Fri Sep 05, 2025 11:44 am
Fri Sep 05, 2025 11:56 am
Fri Sep 05, 2025 12:14 pm
Fri Sep 05, 2025 12:48 pm
llan bluebird wrote:It’s a shame a single mother from Stockport had to resign, but it just goes to show human nature of trying to protect what you’ve sweated for.
When she had nothing she was snearing at those with wealth and their resistance to redistribution, until she did well enough to be one.
This is why this son of a single parent from coed y gores admired her. She isn’t morally superior to me, she is just the same
Fri Sep 05, 2025 12:56 pm
montyblue wrote:RESIGNED.
Fri Sep 05, 2025 1:18 pm
Fri Sep 05, 2025 1:26 pm
Fri Sep 05, 2025 1:33 pm
New Day Rising wrote:Oooh bet the social enclave callws CCMB will be fuming , yet another hit for their socalist principles how many hits gas it been for Labour in their first year of bringing in trusted politicians and care for thier own, time for Two Tier Kier to call an Election, if he carries on more will fall leading to a Reform government [ oh hang on , isnt it best Sir Kier stays in power to ensure we get change as im sure there are few more resigiations ,sackings to come ]
The councillor in Peterborough Whatts App comment is especially disgusting.. https://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/l ... n=sharebar
Fri Sep 05, 2025 1:33 pm
Fri Sep 05, 2025 1:42 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:OK I know I am in the minority here but I think there needs to be the reality here the politicians are, like all of us, human and they should, like us, be allowed to make mistakes.
I strongly believe that I should not criticise another person unless I can be satisfied I have never made a mistake in life (and I have made some really serious mistakes). Whether others feel the same way I dont know - thats personal to each of us - but for me I cant criticise someone for making a correctable error when I have made more serious mistakes myself.
I do believe that their should be high standards in public life but I also think it should not be the case that ministers are expected to resign every 5 minutes.
To me it does seem wrong that Boris Johnson can stay in power after parties during covid and tax avoidance (legal or illegal) by the Sunak family and these type of scenarios should be sanctioned.
But where a mistake is found, and highlighted by the offender straight away, and wanting to correct the error straight away - to me that is the sign of a good MP. Someone who recognises a problem, doesnt try to hide it, and seeks to correct it - surely that is all we can ask?
I just think in any of our jobs we made a mistake. How would we feel if we werent allowed to correct the mistake and were asked to resign
Fri Sep 05, 2025 1:50 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:montyblue wrote:RESIGNED.
No surprise whatsoever.
this scandel will be swept under the carpet and forgotten very soon.
Fri Sep 05, 2025 1:51 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:OK I know I am in the minority here but I think there needs to be the reality here the politicians are, like all of us, human and they should, like us, be allowed to make mistakes.
I strongly believe that I should not criticise another person unless I can be satisfied I have never made a mistake in life (and I have made some really serious mistakes). Whether others feel the same way I dont know - thats personal to each of us - but for me I cant criticise someone for making a correctable error when I have made more serious mistakes myself.
I do believe that their should be high standards in public life but I also think it should not be the case that ministers are expected to resign every 5 minutes.
To me it does seem wrong that Boris Johnson can stay in power after parties during covid and tax avoidance (legal or illegal) by the Sunak family and these type of scenarios should be sanctioned.
But where a mistake is found, and highlighted by the offender straight away, and wanting to correct the error straight away - to me that is the sign of a good MP. Someone who recognises a problem, doesnt try to hide it, and seeks to correct it - surely that is all we can ask?
I just think in any of our jobs we made a mistake. How would we feel if we werent allowed to correct the mistake and were asked to resign
Fri Sep 05, 2025 2:16 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:OK I know I am in the minority here but I think there needs to be the reality here the politicians are, like all of us, human and they should, like us, be allowed to make mistakes.
I strongly believe that I should not criticise another person unless I can be satisfied I have never made a mistake in life (and I have made some really serious mistakes). Whether others feel the same way I dont know - thats personal to each of us - but for me I cant criticise someone for making a correctable error when I have made more serious mistakes myself.
I do believe that their should be high standards in public life but I also think it should not be the case that ministers are expected to resign every 5 minutes.
To me it does seem wrong that Boris Johnson can stay in power after parties during covid and tax avoidance (legal or illegal) by the Sunak family and these type of scenarios should be sanctioned.
