Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:10 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Well if it dosent then there aint no point in giving it to you Lee![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
[/quote]
[/quote]Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:16 pm
Bowmonster wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Well if it dosent then there aint no point in giving it to you Lee![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I'll have to take it off your hands then will I![]()
![]()
![]()
[/quote]
[/quote]Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:37 pm
Marc wrote:Bowmonster wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Well if it dosent then there aint no point in giving it to you Lee![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I'll have to take it off your hands then will I![]()
![]()
![]()
Well i have got two belts i can join together for you Marc![]()
![]()
![]()
[/quote]
[/quote]Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:39 pm
Marc wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Well if it dosent then there aint no point in giving it to you Lee![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I'll have to take it off your hands then will I![]()
![]()
![]()
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:56 pm
Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:57 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Opinions please i think its fooking well smart![]()
![]()
![]()
Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:59 pm
Bluemellons wrote:It's not very big is it???
Tue Jan 03, 2012 6:00 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Bluemellons wrote:It's not very big is it???
It's XL Chief !! Why do you need XXXXXXXL ?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Tue Jan 03, 2012 6:09 pm
Bluemellons wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Bluemellons wrote:It's not very big is it???
It's XL Chief !! Why do you need XXXXXXXL ?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
XL??????????? What are you? An XL hamster????
Tue Jan 03, 2012 6:13 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Opinions please i think its fooking well smart![]()
![]()
![]()
Tue Jan 03, 2012 6:19 pm
steve davies wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Opinions please i think its fooking well smart![]()
![]()
![]()
show us a picture of the back nukes ive bet annis a fiver its got the blue oyster club emblazoned across the shoulders
Tue Jan 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Tue Jan 03, 2012 7:40 pm
Tue Jan 03, 2012 7:54 pm
welshcitydragon wrote:Im over the mood that someone didnt buy it for me for xmas, but Im sure you will give someone a good laugh with it on .![]()
![]()
Tue Jan 03, 2012 7:56 pm
cecilccfc wrote:its minging mate, just IMO.. Barber's are decent jackets but prefer the smart ones without the big label
Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:18 pm
Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:34 pm
AHERNE wrote:did they throw the other 2 jackets in free? .... cause i can see 3 crap jackets in that photo not one!
Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:45 pm
Tue Jan 03, 2012 10:10 pm
tylerdurdenisabluebird wrote:It is nice, but a very common piece lately. As long as that doesn't bother you Nukes, then carry on![]()
Tue Jan 03, 2012 10:52 pm
Tue Jan 03, 2012 10:57 pm
Tue Jan 03, 2012 11:22 pm
Blackwood_Bluebird wrote:i have to disagree with the scruffs on this post![]()
i think its a smart jacket...
http://barbourjacket.wordpress.com/2011/06/ if its good enough for steve mcqueen, its good enough for mr nukes...
Tue Jan 03, 2012 11:40 pm
Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:38 am
T-G-I-ROBINFRIDAY wrote:It is ok but not as nice as my Belstaff Trailmaster jacket.
Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:58 am
Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:01 am
Jason Bourne wrote:Emoticon overload forum![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I think anyone who wears that jacket will look like a right tw*t.
I thought the days of "trying" to look cool and smart in crappy "designer" Stone Island type chav gear were over.....oh well.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:07 am
Wed Jan 04, 2012 2:13 am
Johnny Rythmn wrote:Jason Bourne wrote:Emoticon overload forum![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I think anyone who wears that jacket will look like a right tw*t.
I thought the days of "trying" to look cool and smart in crappy "designer" Stone Island type chav gear were over.....oh well.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Why are you hiding behind that name jason.
Reveal your identity or are you scared that nukes will kick yo arse
Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:37 pm