Sun Oct 23, 2011 6:55 pm
Sun Oct 23, 2011 6:58 pm
colours wrote:Deleting posts i see
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:00 pm
nerd wrote:
Hmm, pretty sure there was an article at some point abput Vetch rent not having been paid. Internet up and down for me, can't be arsed searching.
Anyway, given your club play a part in Stadco, surely Huw et al should be teaching them such sound financial business practices eh, so that Stadco can turn a profit and repay the council?
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:01 pm
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:04 pm
bluebirdbaz wrote:colours wrote:Deleting posts i see
we have had a burst of cockhaholic this evening, measures were taken(pardon the pun) to dispose of said nuisance
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:05 pm
NJ73 wrote:nerd wrote:
Hmm, pretty sure there was an article at some point abput Vetch rent not having been paid. Internet up and down for me, can't be arsed searching.
Anyway, given your club play a part in Stadco, surely Huw et al should be teaching them such sound financial business practices eh, so that Stadco can turn a profit and repay the council?
While the council are on the board of Stadco and have a say in the running of it, it's highly unlikely that it will turn a profit. It's also not helped by the fact the Ospreys crowds are so low therefore providing very little contribution to the Stadco coffers.
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:09 pm
colours wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:colours wrote:Deleting posts i see
we have had a burst of cockhaholic this evening, measures were taken(pardon the pun) to dispose of said nuisance
Oh Baz, you know he admitted the truth Freedom of speech mun come on you answer me then.
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:10 pm
nerd wrote:NJ73 wrote:nerd wrote:
Hmm, pretty sure there was an article at some point abput Vetch rent not having been paid. Internet up and down for me, can't be arsed searching.
Anyway, given your club play a part in Stadco, surely Huw et al should be teaching them such sound financial business practices eh, so that Stadco can turn a profit and repay the council?
While the council are on the board of Stadco and have a say in the running of it, it's highly unlikely that it will turn a profit. It's also not helped by the fact the Ospreys crowds are so low therefore providing very little contribution to the Stadco coffers.
So out of interest then, who ae burdening the losses?
And more importantly, given you're conceding that it's highly unlikely any profit will ever be made, on what grounds should Stadco avoid standard business rules and go bust?
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:14 pm
bluebirdbaz wrote:colours wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:colours wrote:Deleting posts i see
we have had a burst of cockhaholic this evening, measures were taken(pardon the pun) to dispose of said nuisance
Oh Baz, you know he admitted the truth Freedom of speech mun come on you answer me then.
freedom of speech is now banned![]()
we are the new gadaffi family(mods) so look out
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:16 pm
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:16 pm
NJ73 wrote:nerd wrote:NJ73 wrote:nerd wrote:
Hmm, pretty sure there was an article at some point abput Vetch rent not having been paid. Internet up and down for me, can't be arsed searching.
Anyway, given your club play a part in Stadco, surely Huw et al should be teaching them such sound financial business practices eh, so that Stadco can turn a profit and repay the council?
While the council are on the board of Stadco and have a say in the running of it, it's highly unlikely that it will turn a profit. It's also not helped by the fact the Ospreys crowds are so low therefore providing very little contribution to the Stadco coffers.
So out of interest then, who ae burdening the losses?
And more importantly, given you're conceding that it's highly unlikely any profit will ever be made, on what grounds should Stadco avoid standard business rules and go bust?
Any losses are covered by the two clubs. Now how that split is worked out I've no idea. For all we know the loss that is headlined may be completely down to the Ospreys being unable to pay their half.
I said while there is still council involvement it's highly unlikely that it will turn a profit. It needs the council to allow the clubs to run the stadium management company.
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:23 pm
nerd wrote:NJ73 wrote:nerd wrote:NJ73 wrote:nerd wrote:
Hmm, pretty sure there was an article at some point abput Vetch rent not having been paid. Internet up and down for me, can't be arsed searching.
Anyway, given your club play a part in Stadco, surely Huw et al should be teaching them such sound financial business practices eh, so that Stadco can turn a profit and repay the council?
While the council are on the board of Stadco and have a say in the running of it, it's highly unlikely that it will turn a profit. It's also not helped by the fact the Ospreys crowds are so low therefore providing very little contribution to the Stadco coffers.
So out of interest then, who ae burdening the losses?
And more importantly, given you're conceding that it's highly unlikely any profit will ever be made, on what grounds should Stadco avoid standard business rules and go bust?
Any losses are covered by the two clubs. Now how that split is worked out I've no idea. For all we know the loss that is headlined may be completely down to the Ospreys being unable to pay their half.
I said while there is still council involvement it's highly unlikely that it will turn a profit. It needs the council to allow the clubs to run the stadium management company.
Sounds to me like it's a highly convenient thing - can Ospreys, yourselves write off losses incurred losses due to Stadco against your taxes?
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:24 pm
bluebirdbaz wrote:zero tolerance ZT as it is now know is the new word, we will be imposing marshall law by the end of the week
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:25 pm
ok love x x xcolours wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:zero tolerance ZT as it is now know is the new word, we will be imposing marshall law by the end of the week
Ok sherriff,
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:27 pm
colours wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:zero tolerance ZT as it is now know is the new word, we will be imposing marshall law by the end of the week
Ok sherriff,
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:28 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:colours wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:zero tolerance ZT as it is now know is the new word, we will be imposing marshall law by the end of the week
Ok sherriff,
Have you had spelling lessons from swansealad69 you dont spell Sheriff like that![]()
![]()
![]()
Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:42 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:colours wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:zero tolerance ZT as it is now know is the new word, we will be imposing marshall law by the end of the week
Ok sherriff,
Have you had spelling lessons from swansealad69 you dont spell Sheriff like that![]()
![]()
![]()
Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:15 pm
swansealad69 wrote:Thank u,,but were are we now clown?money in the bank, no debt,sellouts every week,in the prem,and our fan base growing all the time,,and were the f**k are you?owned by a billionaire who don't guve money,average champ team,no players of real quality, o yes and upwards of 40 mil in debt,,,again thanks for the whip round..ps you keep on about your the biger club?I
on what grounds can you say that,you have done feck all and since the early 80s you have average biger crowds then us on 5 seasons,not realy that impressive is it and please don't keep on about your fa cup win ffs,as the army use to play and reach the later stages in it in them days. To be honest the only thing you got on us is a biger ground and crowds,but we can only fill what we got,,,,
Wed Oct 26, 2011 9:33 am
NJ73 wrote:nerd wrote:
Hmm, pretty sure there was an article at some point abput Vetch rent not having been paid. Internet up and down for me, can't be arsed searching.
Anyway, given your club play a part in Stadco, surely Huw et al should be teaching them such sound financial business practices eh, so that Stadco can turn a profit and repay the council?
While the council are on the board of Stadco and have a say in the running of it, it's highly unlikely that it will turn a profit. It's also not helped by the fact the Ospreys crowds are so low therefore providing very little contribution to the Stadco coffers.