" QPR 5-1 Jacks "

Swansea City lost 5-1 to QPR end of discussion.

Which is my point, it isn’t the end of the discussion is it, reality suggests that it is completely unrepresentative of the point you are trying to make.

The amusing thing (hence the point) is people are clearly continuing to create their own bubble on here, terrified that someone adds a dose of reality.

Dreamer:- “We lost 6-1 and they lost 5-1 so it’s not that bad”

Realist:- “But they did play their reserve side mind, they beat them 3-1 away when full strength”

“5-1 end of discussion”.... proceeds to put fingers in ears whilst shouting “la la la la”.

Swansea City lost 5-1 to QPR end of discussion.

Which is my point, it isn’t the end of the discussion is it, reality suggests that it is completely unrepresentative of the point you are trying to make.

The amusing thing (hence the point) is people are clearly continuing to create their own bubble on here, terrified that someone adds a dose of reality.

Dreamer:- “We lost 6-1 and they lost 5-1 so it’s not that bad”

Realist:- “But they did play their reserve side mind, they beat them 3-1 away when full strength”

“5-1 end of discussion”.... proceeds to put fingers in ears whilst shouting “la la la la”.

I didn't once mention our league fixture.

So for clarity Swansea City lost 5-1 to QPR.

Nothing more to add.

Swansea City lost 5-1 to QPR end of discussion.

Which is my point, it isn’t the end of the discussion is it, reality suggests that it is completely unrepresentative of the point you are trying to make.

The amusing thing (hence the point) is people are clearly continuing to create their own bubble on here, terrified that someone adds a dose of reality.

Dreamer:- “We lost 6-1 and they lost 5-1 so it’s not that bad”

Realist:- “But they did play their reserve side mind, they beat them 3-1 away when full strength”

“5-1 end of discussion”.... proceeds to put fingers in ears whilst shouting “la la la la”.

I didn't once mention our league fixture.

So for clarity Swansea City lost 5-1 to QPR.

Nothing more to add.

I didn’t say you did. That is however the theme of the thread to which you are involved.

To say Swansea lost 5-1 to QPR without wanting any expansion is a pointless statement and ultimately misleading in this context as we all now know that it was a reserve side. If you started a seperate thread stating the score with a caveat that it was a severely weakened side then you may well have got your wish and nobody else would add anything.

However to enter a thread where the theme is clearly a comparison between your league result and our cup result in which you are declaring a score and not wanting any expansion in an area which obviously needs it - is pointless. Hope I explained that well enough.

Swansea City lost 5-1 to QPR end of discussion.

Which is my point, it isn’t the end of the discussion is it, reality suggests that it is completely unrepresentative of the point you are trying to make.

The amusing thing (hence the point) is people are clearly continuing to create their own bubble on here, terrified that someone adds a dose of reality.

Dreamer:- “We lost 6-1 and they lost 5-1 so it’s not that bad”

Realist:- “But they did play their reserve side mind, they beat them 3-1 away when full strength”

“5-1 end of discussion”.... proceeds to put fingers in ears whilst shouting “la la la la”.

I didn't once mention our league fixture.

So for clarity Swansea City lost 5-1 to QPR.

Nothing more to add.

I didn’t say you did. That is however the theme of the thread to which you are involved.

To say Swansea lost 5-1 to QPR without wanting any expansion is a pointless statement and ultimately misleading in this context as we all now know that it was a reserve side. If you started a seperate thread stating the score with a caveat that it was a severely weakened side then you may well have got your wish and nobody else would add anything.

However to enter a thread where the theme is clearly a comparison between your league result and our cup result in which you are declaring a score and not wanting any expansion in an area which obviously needs it - is pointless. Hope I explained that well enough.

Seriously dude just stop, you're making yourself look like a bigger moron with every comment.

I love the fact nobody has mentioned the fact we had 1 (yes one) of our regular starting team playing

I would have been incredibly shocked had it not been a battering.

We beat them 3-1 at their place earlier in the season when we had our real team out.

And we beat them 3-0 earlier in the season so whats your point?

My point is exactly how I described.

People are using a defeat for our reserves against QPR to compare to your 6-1 league defeat as a yard-stick to state that your score doesn’t look as bad. Also using the result as a door to show how our first team isn’t very good.

We are averaging 2 points per game over the last 5 games and find ourselves in the top 6. To use this result as a way of judging our first team when only 1 of them was in the starting line up is hilarious, comes across as very nervy and desperate

You were playing a team made up mostly of QPR’s reserve players including the fact that two out of their usual deadly front 3 were not playing against you.