But where a mistake is found, and highlighted by the offender straight away, and wanting to correct the error straight away - to me that is the sign of a good MP. Someone who recognises a problem, doesnt try to hide it, and seeks to correct it - surely that is all we can ask?
I just think in any of our jobs we made a mistake. How would we feel if we werent allowed to correct the mistake and were asked to resign
Fri Sep 05, 2025 2:37 pm
Fri Sep 05, 2025 2:39 pm
montyblue wrote:EastleighBlue wrote:llan bluebird wrote:She managed to take advice with the trust, that's not easy, so i guess she has access to advice. I have placed my house in a trust for my girls with all sorts of stipulations. So the "I dunno, i am a working class kid with little education" doesn't wash.
She gamed the system and got caught. Its the hyprocracy of her working class attack dogs comments from when the tories gamed the system that means labour lose any credibility.
Labour are only there because of the anyone but the tories, next election it will be anyone but the tories and labour.
I didn't think it was possible to get worse than Boris,Truss and Sunak, but Keir Starmer has kept the trend.......
In 2 months Rachel from accounts is going to screw us all for more tax, saying its only fair that those earning more should pat more and all eyes will be on the "dunno" housing minister/deputy prime minister.....
Starmer should have sacked her by now, he won't and to quote Raynor he dithered because he is weak (she said that of Sunak due to his dodgy chancellor)
If Starmer sacked Raynor immediately he would have been accused of poor judgement for choosing her from the right and disloyalty to her from the left. He can't win.
The level of vitriol and attack from the right wing is staggering given the Tory government had 14 years. Like many I am disappointed with Labours performance after a year but constantly trying to disable the government and bring it down is not good for the country or democracy. Labour should be given a parliament to make change not 13 months, judge them then. For the country's sake I hope they get it right because if you peel back the skin of the Reform party its full of dangerous individuals who will go after all our freedoms, the NHS, our pensions and much more.
Boll.cks freedoms are under attack from labour not reform they have never been so bad.
Fri Sep 05, 2025 2:39 pm
montyblue wrote:EastleighBlue wrote:llan bluebird wrote:She managed to take advice with the trust, that's not easy, so i guess she has access to advice. I have placed my house in a trust for my girls with all sorts of stipulations. So the "I dunno, i am a working class kid with little education" doesn't wash.
She gamed the system and got caught. Its the hyprocracy of her working class attack dogs comments from when the tories gamed the system that means labour lose any credibility.
Labour are only there because of the anyone but the tories, next election it will be anyone but the tories and labour.
I didn't think it was possible to get worse than Boris,Truss and Sunak, but Keir Starmer has kept the trend.......
In 2 months Rachel from accounts is going to screw us all for more tax, saying its only fair that those earning more should pat more and all eyes will be on the "dunno" housing minister/deputy prime minister.....
Starmer should have sacked her by now, he won't and to quote Raynor he dithered because he is weak (she said that of Sunak due to his dodgy chancellor)
If Starmer sacked Raynor immediately he would have been accused of poor judgement for choosing her from the right and disloyalty to her from the left. He can't win.
The level of vitriol and attack from the right wing is staggering given the Tory government had 14 years. Like many I am disappointed with Labours performance after a year but constantly trying to disable the government and bring it down is not good for the country or democracy. Labour should be given a parliament to make change not 13 months, judge them then. For the country's sake I hope they get it right because if you peel back the skin of the Reform party its full of dangerous individuals who will go after all our freedoms, the NHS, our pensions and much more.
Boll.cks freedoms are under attack from labour not reform they have never been so bad.
Fri Sep 05, 2025 2:39 pm
Fri Sep 05, 2025 2:58 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:New Day Rising wrote:Oooh bet the social enclave callws CCMB will be fuming , yet another hit for their socalist principles how many hits gas it been for Labour in their first year of bringing in trusted politicians and care for thier own, time for Two Tier Kier to call an Election, if he carries on more will fall leading to a Reform government [ oh hang on , isnt it best Sir Kier stays in power to ensure we get change as im sure there are few more resigiations ,sackings to come ]
The councillor in Peterborough Whatts App comment is especially disgusting.. https://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/l ... n=sharebar
Call an election?
Sorry but we have a clear system in this country where there (should be) an election every five years. The last was just over a year ago.
