A forum for all things Cardiff City
Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:42 pm
Nerd, even if you just cannot quit the FAW, you can refrain from using them to your benefit every time you don't like a decision handed down by the FA. If there was no reason for Bellamy to be charged, then why was he charged? Strange that you feel that one situation is of total innocence and yet the likes of you re already hanging and flogging QPR before the hearing has been done and without knowing the facts. You must be mourning the demise of the Daily Sport!
Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:43 pm
well thats 99% of clubs.and the only way we'll ever get to grips with clubs living above their means is by such actions as being put out of the league if admin happens,we all trade in debt .but i take apoint with the way you call ccfc a tin pot club, we have a rich history,euro cup semi finalist fa cup winners fa cup runners up twice and so on.it's better to have loved and lost than never loved at all.
Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:53 pm
marky1927 wrote:well thats 99% of clubs.and the only way we'll ever get to grips with clubs living above their means is by such actions as being put out of the league if admin happens,we all trade in debt .but i take apoint with the way you call ccfc a tin pot club, we have a rich history,euro cup semi finalist fa cup winners fa cup runners up twice and so on.it's better to have loved and lost than never loved at all.
Marky, since when in this thread did I call Cardiff a tin pot club? Read my posts again and I think that you will find that I haven't. Oh and by the way, you missed out all of the Welsh Cup triumphs, which without you would never have played Real Madrid and won in front of 60,000, (f**k me how did they get that lot in Ninian Park!). Oh and we have loved a bit as well, League Cup winners 1967, FA and League Up runners-up, League runners-up 1976, UEFA Cup QF, 1977 and also we used to regularly win the London Standard 5 a sides during the 70's and early 80's, not to forget winning the London Masters for the last to years!
Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:01 pm
in front of 60000, as for the old lady NP, she had the biggest terrace in the football legague,it's hard to beleive, even bigger than that massive terrace i stood on a couple of times at the valley.
Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:03 pm
DWQPR wrote:Nerd, even if you just cannot quit the FAW, you can refrain from using them to your benefit every time you don't like a decision handed down by the FA. If there was no reason for Bellamy to be charged, then why was he charged? Strange that you feel that one situation is of total innocence and yet the likes of you re already hanging and flogging QPR before the hearing has been done and without knowing the facts. You must be mourning the demise of the Daily Sport!
LMFAO.
FA have never handed decisions down on us. Referees do - and we have right of appeal on red cards as every other club do to the FA.
In your ignorance you'd not know we went close to a decade without the FAW overturning - including one case where even the ref said he was wrong to have given a red. FAW benefit us? We appealed Gyepes, RossCo reds against Sheff Utd a few years ago. Only one of which was overturned. Oooops.
Bellamy was charged as the FAW felt there was a case of answer based upon claims made by Reading. We presented the available evidence which cast great doubt on Reading's claim.
In case you'd not actually bothered reading, I've always said "IF QPR are found guilty". Might want to look at dictionary.com to understand the meaning of "IF" tbh. Irrespective of that, you fail to grasp there's a massive difference between claims of events in a heated atmosphere, crowded space and paperwork issues which are fairly black and white. Massive difference.
Indeed, a lot is reading between the lines. And looking at similar cases. Or at least cases close enough to this.
Stil waiting for you to list our "dodgy" things.
Sun May 01, 2011 12:14 am
DWQPR wrote:Blazing Saddles wrote:DWQPR wrote:And frankly after the roller coaster of this season I don't give a monkeys what the FA decide to do, because they don't give a monkeys about what our national sport is without the us, the supporters! The record speaks for itself, won the most games, lost the least games, let in the least goals and have the most points. That is the stuff of champions. Well done Neil and the boys! Big, big party down the Bush tonight and again at the POTY do tomorrow!
And a big acknowledgement for the majority of you guys who have been most gracious since the FA charges were announced. Now come on, make sure you keep the pressure on the yellow peril!
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR'SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The records speak for themselves.........you are cheats. FACT.
As I said the majority are most gracious, you sad little boy. Still I suppose denying other clubs desperately needed money on a player bought from them, at the correct payment date isn't cheating eh? Especially as it was obvious at that time that the purchasing club didn't have a pot to piss in. Ring a bell sunshine?
Congratulations to the fans and armchair supporters of Queens Park Rangers FC and a Championship well-deserved from a playing aspect. Enjoy your moment in the sun (oops, that wasn't an intended pun, honest!!

