Tue Jul 01, 2025 7:21 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:Forever Blue wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I can’t be positive Sorry All Ex Rochdale:
Surely if all that good they would have been with other League Clubs by now?
Good luck to them , We will need it:
TAN OUT OUT
Think that's completely wrong.
BBM has already said that despite all the world class coaches he worked with at Man City, Riley is the best he's seen.
I want Tan out too but I'm not going to slate a manager or his coaches before they get a chance.
It is also imperative that the manager works with people he knows.
So yes I'm very pleased with this outcome.
Different Opinions Yet again Ned all the last managers for years.
Let’s hope I’m finally wrong.
I stand Strongly but it.
I agree to work with people you know, BUT ROCHDALE ???
It’s a BIG NO
TAN OUT OUT OUT
I'd take BBM every day over attention seeking, pathetic and awful football from Nathan Jones.
Hopefully our fans will wake up to football in 2025 soon and see this is the right sort of appointment.
I don't think Tan out should have anything to do with supporting the manager. I think every manager should be given a fair chance.
But those already writing him off are showing they can't be objective while Tan is around, I find that sad because that's like letting Tan win.
Tue Jul 01, 2025 8:47 pm
desbluebird wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Forever Blue wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I can’t be positive Sorry All Ex Rochdale:
Surely if all that good they would have been with other League Clubs by now?
Good luck to them , We will need it:
TAN OUT OUT
Think that's completely wrong.
BBM has already said that despite all the world class coaches he worked with at Man City, Riley is the best he's seen.
I want Tan out too but I'm not going to slate a manager or his coaches before they get a chance.
It is also imperative that the manager works with people he knows.
So yes I'm very pleased with this outcome.
Different Opinions Yet again Ned all the last managers for years.
Let’s hope I’m finally wrong.
I stand Strongly but it.
I agree to work with people you know, BUT ROCHDALE ???
It’s a BIG NO
TAN OUT OUT OUT
I'd take BBM every day over attention seeking, pathetic and awful football from Nathan Jones.
Hopefully our fans will wake up to football in 2025 soon and see this is the right sort of appointment.
I don't think Tan out should have anything to do with supporting the manager. I think every manager should be given a fair chance.
But those already writing him off are showing they can't be objective while Tan is around, I find that sad because that's like letting Tan win.
no comment
Tue Jul 01, 2025 8:49 pm
Tue Jul 01, 2025 10:26 pm
Tue Jul 01, 2025 10:40 pm
Tue Jul 01, 2025 10:45 pm
Wed Jul 02, 2025 6:17 am
Roath_Blue wrote:brickyblue wrote:The start of yet another gamble from tan .
I've no confidence what so ever if it all clicks and works it's just luck ..ive absolutely no confidence at all in tan and this appointment i hope im proved completely wrong
So what manager wouldn’t have been a gamble?
Wed Jul 02, 2025 7:40 am
Bluebina wrote:Roath_Blue wrote:brickyblue wrote:The start of yet another gamble from tan .
I've no confidence what so ever if it all clicks and works it's just luck ..ive absolutely no confidence at all in tan and this appointment i hope im proved completely wrong
So what manager wouldn’t have been a gamble?
One who had a previous promotion would have been far less of a gamble than one who only has a relegation from League one to his Managerial name.
We all knew Dave Jones and Warnock were likely to succeed, and that Trollope, Hudson, and Riza were more likely to fail.
I'll give him my support, though, I have too; it's him who they took a couple of months to select, but there is no denying it's another massive gamble.
Wed Jul 02, 2025 7:59 am
Forever Blue wrote:I can’t be positive Sorry All Ex Rochdale:
Surely if all that good they would have been with other League Clubs by now?
Good luck to them , We will need it:
TAN OUT OUT
Wed Jul 02, 2025 8:03 am
Wed Jul 02, 2025 8:10 am
Wed Jul 02, 2025 8:12 am
Abergavenny wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I can’t be positive Sorry All Ex Rochdale:
Surely if all that good they would have been with other League Clubs by now?
