Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:37 pm
Roath_Blue wrote:A 40m bid would indicate that the debt would fall to the new owners.
It’s a fair bid if that’s the case.
I just hope that Tan doesn’t hold out looking for more.
Do we know how much of our debt is to Tan?
Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:45 pm
wez1927 wrote:RhysBunce wrote:I will be very, very shocked if anyone offers near £100m for the football club.
The club is financially insolvent without Tan filling in the gaps every season from his waste. It loses money every season, because the agents dream of a board overpay for almost all transfers, whether salary or fee. Bale and his pals are here to make money, first and foremost. The £40-50m offer gives them plenty of wiggle room to invest without too much risk. Anything north of £70m means risk outweighs benefit. I can’t see them moving forward at that value.
It’s why Tan is unlikely to leave. He’s dug himself a hole and nobody will be dull enough to pay him back the money he’s thrown away with part time running and a terrible recruitment strategy. Until he accepts he’s going to have to take a 50% loss on the debt he’s piled up, through his own ineptitude, he’ll have to keep throwing money in. The club won’t be worth £150m next season when he has to plow another 15-20m in to balance the loss of revenue this year. Nor £160-170m the year after. Only promotion will return some increased value.
He either takes the £40-50m and writes the rest off as a loss, or he keeps putting in £15-20m a year through various funds and sponsorship and hopes to get lucky on getting to the prem. The latter seems far more realistic .. we’re essentially screwed until he passes away and the family want rid.
Your totally forgetting the valuation of the stadium in any of your posts, it was valued over 80 million by an independent company in the latest set of accounts its a non matchday revenue stream and could make a lot of more if used correctly,anyone who thinks the club will go with the stadium & debt free for 40 million is deluded . .
Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:47 pm
wez1927 wrote:Bluebina wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:£40m sounds feasible.
It was £85 Million yesterday
I think the 85m is true from a very reliable source, times article is wrong and out of date .
Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:50 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:55 pm
RhysBunce wrote:wez1927 wrote:RhysBunce wrote:I will be very, very shocked if anyone offers near £100m for the football club.
The club is financially insolvent without Tan filling in the gaps every season from his waste. It loses money every season, because the agents dream of a board overpay for almost all transfers, whether salary or fee. Bale and his pals are here to make money, first and foremost. The £40-50m offer gives them plenty of wiggle room to invest without too much risk. Anything north of £70m means risk outweighs benefit. I can’t see them moving forward at that value.
It’s why Tan is unlikely to leave. He’s dug himself a hole and nobody will be dull enough to pay him back the money he’s thrown away with part time running and a terrible recruitment strategy. Until he accepts he’s going to have to take a 50% loss on the debt he’s piled up, through his own ineptitude, he’ll have to keep throwing money in. The club won’t be worth £150m next season when he has to plow another 15-20m in to balance the loss of revenue this year. Nor £160-170m the year after. Only promotion will return some increased value.
He either takes the £40-50m and writes the rest off as a loss, or he keeps putting in £15-20m a year through various funds and sponsorship and hopes to get lucky on getting to the prem. The latter seems far more realistic .. we’re essentially screwed until he passes away and the family want rid.
Your totally forgetting the valuation of the stadium in any of your posts, it was valued over 80 million by an independent company in the latest set of accounts its a non matchday revenue stream and could make a lot of more if used correctly,anyone who thinks the club will go with the stadium & debt free for 40 million is deluded . .
I’m not going to go over the stadium again. It’s a paper asset. It might be independently valued at £85m for insurance purposes, but it’s not worth £85m in a sale price. If you put a £100k pool in your back garden, you’ll insurer it for 100k, but it isn’t adding 100k to your house value.
Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:57 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:wez1927 wrote:Bluebina wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:£40m sounds feasible.
It was £85 Million yesterday
I think the 85m is true from a very reliable source, times article is wrong and out of date .
Are you serious about the £85m?
Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:57 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:wez1927 wrote:Bluebina wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:£40m sounds feasible.
It was £85 Million yesterday
I think the 85m is true from a very reliable source, times article is wrong and out of date .
Are you serious about the £85m?
Wed Jul 02, 2025 5:59 pm
RhysBunce wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:wez1927 wrote:Bluebina wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:£40m sounds feasible.
It was £85 Million yesterday
I think the 85m is true from a very reliable source, times article is wrong and out of date .
Are you serious about the £85m?
If it’s £85m … to me that can only be a clean slate. Tan, Dalman, the lot cleared out. Else you’ve already maxed out value before you start. Bale and the group are trying to take advantage of our position to get a cheap deal, £85m is the value of a top end championship side pushing promotion. We aren’t that
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:04 pm
wez1927 wrote:RhysBunce wrote:wez1927 wrote:RhysBunce wrote:I will be very, very shocked if anyone offers near £100m for the football club.
The club is financially insolvent without Tan filling in the gaps every season from his waste. It loses money every season, because the agents dream of a board overpay for almost all transfers, whether salary or fee. Bale and his pals are here to make money, first and foremost. The £40-50m offer gives them plenty of wiggle room to invest without too much risk. Anything north of £70m means risk outweighs benefit. I can’t see them moving forward at that value.
It’s why Tan is unlikely to leave. He’s dug himself a hole and nobody will be dull enough to pay him back the money he’s thrown away with part time running and a terrible recruitment strategy. Until he accepts he’s going to have to take a 50% loss on the debt he’s piled up, through his own ineptitude, he’ll have to keep throwing money in. The club won’t be worth £150m next season when he has to plow another 15-20m in to balance the loss of revenue this year. Nor £160-170m the year after. Only promotion will return some increased value.
He either takes the £40-50m and writes the rest off as a loss, or he keeps putting in £15-20m a year through various funds and sponsorship and hopes to get lucky on getting to the prem. The latter seems far more realistic .. we’re essentially screwed until he passes away and the family want rid.
Your totally forgetting the valuation of the stadium in any of your posts, it was valued over 80 million by an independent company in the latest set of accounts its a non matchday revenue stream and could make a lot of more if used correctly,anyone who thinks the club will go with the stadium & debt free for 40 million is deluded . .
I’m not going to go over the stadium again. It’s a paper asset. It might be independently valued at £85m for insurance purposes, but it’s not worth £85m in a sale price. If you put a £100k pool in your back garden, you’ll insurer it for 100k, but it isn’t adding 100k to your house value.
Sorry you are wrong its not paper asset ffs its independently value, you try building a stadiumof our calibre for 30-40 million these days .the fact is its an asset
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:12 pm
RhysBunce wrote:wez1927 wrote:RhysBunce wrote:wez1927 wrote:RhysBunce wrote:I will be very, very shocked if anyone offers near £100m for the football club.
The club is financially insolvent without Tan filling in the gaps every season from his waste. It loses money every season, because the agents dream of a board overpay for almost all transfers, whether salary or fee. Bale and his pals are here to make money, first and foremost. The £40-50m offer gives them plenty of wiggle room to invest without too much risk. Anything north of £70m means risk outweighs benefit. I can’t see them moving forward at that value.
It’s why Tan is unlikely to leave. He’s dug himself a hole and nobody will be dull enough to pay him back the money he’s thrown away with part time running and a terrible recruitment strategy. Until he accepts he’s going to have to take a 50% loss on the debt he’s piled up, through his own ineptitude, he’ll have to keep throwing money in. The club won’t be worth £150m next season when he has to plow another 15-20m in to balance the loss of revenue this year. Nor £160-170m the year after. Only promotion will return some increased value.
He either takes the £40-50m and writes the rest off as a loss, or he keeps putting in £15-20m a year through various funds and sponsorship and hopes to get lucky on getting to the prem. The latter seems far more realistic .. we’re essentially screwed until he passes away and the family want rid.
