Wed Aug 19, 2020 6:00 pm
Igovernor wrote:I have to disagree with many points Nukes.
When you say people have a 99.9% chance of surviving, not sure where you got this info from try telling that to the families of the 40,000+ that have died
There is a big difference between not wearing a mask for influenza and pneumonia
(most likely cause of catching Pneumonia is bacteria and viruses living in your nose, sinuses, or mouth and spreading to your lungs) and there are vaccines for Influenza and pneumonia. For Covid19 there is none, and I believe that it will be many years before there is one that is effective and side effects free.
Do you honestly think that a healthy diet, vitamins, being happy, keep your immune system high, being happy may keep you mind healthy, and a healthy diet helps if you do catch Covid19 but it certainly does not prevent you catching Covid19.
Wed Aug 19, 2020 6:08 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:I wonder how many commenting on here has had a loved one perish from Covid.
Wed Aug 19, 2020 6:15 pm
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:Posted a week or so ago about the Covid and the attack on our lives by the cynical bastards that run the world.
There is a view that climate emergency didn't create the moral panic that was needed so they've gone all in on Covid panic, hoping to use this to push through societal change they desire (and screw Trump in the process). They'll go back to climate when it suits the agenda.
Not my work but the signs of a stitch-up are clear when Blair gets involved:
‘There's this from the "Tony Blair Institute for Global Change" (They could have come up with a less evil dystopian name)
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/0 ... hr#comment
That is so, so worrying, but not at all surprising. This is why people should start to question what ours, and other governments are doing - the consequences of neglecting to do so could be dire. The globalists will win - only of we let them.
Digital 'coronavirus-status passports' could be used to scrap blanket lockdown measures and free up vast swathes of the economy, a new report, backed by former Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt, has urged.
Under the proposals, people would be tested as often as every two weeks for coronavirus and keep their results in a app on their phone.
Passport holders would be able to scan an individual QR code to get into restaurants and sports venues, meaning businesses would be able to reduce social distancing requirements.
Those who test negative would also avoid the need for quarantining when crossing borders.
The report from the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change advocates for the implementation of 'digital' passports as part of wider calls for mass testing.
In a foreword to the report, Mr Hunt writes: "We know there is a delicate balance to be struck between health and economic concerns.
"We also know that the two are inextricably linked: an economy in freefall causes immense physical and mental harm and the uncertainty of lockdowns will lead to deep and lasting economic damage.
“Having the confidence to return to work and for consumers to interact with businesses is now a must, but it can only be achieved by learning to live alongside the virus. Short of a safe vaccine, mass testing is the only way to realise this.”
The paper, which is also backed by former Prime Minister Tony Blair and ex-leader of the Conservative Party William Hague, argues for “Covid-19 status passports” to help open up the economy further.
The report’s author, strategic adviser at the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, Ryan Wain said: “It’s almost a passport back to normality. It would allow restaurants to open closer to full capacity, it could help get crowds back in sports stadiums.
“It’s really important for the economy to eventually remove and reduce social distancing and I see the passport as a way of doing that. It would also allow people to travel more freely and enable mass quarantine to be scaled down.”
Mr Wain said the suggestion was different to an “immunity passport”, which was previously touted as a potential route out of the coronavirus pandemic.
In May, the Health Secretary Matt Hancock had hinted that immunity certificates could be issued to those who had already recovered from coronavirus
In May, the Health Secretary Matt Hancock hinted that immunity certificates could be issued to those who had already recovered from coronavirus in order to enable them to return to a more normal way of life.
However, Mr Wain noted that “evidence is still in flux about how long immunity lasts”, with some studies suggesting it can last for as little as three months.
The paper also argues the Government should look to the football Premier League’s success with mass testing which works by “removing the threat posed by non-symptomatic spreaders".
The Premier League tests every player and staff member across all 20 clubs twice every week in order to find asymptomatic cases.
I'm sure the next idea will be the digital passport linked to your green credentials - only those woke enough allowed to travel abroad.’
Seriously, OR code on your smartphone and you go nowhere without it.
What they also don’t tell you about testing is that your DNA is taken and held.
If you haven’t already done so read about the ‘social credit societal system.’
