helpful. Why? It is a genuine concern of many of us who oppose these changes. If our owners are so willing to throw away so much of our clubs identity, then I see no reason why they would not be willing to throw away more of it (such as our club name). While my comment about Malaysia Welsh Dragons FC was obviously sarcastic in nature, I don't see why a name change is so seemingly out of your imagination when (as I have said), so much of our identity is already being thrown away. Yes it may not be on the cards right now, but if we allow these changes to go ahead, then it may be - and then it will be too late.
If we could get a guarantee from VT that he will not try to change the name of our club in exchange for more money, then I think a lot of people will at least partly accept the current changes. But so far - we have no had that, and indeed have been told that such a guarantee could not be given.
Wed May 09, 2012 9:21 pm
Wed May 09, 2012 9:33 pm
Wed May 09, 2012 10:55 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:WelshBluebird wrote:Just want a little rant.
So many people who are not opposed to all this are missing the point.
They say "its just a colour, so what" or "we have changed our badge before, why not again".
But that is not the point!
They are ignoring the fact that someone who hasn't long come into the club is steamrolling over 100+ years of history and tradition.
The fact that we would essentially be whoring ourselves out - anything in exchange for money.
And finally, what worries me the most, the fact that we don't know where it will end. If we are prepared to lose our history and tradition for money, why not our name, or our location? Do we really want even that slightest chance that we would become essentially a malaysian franchise even if we get to the premiership or even champions league?
I would counter by saying your missing a HUGE point, Cardiff City FC is a business and as such needs to pay its way in a very cut throat industry. I don't see changing our colours as 'whoring ourselves out' rather I see it as making the most of an extraordinary oppotunity which could put us fianancially miles ahead of every other football club.
As for history, if we don't take this oppotunity then we go bust and we will have as much history as all other football clubs that have dodged their financial liabilities and reinvented themselves as a new companies e.g. Swansea City 1993 (or whatever).
Personally I think a club loses far more 'identity' when they take the spinless administration/reinvention route than a club which is willing to pay its way and not rip anyone off by utilising every possible oppotunity.
Of course this might not be enough to satisfy you. If you wish to boycott shirts, season tickets etc then go ahead, but in the meantime the less bloddy minded amongst us will embrace this golden gift and look forward to brilliant future.
Thu May 10, 2012 7:49 am
Thu May 10, 2012 7:52 am
Thu May 10, 2012 8:44 am
Bluebird64 wrote:Die Walkure wrote:aj1927 wrote:Our history will still be intact!
If we were to be liquidated what would our history be then....
f**k all.
I'm not happy with the idea of being red, however I'd rather it be red than f**k all!!
that makes sense
Only to a plastic.
Thu May 10, 2012 8:45 am
goats wrote:ps
changing our name is a different kettle, now if that ever happened we'd all F off and there wud be no-one at the ground.
i wudnt care then. i reckon the kit colour will be resolved anyway, just a new badge. u wait.
Thu May 10, 2012 9:17 am
Randy Udderway wrote:goats wrote:ps
changing our name is a different kettle, now if that ever happened we'd all F off and there wud be no-one at the ground.
i wudnt care then. i reckon the kit colour will be resolved anyway, just a new badge. u wait.
This is my feelings too. Fan pressure will win.
Thu May 10, 2012 12:55 pm
WelshBluebird wrote:So again I ask, where do you draw the line?
If changing the colours, the badge and the nickname is fine by you in order for us to be successful, what about a name change? If renaming ourselves Malaysia Welsh Dragons FC meant we got even more investment, and so an even greater chance of success, would you be fine with that too? What about a move to a different town or city? Your mantra seems to be whatever increases the chances of success is a good thing. But surely there must be a line somewhere?