A forum for all things Cardiff City
Tue Jan 24, 2023 8:23 pm
he was a menace against defenders without doubt he saved us last season if he didnt score he assisted someway .
Remember playing Coventry and Morrison made a sub before half time and in fairness we would have lost that game but he brought hugill on and you could see the difference straight away.
We will end up signing a player who cannot score from Non league or no one at all but then as a player seeing how we are run Hugill thought Rotherham weas a better choice that is how low Tan has taking us
Tue Jan 24, 2023 8:26 pm
If you can't see Hugill improving this team then you are way off!! He was a nuisance, and made as many as he scored. He made clear cut chances, and an absolute grafter when pressing.
The fact that our relegation rivals are strengthening with some real quality and we're still dealing with a 2019 transfer is worrying. We are in big trouble.
Tue Jan 24, 2023 8:31 pm
Not a player at the club who can play back to goal, but the football fantasists believe we don't need one.....Plain crazy
Wed Jan 25, 2023 12:04 am
SB 1927 wrote:If you can't see Hugill improving this team then you are way off!! He was a nuisance, and made as many as he scored. He made clear cut chances, and an absolute grafter when pressing.
The fact that our relegation rivals are strengthening with some real quality and we're still dealing with a 2019 transfer is worrying. We are in big trouble.
Agree .
Wed Jan 25, 2023 9:34 am
Don't know how to put this but....
HE HAS GONE ELSEWHERE. MOVE ON.
any itk certain we even looked at him or has anyone stopped and thought before berating the club that Hugill's transfer demanded a fee and as others have pointed out we have an embargo which prevents us paying transfer fees.
Before anyone chips in with the " we wouldn't be under embargo if we had paid Nantes" I know.
Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:00 am
I would have loved to have Hugill back, would have made a big difference to our team.
We were in the running to get him, but as we could not pay any fee it was a no go.
Nothing to do with length of contract, but quite possible we could not pay a signing on fee or whatevever fee Norwich wanted!
Wed Jan 25, 2023 12:55 pm
JulesK wrote:Don't know how to put this but....
HE HAS GONE ELSEWHERE. MOVE ON.
any itk certain we even looked at him or has anyone stopped and thought before berating the club that Hugill's transfer demanded a fee and as others have pointed out we have an embargo which prevents us paying transfer fees.
Before anyone chips in with the " we wouldn't be under embargo if we had paid Nantes" I know.
In the running, or not; ability to afford, or not... we know that Hugill will strengthen one of our relegation rivals. Add that to a proven leader leaving us for the same club!
Wed Jan 25, 2023 1:15 pm
Forever Blue wrote:JulesK wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:I would have loved us to sign Hugill, however, I don't think we would have offered more than an 18mth contract.
Fair play Martin,
That I agree on.
But suddenly to others not good enough for this team

Not saying he ain't good enough in case you misunderstood but as far I can recall he wanted to go back to Norwich and fight for his place.
Anyway Annis as you know time is against us to get someone in so don't think we can pussyfoot about and hopefully the committee has a few names LMFAO.
Jules,
I though he did well for us.
I actually wasn’t including you in my comments.
In a serious note, I hope the Committee are not going to let us down.
I thought he was excellent for us. Hard worker, team player and held the ball up well.
Wed Jan 25, 2023 3:19 pm
well i can confirm, at 31 years old, several serious knee injuries and can't even hit the target when i pee. i've not been contacted by the club to play number 9. if anything changes, i shall be the first to let you know
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.