Our players were pathetic in that game v QPR zero commitment or fight just as they were away to you earlier in the season. If the players actually turn up with fight next week shouldn’t be too difficult a game as you are just a bang average midtable championship club with an inflated position because of your awesome start in the first 6 games.

I didn’t say QPR didn’t play a weakened side. I am making the point that we were. Our second string is incredibly young and inexperienced and aren’t anywhere close to being fielded as a starting 11 in the league, so to put our reserve side as a barometer to mark results against your first team is bizarre.

You cannot selectively choose runs of form and isolate them as to how you want us to be described. If you are to look at form in a way it has relevance then recent form is more telling, of which we have picked up 10 points from a possible 15 in our last matches

Your starting eleven included a 30 year old Goalkeeper, Declan John who has played at prem and international level, Roberts who is a full international, a 26 year old Bidwell with over 250 league appreances.

Your midfield included a 32 year old Nathan Dyer, 27 year old Carroll and 3 25 year olds Fulton, Peterson and McKay. Even your striker was 23 so hardly a youngster. Not to mention you brought on Baston and Celina.


Young and inexperienced my arse

I love the fact nobody has mentioned the fact we had 1 (yes one) of our regular starting team playing

I would have been incredibly shocked had it not been a battering.

We beat them 3-1 at their place earlier in the season when we had our real team out.

And we beat them 3-0 earlier in the season so whats your point?

My point is exactly how I described.

People are using a defeat for our reserves against QPR to compare to your 6-1 league defeat as a yard-stick to state that your score doesn’t look as bad. Also using the result as a door to show how our first team isn’t very good.

We are averaging 2 points per game over the last 5 games and find ourselves in the top 6. To use this result as a way of judging our first team when only 1 of them was in the starting line up is hilarious, comes across as very nervy and desperate

You were playing a team made up mostly of QPR’s reserve players including the fact that two out of their usual deadly front 3 were not playing against you.

Our players were pathetic in that game v QPR zero commitment or fight just as they were away to you earlier in the season. If the players actually turn up with fight next week shouldn’t be too difficult a game as you are just a bang average midtable championship club with an inflated position because of your awesome start in the first 6 games.

I didn’t say QPR didn’t play a weakened side. I am making the point that we were. Our second string is incredibly young and inexperienced and aren’t anywhere close to being fielded as a starting 11 in the league, so to put our reserve side as a barometer to mark results against your first team is bizarre.

You cannot selectively choose runs of form and isolate them as to how you want us to be described. If you are to look at form in a way it has relevance then recent form is more telling, of which we have picked up 10 points from a possible 15 in our last matches

Your starting eleven included a 30 year old Goalkeeper, Declan John who has played at prem and international level, Roberts who is a full international, a 26 year old Bidwell with over 250 league appreances.

Your midfield included a 32 year old Nathan Dyer, 27 year old Carroll and 3 25 year olds Fulton, Peterson and McKay. Even your striker was 23 so hardly a youngster. Not to mention you brought on Baston and Celina.


Young and inexperienced my arse

You must presume QPR made a fair few changes like all other championship clubs so how many players were left out like Swansea, and going on their policy of youngsters maybe they fielded a side a bit younger than the Swansea players you've mentioned Steve?

Swansea City lost 5-1 to QPR end of discussion.

Which is my point, it isn’t the end of the discussion is it, reality suggests that it is completely unrepresentative of the point you are trying to make.

The amusing thing (hence the point) is people are clearly continuing to create their own bubble on here, terrified that someone adds a dose of reality.

Dreamer:- “We lost 6-1 and they lost 5-1 so it’s not that bad”

Realist:- “But they did play their reserve side mind, they beat them 3-1 away when full strength”

“5-1 end of discussion”.... proceeds to put fingers in ears whilst shouting “la la la la”.

I didn't once mention our league fixture.

So for clarity Swansea City lost 5-1 to QPR.

Nothing more to add.

I didn’t say you did. That is however the theme of the thread to which you are involved.

To say Swansea lost 5-1 to QPR without wanting any expansion is a pointless statement and ultimately misleading in this context as we all now know that it was a reserve side. If you started a seperate thread stating the score with a caveat that it was a severely weakened side then you may well have got your wish and nobody else would add anything.

