' Mick McCarthy addresses Robert Glatzel exit '

Have also just gone over these threads,and bc didnt answer you at all,its an empty bubble with nothing written!! Check please thomas,I replied with the line regards your ego,I suggest specsavers need to see you!!

I really can't be assed dealing with this crap

It is obvious to see that it was posted under HIS name NOT yours and is still on the thread. OPEN you're eyes . Whether that was the forum messing up or not I really couldn't care less.
Why are you so angry ?
There are loads of good help groups online for anger issues . Do you want me to send you some links ?

I really can't be assed dealing with this crap

It is obvious to see that it was posted under HIS name NOT yours and is still on the thread. OPEN you're eyes . Whether that was the forum messing up or not I really couldn't care less.
Why are you so angry ?
There are loads of good help groups online for anger issues . Do you want me to send you some links ?

Well at least you admit it could be a cock up,I've pm'd this bccb myself.if you look through from page one,you will CLEARLY see I had posted that post,word for word,earlier than the one you are referring to!! You really are the angry one mate,because you are WRING in your conspiracy bollocks,you are now on ignore,I've had enough nonsense from you.you sad individual you.

Got there in the end; one of the posters in the thread that set 'thomasblue' off on a path of confrontation accidentally deleted the [quote/] box from the response, which gave the impression that two comments came from 'BC-CB'

The first part came from 'bluesince62' and ONLY the second part came from BC-CB

I have corrected the error and a trip back to the appropriate post will show the correct formation, i.e. who said what

Too much to expect an apology from 'thomasblue' who feels he owes no one anything of the sort, which is a shame as he got it wrong big time...

Got there in the end; one of the posters in the thread that set 'thomasblue' off on a path of confrontation accidentally deleted the [quote/] box from the response, which gave the impression that two comments came from 'BC-CB'

The first part came from 'bluesince62' and ONLY the second part came from BC-CB

I have corrected the error and a trip back to the appropriate post will show the correct formation, i.e. who said what

Too much to expect an apology from 'thomasblue' who feels he owes no one anything of the sort, which is a shame as he got it wrong big time...

I owe no apology
All I said was he might have been using more than 1 user name.

Thats not abusive or offensive and I won't apologise for it. If that worries him in life then I feel sorry for him. He should be apologising to me for the abuse and name calling.

I won't be replying to this rubbish anymore

Got there in the end; one of the posters in the thread that set 'thomasblue' off on a path of confrontation accidentally deleted the [quote/] box from the response, which gave the impression that two comments came from 'BC-CB'

The first part came from 'bluesince62' and ONLY the second part came from BC-CB

I have corrected the error and a trip back to the appropriate post will show the correct formation, i.e. who said what

Too much to expect an apology from 'thomasblue' who feels he owes no one anything of the sort, which is a shame as he got it wrong big time...

I owe no apology
All I said was he might have been using more than 1 user name.

Thats not abusive or offensive and I won't apologise for it. If that worries him in life then I feel sorry for him. He should be apologising to me for the abuse and name calling.

I won't be replying to this rubbish anymore

On a last note

Why are you not calling Blue since 62 out on this thread for swearing and calling people names ?

Actually being abusive and breaking forum rules ?

Stop the double standards

Got there in the end; one of the posters in the thread that set 'thomasblue' off on a path of confrontation accidentally deleted the [quote/] box from the response, which gave the impression that two comments came from 'BC-CB'

The first part came from 'bluesince62' and ONLY the second part came from BC-CB

I have corrected the error and a trip back to the appropriate post will show the correct formation, i.e. who said what

Too much to expect an apology from 'thomasblue' who feels he owes no one anything of the sort, which is a shame as he got it wrong big time...

Thanks sven,although I suspect the two posts above(on ignore)continue his usual crap, Of how he is right,and everyone else is wrong on things,my fault partly,for not backing down on his accusation of being a multi,with the line of "ahh at least two usernames" apologies if I offended anyone,should have just put him on ignore as soon as he threw that line out there!

