Wed Nov 18, 2020 2:06 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:goats wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:And as I understand they have dispensed with liability in case of these vaccines being unsafe. Many of you on here was to young when they told pregnant women that Thalidomide was a very safe drug and look what happened there.
There are reasons why it takes around 6 years to produce and test a vaccine and speeding it up and cutting red tape is laughable.
But after a couple of months please tell me how the living hell can they say to what percentage it is effective ? They can’t and you have got to be f*cking brainwashed or frightened enough to believe such a claim.
Agree with a poster that those saying that 5g chips inserted in this vaccine does not help at all that is madness. But the talk of mandatory vaccination or blackmail ie travel and restrictions would not be needed if this vaccine had gone through the stringent testing that it should. And talk of censoring those that question it is also very dangerous.
Those that wish to take it then Cary on but would you willingly have your own children vaccinated ?
For me to many people would believe anything if they said it would control this so say pandemic.
Pity they can’t find a vaccination against dementia and cancer etc isn’t it ? Wakey wakey
Sweet Jesus.....I don’t know where to begin with this. It isn’t the 1970’s and medical science has come a long way since we electrocuted people or cut out part of the frontal lobe of the brain for with depression. Computer tech makes analysis of the virus and how to counter it, aswell as new drugs far far quicker than it used to, this is one if the biggest factors in reducing the time to bring a new drug into the public domain. We don’t need to wait 5 years to see if it works. Why should we? We have lots of new cancer treatments we didn’t have 10 years ago, 25 years ago we hardly had any! Dementia is one of the trickiest as we still don’t understand half of what the brain does.
Come in nukes you’ll be saying the yanks took down the twin towers next
They didSo what are the Cancer treatments since the 80s ?
Wed Nov 18, 2020 4:39 pm
skidemin wrote:Bluebina wrote:skidemin wrote:goats wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:And as I understand they have dispensed with liability in case of these vaccines being unsafe. Many of you on here was to young when they told pregnant women that Thalidomide was a very safe drug and look what happened there.
There are reasons why it takes around 6 years to produce and test a vaccine and speeding it up and cutting red tape is laughable.
But after a couple of months please tell me how the living hell can they say to what percentage it is effective ? They can’t and you have got to be f*cking brainwashed or frightened enough to believe such a claim.
Agree with a poster that those saying that 5g chips inserted in this vaccine does not help at all that is madness. But the talk of mandatory vaccination or blackmail ie travel and restrictions would not be needed if this vaccine had gone through the stringent testing that it should. And talk of censoring those that question it is also very dangerous.
Those that wish to take it then Cary on but would you willingly have your own children vaccinated ?
For me to many people would believe anything if they said it would control this so say pandemic.
Pity they can’t find a vaccination against dementia and cancer etc isn’t it ? Wakey wakey
Sweet Jesus.....I don’t know where to begin with this. It isn’t the 1970’s and medical science has come a long way since we electrocuted people or cut out part of the frontal lobe of the brain for with depression. Computer tech makes analysis of the virus and how to counter it, aswell as new drugs far far quicker than it used to, this is one if the biggest factors in reducing the time to bring a new drug into the public domain. We don’t need to wait 5 years to see if it works. Why should we? We have lots of new cancer treatments we didn’t have 10 years ago, 25 years ago we hardly had any! Dementia is one of the trickiest as we still don’t understand half of what the brain does.
Come in nukes you’ll be saying the yanks took down the twin towers next
indeed....teams all over the world are tasked with making a vaccine.... abracadabra 6 months later each different team has not only developed one that works, but they are all different, and all have incredibly high effectiveness....
its a virus and a vaccine for christ sakes..not a TV show where 10 teams race to make a raft out of twigs and then negotiate a pond...
You were saying it's like the flu and a vaccine would take either take years or never happen and that we should all carry on as if nothing had happened a few weeks ago, I told you it wouldn't take long as all the best brains in the world were working on this vaccine as it is a global problem. Of course the results were going to come close together as they started at the same time and it looks like it took about ten months to crack!
yes its so obvious that your going to get different vaccines that all work incredibly well at all the same timebecause they started at the same time.. how there is any illness or death on this planet is truly a mystery..
Wed Nov 18, 2020 7:04 pm
skidemin wrote:Bluebina wrote:Great news after the Pfizer vaccine news last week, all we need now is to get the message across to the people who are still concerned, these are real game-changers, 11 vaccine's in final trials now![]()
![]()
![]()
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-54902908
my only concern is for those buying into something that would normally take them a nano second to reject...
90% then Russia have one thats 92% , now the next one is 95% , chances are by the end of the week its going to top a 100 %.. and remarkably all these vaccines are coming to fruit one after another in a relatively short period of time.... bit like the twighlight zone...
pushing the percentage is actually making it look more sus not less....