There’s a lot more - they can/are possibly undertaking the 'Great Reset,' but this should do for now.
Wed Aug 19, 2020 6:19 pm
Borders Blue wrote:C. Rombie-Coat wrote:Posted a week or so ago about the Covid and the attack on our lives by the cynical bastards that run the world.
There is a view that climate emergency didn't create the moral panic that was needed so they've gone all in on Covid panic, hoping to use this to push through societal change they desire (and screw Trump in the process). They'll go back to climate when it suits the agenda.
Not my work but the signs of a stitch-up are clear when Blair gets involved:
‘There's this from the "Tony Blair Institute for Global Change" (They could have come up with a less evil dystopian name)
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/0 ... hr#comment
Very worrying, but not surprising - not surprising either that Bliar was involved. People have to wake up - the globalists will win only if we let them.
That is so, so worrying, but not at all surprising. This is why people should start to question what ours, and other governments are doing - the consequences of neglecting to do so could be dire. The globalists will win - only of we let them.
Digital 'coronavirus-status passports' could be used to scrap blanket lockdown measures and free up vast swathes of the economy, a new report, backed by former Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt, has urged.
Under the proposals, people would be tested as often as every two weeks for coronavirus and keep their results in a app on their phone.
Passport holders would be able to scan an individual QR code to get into restaurants and sports venues, meaning businesses would be able to reduce social distancing requirements.
Those who test negative would also avoid the need for quarantining when crossing borders.
The report from the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change advocates for the implementation of 'digital' passports as part of wider calls for mass testing.
In a foreword to the report, Mr Hunt writes: "We know there is a delicate balance to be struck between health and economic concerns.
"We also know that the two are inextricably linked: an economy in freefall causes immense physical and mental harm and the uncertainty of lockdowns will lead to deep and lasting economic damage.
“Having the confidence to return to work and for consumers to interact with businesses is now a must, but it can only be achieved by learning to live alongside the virus. Short of a safe vaccine, mass testing is the only way to realise this.”
The paper, which is also backed by former Prime Minister Tony Blair and ex-leader of the Conservative Party William Hague, argues for “Covid-19 status passports” to help open up the economy further.
The report’s author, strategic adviser at the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, Ryan Wain said: “It’s almost a passport back to normality. It would allow restaurants to open closer to full capacity, it could help get crowds back in sports stadiums.
“It’s really important for the economy to eventually remove and reduce social distancing and I see the passport as a way of doing that. It would also allow people to travel more freely and enable mass quarantine to be scaled down.”
Mr Wain said the suggestion was different to an “immunity passport”, which was previously touted as a potential route out of the coronavirus pandemic.
In May, the Health Secretary Matt Hancock had hinted that immunity certificates could be issued to those who had already recovered from coronavirus
In May, the Health Secretary Matt Hancock hinted that immunity certificates could be issued to those who had already recovered from coronavirus in order to enable them to return to a more normal way of life.
However, Mr Wain noted that “evidence is still in flux about how long immunity lasts”, with some studies suggesting it can last for as little as three months.
The paper also argues the Government should look to the football Premier League’s success with mass testing which works by “removing the threat posed by non-symptomatic spreaders".
The Premier League tests every player and staff member across all 20 clubs twice every week in order to find asymptomatic cases.
I'm sure the next idea will be the digital passport linked to your green credentials - only those woke enough allowed to travel abroad.’
Seriously, OR code on your smartphone and you go nowhere without it.
What they also don’t tell you about testing is that your DNA is taken and held.
If you haven’t already done so read about the ‘social credit societal system.’
There’s a lot more - they can/are possibly undertaking the 'Great Reset,' but this should do for now.
Wed Aug 19, 2020 6:25 pm
Borders Blue wrote:Igovernor wrote:I have to disagree with many points Nukes.
When you say people have a 99.9% chance of surviving, not sure where you got this info from try telling that to the families of the 40,000+ that have died
There is a big difference between not wearing a mask for influenza and pneumonia
(most likely cause of catching Pneumonia is bacteria and viruses living in your nose, sinuses, or mouth and spreading to your lungs) and there are vaccines for Influenza and pneumonia. For Covid19 there is none, and I believe that it will be many years before there is one that is effective and side effects free.