Got there in the end; one of the posters in the thread that set 'thomasblue' off on a path of confrontation accidentally deleted the [quote/] box from the response, which gave the impression that two comments came from 'BC-CB'

The first part came from 'bluesince62' and ONLY the second part came from BC-CB

I have corrected the error and a trip back to the appropriate post will show the correct formation, i.e. who said what

Too much to expect an apology from 'thomasblue' who feels he owes no one anything of the sort, which is a shame as he got it wrong big time...

I owe no apology
All I said was he might have been using more than 1 user name.

Thats not abusive or offensive and I won't apologise for it. If that worries him in life then I feel sorry for him. He should be apologising to me for the abuse and name calling.

I won't be replying to this rubbish anymore

Go back again thomas!! You did NOT say I MIGHT of been using at least two usernames at all, you said "ahh,at least two usernames" then went in to accuse me of using these "supposed" names to back MY opinion on glatzel !! I pm'd you,you ignored it??
And here you are: I apologise for calling you names,as for any so called abuse? You deserved it!!
Dont make FALSE accusations if you dont want to be offended by being called out for it,simple really.

I wont expect one back(apology) but just want to show others,im man enough to give you one for upsetting you through swearing and calling you,what I believe to be mild names.

Got there in the end; one of the posters in the thread that set 'thomasblue' off on a path of confrontation accidentally deleted the [quote/] box from the response, which gave the impression that two comments came from 'BC-CB'

The first part came from 'bluesince62' and ONLY the second part came from BC-CB

I have corrected the error and a trip back to the appropriate post will show the correct formation, i.e. who said what

Too much to expect an apology from 'thomasblue' who feels he owes no one anything of the sort, which is a shame as he got it wrong big time...

I owe no apology
All I said was he might have been using more than 1 user name.

Thats not abusive or offensive and I won't apologise for it. If that worries him in life then I feel sorry for him. He should be apologising to me for the abuse and name calling.

I won't be replying to this rubbish anymore

Go back again thomas!! You did NOT say I MIGHT of been using at least two usernames at all, you said "ahh,at least two usernames" then went in to accuse me of using these "supposed" names to back MY opinion on glatzel !! I pm'd you,you ignored it??
And here you are: I apologise for calling you names,as for any so called abuse? You deserved it!!
Dont make FALSE accusations if you dont want to be offended by being called out for it,simple really.

I wont expect one back(apology) but just want to show others,im man enough to give you one for upsetting you through swearing and calling you,what I believe to be mild names.

If you were offended by my comment then I apologise, It was clear now a mistake on the page which made it look like you replying under a different name.

I didnt deserve anything its a forum where people discuss football topics without the need for name calling.

Get the Mods to delete this thread and we can all move on and we won't bother discussing each others posts which is a shame because you make some good points a lot of the time I just don't agree on Glatzel

Got there in the end; one of the posters in the thread that set 'thomasblue' off on a path of confrontation accidentally deleted the [quote/] box from the response, which gave the impression that two comments came from 'BC-CB'

The first part came from 'bluesince62' and ONLY the second part came from BC-CB

I have corrected the error and a trip back to the appropriate post will show the correct formation, i.e. who said what

Too much to expect an apology from 'thomasblue' who feels he owes no one anything of the sort, which is a shame as he got it wrong big time...

I owe no apology
All I said was he might have been using more than 1 user name.

Thats not abusive or offensive and I won't apologise for it. If that worries him in life then I feel sorry for him. He should be apologising to me for the abuse and name calling.

I won't be replying to this rubbish anymore

Go back again thomas!! You did NOT say I MIGHT of been using at least two usernames at all, you said "ahh,at least two usernames" then went in to accuse me of using these "supposed" names to back MY opinion on glatzel !! I pm'd you,you ignored it??
And here you are: I apologise for calling you names,as for any so called abuse? You deserved it!!
Dont make FALSE accusations if you dont want to be offended by being called out for it,simple really.

I wont expect one back(apology) but just want to show others,im man enough to give you one for upsetting you through swearing and calling you,what I believe to be mild names.

