Sun Dec 18, 2011 12:44 am
Sun Dec 18, 2011 12:56 am
2blue2handle wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Uh I think us being awarded the first penalty, scoring from it then going on from there. Basically taking an early lead well I would say a betting man would have put his money on us would you not agree?
Is it that simple then? Boro took an early lead and got pegged back before going on to beat you.
You seem to be ignoring Boro's pen.
Which Looked offside before
And you then ignore kevs second pen
Sun Dec 18, 2011 12:58 am
Sun Dec 18, 2011 12:59 am
Bakedalasker wrote:2blue2handle wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Uh I think us being awarded the first penalty, scoring from it then going on from there. Basically taking an early lead well I would say a betting man would have put his money on us would you not agree?
Is it that simple then? Boro took an early lead and got pegged back before going on to beat you.
You seem to be ignoring Boro's pen.
Which Looked offside before
And you then ignore kevs second pen
You took my main ammo there Luke. I was waiting to use that.
What you are ignoring NJ or should I say trying to be annoying with, is the fact the first bad decision is the one that really shapes a game. That decision was a double whammy to us you cannot deny that. We could have been 1-0 instead found ourselves 1-0 down. Simple really.
Sun Dec 18, 2011 1:05 am
NJ73 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:2blue2handle wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Uh I think us being awarded the first penalty, scoring from it then going on from there. Basically taking an early lead well I would say a betting man would have put his money on us would you not agree?
Is it that simple then? Boro took an early lead and got pegged back before going on to beat you.
You seem to be ignoring Boro's pen.
Which Looked offside before
And you then ignore kevs second pen
You took my main ammo there Luke. I was waiting to use that.
What you are ignoring NJ or should I say trying to be annoying with, is the fact the first bad decision is the one that really shapes a game. That decision was a double whammy to us you cannot deny that. We could have been 1-0 instead found ourselves 1-0 down. Simple really.
Aye, and you were 2-1 up and still lost. My point being that while that decision would obviously have had a bearing on the game, it wouldn't necessarily have meant you would have gone on to win.
Besides, I think it's fair to say that you've had enough ropey penalty decisions go in your favour in the recent past.
Sun Dec 18, 2011 1:08 am
Bakedalasker wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:2blue2handle wrote:NJ73 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Uh I think us being awarded the first penalty, scoring from it then going on from there. Basically taking an early lead well I would say a betting man would have put his money on us would you not agree?
Is it that simple then? Boro took an early lead and got pegged back before going on to beat you.
You seem to be ignoring Boro's pen.
Which Looked offside before
And you then ignore kevs second pen
You took my main ammo there Luke. I was waiting to use that.
What you are ignoring NJ or should I say trying to be annoying with, is the fact the first bad decision is the one that really shapes a game. That decision was a double whammy to us you cannot deny that. We could have been 1-0 instead found ourselves 1-0 down. Simple really.
Aye, and you were 2-1 up and still lost. My point being that while that decision would obviously have had a bearing on the game, it wouldn't necessarily have meant you would have gone on to win.
Besides, I think it's fair to say that you've had enough ropey penalty decisions go in your favour in the recent past.
And my point being we could have gone in 3-0 at HT.
Ropey penalty decisions? Perhaps we should organise a march to UEFA, oh the irony.
Sun Dec 18, 2011 1:17 am
NJ73 wrote:But you didn't. And just because you may have had a penalty that wasn't given doesn't mean you would have.
No doubt at some game in the future this season you'll get an early decision go for you. I wonder what the reaction to that would be.
Anyway, those lower league refs never were much good.
Nos Da
Sun Dec 18, 2011 1:23 am
Bakedalasker wrote:NJ73 wrote:But you didn't. And just because you may have had a penalty that wasn't given doesn't mean you would have.
No doubt at some game in the future this season you'll get an early decision go for you. I wonder what the reaction to that would be.
Anyway, those lower league refs never were much good.
Nos Da
Yes these lower league refs.....well you may as well know about them now as you will need to next season.
Sun Dec 18, 2011 1:48 am
Sun Dec 18, 2011 2:32 am
Sun Dec 18, 2011 2:51 pm
Sun Dec 18, 2011 3:54 pm
polo wrote:Ref was just as bad for both teams.
We got beaten by the better team, cant blame the ref for that.
Sun Dec 18, 2011 3:56 pm
2blue2handle wrote:polo wrote:Ref was just as bad for both teams.
We got beaten by the better team, cant blame the ref for that.
I certainly blame the ref for poor decisions but it's not why we lost.
Don't think they were a better team either, very equal game