An election is not going to be called because people aren't happy with the Government, that's not how it works. Especially when you look at the polls in the moment.
I have had sympathy for Angela Rayner because she has faced a lot of misogyny in the press, both in and out of government, but absolutely the right decision for her to resign for something that is clearly her fault here.
I don't buy the argument it's terrible news for the PM. It's inconvenient but him and Rayner have never seen eye to eye.
But talk of an election being called is for the birds. Absolutely zero chance, no matter how many people sign a petition.
Millions also signed a petition to reverse the result of the referendum and, even though I am still a Remainer, that also correctly was ignored.
Fri Sep 05, 2025 3:00 pm
New Day Rising wrote:Oooh bet the social enclave callws CCMB will be fuming , yet another hit for their socalist principles how many hits gas it been for Labour in their first year of bringing in trusted politicians and care for thier own, time for Two Tier Kier to call an Election, if he carries on more will fall leading to a Reform government [ oh hang on , isnt it best Sir Kier stays in power to ensure we get change as im sure there are few more resigiations ,sackings to come ]
The councillor in Peterborough Whatts App comment is especially disgusting.. https://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/l ... n=sharebar
Fri Sep 05, 2025 4:15 pm
Fri Sep 05, 2025 4:35 pm
theDelaney88 wrote:New Day Rising wrote:Reform must rise and shake the mechanisms ,to the core
Yeah I wouldn’t hold your breath on Reform doing anything of the sort. They’re riddled with scandal just as much as the other two.
Fri Sep 05, 2025 4:43 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:New Day Rising wrote:Oooh bet the social enclave callws CCMB will be fuming , yet another hit for their socalist principles how many hits gas it been for Labour in their first year of bringing in trusted politicians and care for thier own, time for Two Tier Kier to call an Election, if he carries on more will fall leading to a Reform government [ oh hang on , isnt it best Sir Kier stays in power to ensure we get change as im sure there are few more resigiations ,sackings to come ]
The councillor in Peterborough Whatts App comment is especially disgusting.. https://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/l ... n=sharebar
Call an election?
Sorry but we have a clear system in this country where there (should be) an election every five years. The last was just over a year ago.
An election is not going to be called because people aren't happy with the Government, that's not how it works. Especially when you look at the polls in the moment.
I have had sympathy for Angela Rayner because she has faced a lot of misogyny in the press, both in and out of government, but absolutely the right decision for her to resign for something that is clearly her fault here.
I don't buy the argument it's terrible news for the PM. It's inconvenient but him and Rayner have never seen eye to eye.
But talk of an election being called is for the birds. Absolutely zero chance, no matter how many people sign a petition.
Millions also signed a petition to reverse the result of the referendum and, even though I am still a Remainer, that also correctly was ignored.
Fri Sep 05, 2025 5:41 pm
New Day Rising wrote:Oooh bet the social enclave callws CCMB will be fuming , yet another hit for their socalist principles how many hits gas it been for Labour in their first year of bringing in trusted politicians and care for thier own, time for Two Tier Kier to call an Election, if he carries on more will fall leading to a Reform government [ oh hang on , isnt it best Sir Kier stays in power to ensure we get change as im sure there are few more resigiations ,sackings to come ]
The councillor in Peterborough Whatts App comment is especially disgusting.. https://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/l ... n=sharebar
Fri Sep 05, 2025 5:42 pm
Fri Sep 05, 2025 5:46 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:OK I know I am in the minority here but I think there needs to be the reality here the politicians are, like all of us, human and they should, like us, be allowed to make mistakes.
I strongly believe that I should not criticise another person unless I can be satisfied I have never made a mistake in life (and I have made some really serious mistakes). Whether others feel the same way I dont know - thats personal to each of us - but for me I cant criticise someone for making a correctable error when I have made more serious mistakes myself.
I do believe that their should be high standards in public life but I also think it should not be the case that ministers are expected to resign every 5 minutes.
To me it does seem wrong that Boris Johnson can stay in power after parties during covid and tax avoidance (legal or illegal) by the Sunak family and these type of scenarios should be sanctioned.
But where a mistake is found, and highlighted by the offender straight away, and wanting to correct the error straight away - to me that is the sign of a good MP. Someone who recognises a problem, doesnt try to hide it, and seeks to correct it - surely that is all we can ask?
