‘ Cardiff City Fans Away At Millwall Tonight

Image was taken before kickoff. Original picture was put on facebook at 8. Obviously taken sometime before kickoff though as there are no players on the pitch. Not that it matters anyway, it could be a picture of an empty stand. The Millwall site reporting 901 travelling fans so that is how many went.

75233634_1154454531426463_2971600499582697472_n.jpg

That’s how many tickets were sold, not how many went.

Technically you are getting 22,000 at your home games, yet I don’t imagine many sensible posters for one second will say that is how many attend. Judging from the state of the stands against Sheff Wed, you would be lucky to have got 17,000.

I’m not saying 900 didn’t go either by the way. I just said it’s funny that two photos can show the same thing, and depending who it is of the responses will be polar opposite. Every excuse under the sun why one is good and every excuse under the sun why the other is bad. More amusing than anything.

What a muppet

Don’t think he’s a muppet as such. He just clearly didn’t think about it.

There is a reason why Millwall apparently say 901 and the OP says 980.

It’s all embellished nonsense when it comes to crowds, always has been.

nobody posted a photo of your lot { Swansea } in Barnsley..or passed comment that less than 1k on a Saturday when 3rd in the league with subsidised tickets prices is p155 poor ..but seeing as youre making an issue of it..
IT WAS POOR ..

So less than a thousand at Millwall is good, less than a thousand at Barnsley is poor?

one was a Saturday the other mid week
one had subsidised tickets { which I doubt you even know about not being a jack } the other did not.. Entender ?
sounds a bit like east ender

Image was taken before kickoff. Original picture was put on facebook at 8. Obviously taken sometime before kickoff though as there are no players on the pitch. Not that it matters anyway, it could be a picture of an empty stand. The Millwall site reporting 901 travelling fans so that is how many went.

75233634_1154454531426463_2971600499582697472_n.jpg

That’s how many tickets were sold, not how many went.

Technically you are getting 22,000 at your home games, yet I don’t imagine many sensible posters for one second will say that is how many attend. Judging from the state of the stands against Sheff Wed, you would be lucky to have got 17,000.

I’m not saying 900 didn’t go either by the way. I just said it’s funny that two photos can show the same thing, and depending who it is of the responses will be polar opposite. Every excuse under the sun why one is good and every excuse under the sun why the other is bad. More amusing than anything.

Attendance was 11,769 of which 901 was city fans! the pictures are not showing supporters when match is on, unless of course you were at match and counted the fans.... But knowing your ego you wont admit pics are wrong!

one was a Saturday the other mid week
one had subsidised tickets { which I doubt you even know about not being a jack } the other did not.. Entender ?
sounds a bit like east ender

Don’t get all stressed and start trying to insult me, surely you know that doesn’t work?

One is a 9 hour round trip, the other is about 7. One has just come from the Premier League, the other off the back of a mid table finish.

We can all do that.

Attendance was 11,769 of which 901 was city fans! the pictures are not showing supporters when match is on, unless of course you were at match and counted the fans.... But knowing your ego you wont admit pics are wrong!

The pics are wrong? How can they be wrong? They are pictures.

So it isn’t 980 then as said in the OP?

Image was taken before kickoff. Original picture was put on facebook at 8. Obviously taken sometime before kickoff though as there are no players on the pitch. Not that it matters anyway, it could be a picture of an empty stand. The Millwall site reporting 901 travelling fans so that is how many went.

75233634_1154454531426463_2971600499582697472_n.jpg

That’s how many tickets were sold, not how many went.

Technically you are getting 22,000 at your home games, yet I don’t imagine many sensible posters for one second will say that is how many attend. Judging from the state of the stands against Sheff Wed, you would be lucky to have got 17,000.

I’m not saying 900 didn’t go either by the way. I just said it’s funny that two photos can show the same thing, and depending who it is of the responses will be polar opposite. Every excuse under the sun why one is good and every excuse under the sun why the other is bad. More amusing than anything.