Do you honestly think that a healthy diet, vitamins, being happy, keep your immune system high, being happy may keep you mind healthy, and a healthy diet helps if you do catch Covid19 but it certainly does not prevent you catching Covid19.
Wed Aug 19, 2020 6:32 pm
skidemin wrote:Igovernor wrote:pembroke allan wrote:It's not only kids that are scared stiff only need to see adults reaction when get to close to them? And people complaining they have to go back to work because they are scared of catching corvid..... at rate we are going people wont build up immunity from it because wont be exposed to virus, bit like a lot of normal
viruses/germs because we are over cautious in being exposed to them so we catch them easily as no immunity gained from them.
Allan if you saw the selfish idiots in supermarkets who may have Covid19 and are not aware of it, stand inches away from you many without masks breathing all over you and many talking to their partners spouting out enough air to blow you over, then you would not think it foolish to have a reaction to them!
in the super market... sorry mate but the person most responsible for my well being is me... and if i was bothered to the extent you seem to be id be getting my groceries delivered.. not out and about calling all and sundry idiots, fools , thickos and selfish.
if anything those expecting life to come to a standstill , children to not be children anymore , young adults to sacrifice special memories that our generation took for granted in case they catch a virus are being selfish..
personally i did not and still do not agree with the lockdown... but we had it and now its time to move on .. god knows how much damage going forward as been done mentally to our young already... the new normal my arse.. lets try dropping the new bit.. and do what humans have done since the beginning of time.. which is risk assess for yourself and act accordingly..
Wed Aug 19, 2020 6:37 pm
C. Rombie-Coat wrote:Posted a week or so ago about the Covid and the attack on our lives by the cynical bastards that run the world.
There is a view that climate emergency didn't create the moral panic that was needed so they've gone all in on Covid panic, hoping to use this to push through societal change they desire (and screw Trump in the process). They'll go back to climate when it suits the agenda.
Not my work but the signs of a stitch-up are clear when Blair gets involved:
‘There's this from the "Tony Blair Institute for Global Change" (They could have come up with a less evil dystopian name)
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/0 ... hr#comment
Wed Aug 19, 2020 6:46 pm
CCFCJosh75 wrote:C. Rombie-Coat wrote:Posted a week or so ago about the Covid and the attack on our lives by the cynical bastards that run the world.
There is a view that climate emergency didn't create the moral panic that was needed so they've gone all in on Covid panic, hoping to use this to push through societal change they desire (and screw Trump in the process). They'll go back to climate when it suits the agenda.
Not my work but the signs of a stitch-up are clear when Blair gets involved:
‘There's this from the "Tony Blair Institute for Global Change" (They could have come up with a less evil dystopian name)
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/0 ... hr#comment
Not planning on getting involved but I am just curious, are you saying that Tony Blair made the corona virus now?
Wed Aug 19, 2020 6:54 pm
Foghorn 65 wrote:CCFCJosh75 wrote:C. Rombie-Coat wrote:Posted a week or so ago about the Covid and the attack on our lives by the cynical bastards that run the world.
There is a view that climate emergency didn't create the moral panic that was needed so they've gone all in on Covid panic, hoping to use this to push through societal change they desire (and screw Trump in the process). They'll go back to climate when it suits the agenda.
Not my work but the signs of a stitch-up are clear when Blair gets involved:
‘There's this from the "Tony Blair Institute for Global Change" (They could have come up with a less evil dystopian name)
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/0 ... hr#comment
Not planning on getting involved but I am just curious, are you saying that Tony Blair made the corona virus now?
Not sure Blair has the intellect to invent a virus but IMO he is a self serving sanctimonious cnut
Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:12 pm
Igovernor wrote:I have to disagree with many points Nukes.
When you say people have a 99.9% chance of surviving, not sure where you got this info from try telling that to the families of the 40,000+ that have died
There is a big difference between not wearing a mask for influenza and pneumonia
(most likely cause of catching Pneumonia is bacteria and viruses living in your nose, sinuses, or mouth and spreading to your lungs) and there are vaccines for Influenza and pneumonia. For Covid19 there is none, and I believe that it will be many years before there is one that is effective and side effects free.