Good luck to them , We will need it:
TAN OUT OUT
I have a similar view as you The only hope I have is that in a few cases in sport it has worked out well I remember playing against Nick Nurse ( basketball ) and his team in Derby He coached them and we are talking Div 2 of British Basketball In world terms not the highest level at all Year later he wins the NBA championship as coach with a few associates he picked up along the way
I have seen good coaches fail because they just don’t have the players and bad coaches who have better players outwardly looking a success.
Let’s hope for all of us we have a success but we will know soon enough
Wed Jul 02, 2025 8:57 am
Wed Jul 02, 2025 8:58 am
Bluebina wrote:Roath_Blue wrote:brickyblue wrote:The start of yet another gamble from tan .
I've no confidence what so ever if it all clicks and works it's just luck ..ive absolutely no confidence at all in tan and this appointment i hope im proved completely wrong
So what manager wouldn’t have been a gamble?
One who had a previous promotion would have been far less of a gamble than one who only has a relegation from League one to his Managerial name.
We all knew Dave Jones and Warnock were likely to succeed, and that Trollope, Hudson, and Riza were more likely to fail.
I'll give him my support, though, I have too; it's him who they took a couple of months to select, but there is no denying it's another massive gamble.
Wed Jul 02, 2025 10:16 am
Wed Jul 02, 2025 10:27 am
SB 1927 wrote:Come on then, those complaining list what you're looking for in backroom staff. You wont have a clue.
Can you give me a review of, say Malky's background staff, where they were recruited from etc without a google search; unlikely.
I remember alot were waxing lyrical about Richard Shaw on here. Came in and seemingly changed zero.
Have a day off! Applying pressure to background staff is hilarious.
How long till we start critiquing the groundsmen???
Wed Jul 02, 2025 10:49 am
SB 1927 wrote:Come on then, those complaining list what you're looking for in backroom staff. You wont have a clue.
Can you give me a review of, say Malky's background staff, where they were recruited from etc without a google search; unlikely.
I remember alot were waxing lyrical about Richard Shaw on here. Came in and seemingly changed zero.
Have a day off! Applying pressure to background staff is hilarious.
How long till we start critiquing the groundsmen???
Wed Jul 02, 2025 10:52 am
Wed Jul 02, 2025 11:49 am
Forever Blue wrote:Let’s hope your right and I hope you are as the last few times it’s been worse than Diabolical and ended all in Disaster
Tans choses virtually mean failure a fact.
Wed Jul 02, 2025 12:32 pm
SB 1927 wrote:Come on then, those complaining list what you're looking for in backroom staff. You wont have a clue.
Can you give me a review of, say Malky's background staff, where they were recruited from etc without a google search; unlikely.
I remember alot were waxing lyrical about Richard Shaw on here. Came in and seemingly changed zero.
Have a day off! Applying pressure to background staff is hilarious.
How long till we start critiquing the groundsmen???
Wed Jul 02, 2025 12:57 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:SB 1927 wrote:Come on then, those complaining list what you're looking for in backroom staff. You wont have a clue.
Can you give me a review of, say Malky's background staff, where they were recruited from etc without a google search; unlikely.
I remember alot were waxing lyrical about Richard Shaw on here. Came in and seemingly changed zero.
Have a day off! Applying pressure to background staff is hilarious.
How long till we start critiquing the groundsmen???
Spot on.
Wed Jul 02, 2025 2:45 pm
SB 1927 wrote:Come on then, those complaining list what you're looking for in backroom staff. You wont have a clue.
Can you give me a review of, say Malky's background staff, where they were recruited from etc without a google search; unlikely.
I remember alot were waxing lyrical about Richard Shaw on here. Came in and seemingly changed zero.
Have a day off! Applying pressure to background staff is hilarious.
How long till we start critiquing the groundsmen???
Wed Jul 02, 2025 2:47 pm