Hats off when its due, what a good write up by TLG.

The report on his blog is basically the "facts" that came out of the meeting. TLG reframes from coing out with his hidden agenda comments but uses CCMB for that. Personally I would be fuming with him if I was the owner of CCMB as I would be feeling used.

However do you fathom that?

My answer was in my post but it has been edited.

If you read TLGs comments on CCMB the "hidden agenda" comes out. Calling others liars, well thats pretty clear what his attentions are.

The report on his blog is basically the "facts" that came out of the meeting. TLG reframes from coing out with his hidden agenda comments but uses CCMB for that. Personally I would be fuming with him if I was the owner of CCMB as I would be feeling used.

However do you fathom that?

Pretty obvious now. Calling others liars about sums it up.

I will have to buy some shares so I can go to one of these meetings because for me the obvious question would have been, why was there a revised agreement with Langston in December 2009 if there was no intention of taking it up and Langston hadn't bothered to get penalty clauses inserted?

I would also assume sigificant legal fees were incurred by Ridsdale and Langston setting up this deal which at the time we were told was central to the Malaysian investment.

Now the story has changed and all along it was a pointless exercise as everything has reverted to how it was prior to December 2009.

Sorry that simply doesn't add up and makes no sense whatsoever.