Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 5:08 pm

ReesWestonSuperMare wrote:"Sam wins? Then I hope we have seen the back of Tan and it will herald a Sam return. Not everyone's cup of tea, but you an be sure you'll want to go to games again whether we win,lose or draw. Also guaranteed we will be in the news for the right reasons, as we can start to look forward to exciting times."

I can see Dalman wacking Sam and chasing him out the stadium.

If Hammam wins and takes one foot inside the stadium of the club he financially tried to ruin - he will get lynched - no matter what body guards and security the little pipsqueak has hired to protect him.



He will get lynched :lol:

Sam walked to Reading Stadium from his car to watch Cardiff a few years ago and walked over a mile and was cheered and over 100 fans asked for photos etc.

You going to lynch you clown.

How old are you? 12

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 5:39 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
ReesWestonSuperMare wrote:"Sam wins? Then I hope we have seen the back of Tan and it will herald a Sam return. Not everyone's cup of tea, but you an be sure you'll want to go to games again whether we win,lose or draw. Also guaranteed we will be in the news for the right reasons, as we can start to look forward to exciting times."

I can see Dalman wacking Sam and chasing him out the stadium.

If Hammam wins and takes one foot inside the stadium of the club he financially tried to ruin - he will get lynched - no matter what body guards and security the little pipsqueak has hired to protect him.



He will get lynched :lol:

Sam walked to Reading Stadium from his car to watch Cardiff a few years ago and walked over a mile and was cheered and over 100 fans asked for photos etc.

You going to lynch you clown.

How old are you? 12


I recall sitting behind Sam when we played Forest Green pre season before our first venture into the Premier. Loads of young kids came up to him asking for his autograph.

This lynching really is fairy tale stuff.

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 5:59 pm

Bakedalasker wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
ReesWestonSuperMare wrote:"Sam wins? Then I hope we have seen the back of Tan and it will herald a Sam return. Not everyone's cup of tea, but you an be sure you'll want to go to games again whether we win,lose or draw. Also guaranteed we will be in the news for the right reasons, as we can start to look forward to exciting times."

I can see Dalman wacking Sam and chasing him out the stadium.

If Hammam wins and takes one foot inside the stadium of the club he financially tried to ruin - he will get lynched - no matter what body guards and security the little pipsqueak has hired to protect him.



He will get lynched :lol:

Sam walked to Reading Stadium from his car to watch Cardiff a few years ago and walked over a mile and was cheered and over 100 fans asked for photos etc.

You going to lynch you clown.

How old are you? 12


I recall sitting behind Sam when we played Forest Green pre season before our first venture into the Premier. Loads of young kids came up to him asking for his autograph.

This lynching really is fairy tale stuff.




Correct Ian.


This is Tans type of support,some of the the comments on here are worse than pathetic and make NO sense, they know as much about football as Tan does.

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 6:04 pm

Isaac trial started today ! Meaning there was no agreement out of court. Not surprised.

Tan has to be 1/10 to win this case, I honestly would be stunned and gobsmacked if Tan lost.

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 6:05 pm

It’s very weird none of Tans followers mention what Guy, Hall and Temme and of course the Riddler made out of our club and put nothing in it at all???

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 6:12 pm

I see it is amateur hour in the "fake news" and propaganda stakes again.

People talking about lynchings others using awful words like hate and detest.

Why are we all so wound up when rich people get angry about richer people outdoing them in the business stakes.

They are all as bad as each other, none of them care about the club, especially if they are changing history, threatening administration or piling debt on the club while suggesting they are our saviours.

You all just care too much about something that doesn't really know you exist except as a funding stream.

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 6:27 pm

Isaac in court today is accusing VT of 'vindictiveness' for diluting share values -

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 6:31 pm

Forever Blue wrote:It’s very weird none of Tans followers mention what Guy, Hall and Temme and of course the Riddler made out of our club and put nothing in it at all???
If it wasn't for guy and pmg we would of folded ,they kept the club afloat remember the egm where they gave the club 1.7 million for the land where the samd Martin is now ? ,basically Sam never had the money to build the stadium pmg did but nearly got caught short coz of the handling of the club from Ridsdale but who brought Ridsdale into the club ? It was Sam wasn't it ?

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 6:39 pm

Forever Blue wrote:Isaac in court today is accusing VT of 'vindictiveness' for diluting share values -


Is vindictiveness grounds for going to Court?

Isn't share dilution standard in public companies if someone ploughs in large amounts of money?