I think you should worry about your own crowds and why a team who were 3rd in the league, having their best start to a season in 40 years and had recently experienced their most successful period in their history cant even get 16,000 for a home match. Obviously that figure would have included tickets sold and not people who actually went so there probably wasn't even 15,000 there.

one was a Saturday the other mid week
one had subsidised tickets { which I doubt you even know about not being a jack } the other did not.. Entender ?
sounds a bit like east ender

Don’t get all stressed and start trying to insult me, surely you know that doesn’t work?

One is a 9 hour round trip, the other is about 7. One has just come from the Premier League, the other off the back of a mid table finish.

We can all do that.

which bit was the insult ?

one was a Saturday the other mid week
one had subsidised tickets { which I doubt you even know about not being a jack } the other did not.. Entender ?
sounds a bit like east ender

Don’t get all stressed and start trying to insult me, surely you know that doesn’t work?

One is a 9 hour round trip, the other is about 7. One has just come from the Premier League, the other off the back of a mid table finish.

We can all do that.

which bit was the insult ?

Hes right insults don't work on him hes far to intellectual to know what an insult is, he thinks it's a compliment.

nobody posted a photo of your lot { Swansea } in Barnsley..or passed comment that less than 1k on a Saturday when 3rd in the league with subsidised tickets prices is p155 poor ..but seeing as youre making an issue of it..
IT WAS POOR ..

So less than a thousand at Millwall is good, less than a thousand at Barnsley is poor?

It wasn’t 1000 at Barnsley though was it ?

It was 700.

nobody posted a photo of your lot { Swansea } in Barnsley..or passed comment that less than 1k on a Saturday when 3rd in the league with subsidised tickets prices is p155 poor ..but seeing as youre making an issue of it..
IT WAS POOR ..

So less than a thousand at Millwall is good, less than a thousand at Barnsley is poor?

It wasn’t 1000 at Barnsley though was it ?

which bit was the insult ?

The lie.

It wasn’t 1000 at Barnsley though was it ?

Didn’t say it was did I?

which bit was the insult ?

The lie.

all Swansea away tickets are subsidised ...20 quid for all away games if your a jack army { contradiction in terms if ever there was one } member...check it out you must be missing out big time all that travelling you do.

I think you should worry about your own crowds and why a team who were 3rd in the league, having their best start to a season in 40 years and had recently experienced their most successful period in their history cant even get 16,000 for a home match. Obviously that figure would have included tickets sold and not people who actually went so there probably wasn't even 15,000 there.

Do you mean 16,000 exactly? It’s pretty hard to get an exact number, unless you mean over 16,000? In which case we have. Birmingham City 17,277, Nottingham Forest 17,102, Reading 16,036, Stoke City 16,612. We also had double your attendance at our respective home Cup games with the your standard of opposition far higher.

In any case, why would I worry about it? That seems to be our normal Championship attendance. Swansea fans don’t seem be be deluded when it comes to our fanbase, we are perfectly comfortable in our own skin.

What I am pointing out is the reactions to pictures of both crowds when they can be relatively similar. When it’s us “it’s awful”, when it’s you “it’s great” and “must have been taken before everyone arrived” and adding a sneaky 10% on... it’s an accurate and amusing observation, no need to get so het up.

which bit was the insult ?

The lie.

all Swansea away tickets are subsidised ...20 quid for all away games if your a jack army { contradiction in terms if ever there was one } member...check it out you must be missing out big time all that travelling you do.

Why would you assume that was the lie?

Secondly, you are wrong. If you have a jack army membership that is paid for, it gives you the opportunity to buy for £20 IF bought within a certain window. When I have been back in the UK and travelled away I found I was never able to commit that early. I would imagine most are the same, it is beneficial to OAP’s essentially or people able to plan 4 weeks in advance, which most professionals can’t.

True subsidised tickets are like those offered for your Cup game where your attendance was around 5000.
Wasn’t it?

