' The £200,000 Max Watters' absence explained '

Hopefully the lad will get a start or play a part tomorrow for the U23's v Charlton ( K.O. 2.00 pm ) .

How anyone can say they have their doubts is odd. None of us have really seen him play, so your all just assuming he's crap cos MM hasn't put him on.
Vs QPR he played 20mins in around 6 weeks before signing for us and Harris throwing him in the deep end.
MM isn't gonna throw him in when he had to win games to keep us out of the relegation fight and en to keep us in playoff hunt, can't see many fringe players getting much game time due to the chances of playoffs.

Hopefully he makes the impact in 23s game and get more game time, as I don't see Mark Harris being the answer just cos he runs around bit more

We can all have our opinions and surely that’s what this forum is for, not a dictatorship and yes I do have my doubts if that’s alright with you.
So your saying we are not allowed our opinions or doubts??

To be fair he was just saying how can anyone have doubts about the lad at the moment when we haven't really seen him in action very much.
Of course this forum is all about opinions but it seems that every time someone has a different opinion to you, you say things like "so you're saying we are not allowed our opinions".
Just because someone has a different opinion to you they are not saying that you ,or anyone else, is not allowed an opinion. Chill mun

No he never, he said. “How can anyone have their doubts.”

Well of course we can going by his past or what we’ve heard in trying etc etc

He was stating we can’t have an opinion, when we can and that’s how life should be and that’s what makes football a forum great debates

I have NO respect for a person when he stops you having your say, even if it’s diffent , you should be allowed it and respected for it and just give your view why yours is different

He must be your mate as your clambering over everyone’s posts to stick up for him

No he's not my mate, actually. I haven't got a clue who he is. And I'm not clambering over everyone's posts to stick up for him...I posted twice as far as I remember. I did it because I have my own opinion, which obviously I am entitled to express...and it's my opinion that the guy was not trying to shut down anyone else's opinion, he was simply saying that he finds it odd that anyone can have their doubts about Watters based on such little evidence. It seems a reasonable point of view which people are entitled to discuss, but I don't see anything in his post that in any way tries to shut down the debate.
Watters might turn out to be great. He might turn out to be terrible. Or he could turn out to be somewhere in between. Based on the little we've seen of him it's difficult to be sure.

How anyone can say they have their doubts is odd. None of us have really seen him play, so your all just assuming he's crap cos MM hasn't put him on.
Vs QPR he played 20mins in around 6 weeks before signing for us and Harris throwing him in the deep end.
MM isn't gonna throw him in when he had to win games to keep us out of the relegation fight and en to keep us in playoff hunt, can't see many fringe players getting much game time due to the chances of playoffs.

Hopefully he makes the impact in 23s game and get more game time, as I don't see Mark Harris being the answer just cos he runs around bit more

We can all have our opinions and surely that’s what this forum is for, not a dictatorship and yes I do have my doubts if that’s alright with you.
So your saying we are not allowed our opinions or doubts??

To be fair he was just saying how can anyone have doubts about the lad at the moment when we haven't really seen him in action very much.
Of course this forum is all about opinions but it seems that every time someone has a different opinion to you, you say things like "so you're saying we are not allowed our opinions".
Just because someone has a different opinion to you they are not saying that you ,or anyone else, is not allowed an opinion. Chill mun

No he never, he said. “How can anyone have their doubts.”

Well of course we can going by his past or what we’ve heard in trying etc etc

He was stating we can’t have an opinion, when we can and that’s how life should be and that’s what makes football a forum great debates

I have NO respect for a person when he stops you having your say, even if it’s diffent , you should be allowed it and respected for it and just give your view why yours is different

He must be your mate as your clambering over everyone’s posts to stick up for him

No he's not my mate, actually. I haven't got a clue who he is. And I'm not clambering over everyone's posts to stick up for him...I posted twice as far as I remember. I did it because I have my own opinion, which obviously I am entitled to express...and it's my opinion that the guy was not trying to shut down anyone else's opinion, he was simply saying that he finds it odd that anyone can have their doubts about Watters based on such little evidence. It seems a reasonable point of view which people are entitled to discuss, but I don't see anything in his post that in any way tries to shut down the debate.
Watters might turn out to be great. He might turn out to be terrible. Or he could turn out to be somewhere in between. Based on the little we've seen of him it's difficult to be sure.

Your opinion is totally Respected

How anyone can say they have their doubts is odd. None of us have really seen him play, so your all just assuming he's crap cos MM hasn't put him on.
Vs QPR he played 20mins in around 6 weeks before signing for us and Harris throwing him in the deep end.
MM isn't gonna throw him in when he had to win games to keep us out of the relegation fight and en to keep us in playoff hunt, can't see many fringe players getting much game time due to the chances of playoffs.

Hopefully he makes the impact in 23s game and get more game time, as I don't see Mark Harris being the answer just cos he runs around bit more

We can all have our opinions and surely that’s what this forum is for, not a dictatorship and yes I do have my doubts if that’s alright with you.
So your saying we are not allowed our opinions or doubts??

To be fair he was just saying how can anyone have doubts about the lad at the moment when we haven't really seen him in action very much.
Of course this forum is all about opinions but it seems that every time someone has a different opinion to you, you say things like "so you're saying we are not allowed our opinions".
Just because someone has a different opinion to you they are not saying that you ,or anyone else, is not allowed an opinion. Chill mun

No he never, he said. “How can anyone have their doubts.”

Well of course we can going by his past or what we’ve heard in trying etc etc

He was stating we can’t have an opinion, when we can and that’s how life should be and that’s what makes football a forum great debates

I have NO respect for a person when he stops you having your say, even if it’s diffent , you should be allowed it and respected for it and just give your view why yours is different

He must be your mate as your clambering over everyone’s posts to stick up for him

No he's not my mate, actually. I haven't got a clue who he is. And I'm not clambering over everyone's posts to stick up for him...I posted twice as far as I remember. I did it because I have my own opinion, which obviously I am entitled to express...and it's my opinion that the guy was not trying to shut down anyone else's opinion, he was simply saying that he finds it odd that anyone can have their doubts about Watters based on such little evidence. It seems a reasonable point of view which people are entitled to discuss, but I don't see anything in his post that in any way tries to shut down the debate.
Watters might turn out to be great. He might turn out to be terrible. Or he could turn out to be somewhere in between. Based on the little we've seen of him it's difficult to be sure.

Your opinion is totally Respected

And yours too. It's good to have healthy debate, which it normally is on here. Can get a bit lively though.