As you have said Annis, our shares are worth nothing now but we understand that prices can go up as well as down. Is Isaac just bitter?

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 6:41 pm

Wayne S wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:Isaac in court today is accusing VT of 'vindictiveness' for diluting share values -


Is vindictiveness grounds for going to Court?

Isn't share dilution standard in public companies if someone ploughs in large amounts of money?

As you have said Annis, our shares are worth nothing now but we understand that prices can go up as well as down. Is Isaac just bitter?

Looks that way ,Isaacs should of taken the money like the rest did at the time .ie Borley and pmg

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 6:47 pm

Wayne S wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:Isaac in court today is accusing VT of 'vindictiveness' for diluting share values -


Is vindictiveness grounds for going to Court?

Isn't share dilution standard in public companies if someone ploughs in large amounts of money?

As you have said Annis, our shares are worth nothing now but we understand that prices can go up as well as down. Is Isaac just bitter?



Wayne,

It is standard.

And I can’t see how Isaac can win, unless he pulls a miracle out and something corrupt???

Isaac must have money to waste.


As I said if he wins, I will be absolutely gobsmacked.

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 6:50 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
Wayne S wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:Isaac in court today is accusing VT of 'vindictiveness' for diluting share values -


Is vindictiveness grounds for going to Court?

Isn't share dilution standard in public companies if someone ploughs in large amounts of money?

As you have said Annis, our shares are worth nothing now but we understand that prices can go up as well as down. Is Isaac just bitter?



Wayne,

It is standard.

And I can’t see how Isaac can win, unless he pulls a miracle out and something corrupt???

Isaac must have money to waste.


As I said if he wins, I will be absolutely gobsmacked.
It's normal standard practice that the more finance raised by way of a share issue to new shares then ,other shares get diluted. He aint got a leg to stand on .

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 6:54 pm

wez1927 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Wayne S wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:Isaac in court today is accusing VT of 'vindictiveness' for diluting share values -


Is vindictiveness grounds for going to Court?

Isn't share dilution standard in public companies if someone ploughs in large amounts of money?

As you have said Annis, our shares are worth nothing now but we understand that prices can go up as well as down. Is Isaac just bitter?



Wayne,

It is standard.

And I can’t see how Isaac can win, unless he pulls a miracle out and something corrupt???

Isaac must have money to waste.


As I said if he wins, I will be absolutely gobsmacked.
It's normal standard practice that the more finance raised by way of a share issue to new shares then ,other shares get diluted. He aint got a leg to stand on .



Correct Wez.

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 7:06 pm

Forever Blue wrote:It’s very weird none of Tans followers mention what Guy, Hall and Temme and of course the Riddler made out of our club and put nothing in it at all???


Who doesn’t? Define Tan’s followers?

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 7:07 pm

maccydee wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:It’s very weird none of Tans followers mention what Guy, Hall and Temme and of course the Riddler made out of our club and put nothing in it at all???


Who doesn’t? Define Tan’s followers?



Tans best mate is back

:lol: :lol:

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 7:09 pm

ReesWestonSuperMare wrote:"Sam wins? Then I hope we have seen the back of Tan and it will herald a Sam return. Not everyone's cup of tea, but you an be sure you'll want to go to games again whether we win,lose or draw. Also guaranteed we will be in the news for the right reasons, as we can start to look forward to exciting times."

I can see Dalman wacking Sam and chasing him out the stadium.

If Hammam wins and takes one foot inside the stadium of the club he financially tried to ruin - he will get lynched - no matter what body guards and security the little pipsqueak has hired to protect him.


Lynched by who?

He won’t need body guards or security. There will be plenty of Cardiff fans willing to help him.

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 7:17 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
maccydee wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:It’s very weird none of Tans followers mention what Guy, Hall and Temme and of course the Riddler made out of our club and put nothing in it at all???


Who doesn’t? Define Tan’s followers?



Tans best mate is back

:lol: :lol:


Hardly but if you are tarring me with that (which you normally do) then you are making stuff up again as I have mentioned what PMG have done to our club many times.

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 7:21 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
Bakedalasker wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
ReesWestonSuperMare wrote:"Sam wins? Then I hope we have seen the back of Tan and it will herald a Sam return. Not everyone's cup of tea, but you an be sure you'll want to go to games again whether we win,lose or draw. Also guaranteed we will be in the news for the right reasons, as we can start to look forward to exciting times."

