dogfound wrote:BLUE54 wrote:No I’m not interested in stats. My point is that we are constantly told how many are infected, but not how many of those have recovered. In my opinion that’s also important for the public to know. Or doesn’t that make as big a headline?
there are 67 thousand totally recovered worldwide..
54 thousand active cases. of which 48k are described as mild.
7 thousand have died.
and much like many viruses the vast majority of those who died are over 70 years old and were already suffering other medical conditions.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/This is a good website, updates live.
At time of writing (or indeed first time of writing before it was deleted) 79,881 have recovered and 7,164 have died. 8% of the outcomes have been death thus far. No doubt that figure is higher than reality due to the number of unreported cases, but in terms of reported cases - this is the rate.
Also, people are comparing this to other diseases that infect people gradually, meaning the health system can cope. With this virus, its going to affect a lot of people very quickly meaning the death rate is going to increase to a huge number because people simply won't be able to be treated. This isn't the case for the other illnesses. Say its 3% (true figure) with a working healthy system, it may well very quickly become 12% without one. This is what the concern is.
Another concern of mine is that I don't entirely trust the figures coming out of China. If you discount China the figures are frightening for the rest of the world in terms of deaths to recoveries.
11,200 recovered and 3,900 deaths - that's almost 35% of reported outcomes outside of China lead to death.
People harping on about media making this up don't have a clue and are hoping that if they say it enough then it may all just go away. This is serious and will affect our lives for a long time. That's the reality.