)
Friday MAY be a different feeling, though and it is today WELL DOCUENTED that a few hierarchical bums are twitching in the House of Loftus....
IF (note I said IF) found guilty (and it DOES appear likely) then the free-flowing Moet might just be making an unwelcome reappearance as that most sickening of feelings descends....
IF that DOES happen then you'll have NO-ONE to blame OUTSIDE your club itself....!!
Sun May 01, 2011 1:00 am
QPR have been promoted,now lets talk about cardiff city.................
Sun May 01, 2011 7:33 am
Your support doesn't warrant premiership football
Just imagine qpr v wigan around 5500
Sun May 01, 2011 8:09 am
englishbluebird wrote:QPR have been promoted,now lets talk about cardiff city.................
CONGRATULATIONS TO THEM and NEIL WARNOCK.
NOW LETS WIN PROMOTION ON OUR OWN MERRIT
Sun May 01, 2011 8:13 am
QPR have won promotion by merit on the pitch and have the best manager (whatever happens) in the Championship. They also seem to have a decent bunch of away support.
However, there is also merit off the pitch and until next Friday a huge cloud hangs over QPR's merit to administer their affairs within the rules of the FA/FL competitions.
If found guilty the blame and consequences of any points deduction will lay wholly at the door of the administrators and owners (for not keeping proper control) and our relationship to the Welsh FA or even West Ham’s breach over Tevez will be totally and utterly irrelevant.
Sun May 01, 2011 10:17 am
Sun May 01, 2011 10:46 am
Mr Moo Cow wrote:Your support doesn't warrant premiership football
Just imagine qpr v wigan around 5500
mr Moo Cow, you really are an embarrressment to your fellow supporters, and obviously a Johnny come lately who didn't realise Cardiff City existed until the creation of the CCS! You are a 1 city team that has spent the best part of the last 20 years plying it's trade in the to bottom divisions playing in front of crowds of 4-5,000. Only when you got to the cup final did crowds at NP begin to reach circa 17-18,000 on a regular basis and with the new stadium only has an additional 3-4,000 been added regularly. Even against us there were plenty of empty seats, especially in the upper tier of the main stand, and the only footballing competition you have is 40 miles away in both directions of the M4. To be honest Cardiff should be as big as Newcastle, but frankly you have never had the fervent support of a team such as them, maybe it is because of the Welsh desire to watch men play with funny shaped balls! Who knows.
But us, we don't care what people think we know we are not ever going to be footballing giants, we are happy with who we are and I for one would not swap the memories of the last 41 years watching QPR, because for all the heartache we have had some fabulous times, especially for a club that has so often punched above it's weight. But even in our darkest days at the turn of the new century, in the third tier, we were still averaging 11,000+ crowds quite comfortably despite our footballing competition of Chelsea, Fulham, Spurs and Arsenal all being in the Prem, and being a little bit more than successful. Next season, if the Sunday Mirror journo, (funnily it seems everybody has ignored his article today), is to be believed, we will be playing in front of average crowds of around 18,000, because that is all our dear old lady, and I wouldn't have her any other way, will hold.
Marky, unbelievable that the terrace at NP held more than the one a the Valley, you needed oxygen masks standing St the top of that, but what a bloody great view of the game you got.
Sun May 01, 2011 10:59 am
Sunday Mirror credible?
The Mirror chain deliberately posted faked photos of "abuses" by British troops. You can't pick and choose tabloids, say "Sun bad, Mirror good"... all quite frankly shit.
The fact remains, the charges are incredibly serious. The fact remains the potential punishment could reflect the seriousness of those charges if your defence presented doesn't hold up.
It, however, doesn't look good when the first statement your team put up on their site referred to not "deliberately" supplying false info. Because that lends itself to being interpreted as"false info was supplied, we didn't really mean to cheat the system, it was just incompetence". Which isn't exactly a winning defence.
Even so, we know the tabloids are making a story. Why is it, knowing that fact, your team make demands on the FA which are easily rebutted, yet fail to do the same when your local media routinely cite QPR sources who downplay any potential punishment? Why does Warnock routinely talk about something when he always starts the speech with "I'm not going to talk about it..."
QPR are spinning the issue within your local media. You've then tried to increase your PR by intimating the FA have been spinning in the tabloids. Do you think that would impress the FA, especially if you're found guilty?
Sun May 01, 2011 11:02 am
DWQPR wrote:Mr Moo Cow wrote:Your support doesn't warrant premiership football
Just imagine qpr v wigan around 5500
mr Moo Cow, you really are an embarrressment to your fellow supporters, and obviously a Johnny come lately who didn't realise Cardiff City existed until the creation of the CCS! You are a 1 city team that has spent the best part of the last 20 years plying it's trade in the to bottom divisions playing in front of crowds of 4-5,000. Only when you got to the cup final did crowds at NP begin to reach circa 17-18,000 on a regular basis and with the new stadium only has an additional 3-4,000 been added regularly. Even against us there were plenty of empty seats, especially in the upper tier of the main stand, and the only footballing competition you have is 40 miles away in both directions of the M4. To be honest Cardiff should be as big as Newcastle, but frankly you have never had the fervent support of a team such as them, maybe it is because of the Welsh desire to watch men play with funny shaped balls! Who knows.
But us, we don't care what people think we know we are not ever going to be footballing giants, we are happy with who we are and I for one would not swap the memories of the last 41 years watching QPR, because for all the heartache we have had some fabulous times, especially for a club that has so often punched above it's weight. But even in our darkest days at the turn of the new century, in the third tier, we were still averaging 11,000+ crowds quite comfortably despite our footballing competition of Chelsea, Fulham, Spurs and Arsenal all being in the Prem, and being a little bit more than successful. Next season, if the Sunday Mirror journo, (funnily it seems everybody has ignored his article today), is to be believed, we will be playing in front of average crowds of around 18,000, because that is all our dear old lady, and I wouldn't have her any other way, will hold.
Marky, unbelievable that the terrace at NP held more than the one a the Valley, you needed oxygen masks standing St the top of that, but what a bloody great view of the game you got.
To be fair, we sold all of the seats you allocated to us, so if there were empty seats, it's because you wouldn't allow us any more.
Sun May 01, 2011 11:05 am
Claire, I am talking about last week at the CCS.
Sun May 01, 2011 11:05 am
Claire wrote:DWQPR wrote:Mr Moo Cow wrote:Your support doesn't warrant premiership football
Just imagine qpr v wigan around 5500
mr Moo Cow, you really are an embarrressment to your fellow supporters, and obviously a Johnny come lately who didn't realise Cardiff City existed until the creation of the CCS! You are a 1 city team that has spent the best part of the last 20 years plying it's trade in the to bottom divisions playing in front of crowds of 4-5,000. Only when you got to the cup final did crowds at NP begin to reach circa 17-18,000 on a regular basis and with the new stadium only has an additional 3-4,000 been added regularly. Even against us there were plenty of empty seats, especially in the upper tier of the main stand, and the only footballing competition you have is 40 miles away in both directions of the M4. To be honest Cardiff should be as big as Newcastle, but frankly you have never had the fervent support of a team such as them, maybe it is because of the Welsh desire to watch men play with funny shaped balls! Who knows.
But us, we don't care what people think we know we are not ever going to be footballing giants, we are happy with who we are and I for one would not swap the memories of the last 41 years watching QPR, because for all the heartache we have had some fabulous times, especially for a club that has so often punched above it's weight. But even in our darkest days at the turn of the new century, in the third tier, we were still averaging 11,000+ crowds quite comfortably despite our footballing competition of Chelsea, Fulham, Spurs and Arsenal all being in the Prem, and being a little bit more than successful. Next season, if the Sunday Mirror journo, (funnily it seems everybody has ignored his article today), is to be believed, we will be playing in front of average crowds of around 18,000, because that is all our dear old lady, and I wouldn't have her any other way, will hold.
Marky, unbelievable that the terrace at NP held more than the one a the Valley, you needed oxygen masks standing St the top of that, but what a bloody great view of the game you got.
To be fair, we sold all of the seats you allocated to us, so if there were empty seats, it's because you wouldn't allow us any more.
Claire, I read it that he was referring to the prem club seating for the game at CCS, not at their ground.
Which again, is a totally different issue due to the way the Prem club is run.
Sun May 01, 2011 11:06 am
DWQPR wrote:Claire, I am talking about last week at the CCS.
Ah ok, sorry!
Sun May 01, 2011 11:18 am
DWQPR wrote:Claire, I am talking about last week at the CCS.
full house, the empty seats were premier seats and are expensive
Sun May 01, 2011 11:47 am
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:DWQPR wrote:Claire, I am talking about last week at the CCS.
full house, the empty seats were premier seats and are expensive