I just think in any of our jobs we made a mistake. How would we feel if we werent allowed to correct the mistake and were asked to resign
Fri Sep 05, 2025 7:30 pm
Fri Sep 05, 2025 7:35 pm
Sat Sep 06, 2025 7:01 am
pembroke allan wrote:Simplesimon wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:Maybe I am in the minority here but I kind of understand how this happened and I am happy to accept that there was no malice intended.
I genuinely believe that she thought she only had one house and tbh I would have thought the same.
Angela Raynor has a disabled child and, from what I understand, when her situation changed and she needed to spend more time away from Manchester so a trust was setup (which didn't include her name) to own the house and provide her disabled child with accommodation.
Insofar as the Land Registry is concerned Angela Raynor no longer owned the house in Manchester.
So when she bought a house in Brighton I can understand why she thought that house was her only house. The other house of course was in a trust which I understand her ex-husband dealt with.
She has been advised of the mistake and has not contested it and she is in the process of paying the difference.
This just seems to be Political Games.
Stamp duty no longer that straightforward Paul. Under trust terms she seems to have retained some form of control interest in the property. HMRC deem that to make it your principal residence. Making any purchases, additional properties attracting higher rate stamp.
She’s not an ordinary Joe Public person. She’s classed as a Potentially Exposed Person under FCA legislation, subject to higher due diligence. That in itself should have been enough to ensure all crossed and dotted. But she’s also the minister for housing. Making her knowledgeable in the eyes of the law.
She’s been extremely flippant in her regard for rules and taxation, on this and previous property. As a government minister she needs to take more care in every transaction she undertakes.
Well the conveyers didn't do the tax as she stated.... and what happened with trust was easy explained if as they put it the right question was asked? Can I put house in my sons name answer is no why because he's under 18 so the house was still in her name...if she asked that simple question she would have known her flat would be 2nd home subject to the higher tax.... May not done deliberately but should be sacked for being stupid.
Sun Sep 07, 2025 1:16 pm
Sun Sep 07, 2025 1:22 pm
Simplesimon wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Simplesimon wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:Maybe I am in the minority here but I kind of understand how this happened and I am happy to accept that there was no malice intended.
I genuinely believe that she thought she only had one house and tbh I would have thought the same.
Angela Raynor has a disabled child and, from what I understand, when her situation changed and she needed to spend more time away from Manchester so a trust was setup (which didn't include her name) to own the house and provide her disabled child with accommodation.
Insofar as the Land Registry is concerned Angela Raynor no longer owned the house in Manchester.
So when she bought a house in Brighton I can understand why she thought that house was her only house. The other house of course was in a trust which I understand her ex-husband dealt with.
She has been advised of the mistake and has not contested it and she is in the process of paying the difference.
This just seems to be Political Games.
Stamp duty no longer that straightforward Paul. Under trust terms she seems to have retained some form of control interest in the property. HMRC deem that to make it your principal residence. Making any purchases, additional properties attracting higher rate stamp.
She’s not an ordinary Joe Public person. She’s classed as a Potentially Exposed Person under FCA legislation, subject to higher due diligence. That in itself should have been enough to ensure all crossed and dotted. But she’s also the minister for housing. Making her knowledgeable in the eyes of the law.
She’s been extremely flippant in her regard for rules and taxation, on this and previous property. As a government minister she needs to take more care in every transaction she undertakes.
Well the conveyers didn't do the tax as she stated.... and what happened with trust was easy explained if as they put it the right question was asked? Can I put house in my sons name answer is no why because he's under 18 so the house was still in her name...if she asked that simple question she would have known her flat would be 2nd home subject to the higher tax.... May not done deliberately but should be sacked for being stupid.
The property will be held in the name of the trust not her son. So it won’t matter how old he is. I think she was greedy more than stupid. Now reading comments that the house sold into the trust went in at twice the value of similar ones sold recently. If that truly is the case it seems to point to using the situation to pull the trust monies out, while dressing it up as “for my son’s benefit “ obviously it’s hypothetical, but imo this whole thing stinks of greed.
And her and the Labour Party need to drop the Working Class single mantra as it’s become insulting, working class single mothers don’t earn £150k + or buy £800k properties. She was one, she’s enjoyed social mobility and is now in a different socio economic class.