However to enter a thread where the theme is clearly a comparison between your league result and our cup result in which you are declaring a score and not wanting any expansion in an area which obviously needs it - is pointless. Hope I explained that well enough.

Reserve side ha ha.

Stop it now.

Swansea lost 5-1

Swansea City lost 5-1 to QPR end of discussion.

Which is my point, it isn’t the end of the discussion is it, reality suggests that it is completely unrepresentative of the point you are trying to make.

The amusing thing (hence the point) is people are clearly continuing to create their own bubble on here, terrified that someone adds a dose of reality.

Dreamer:- “We lost 6-1 and they lost 5-1 so it’s not that bad”

Realist:- “But they did play their reserve side mind, they beat them 3-1 away when full strength”

“5-1 end of discussion”.... proceeds to put fingers in ears whilst shouting “la la la la”.

I didn't once mention our league fixture.

So for clarity Swansea City lost 5-1 to QPR.

Nothing more to add.

I didn’t say you did. That is however the theme of the thread to which you are involved.

To say Swansea lost 5-1 to QPR without wanting any expansion is a pointless statement and ultimately misleading in this context as we all now know that it was a reserve side. If you started a seperate thread stating the score with a caveat that it was a severely weakened side then you may well have got your wish and nobody else would add anything.

However to enter a thread where the theme is clearly a comparison between your league result and our cup result in which you are declaring a score and not wanting any expansion in an area which obviously needs it - is pointless. Hope I explained that well enough.

Reserve side ha ha.

Stop it now.

Swansea lost 5-1

You don’t think it was a reserve side now?

I think one of those will be starting against you. How many are you expecting would then?

You must presume QPR made a fair few changes like all other championship clubs so how many players were left out like Swansea, and going on their policy of youngsters maybe they fielded a side a bit younger than the Swansea players you've mentioned Steve?

QPR making changes is irrelevant to the point I’m making. I’m fully aware their changed team is probably going to be better than our reserves. Thankfully their first team isn’t though, and oddly you are comparing a side full of reserves and how they fared against QPR to compare with how your first team did:

It’s just weird.

Your starting eleven included a 30 year old Goalkeeper,

24 appearances for us in 5 years

a 26 year old Bidwell with over 250 league appreances.

You mean the right back playing his first game at centre back?

Declan John who has played at prem and international level.

10 appearances for us in 2 years.

Roberts who is a full international

Yes, he is the only regular starter in that side, as I said.

Your midfield included a 32 year old Nathan Dyer, 27 year old Carroll and 3 25 year olds Fulton, Peterson and McKay.

None of which are starting players

Even your striker was 23 so hardly a youngster.

You mean the guy with 5 appearances for us?

Young and inexperienced my arse

Young and inexperienced absolutely - and ultimately reserves as is the point.

Corrections and important information highlighted above in red. I also see you fail to mention Brandon Cooper making his first professional start at center back along with a center back partner who is a right back. A defence that has never once played together before, some not even in that position before - is inexperienced.

The midfield was experienced but ultimately a reserve midfield.

The striker was inexperienced.

So as I said, young, inexperienced and ultimately - reserves. Unless of course you would also like to answer the question of how many of those starters would you expect to start at the CCS?

Whenever I have watched Jake Bidwell play, that has been true in quite a few occasions, he played left back. He is a very left footed player.

Your starting eleven included a 30 year old Goalkeeper,

24 appearances for us in 5 years

a 26 year old Bidwell with over 250 league appreances.

You mean the right back playing his first game at centre back?

Declan John who has played at prem and international level.

10 appearances for us in 2 years.

Roberts who is a full international

Yes, he is the only regular starter in that side, as I said.

Your midfield included a 32 year old Nathan Dyer, 27 year old Carroll and 3 25 year olds Fulton, Peterson and McKay.

None of which are starting players

Even your striker was 23 so hardly a youngster.

You mean the guy with 5 appearances for us?

Young and inexperienced my arse

Young and inexperienced absolutely - and ultimately reserves as is the point.

Corrections and important information highlighted above in red. I also see you fail to mention Brandon Cooper making his first professional start at center back along with a center back partner who is a right back. A defence that has never once played together before, some not even in that position before - is inexperienced.

The midfield was experienced but ultimately a reserve midfield.

The striker was inexperienced.

So as I said, young, inexperienced and ultimately - reserves. Unless of course you would also like to answer the question of how many of those starters would you expect to start at the CCS?

3 young players doesnt make it a young team

Your starting eleven included a 30 year old Goalkeeper,

24 appearances for us in 5 years

a 26 year old Bidwell with over 250 league appreances.