Your totally forgetting the valuation of the stadium in any of your posts, it was valued over 80 million by an independent company in the latest set of accounts its a non matchday revenue stream and could make a lot of more if used correctly,anyone who thinks the club will go with the stadium & debt free for 40 million is deluded . .
I’m not going to go over the stadium again. It’s a paper asset. It might be independently valued at £85m for insurance purposes, but it’s not worth £85m in a sale price. If you put a £100k pool in your back garden, you’ll insurer it for 100k, but it isn’t adding 100k to your house value.
Sorry you are wrong its not paper asset ffs its independently value, you try building a stadiumof our calibre for 30-40 million these days .the fact is its an asset
Yes, an independent value for insurance purposes. If you had to rebuild it, it would likely cost £85m. Hence its valuation so the club can sort it. But in terms of value in the sale of a club, it’s largely irrelevant. It makes you more attractive if you have a good one, but it also has significant overheads. By your logic no club in London would be sold for less than probably £40m on land value alone. You and I both know that’s not the case.
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:14 pm
Bluebina wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:£40m sounds feasible.
It was £85 Million yesterday
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:18 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Bluebina wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:£40m sounds feasible.
It was £85 Million yesterday
Yeah it makes me laugh, everyone on here throwing numbers about and knowing virtually nothing about nothing!
All guesswork for what’s been offered, what Tan wants or will accept!
Comedy gold but I’m quite enjoying the nonsense.
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:22 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:24 pm
wez1927 wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Bluebina wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:£40m sounds feasible.
It was £85 Million yesterday
Yeah it makes me laugh, everyone on here throwing numbers about and knowing virtually nothing about nothing!
All guesswork for what’s been offered, what Tan wants or will accept!
Comedy gold but I’m quite enjoying the nonsense.
A clubs value is what ever someone is willing to pay and the seller willing to take.
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:31 pm
eddiep wrote:Wez is bang on
At best all in would be north of 100mill.
The deal must include the stadium.
To save face for Tan
What I would do is give tan a % of non footy future revenue
And deal at 90 mill.
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:31 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:wez1927 wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Bluebina wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:£40m sounds feasible.
It was £85 Million yesterday
Yeah it makes me laugh, everyone on here throwing numbers about and knowing virtually nothing about nothing!
All guesswork for what’s been offered, what Tan wants or will accept!
Comedy gold but I’m quite enjoying the nonsense.
A clubs value is what ever someone is willing to pay and the seller willing to take.
Of course it is and that’s stating the obvious.
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:31 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:38 pm
RhysBunce wrote:Let’s just agree to disagree.. next you’ll be trying to convince me the Aston Villa women’s team was worth £55m or Chelsea’s £100m plus
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:41 pm
RhysBunce wrote:Let’s just agree to disagree.. next you’ll be trying to convince me the Aston Villa women’s team was worth £55m or Chelsea’s £100m plus
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:41 pm
pembroke allan wrote:RhysBunce wrote:Let’s just agree to disagree.. next you’ll be trying to convince me the Aston Villa women’s team was worth £55m or Chelsea’s £100m plus
Mmmmm Chelsea womens team sold for £189m fairly recently..
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:42 pm
RhysBunce wrote:pembroke allan wrote:RhysBunce wrote:Let’s just agree to disagree.. next you’ll be trying to convince me the Aston Villa women’s team was worth £55m or Chelsea’s £100m plus
Mmmmm Chelsea womens team sold for £189m fairly recently..
I heard it had an independent valuation so must be worth that
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:43 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:44 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:46 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Bluebina wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:£40m sounds feasible.
It was £85 Million yesterday
Yeah it makes me laugh, everyone on here throwing numbers about and knowing virtually nothing about nothing!
All guesswork for what’s been offered, what Tan wants or will accept!
Comedy gold but I’m quite enjoying the nonsense.
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:55 pm