THE SEASON OF GOODWILL MY ARSE!

So AJH first time poster- what do you know about it anyway? Dont own a farm by any chance do you?

Haha, no I don't. I've heard from friends, just trying to shed some light.
Anyway...

Planning laws exist to ensure a due process is followed. This requires that premises are suitable, that no undue disruption or noise will be caused, and that any reservations or objections locally can be dealt with.
Clearly this business was far removed from "an old lady washing dogs"( check out the website). You might question the motive behind the failure to apply for the necessary planning permission before passing judgment on a clearly one sided viewpoint.

2 posts and heard from a friend thats ha ha ha ------ heres a question for you, whos Citys 3rd choice keeper?

Second question ..... who is Citys best midfielder and state your reasons why?

Is the farmer within his *legal* rights to do so?

Sure.

Does that make him any less of a piece of shit?

No.

Let's just hope he loses his subsidies, living and karma shits on him from a great height.

it would be interesting for anyone skilled enough to do full investigation to see if his own activities are utterly kosher./ Be a shame for things to bite him on the no doubt fat arse.

exactly nerd, " cash scanning business" i heard just one of his numbers.

That would be of my opinion Damned Yank, it's a simple process if the Farmer in question relents on the dated covenant and makes life easier for everyone. There is nothing more better than public knowledge and pressure to solve this issues.

Correction, this business was being run without planning permission. Retrospective planning was sought and was refused by RCT. No information regarding any covenants etc. was available to RCT prior to their refusal to grant the planning permission.

Hardly crime of the century though is it. Pathetic how this country stops honest people from working and paying their way yet lets drink driving assylum seeking murderers stay in case their human rights are breached.One word for it



BOLLOCKS

Well said mate it makes my blood boil

2 posts and heard from a friend thats ha ha ha ------ heres a question for you, whos Citys 3rd choice keeper?

Second question ..... who is Citys best midfielder and state your reasons why?

An interrogation eh?
Alrighty

As far as I know, City don't have a 3rd Keeper.
Though I'm sure there will be some young player in the reserves I've not heard of
Statswise...the best Midfielder should be Whittingham, after his performance last year
but for effort I'd have to give that to Burke

Though I'd be the first to admit I don't follow as closely as some fans
I don't see why any of that should qualify me to post my opinions on a public forum

I did join just to post in this topic, but I've hung around a lot before that
I'm usually on ccmb mind.

2 posts and heard from a friend thats ha ha ha ------ heres a question for you, whos Citys 3rd choice keeper?

Second question ..... who is Citys best midfielder and state your reasons why?

An interrogation eh?
Alrighty

As far as I know, City don't have a 3rd Keeper.
Though I'm sure there will be some young player in the reserves I've not heard of
Statswise...the best Midfielder should be Whittingham, after his performance last year
but for effort I'd have to give that to Burke

Though I'd be the first to admit I don't follow as closely as some fans
I don't see why any of that should qualify me to post my opinions on a public forum

I did join just to post in this topic, but I've hung around a lot before that
I'm usually on ccmb mind.

Santiago is the answer that you couldnt find on google, if you went to games you would have noticed hes been on the bench since Heaton got injured.

Get your stats off google too did you?

You joined this forum just to join in this topic , so then whys it such an interest to you.?

Well i hope you and your mucker Dai Roberts are up for a real f*cking ruck..... coz " operation dog " is under way!! u wont see the plans as it all being done by private message so u might as well f**k off back to CCMB and wait .

What did Basil Brush say? was it][b]" BOOM BOOM "[/b]

this farmer needs teaching a lesson

Eddie.... keep it now to PM , lesson part 1 underway alledgedy, farmers a jack too

Dayo PM me, ive got a idea!!

Dayo PM me, ive got a idea!!

just sent pm mate....

I'd have thought that given the length of time they have been in business without previous objection would be grounds for having the covenant set aside. Covenants are not set in stone and a judge can look at the facts of an individual case and see if a covenant is truly in existence or not. Having read that, it would be implied that the covenant was not in force. The business owners need to see specialist property solicitors regarding this as the covenant may not be enforceable.

bugger paper work and talking! good old fashioned "vist" is whats needed

There are two ways of looking at this....

1: At the end of the day IF there is such a covenant then it is legally binding, regardless of the incompetent solicitor who failed to disclose this originally

2: For the farmer to wait 23 years is showing that he either only just found out about the covenant (which I doubt, as it appears it was a forefather of his that put it in place all those years ago) OR....HE IS JUST A COMPLETE tw*t!!

I used to work fairly close to the Royal Mint and know several people from that area. Conversations confirm the latter....

There are two ways of looking at this....

1: At the end of the day IF there is such a covenant then it is legally binding, regardless of the incompetent solicitor who failed to disclose this originally

2: For the farmer to wait 23 years is showing that he either only just found out about the covenant (which I doubt, as it appears it was a forefather of his that put it in place all those years ago) OR....HE IS JUST A COMPLETE tw*t!!

I used to work fairly close to the Royal Mint and know several people from that area. Conversations confirm the latter....

Correct Sven..... Dai Roberts is a complete tw*t although hes likely to get TWATTED.

01443 670846

Ask your mates Sven if thats his number? i think it is but not sure - sounded like a Jack, could be the one who hangs that LLantrisant Jacks Flag at the derbies?

I'd have thought that given the length of time they have been in business without previous objection would be grounds for having the covenant set aside. Covenants are not set in stone and a judge can look at the facts of an individual case and see if a covenant is truly in existence or not. Having read that, it would be implied that the covenant was not in force. The business owners need to see specialist property solicitors regarding this as the covenant may not be enforceable.

Damian, Your prob Right