Wed Dec 15, 2021 3:10 pm
ThomasC wrote:nubbsy wrote:Death by starvation in a dark, padded room seems fair.
People have to rem to pay the TV license somehow
Wed Dec 15, 2021 4:05 pm
nubbsy wrote:ThomasC wrote:nubbsy wrote:Death by starvation in a dark, padded room seems fair.
People have to rem to pay the TV license somehow
Are you suggestion we live stream the starvation on TV? I like this idea.
Wed Dec 15, 2021 11:07 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:piledriver64 wrote:It's hard not to want capital punishment for these child killers.
However, a note of caution.
In the last 20+ years there have been a large number of parents in the UK (and around the world) convicted for the murder of their children by "Shaken Baby Syndrome". This was as a result of flawed medical advice to courts and some maverick doctors who decided they could make a name for themselves.
If we had capital punishment those parents would have been executed before the evidence was unearthed that this medial "opinion" was completely flawed and they were exonerated.
That alone should be enough for people to have doubts about the reliability of capital punishment, despite how feel about some of these monsters, natural though that reaction may be for all of us.
Of serial killers, etc., are a different kettle of fish but we have to be so careful on this subject because once the sentence is carried out there is no coming back !!
That in a nutshell is why I am against CP.
Our justice system is far from perfect and it does not give us the Right to play God. The argument the comes back why should we pay for them to live. Well we can make these guys do hard labour or some other work to pay their way. If they are proved innocent later then they can claim for the work they were forced to do. To be I'm comfortable with this.
Wed Dec 15, 2021 11:11 pm
Thu Dec 16, 2021 8:35 am
rumpo kid wrote:Yes, I’d also drag in the social workers who are complicit. They should be be charged likewise.
Thu Dec 16, 2021 2:10 pm
Thu Dec 16, 2021 2:32 pm
mjw6150 wrote:If you have it, it should only be for most serious and heinous crimes and would need a 100% certainty of guilt as well. No 'beyond reasonable doubt' you would have to prove beyond any doubt whatsoever they were guilty.
Thu Dec 16, 2021 6:11 pm