“ Steve Morison says theirs a leak in his camp “

If I was Morison I’d tell the coaches the team but tell each one just one different player in the team for the match. When the team is leaked it would point to the individual coach.

Apart from the mention in an earlier post that it could be a senior coach, there's nothing to back that up.
It's dangerous how one comment can escalate into wanting someone out of the club asap and that they may never work in football again.
We should just let the club carry out any necessary enquiry and see what comes of it.

Dropped player maybe

Apart from the mention in an earlier post that it could be a senior coach, there's nothing to back that up.
It's dangerous how one comment can escalate into wanting someone out of the club asap and that they may never work in football again.
We should just let the club carry out any necessary enquiry and see what comes of it.

Could even be one of the informants who continually give information to the people on this site, about peoples wages, signings, talks between Tan, Dalman, Choo and whoever is the manager. That needs to be sorted out as well.

Apart from the mention in an earlier post that it could be a senior coach, there's nothing to back that up.
It's dangerous how one comment can escalate into wanting someone out of the club asap and that they may never work in football again.
We should just let the club carry out any necessary enquiry and see what comes of it.

Could even be one of the informants who continually give information to the people on this site, about peoples wages, signings, talks between Tan, Dalman, Choo and whoever is the manager. That needs to be sorted out as well.

That point, of course has some merit; but I think there is a huge difference between droplets of information and the blatant dripping of (seemingly) 100% accurate team information that can/maybe impact any given game and disrupt the foundation of the club and squad from within

The 'stuff' that goes on this Forum is largely 'rumour' and/or 'gossip' based on snippets of information from many sources not always inside the club

Occasionally, it proves accurate, sometimes it's a mix, and sometimes it proves to be wrong

We are not infallible; we strive to get relevant and occasionally 'Off Topic' information out there to interested parties, i.e. those who choose to read or become members

I'm not one to criticise the reporter on this one; I believe he was simply 'doing his job' and it is better we know it has gone one, as it may well explain one certain result

Malicious or not? That is yet to be confirmed; but it is damaging and it needs to be stopped in the format that it is occurring from one or more 'inside' individuals

Of that, I hope we can agree?

Apart from the mention in an earlier post that it could be a senior coach, there's nothing to back that up.
It's dangerous how one comment can escalate into wanting someone out of the club asap and that they may never work in football again.
We should just let the club carry out any necessary enquiry and see what comes of it.

Could even be one of the informants who continually give information to the people on this site, about peoples wages, signings, talks between Tan, Dalman, Choo and whoever is the manager. That needs to be sorted out as well.

That point, of course has some merit; but I think there is a huge difference between droplets of information and the blatant dripping of (seemingly) 100% accurate team information that can/maybe impact any given game and disrupt the foundation of the club and squad from within

The 'stuff' that goes on this Forum is largely 'rumour' and/or 'gossip' based on snippets of information from many sources not always inside the club

Agree with you 100%, but wish that posters would say i heard a rumour and not say I have been told by a reliable source from within as some posts.

Occasionally, it proves accurate, sometimes it's a mix, and sometimes it proves to be wrong

We are not infallible; we strive to get relevant and occasionally 'Off Topic' information out there to interested parties, i.e. those who choose to read or become members

I'm not one to criticise the reporter on this one; I believe he was simply 'doing his job' and it is better we know it has gone one, as it may well explain one certain result

Malicious or not? That is yet to be confirmed; but it is damaging and it needs to be stopped in the format that it is occurring from one or more 'inside' individuals

Of that, I hope we can agree?