You mean the right back playing his first game at centre back?

Declan John who has played at prem and international level.

10 appearances for us in 2 years.

Roberts who is a full international

Yes, he is the only regular starter in that side, as I said.

Your midfield included a 32 year old Nathan Dyer, 27 year old Carroll and 3 25 year olds Fulton, Peterson and McKay.

None of which are starting players

Even your striker was 23 so hardly a youngster.

You mean the guy with 5 appearances for us?

Young and inexperienced my arse

Young and inexperienced absolutely - and ultimately reserves as is the point.

Corrections and important information highlighted above in red. I also see you fail to mention Brandon Cooper making his first professional start at center back along with a center back partner who is a right back. A defence that has never once played together before, some not even in that position before - is inexperienced.

The midfield was experienced but ultimately a reserve midfield.

The striker was inexperienced.

So as I said, young, inexperienced and ultimately - reserves. Unless of course you would also like to answer the question of how many of those starters would you expect to start at the CCS?

3 young players doesnt make it a young team

Young AND inexperienced, most fall into one or the other. Inexperienced doesn’t have to mean never played the game before.

Inexperienced playing in a certain position, inexperienced playing together, inexperienced playing for the club.

Again, how many of that starting 11 do you expect to start at the CCS?

Is Jake Bidwell a right back or a left back?
I have never seen him play right back before?

Is Jake Bidwell a right back or a left back?
I have never seen him play right back before?

Your starting eleven included a 30 year old Goalkeeper,

24 appearances for us in 5 years

a 26 year old Bidwell with over 250 league appreances.

You mean the right back playing his first game at centre back?

Declan John who has played at prem and international level.

10 appearances for us in 2 years.

Roberts who is a full international

Yes, he is the only regular starter in that side, as I said.

Your midfield included a 32 year old Nathan Dyer, 27 year old Carroll and 3 25 year olds Fulton, Peterson and McKay.

None of which are starting players

Even your striker was 23 so hardly a youngster.

You mean the guy with 5 appearances for us?

Young and inexperienced my arse

Young and inexperienced absolutely - and ultimately reserves as is the point.

Corrections and important information highlighted above in red. I also see you fail to mention Brandon Cooper making his first professional start at center back along with a center back partner who is a right back. A defence that has never once played together before, some not even in that position before - is inexperienced.

The midfield was experienced but ultimately a reserve midfield.

The striker was inexperienced.

So as I said, young, inexperienced and ultimately - reserves. Unless of course you would also like to answer the question of how many of those starters would you expect to start at the CCS?

3 young players doesnt make it a young team

Young AND inexperienced, most fall into one or the other. Inexperienced doesn’t have to mean never played the game before.

Inexperienced playing in a certain position, inexperienced playing together, inexperienced playing for the club.

Again, how many of that starting 11 do you expect to start at the CCS?

Someone's over defensive because they've been called out on their bullshit seriously dude get off the internet and get a life, you literally spend all your time on here its sad as f**k

Someone's over compensating because they've been called out on their bullshit seriously dude get off the internet and get a life, you literally spend all your time on here its sad as f**k

I said it was a reserve side that was young and inexperienced. It’s correct.

Yes you certainly are. You can’t take one of those descriptive words, ignore the rest and pretend I didn’t say it

You are just going to have to deal with the fact it was a reserve side and that comparisons to your result are obsolete. That’s all there is to it no matter how much you kick and scream, make pedantic points or selectively cut my quotes

I also find it funny you have been seemingly debating this for days where as I have logged in for maybe an hour today and I am the one that spends all day on here. Try again

What position does Jake Bidwell normally play for Swansea?

Someone's over compensating because they've been called out on their bullshit seriously dude get off the internet and get a life, you literally spend all your time on here its sad as f**k

I said it was a reserve side that was young and inexperienced. It’s correct.

Yes you certainly are. You can’t take one of those descriptive words, ignore the rest and pretend I didn’t say it

You are just going to have to deal with the fact it was a reserve side and that comparisons to your result are obsolete. That’s all there is to it no matter how much you kick and scream, make pedantic points or selectively cut my quotes

I also find it funny you have been seemingly debating this for days where as I have logged in for maybe an hour today and I am the one that spends all day on here. Try again

Sure thing butty, whatever helps you sleep at night.
Try going out some more, get some fresh air instead of spending all your time on a rivals forum you'll be happier.

