Sun Oct 30, 2011 3:59 pm
SBF1 wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:What a crap game we was lucky to even get a point sitting back and defending for 90mins im worryed for us this year when will are luck run out in games like this only so long it will last for sure,We need players badly one chance the WHOLE game and that was all we had,I doubt we even put 4-5 passes together or had one run at a full back just looked like hoofball div 2 stuff with lets smash it up to there center halfs heads and then they picked 90% of the 2nd balls up off the headers down from there back fourbut we got a point so i guess im supposed to post how good we was and how good the players played and the way there goalkeeper pulled off loads of good saves so we should have won but none of this happened so i suppose as they say on here "IM BEING NEGATIVE" because ive posted how i seen it
You could go and support a prem side? I hear Man City are doing well?
It was a hard fought draw against a very decent Leeds side at Elland rd.
A point gained as far as I'm concerned.
Sun Oct 30, 2011 3:59 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:SBF1 wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:SBF1 wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:still harping on about man city i see sbf1
well i guess your shot on 3mins was enough for you
In the circumstances yes. If you want full on action go and support some team who supplies that.
I reckon, given that we are a team on the rebuild, with limited resources, we are doing very well indeed. Perhaps we will be boring for a little while yet to come. I expect we will be, but hey ho, I'm a City fan and will hang on in there and not slag the team for being boring. I my opinion the did team well.
whos slagging them off im just saying what i watched today on TV thats it your the one saying i should go watch man citywe was boring and the game was shit we defended for most of the game that dont mean im slagging them off does it just posting what i seen,we can only field what we have and what we have is a work rate like ive not seen in a city side for years but does that cut it only time will tell this year and next year depending on what the owners want to do and which path they go down.
Each to their own. I would say the title of this thread is a bit of a slagging off but hey ho!
Sun Oct 30, 2011 4:01 pm
Sun Oct 30, 2011 4:01 pm
PtB wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:PtB wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:PTB we was shit today lets face it we scored out of LUCK and that was it offered nothing else for rest of the game THATS THE GAME I WATCHED
I'm not neccesarily disagreeing with those points now, as for luck -you make your own luck in this game and you take it when it falls. Would you have been happy with a point before the game?
Yea of course but the luck will only last so long im just saying what i seen on SKY SPORTS 1
It's not as if we're using luck every week though, that's all I'm saying. We scudded Barnsley last week - you don't score 5 through luck for instance. Sometimes you do have to ride your luck though, and to be honest we've not had much luck away from home this season - Peterborough for example.
It doesn't hide the fact that we need another 2 or 3 players, especially someone with a bit of pace.
Sun Oct 30, 2011 4:04 pm
DEZZY wrote:SBF1 wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:What a crap game we was lucky to even get a point sitting back and defending for 90mins im worryed for us this year when will are luck run out in games like this only so long it will last for sure,We need players badly one chance the WHOLE game and that was all we had,I doubt we even put 4-5 passes together or had one run at a full back just looked like hoofball div 2 stuff with lets smash it up to there center halfs heads and then they picked 90% of the 2nd balls up off the headers down from there back fourbut we got a point so i guess im supposed to post how good we was and how good the players played and the way there goalkeeper pulled off loads of good saves so we should have won but none of this happened so i suppose as they say on here "IM BEING NEGATIVE" because ive posted how i seen it
You could go and support a prem side? I hear Man City are doing well?
It was a hard fought draw against a very decent Leeds side at Elland rd.
A point gained as far as I'm concerned.
I would say go and support leeds but - wait a min ?? aint they in the same div as us now?? erm - yeppa !!!!
we managed a point in a very very volitile situation - well done boys - it could have been better - but oh sooo very much worse![]()
![]()
SBF1 wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:still harping on about man city i see sbf1
well i guess your shot on 3mins was enough for you
In the circumstances yes. If you want full on action go and support some team who supplies that.
I reckon, given that we are a team on the rebuild, with limited resources, we are doing very well indeed. Perhaps we will be boring for a little while yet to come. I expect we will be, but hey ho, I'm a City fan and will hang on in there and not slag the team for being boring. I my opinion the did team well.