Do you honestly think that a healthy diet, vitamins, being happy, keep your immune system high, being happy may keep you mind healthy, and a healthy diet helps if you do catch Covid19 but it certainly does not prevent you catching Covid19.
Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:16 pm
Mike Strinati wrote:”When I see people with masks on I don’t see a person I see a faceless robot that are terrified of a virus that you have a 99.9% of surviving.“
In my job as delivery driver it’s company rule to wear mask into the shops when staff and customers are present. Don’t fancy losing my job for not wearing a mask for 10 minutes.
Wed Aug 19, 2020 8:45 pm
Wed Aug 19, 2020 9:27 pm
Wed Aug 19, 2020 11:33 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Some interesting points and yes I was compliant at the beginning but as time went on I could see the lies the fear that was being spread.
As stated before, we were seeing in China of people collapsing in a zombie like way, of which was starting to scare the living daylights out of everyone. But then we haven’t seen anyone die that way from covid in the West.
So was the film footage from other diseases or even drugs ? But one thing it wasn’t Covid and that is shameful.
Then there was a couple of articles from Sky News of a step by step account of how you die from Covid. And I thought that was one of the most shameful piece of journalism I have ever seen.
And then there was a daily 800 odd people were dying of Covid every single day we was told. Even though that number I really do believe could of been manipulated to a very high %
But when that went down the report wasn’t that the so called curve was flattening or anything that would reassure the populationNo we went from daily deaths to total deaths. So instead of 800 people died yesterday Is was the total now stands at 45.000 deaths.
Boris Johnson ? Well him and Prince Charles So say having it. I’m very suspicious indeed. To the point I flatly don’t believe it.
The Government and media have driven this whole virus charade with 100% fear. And fear is what I see on a daily basis, no matter what proof is out there people are so frightened they truly look to Boris or even beg him to keep them safe even if it’s being locked in our houses to marshal law to putting those that don’t comply in prison.
Then I saw the George Floyd saga and all of a sudden the press and the Government went totally silent on Covid and the far left took to the streets. All you heard from the media was it’s a peaceful protest etc.
So all I see tells me it’s all bullshit but people are so scared now the Government can get them to do whatever they are told because they now firmly believe the state is keeping them safe.
You now have total control by the Government over the population. And even though there is very little of covid now they are turning the screw. Masks are as I said you see people as faceless Robots and that’s how the establishment look at everyone.
If you think that is crazy look at North Korea to see how to control the population with fear. Don’t think that can’t happen hear as Marxism is being given a push.
All I’m asking is open your eyes and look at the evidence in front of you and see you are being played. If you are frightened ask yourself why are you so frightened now when there have been far more deaths from influenza in the past.
And just to restate the deaths from suicide with be epidemic with being locked up and loosing jobs and business etc and we will also see a huge rise in Cancer deaths and heart disease because people were to frightened to seek help or who couldn’t because that help just wasn’t there the last several months.
But I do wonder they are planning another wave soon and these deaths from cancer and heart disease will be put down to the new wave of covid you watch. This is only the beginning I fear and the amount of frightened people out there they can pull this off and not many would not question them.
The only Virus I see is the media and the establishment. Not this is what I’m frightened of not COVID19
Wed Aug 19, 2020 11:37 pm
stickywicket wrote:99.9% of surviving which means you have 0.1% of dying.
My kid had a cancer where only 100 kids per year died from neuroblastoma .He was one of them.
So never think death won't come calling at your door.
Thu Aug 20, 2020 7:46 am
Fri Aug 21, 2020 5:42 am
Fri Aug 21, 2020 6:33 am
Nuclearblue wrote:Igovernor wrote:I have to disagree with many points Nukes.
When you say people have a 99.9% chance of surviving, not sure where you got this info from try telling that to the families of the 40,000+ that have died
There is a big difference between not wearing a mask for influenza and pneumonia
(most likely cause of catching Pneumonia is bacteria and viruses living in your nose, sinuses, or mouth and spreading to your lungs) and there are vaccines for Influenza and pneumonia. For Covid19 there is none, and I believe that it will be many years before there is one that is effective and side effects free.