Your starting eleven included a 30 year old Goalkeeper,

24 appearances for us in 5 years

a 26 year old Bidwell with over 250 league appreances.

You mean the right back playing his first game at centre back?

Declan John who has played at prem and international level.

10 appearances for us in 2 years.

Roberts who is a full international

Yes, he is the only regular starter in that side, as I said.

Your midfield included a 32 year old Nathan Dyer, 27 year old Carroll and 3 25 year olds Fulton, Peterson and McKay.

None of which are starting players

Even your striker was 23 so hardly a youngster.

You mean the guy with 5 appearances for us?

Young and inexperienced my arse

Young and inexperienced absolutely - and ultimately reserves as is the point.

Corrections and important information highlighted above in red. I also see you fail to mention Brandon Cooper making his first professional start at center back along with a center back partner who is a right back. A defence that has never once played together before, some not even in that position before - is inexperienced.

The midfield was experienced but ultimately a reserve midfield.

The striker was inexperienced.

So as I said, young, inexperienced and ultimately - reserves. Unless of course you would also like to answer the question of how many of those starters would you expect to start at the CCS?

3 young players doesnt make it a young team

Young AND inexperienced, most fall into one or the other. Inexperienced doesn’t have to mean never played the game before.

Inexperienced playing in a certain position, inexperienced playing together, inexperienced playing for the club.

Again, how many of that starting 11 do you expect to start at the CCS?

Someone's over defensive because they've been called out on their bullshit seriously dude get off the internet and get a life, you literally spend all your time on here its sad as f**k

I cought a moray eel couple of weeks ago and hes Trying to work his way out of what he said Hes as slimy as eel was.....

Sure thing butty, whatever helps you sleep at night.
Try going out some more, get some fresh air instead of spending all your time on a rivals forum you'll be happier.

Someone is throwing his toys out of his pram.

Sure thing butty, whatever helps you sleep at night.
Try going out some more, get some fresh air instead of spending all your time on a rivals forum you'll be happier.

Someone is throwing his toys out of his pram.

You literally have no idea what that means nice try, seriously dude take a break watch some Netflix, get yourself off the forum for a little while you'll feel better.

https://www.swanseacity.com/news/swanse ... ke-bidwell
Interesting article stating that Bidwell is a left back!
Strange I thought someone could never be wrong!

I cought a moray eel couple of weeks ago and hes Trying to work his way out of what he said Hes as slimy as eel was.....

I cought a moray eel couple of weeks ago and hes Trying to work his way out of what he said Hes as slimy as eel was.....

How many of the starting 11 against QPR are you expecting to start against you then out of interest?

That’s right, you agree with me but just trying to make it sound like you don’t.

Sure thing butty, whatever helps you sleep at night.
Try going out some more, get some fresh air instead of spending all your time on a rivals forum you'll be happier.

Someone is throwing his toys out of his pram.

You literally have no idea what that means nice try, seriously dude take a break watch some Netflix, get yourself off the forum for a little while you'll feel better.

I know exactly what it means. It means someone who cannot put an argument together that this was a reserve side so is making personal and silly remarks in an attempt to get out of it

Sure thing butty, whatever helps you sleep at night.
Try going out some more, get some fresh air instead of spending all your time on a rivals forum you'll be happier.

Someone is throwing his toys out of his pram.

You literally have no idea what that means nice try, seriously dude take a break watch some Netflix, get yourself off the forum for a little while you'll feel better.

I know exactly what it means. It means someone who cannot put an argument together that this was a reserve side so is making personal and silly remarks in an attempt to get out of it

Wrong im not the sad f**k spending all his time on a rivals forum talking bollocks.
Again dude get a life you're pathetic.

Sure thing butty, whatever helps you sleep at night.
Try going out some more, get some fresh air instead of spending all your time on a rivals forum you'll be happier.

Someone is throwing his toys out of his pram.

You literally have no idea what that means nice try, seriously dude take a break watch some Netflix, get yourself off the forum for a little while you'll feel better.

I know exactly what it means. It means someone who cannot put an argument together that this was a reserve side so is making personal and silly remarks in an attempt to get out of it

Wrong im not the sad f**k spending all his time on a rivals forum talking bollocks.
Again dude get a life you're pathetic.

Says the man that continues to swear at a man he has never met in the internet approaching midnight UK time.....

However, frustrated and pedantic protestations aside - I’m glad we all now agree it was a reserve side and comparisons to the first team results are obsolete as per my point.