Sun Oct 30, 2011 4:10 pm
Sun Oct 30, 2011 4:35 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:PtB wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:PtB wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:PTB we was shit today lets face it we scored out of LUCK and that was it offered nothing else for rest of the game THATS THE GAME I WATCHED
I'm not neccesarily disagreeing with those points now, as for luck -you make your own luck in this game and you take it when it falls. Would you have been happy with a point before the game?
Yea of course but the luck will only last so long im just saying what i seen on SKY SPORTS 1
It's not as if we're using luck every week though, that's all I'm saying. We scudded Barnsley last week - you don't score 5 through luck for instance. Sometimes you do have to ride your luck though, and to be honest we've not had much luck away from home this season - Peterborough for example.
It doesn't hide the fact that we need another 2 or 3 players, especially someone with a bit of pace.
barnsley was the worst team ive seen at a home game for 6years why we scored 5 and still let in 3 but yea we need players badly thats for sure just don't know what the owners are doing to get a return on there money they have put in because at the moment we are mid table at best plus any injurys leave us way short which will not give the owners anything but losses at the end of the season which im sure will still happen even though we have and im guessing 60% of what DJ had last year money wise for this year
Sun Oct 30, 2011 5:59 pm
PtB wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:PtB wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:PtB wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:PTB we was shit today lets face it we scored out of LUCK and that was it offered nothing else for rest of the game THATS THE GAME I WATCHED
I'm not neccesarily disagreeing with those points now, as for luck -you make your own luck in this game and you take it when it falls. Would you have been happy with a point before the game?
Yea of course but the luck will only last so long im just saying what i seen on SKY SPORTS 1
It's not as if we're using luck every week though, that's all I'm saying. We scudded Barnsley last week - you don't score 5 through luck for instance. Sometimes you do have to ride your luck though, and to be honest we've not had much luck away from home this season - Peterborough for example.
It doesn't hide the fact that we need another 2 or 3 players, especially someone with a bit of pace.
barnsley was the worst team ive seen at a home game for 6years why we scored 5 and still let in 3 but yea we need players badly thats for sure just don't know what the owners are doing to get a return on there money they have put in because at the moment we are mid table at best plus any injurys leave us way short which will not give the owners anything but losses at the end of the season which im sure will still happen even though we have and im guessing 60% of what DJ had last year money wise for this year
Maybe, but fact is Barnsely were on a good run and not conceding much and we gave them a doing. Maybe that says more about us than them or vice versa. It's just football. Thekey is we need bodies in
Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:14 pm
SBF1 wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:SBF1 wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:SBF1 wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:still harping on about man city i see sbf1
well i guess your shot on 3mins was enough for you
In the circumstances yes. If you want full on action go and support some team who supplies that.
I reckon, given that we are a team on the rebuild, with limited resources, we are doing very well indeed. Perhaps we will be boring for a little while yet to come. I expect we will be, but hey ho, I'm a City fan and will hang on in there and not slag the team for being boring. I my opinion the did team well.
whos slagging them off im just saying what i watched today on TV thats it your the one saying i should go watch man citywe was boring and the game was shit we defended for most of the game that dont mean im slagging them off does it just posting what i seen,we can only field what we have and what we have is a work rate like ive not seen in a city side for years but does that cut it only time will tell this year and next year depending on what the owners want to do and which path they go down.
Each to their own. I would say the title of this thread is a bit of a slagging off but hey ho!
Ok maybe i should change it to SUPER SUPER CITY for a boring game at leeds![]()
every player got a rating of 9 and the whole game we was awsome
is that better??
/quote]
Muchly!! lol
![]()
![]()
Mon Oct 31, 2011 5:40 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:What a crap game we was lucky to even get a point sitting back and defending for 90mins im worryed for us this year when will are luck run out in games like this only so long it will last for sure,We need players badly one chance the WHOLE game and that was all we had,I doubt we even put 4-5 passes together or had one run at a full back just looked like hoofball div 2 stuffbut we got a point so i guess im supposed to post how good we was and how good the players played and the way there goalkeeper pulled off loads of good saves so we should have won but none of this happened so i suppose as they say on here "IM BEING NEGATIVE" because ive posted how i seen it
How can you say we defended for 90 mins ? The first half we was excellent the second half i agree with you.
what did we do in the 1st half one long ball and there center half who got subbed didnt clear it and let mason in apart from that i carnt remember anything one shot one save fromt here keeper or even a run at anyone ?
You must of been watching a different game to me in the first half.