I can see Dalman wacking Sam and chasing him out the stadium.

If Hammam wins and takes one foot inside the stadium of the club he financially tried to ruin - he will get lynched - no matter what body guards and security the little pipsqueak has hired to protect him.



He will get lynched :lol:

Sam walked to Reading Stadium from his car to watch Cardiff a few years ago and walked over a mile and was cheered and over 100 fans asked for photos etc.

You going to lynch you clown.

How old are you? 12


I recall sitting behind Sam when we played Forest Green pre season before our first venture into the Premier. Loads of young kids came up to him asking for his autograph.

This lynching really is fairy tale stuff.




Correct Ian.


This is Tans type of support,some of the the comments on here are worse than pathetic and make NO sense, they know as much about football as Tan does.


Don’t attribute him to being a Tan supporter. He is anti Sam for sure but not a Tan supporter.

Another post mentions attendances.

The year after we finished 16th in the championship we had an average attendance of 11000 which is practically half full stadium.

Re: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 7:23 pm

Ninian27 wrote:Me personally am sick and tired of court case, court case costing our club millions and never getting resolved after all these years, we must have a problem at board level


Absolute parrot.

Does Annis control you with strings or a stick up your arse?

Re: UPDATED: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 7:29 pm

Maccydee is off again :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: UPDATED: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 7:35 pm

Sorry i have read the posts but still have no idea how we get to Sam owning the club ?

Age and time has diminished my memory. Didn't Sam leave through the side door over 15 years ago after mis managing the clubs finance and sold it to a right chancer. He also sold a tearful Kav or was that the riddler ?

I don't give a rats arse who owns us, but would it be safe to say dungeon to championship was as far as Sam could take us ? We have been to the premier league twice and a cup under Tan.

I get this is personal and not rationale for many.

Re: UPDATED: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 7:37 pm

llan bluebird wrote:Sorry i have read the posts but still have no idea how we get to Sam owning the club ?

Age and time has diminished my memory. Didn't Sam leave through the side door over 15 years ago after mis managing the clubs finance and sold it to a right chancer. He also sold a tearful Kav or was that the riddler ?

I don't give a rats arse who owns us, but would it be safe to say dungeon to championship was as far as Sam could take us ? We have been to the premier league twice and a cup under Tan.

I get this is personal and not rationale for many.





It’s been twisted once again in to a Sam debate as usual.

It was supposed to be about the 3 u and coming court cases.

Re: UPDATED: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 7:55 pm

The Tan Sam debate has been done to death. Same posters saying the same shit over and over again. It's killing this forum.

Re: UPDATED: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 7:57 pm

City slicker27 wrote:The Tan Sam debate has been done to death. Same posters saying the same shit over and over again. It's killing this forum.



I was just putting out the next three court cases.


As usual it’s been twisted.

I agree it’s just repeating.

But this Court case started today Isaac and Tan.

Re: UPDATED: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 8:00 pm

I would just like to stick to how these court cases will go etc

Re: UPDATED: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 8:12 pm

Forever Blue wrote:I would just like to stick to how these court cases will go etc


You're not alone in that.

Re: UPDATED: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 8:13 pm

Welshman in CA wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:I would just like to stick to how these court cases will go etc


You're not alone in that.



Cheers.

Re: UPDATED: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 8:42 pm

City slicker27 wrote:The Tan Sam debate has been done to death. Same posters saying the same shit over and over again. It's killing this forum.

Bang on ,

Re: UPDATED: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 8:59 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
City slicker27 wrote:The Tan Sam debate has been done to death. Same posters saying the same shit over and over again. It's killing this forum.



I was just putting out the next three court cases.


As usual it’s been twisted.

I agree it’s just repeating.

But this Court case started today Isaac and Tan.


Barclay brought up Sam taking over.

It went from there.

Someone mentioned Sam getting Lynched. You said Tan supporters.

You push it that way Annis. Constantly.

Re: UPDATED: ‘ Vincent Tan v Michael Isaac ‘

Mon Feb 14, 2022 9:31 pm

I've suggested that the outcome of the case will have a bearing on the next few years as a Cardiff fan, and gave two particular scenarios.

Now, my point about the fact that the outcome will have such a bearing could have become the topic of debate, but it has been decided by a few that the part of my response that you wanted to debate was the point I raised about Sam.

Anyone was perfectly entitled to say that this court case, once sorted can have a positive effect either way and back up their theory. A few did, and a few took the thread down a different route.