Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:13 am
Vintage 63 wrote:so are there currently CCFC risk supporters then in the eyes of the Law and are the SWP and Mr Insole going to publish such a list so we the innocent supporter can avoid these people ? If the letter of the Law is to be used then it could be said that the various writers and contribitors to the various books can be seen as being Risk Supporters too , for example Gwyn has related many stories in his book BUT does that make him a Risk supporter for witnessing more then 3 incidents ?
All seems just an excuse by the Police to issue banning orders without any other justification then a simple case of " I was there " .
Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:15 am
Damned Yank wrote:if you've been at the scene three times, but not involved in any trouble, isn't that an example of someone who can show considerable restraint and should be commended? Just askin'.
Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:43 am
Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:46 am
Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:17 am
milly44 wrote:what a load of shite........![]()
luckily im an angelic football lover
Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:44 am
Bluetaf wrote:milly44 wrote:what a load of shite........![]()
luckily im an angelic football lover
and a poor pool player![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
or so says Morgan
Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:13 pm
Thu Oct 28, 2010 5:27 pm
Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:56 pm
rontom wrote:So the 10 people in the mad train woman incident, are now two thirds away from being a risk supporter, when all they did was catch the train home.
Fri Oct 29, 2010 4:34 pm
Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:22 am
Sat Oct 30, 2010 5:28 pm