If you were offended by my comment then I apologise, It was clear now a mistake on the page which made it look like you replying under a different name.

I didnt deserve anything its a forum where people discuss football topics without the need for name calling.

Get the Mods to delete this thread and we can all move on and we won't bother discussing each others posts which is a shame because you make some good points a lot of the time I just don't agree on Glatzel

Fair enough thomas,apology accepted.lets just agree to disagree re glatzel,and move on.
Its been cleared up now,I am just bluesince62.
I was offended,as its one thing I find frustrating, when someone believes they need more than one voice(roathy) to back themselves in a debate,very odd behaviour.
No need to delete thread,tbf to the op.other people may want to add to the topic.

Got there in the end; one of the posters in the thread that set 'thomasblue' off on a path of confrontation accidentally deleted the [quote/] box from the response, which gave the impression that two comments came from 'BC-CB'

The first part came from 'bluesince62' and ONLY the second part came from BC-CB

I have corrected the error and a trip back to the appropriate post will show the correct formation, i.e. who said what

Too much to expect an apology from 'thomasblue' who feels he owes no one anything of the sort, which is a shame as he got it wrong big time...

I owe no apology
All I said was he might have been using more than 1 user name.

Thats not abusive or offensive and I won't apologise for it. If that worries him in life then I feel sorry for him. He should be apologising to me for the abuse and name calling.

I won't be replying to this rubbish anymore

Go back again thomas!! You did NOT say I MIGHT of been using at least two usernames at all, you said "ahh,at least two usernames" then went in to accuse me of using these "supposed" names to back MY opinion on glatzel !! I pm'd you,you ignored it??
And here you are: I apologise for calling you names,as for any so called abuse? You deserved it!!
Dont make FALSE accusations if you dont want to be offended by being called out for it,simple really.

I wont expect one back(apology) but just want to show others,im man enough to give you one for upsetting you through swearing and calling you,what I believe to be mild names.

If you were offended by my comment then I apologise, It was clear now a mistake on the page which made it look like you replying under a different name.

I didnt deserve anything its a forum where people discuss football topics without the need for name calling.

Get the Mods to delete this thread and we can all move on and we won't bother discussing each others posts which is a shame because you make some good points a lot of the time I just don't agree on Glatzel

Finally, an apology

It took a while but is all that was needed. Hopefully everyone can move on with a couple of lessons learned...

Got there in the end; one of the posters in the thread that set 'thomasblue' off on a path of confrontation accidentally deleted the [quote/] box from the response, which gave the impression that two comments came from 'BC-CB'

The first part came from 'bluesince62' and ONLY the second part came from BC-CB

I have corrected the error and a trip back to the appropriate post will show the correct formation, i.e. who said what

Too much to expect an apology from 'thomasblue' who feels he owes no one anything of the sort, which is a shame as he got it wrong big time...

I owe no apology
All I said was he might have been using more than 1 user name.

Thats not abusive or offensive and I won't apologise for it. If that worries him in life then I feel sorry for him. He should be apologising to me for the abuse and name calling.

I won't be replying to this rubbish anymore

Go back again thomas!! You did NOT say I MIGHT of been using at least two usernames at all, you said "ahh,at least two usernames" then went in to accuse me of using these "supposed" names to back MY opinion on glatzel !! I pm'd you,you ignored it??
And here you are: I apologise for calling you names,as for any so called abuse? You deserved it!!
Dont make FALSE accusations if you dont want to be offended by being called out for it,simple really.

I wont expect one back(apology) but just want to show others,im man enough to give you one for upsetting you through swearing and calling you,what I believe to be mild names.

If you were offended by my comment then I apologise, It was clear now a mistake on the page which made it look like you replying under a different name.

I didnt deserve anything its a forum where people discuss football topics without the need for name calling.

Get the Mods to delete this thread and we can all move on and we won't bother discussing each others posts which is a shame because you make some good points a lot of the time I just don't agree on Glatzel

Finally, an apology

It took a while but is all that was needed. Hopefully everyone can move on with a couple of lessons learned...

Agreed