Do you honestly think that a healthy diet, vitamins, being happy, keep your immune system high, being happy may keep you mind healthy, and a healthy diet helps if you do catch Covid19 but it certainly does not prevent you catching Covid19.
Just to answer your reply. 40.000 plus deaths now this is why I said included in that total you have those that had Covid when they died but was not the cause of death. You have those older people who had Covid and put back in the care home system which then they infected other older people. I was hearing even if someone had Covid recovered and left if they died of something totally unrelated Covid was still put down. I also heard doctors was getting paid extra if they put covid as cause of death. So as you see that 40.000 is pretty damn dodgy number.
And yes an immune system fights viruses and helps keep us alive and this is why many with certain conditions that didn’t have much of an immune system (my wife included because of MS) were very vulnerable. But they are also vulnerable to all the other viruses and germs out there this is just another added to the mix.
And all what I said which raises your immune system is in fact true and can’t be denied. And depression does lower your immune system that is also fact. So I do stand by 100% what I wrote in the original post Chief.
Fri Aug 21, 2020 9:02 am
RV Casual wrote:I understand the need for a change in tactic to some degree and people's frustrations but do you not think/agree that the reason that infections have been kept down/low is exactly because of the restrictions etc, it's no coincidence that as soon as things get relaxed and people abuse it that the infections rise etc
You got to cut the government some slack, they are dealing with an unknown virus but they are making a mess of it I agree with that in some instances.
I dont believe in all the conspiracies though mate, I mean in who's interest is it to keep us like this and why? And not the government's surely? It's costing them a fortune and they clearly want things back to normal more than some of the public but have to box clever as we don't know what's to come over the winter
Fri Aug 21, 2020 9:42 am
BlueVanman wrote:RV Casual wrote:I understand the need for a change in tactic to some degree and people's frustrations but do you not think/agree that the reason that infections have been kept down/low is exactly because of the restrictions etc, it's no coincidence that as soon as things get relaxed and people abuse it that the infections rise etc
You got to cut the government some slack, they are dealing with an unknown virus but they are making a mess of it I agree with that in some instances.
I dont believe in all the conspiracies though mate, I mean in who's interest is it to keep us like this and why? And not the government's surely? It's costing them a fortune and they clearly want things back to normal more than some of the public but have to box clever as we don't know what's to come over the winter
Just adifferent view and opinion addressing your points
1 - Sweden and others did not opt to lockdown and deaths per million are lower than ours so there is evidence pointing to the possibility that lockdown has achieved very little if anything.
Fri Aug 21, 2020 3:01 pm
CCFCJosh75 wrote:BlueVanman wrote:RV Casual wrote:I understand the need for a change in tactic to some degree and people's frustrations but do you not think/agree that the reason that infections have been kept down/low is exactly because of the restrictions etc, it's no coincidence that as soon as things get relaxed and people abuse it that the infections rise etc
You got to cut the government some slack, they are dealing with an unknown virus but they are making a mess of it I agree with that in some instances.
I dont believe in all the conspiracies though mate, I mean in who's interest is it to keep us like this and why? And not the government's surely? It's costing them a fortune and they clearly want things back to normal more than some of the public but have to box clever as we don't know what's to come over the winter
Just adifferent view and opinion addressing your points
1 - Sweden and others did not opt to lockdown and deaths per million are lower than ours so there is evidence pointing to the possibility that lockdown has achieved very little if anything.
I probably wouldn't use Sweden as an example if you compare to the countries around it.
As of last week
Sweden: 8200 confirmed cases per mill
Norway: 1780
Denmark: 2560
(UK is 4600)
Deaths per 100,000
Sweden: 57
Norway: 5
Denmark: 11
(UK is 70)
Deaths per million of the population (World ranking)
Uk: 6th
Sweden: 8th
Denmark:50th
Norway: 81st
And Sweden did have restrictions, travel in Stockholm went down 40%.
