O/T - Can you now explain to me what a COVIDiot is?

Rishi Sunak is heavily invested in Moderna, many Yank politicians hold shares in Pfizer. I’ve been offered the booster (4th jab) but really don’t know if I want it or not. The way information has been suppressed, the lies told by big pharma and politicians and the blocking of anyone suggesting it came from a lab on social media point to something not being right about the whole shebang.

Had my 4h but that's it no more... lots of misinformation from every side of the equation... not sure it is nessasary so I believe
it is now a personal choice to have or not to have

I 've had every vaccine offered.T.B.Polio etc.
Yes it is a personal choice.
However, I wouldn't say it's a personal choice of NHS staff to treat patients whose illness could have been avoided by use of a vaccine.

Wont disagree with that was just saying not to have any more is a personal choice now.... i worked on frontline all through it and after main infection ended got it off an unvaccinated person with her child! Luckily only mildly for couple of days.... had more vaccinations in my working life than average that's for sure to keep me safe in my work.

Rishi Sunak is heavily invested in Moderna, many Yank politicians hold shares in Pfizer. I’ve been offered the booster (4th jab) but really don’t know if I want it or not. The way information has been suppressed, the lies told by big pharma and politicians and the blocking of anyone suggesting it came from a lab on social media point to something not being right about the whole shebang.

Had my 4h but that's it no more... lots of misinformation from every side of the equation... not sure it is nessasary so I believe
it is now a personal choice to have or not to have

I 've had every vaccine offered.T.B.Polio etc.
Yes it is a personal choice.
However, I wouldn't say it's a personal choice of NHS staff to treat patients whose illness could have been avoided by use of a vaccine.

Go on.Keep on having them.You'll only feel a little prick.


Wont disagree with that was just saying not to have any more is a personal choice now.... i worked on frontline all through it and after main infection ended got it off an unvaccinated person with her child! Luckily only mildly for couple of days.... had more vaccinations in my working life than average that's for sure to keep me safe in my work.

Rishi Sunak is heavily invested in Moderna, many Yank politicians hold shares in Pfizer. I’ve been offered the booster (4th jab) but really don’t know if I want it or not. The way information has been suppressed, the lies told by big pharma and politicians and the blocking of anyone suggesting it came from a lab on social media point to something not being right about the whole shebang.

Had my 4h but that's it no more... lots of misinformation from every side of the equation... not sure it is nessasary so I believe
it is now a personal choice to have or not to have

I 've had every vaccine offered.T.B.Polio etc.
Yes it is a personal choice.
However, I wouldn't say it's a personal choice of NHS staff to treat patients whose illness could have been avoided by use of a vaccine.

Go on.Keep on having them.You'll only feel a little prick.


Wont disagree with that was just saying not to have any more is a personal choice now.... i worked on frontline all through it and after main infection ended got it off an unvaccinated person with her child! Luckily only mildly for couple of days.... had more vaccinations in my working life than average that's for sure to keep me safe in my work.

Nahhh use to stick needles in people so know that they are not little pricks?
Besides I'm long retired so dont need any unless need for my travels..

Hope nobody minds me bumping this thread. To add to the excellent discussion, I have just read this very informative article by retired American Neurosurgeon, Russell Blaylock. I think lots contributing in this thread will find this article very interesting. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062939/

Hope nobody minds me bumping this thread. To add to the excellent discussion, I have just read this very informative article by retired American Neurosurgeon, Russell Blaylock. I think lots contributing in this thread will find this article very interesting. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062939/

No dont mind change is good as a rest!
basically what he is saying is the whole world should have just carried on and ignore a foney disease made up by world leaders to suppress the people and deprive them of their rights..... the millions who died did so from being poisoned by vaccines and not a made up disease?
people either died of covid or they died of the vaccines cannot have it both ways otherwise what he says cannot be true it's that simple

Hope nobody minds me bumping this thread. To add to the excellent discussion, I have just read this very informative article by retired American Neurosurgeon, Russell Blaylock. I think lots contributing in this thread will find this article very interesting. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062939/

No dont mind change is good as a rest!
basically what he is saying is the whole world should have just carried on and ignore a foney disease made up by world leaders to suppress the people and deprive them of their rights..... the millions who died did so from being poisoned by vaccines and not a made up disease?
people either died of covid or they died of the vaccines cannot have it both ways otherwise what he says cannot be true it's that simple

"It has been estimated, based on results by physicians treating the most covid patients successfully, that of the 800,000 people that we are told died from Covid, 640,000 could have not only been saved, but could have, in many cases, returned to their pre-infection health status had mandated early treatment with these proven methods been used. This neglect of early treatment constitutes mass murder.

That means 160,000 would have actually died, far less than the number dying at the hands of bureaucracies, medical associations and medical boards that refused to stand up for their patients. According to studies of early treatment of thousands of patients by brave, caring doctors, seventy-five to eighty percent of the deaths could have been prevented

Doesn't sound to me like he is saying the virus wasn't real.

Just that the response, which was driven by big pharma who made Billions, cost hundreds of thousands of lives in the US alone, because of the suppression of Hydroxy-chloroquine and Ivermectin both of which were out of patent so would have been very cheap and ultimately have proven to be effective.

There's not really anyone credible arguing the virus isn't real mate, just that the vaccines were more to do with greed than saving the world

Hope nobody minds me bumping this thread. To add to the excellent discussion, I have just read this very informative article by retired American Neurosurgeon, Russell Blaylock. I think lots contributing in this thread will find this article very interesting. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062939/

No dont mind change is good as a rest!
basically what he is saying is the whole world should have just carried on and ignore a foney disease made up by world leaders to suppress the people and deprive them of their rights..... the millions who died did so from being poisoned by vaccines and not a made up disease?
people either died of covid or they died of the vaccines cannot have it both ways otherwise what he says cannot be true it's that simple

"It has been estimated, based on results by physicians treating the most covid patients successfully, that of the 800,000 people that we are told died from Covid, 640,000 could have not only been saved, but could have, in many cases, returned to their pre-infection health status had mandated early treatment with these proven methods been used. This neglect of early treatment constitutes mass murder.

That means 160,000 would have actually died, far less than the number dying at the hands of bureaucracies, medical associations and medical boards that refused to stand up for their patients. According to studies of early treatment of thousands of patients by brave, caring doctors, seventy-five to eighty percent of the deaths could have been prevented

Doesn't sound to me like he is saying the virus wasn't real.

Just that the response, which was driven by big pharma who made Billions, cost hundreds of thousands of lives in the US alone, because of the suppression of Hydroxy-chloroquine and Ivermectin both of which were out of patent so would have been very cheap and ultimately have proven to be effective.

There's not really anyone credible arguing the virus isn't real mate, just that the vaccines were more to do with greed than saving the world

Everything to do with the pandemic was about money... I have said many times that people with vested interest kept pandemic going to make money some advisors were making millions just to open their mouths ...pharmaceutical companies same scientists same .... people saying we were manipulated ect ect to take vaccine are correct but as I've experienced and pointed out anti vaccinators did same by intimidation and false stories.... one side about money other side about their idiolgy (anti establishment)
and conspiracies...... as for the deaths who knows how many there would have been if no vaccine given, same for other established medications that were ignored would they have worked That depends on which scientist you believe? The only safe thing you can say is mass vaccination works that's how diseases are irradicated from countries or are they unnecessary and used just to make money for interested parties? Got a good pheory to end... many researchers into diseases say they are near to discovery of cure for something but it will take 5 to 10years to succeed but you never see it happen why because it's used to get more funding for research keeps them in job for life!