Your starting eleven included a 30 year old Goalkeeper,

24 appearances for us in 5 years

a 26 year old Bidwell with over 250 league appreances.

You mean the right back playing his first game at centre back?

Declan John who has played at prem and international level.

10 appearances for us in 2 years.

Roberts who is a full international

Yes, he is the only regular starter in that side, as I said.

Your midfield included a 32 year old Nathan Dyer, 27 year old Carroll and 3 25 year olds Fulton, Peterson and McKay.

None of which are starting players

Even your striker was 23 so hardly a youngster.

You mean the guy with 5 appearances for us?

Young and inexperienced my arse

Young and inexperienced absolutely - and ultimately reserves as is the point.

Corrections and important information highlighted above in red. I also see you fail to mention Brandon Cooper making his first professional start at center back along with a center back partner who is a right back. A defence that has never once played together before, some not even in that position before - is inexperienced.

The midfield was experienced but ultimately a reserve midfield.

The striker was inexperienced.

So as I said, young, inexperienced and ultimately - reserves. Unless of course you would also like to answer the question of how many of those starters would you expect to start at the CCS?

I didn’t mention him as he was the exception to the rule in that he was only player who actually fitted your “young and inexperinced line”

Your starting eleven included a 30 year old Goalkeeper,

24 appearances for us in 5 years

a 26 year old Bidwell with over 250 league appreances.

You mean the right back playing his first game at centre back?

Declan John who has played at prem and international level.

10 appearances for us in 2 years.

Roberts who is a full international

Yes, he is the only regular starter in that side, as I said.

Your midfield included a 32 year old Nathan Dyer, 27 year old Carroll and 3 25 year olds Fulton, Peterson and McKay.

None of which are starting players

Even your striker was 23 so hardly a youngster.

You mean the guy with 5 appearances for us?

Young and inexperienced my arse

Young and inexperienced absolutely - and ultimately reserves as is the point.

Corrections and important information highlighted above in red. I also see you fail to mention Brandon Cooper making his first professional start at center back along with a center back partner who is a right back. A defence that has never once played together before, some not even in that position before - is inexperienced.

The midfield was experienced but ultimately a reserve midfield.

The striker was inexperienced.

So as I said, young, inexperienced and ultimately - reserves. Unless of course you would also like to answer the question of how many of those starters would you expect to start at the CCS?

I didn’t mention him as he was the exception to the rule in that he was only player who actually fitted your “young and inexperinced line”

You mean he was the only one to fit both?

Most of that starting team fits one criteria or the other. Just a fact.

Anyway, how many of that starting 11 do you reckon will start against you?

Your starting eleven included a 30 year old Goalkeeper,

24 appearances for us in 5 years

a 26 year old Bidwell with over 250 league appreances.

You mean the right back playing his first game at centre back?

Declan John who has played at prem and international level.

10 appearances for us in 2 years.

Roberts who is a full international

Yes, he is the only regular starter in that side, as I said.

Your midfield included a 32 year old Nathan Dyer, 27 year old Carroll and 3 25 year olds Fulton, Peterson and McKay.

None of which are starting players

Even your striker was 23 so hardly a youngster.

You mean the guy with 5 appearances for us?

Young and inexperienced my arse

Young and inexperienced absolutely - and ultimately reserves as is the point.

Corrections and important information highlighted above in red. I also see you fail to mention Brandon Cooper making his first professional start at center back along with a center back partner who is a right back. A defence that has never once played together before, some not even in that position before - is inexperienced.

The midfield was experienced but ultimately a reserve midfield.

The striker was inexperienced.

So as I said, young, inexperienced and ultimately - reserves. Unless of course you would also like to answer the question of how many of those starters would you expect to start at the CCS?

I didn’t mention him as he was the exception to the rule in that he was only player who actually fitted your “young and inexperinced line”

You mean he was the only one to fit both?

Most of that starting team fits one criteria or the other. Just a fact.

Anyway, how many of that starting 11 do you reckon will start against you?

Experience doesn’t just come from playing For Swansea you know. The aforementioned CB is the only young and inexperienced player in your squad. The rest are both not young or inexperienced. The only other player who could maybe fit your descriptions is the striker who at 23 isn’t that young and has also played top level football in France so it’s hard to call him inexperienced.

The rest are neither young or inexperinced with them all playing well over 100 senior professional matches each.


As for who you start against us I couldn’t give a monkeys as the game is all about wether our players actually turn up with the right attitude or not.