Fri Aug 21, 2020 5:46 pm
Fri Aug 21, 2020 7:46 pm
BlueVanman wrote:CCFCJosh75 wrote:BlueVanman wrote:RV Casual wrote:I understand the need for a change in tactic to some degree and people's frustrations but do you not think/agree that the reason that infections have been kept down/low is exactly because of the restrictions etc, it's no coincidence that as soon as things get relaxed and people abuse it that the infections rise etc
You got to cut the government some slack, they are dealing with an unknown virus but they are making a mess of it I agree with that in some instances.
I dont believe in all the conspiracies though mate, I mean in who's interest is it to keep us like this and why? And not the government's surely? It's costing them a fortune and they clearly want things back to normal more than some of the public but have to box clever as we don't know what's to come over the winter
Just adifferent view and opinion addressing your points
1 - Sweden and others did not opt to lockdown and deaths per million are lower than ours so there is evidence pointing to the possibility that lockdown has achieved very little if anything.
I probably wouldn't use Sweden as an example if you compare to the countries around it.
As of last week
Sweden: 8200 confirmed cases per mill
Norway: 1780
Denmark: 2560
(UK is 4600)
Deaths per 100,000
Sweden: 57
Norway: 5
Denmark: 11
(UK is 70)
Deaths per million of the population (World ranking)
Uk: 6th
Sweden: 8th
Denmark:50th
Norway: 81st
And Sweden did have restrictions, travel in Stockholm went down 40%.
Firstly you state confirmed cases per million which is irrelevant for the reasons given in my original post and will be totally dependent on each countries number of tests.
I am not saying the rest of your info is also incorrect but certainly does not correspond with what is being published on https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries in regars to UK/Sweden comparisons.
Could you please provide sources backing your stats.
Fri Aug 21, 2020 9:20 pm
Borders Blue wrote:Igovernor wrote:I have to disagree with many points Nukes.
When you say people have a 99.9% chance of surviving, not sure where you got this info from try telling that to the families of the 40,000+ that have died
There is a big difference between not wearing a mask for influenza and pneumonia
(most likely cause of catching Pneumonia is bacteria and viruses living in your nose, sinuses, or mouth and spreading to your lungs) and there are vaccines for Influenza and pneumonia. For Covid19 there is none, and I believe that it will be many years before there is one that is effective and side effects free.
Do you honestly think that a healthy diet, vitamins, being happy, keep your immune system high, being happy may keep you mind healthy, and a healthy diet helps if you do catch Covid19 but it certainly does not prevent you catching Covid19.
Why do they not prevent you from catching it? Immune systems have kept the species going for millions of years. But assuming you are right, then having a healthy immune system will at the very least, prevent you from dying from the disease. You talk about 40,000 people dying of Covid - yet in 1968 85,000 people died of the 'flu and in 1919 200,000 people died of Spanish 'flu - yet we did not lockdown. Furthermore, there is plenty of evidene out there to show that lockdowns do not work - Sweden did not lockdown yet its death rate is lower than ours. Wearing a mask may be fine for you, but not for me: it makes me anxious and my wife tells me that her breathing is affected. There is plenty of evidence out there that masks are bad for you. If you want me to send you links please pm me.
Fri Aug 21, 2020 11:11 pm
WestCoastBlue wrote:Borders Blue wrote:Igovernor wrote:I have to disagree with many points Nukes.
When you say people have a 99.9% chance of surviving, not sure where you got this info from try telling that to the families of the 40,000+ that have died
There is a big difference between not wearing a mask for influenza and pneumonia
(most likely cause of catching Pneumonia is bacteria and viruses living in your nose, sinuses, or mouth and spreading to your lungs) and there are vaccines for Influenza and pneumonia. For Covid19 there is none, and I believe that it will be many years before there is one that is effective and side effects free.
Do you honestly think that a healthy diet, vitamins, being happy, keep your immune system high, being happy may keep you mind healthy, and a healthy diet helps if you do catch Covid19 but it certainly does not prevent you catching Covid19.
Why do they not prevent you from catching it? Immune systems have kept the species going for millions of years. But assuming you are right, then having a healthy immune system will at the very least, prevent you from dying from the disease. You talk about 40,000 people dying of Covid - yet in 1968 85,000 people died of the 'flu and in 1919 200,000 people died of Spanish 'flu - yet we did not lockdown. Furthermore, there is plenty of evidene out there to show that lockdowns do not work - Sweden did not lockdown yet its death rate is lower than ours. Wearing a mask may be fine for you, but not for me: it makes me anxious and my wife tells me that her breathing is affected. There is plenty of evidence out there that masks are bad for you. If you want me to send you links please pm me.