Bridgend, I bet we can beat you for the most expensive seats! Our Centenary Club seats are snip at £10,000 for a season ticket!
Sun May 01, 2011 3:45 pm
DWQPR wrote:Bridgend_bluebird wrote:DWQPR wrote:Claire, I am talking about last week at the CCS.
full house, the empty seats were premier seats and are expensive

Bridgend, I bet we can beat you for the most expensive seats! Our Centenary Club seats are snip at £10,000 for a season ticket!

f*cking hell!!!!
Sun May 01, 2011 4:23 pm
full house, the empty seats were premier seats and are expensive

[/quote]
Bridgend, I bet we can beat you for the most expensive seats! Our Centenary Club seats are snip at £10,000 for a season ticket!

[/quote]
f*cking hell!!!!

[/quote]
And full up!
Sun May 01, 2011 4:26 pm
DWQPR wrote:full house, the empty seats were premier seats and are expensive

Bridgend, I bet we can beat you for the most expensive seats! Our Centenary Club seats are snip at £10,000 for a season ticket!

[/quote]
f*cking hell!!!!

[/quote]
And full up![/quote]
QPR = Rich club with rich fans
Sun May 01, 2011 5:55 pm
DWQPR wrote:full house, the empty seats were premier seats and are expensive

Bridgend, I bet we can beat you for the most expensive seats! Our Centenary Club seats are snip at £10,000 for a season ticket!

[/quote]
f*cking hell!!!!

[/quote]
And full up![/quote]
Full up in London, where there is usually more disposable income, companies more biased towards the financial side etc.
Fri Oct 21, 2011 11:40 am
DWQPR wrote:when you consider the price of real estate in West London.
Is the price of real estate is higher in West London as compared to other parts of the country??
Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:09 pm
Fletcher wrote:DWQPR wrote:when you consider the price of real estate in West London.
Is the price of real estate is higher in West London as compared to other parts of the country??
DAYA GO AWAY
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.