So just to clarify;
Lockdown and restrictions on interaction with people - 40,000 dead
No lockdown and carrying on as normal - 85,000 and 200,000 dead
Surely you’ve just justified that a lockdown is effective, the 40k dead is also with 52 and 101 years of advancement in medical knowledge and science compared to the other pandemics.
Sweden’s death rate may be lower than ours but our countries are wildly different, when you make comparisons between Sweden and their Scandinavian neighbours with similar climates, populations, lifestyles and cultures they come out considerably worse when looking at Norway, Finland and Denmark.
As for there being plenty of evidence that masks are bad for you I’d argue there’s 100x more evidence stating why they’re not harmful for you and how they can help control the pandemic.
Sat Aug 22, 2020 9:43 am
Sat Aug 22, 2020 9:58 am
RV Casual wrote:Can anyone from the 'conspicacy theory' types tell me why the government would want this to be happening?
I am genuinely interested, I don't get it as I don't see how any of this is in anyone's interest but I'm open to learning, someone mentioned there is something coming out called Pandemic? that is supposed to be an eye opener
Sat Aug 22, 2020 2:25 pm
bluesince62 wrote:WestCoastBlue wrote:Borders Blue wrote:Igovernor wrote:I have to disagree with many points Nukes.
When you say people have a 99.9% chance of surviving, not sure where you got this info from try telling that to the families of the 40,000+ that have died
There is a big difference between not wearing a mask for influenza and pneumonia
(most likely cause of catching Pneumonia is bacteria and viruses living in your nose, sinuses, or mouth and spreading to your lungs) and there are vaccines for Influenza and pneumonia. For Covid19 there is none, and I believe that it will be many years before there is one that is effective and side effects free.
Do you honestly think that a healthy diet, vitamins, being happy, keep your immune system high, being happy may keep you mind healthy, and a healthy diet helps if you do catch Covid19 but it certainly does not prevent you catching Covid19.
Why do they not prevent you from catching it? Immune systems have kept the species going for millions of years. But assuming you are right, then having a healthy immune system will at the very least, prevent you from dying from the disease. You talk about 40,000 people dying of Covid - yet in 1968 85,000 people died of the 'flu and in 1919 200,000 people died of Spanish 'flu - yet we did not lockdown. Furthermore, there is plenty of evidene out there to show that lockdowns do not work - Sweden did not lockdown yet its death rate is lower than ours. Wearing a mask may be fine for you, but not for me: it makes me anxious and my wife tells me that her breathing is affected. There is plenty of evidence out there that masks are bad for you. If you want me to send you links please pm me.
So just to clarify;
Lockdown and restrictions on interaction with people - 40,000 dead
No lockdown and carrying on as normal - 85,000 and 200,000 dead
Surely you’ve just justified that a lockdown is effective, the 40k dead is also with 52 and 101 years of advancement in medical knowledge and science compared to the other pandemics.
Sweden’s death rate may be lower than ours but our countries are wildly different, when you make comparisons between Sweden and their Scandinavian neighbours with similar climates, populations, lifestyles and cultures they come out considerably worse when looking at Norway, Finland and Denmark.
As for there being plenty of evidence that masks are bad for you I’d argue there’s 100x more evidence stating why they’re not harmful for you and how they can help control the pandemic.
Or you could use turkey as an example? 82m people,6,000 deaths! And had a partial lockdown,unless you were under 16 or over 65,who were told to stay home,plus people who had serious underlying conditions.
If as the experts are now saying,it's airborne, a mask will just prevent it entering mouths and noses,eyes are still vulnerable, as is every item of clothes you wear,your hair etc.,cases are rising around the globe,but that's because they are carrying out massive testing ? Where as early on they weren't doing many.
The saddest fact is more people will die because of covid,not with it or of it.![]()
![]()
Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:38 pm
Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:50 pm