1000 at Barnsley lol JACKanory JACKanory

1000 at Barnsley lol JACKanory JACKanory

Where did I say 1000 at Barnsley then?

Why do Cardiff fans insist on lying on this board, I have not encountered anything quite like it

I think you should worry about your own crowds and why a team who were 3rd in the league, having their best start to a season in 40 years and had recently experienced their most successful period in their history cant even get 16,000 for a home match. Obviously that figure would have included tickets sold and not people who actually went so there probably wasn't even 15,000 there.

Do you mean 16,000 exactly? It’s pretty hard to get an exact number, unless you mean over 16,000? In which case we have. Birmingham City 17,277, Nottingham Forest 17,102, Reading 16,036, Stoke City 16,612. We also had double your attendance at our respective home Cup games with the your standard of opposition far higher.

In any case, why would I worry about it? That seems to be our normal Championship attendance. Swansea fans don’t seem be be deluded when it comes to our fanbase, we are perfectly comfortable in our own skin.

What I am pointing out is the reactions to pictures of both crowds when they can be relatively similar. When it’s us “it’s awful”, when it’s you “it’s great” and “must have been taken before everyone arrived” and adding a sneaky 10% on... it’s an accurate and amusing observation, no need to get so het up.

Brentford 15,875 despite the reasons I gave. probably closer to 15,000 as well with people who actually turned up even though You could have potentially gone top of the league. You clearly arnt that comfortably with your attendances as you feel the need to bring ours up whenever you can in what looks like a desperate attempt just to show when our support is similar. Laughable really that it clearly bothers you that much.

I don’t even know what pictures you’re so upset about you tart.

I think you should worry about your own crowds and why a team who were 3rd in the league, having their best start to a season in 40 years and had recently experienced their most successful period in their history cant even get 16,000 for a home match. Obviously that figure would have included tickets sold and not people who actually went so there probably wasn't even 15,000 there.

Do you mean 16,000 exactly? It’s pretty hard to get an exact number, unless you mean over 16,000? In which case we have. Birmingham City 17,277, Nottingham Forest 17,102, Reading 16,036, Stoke City 16,612. We also had double your attendance at our respective home Cup games with the your standard of opposition far higher.

In any case, why would I worry about it? That seems to be our normal Championship attendance. Swansea fans don’t seem be be deluded when it comes to our fanbase, we are perfectly comfortable in our own skin.

What I am pointing out is the reactions to pictures of both crowds when they can be relatively similar. When it’s us “it’s awful”, when it’s you “it’s great” and “must have been taken before everyone arrived” and adding a sneaky 10% on... it’s an accurate and amusing observation, no need to get so het up.

Brentford 15,875 despite the reasons I gave. probably closer to 15,000 as well with people who actually turned up even though You could have potentially gone top of the league. You clearly arnt that comfortably with your attendances as you feel the need to bring ours up whenever you can in what looks like a desperate attempt just to show when our support is similar. Laughable really that it clearly bothers you that much.

I don’t even know what pictures you’re so upset about you tart.

That probably suggests that league position doesn’t matter to our fanbase. We get roughly the same regardless. League matters but not really position, our attendances are fairly solid.

I’m very comfortable with our attendances, why do I care how many go? Do you care how many are in the cinema when you go and watch a movie? Me neither. I am just pointing out the hypocrisy in play here and the “extension of the truth” shall we say.

You don’t have to know what pictures I’m talking about; you joined the conversation and it wasn’t being put to you for review.

which bit was the insult ?

The lie.

all Swansea away tickets are subsidised ...20 quid for all away games if your a jack army { contradiction in terms if ever there was one } member...check it out you must be missing out big time all that travelling you do.

Why would you assume that was the lie?

Secondly, you are wrong. If you have a jack army membership that is paid for, it gives you the opportunity to buy for £20 IF bought within a certain window. When I have been back in the UK and travelled away I found I was never able to commit that early. I would imagine most are the same, it is beneficial to OAP’s essentially or people able to plan 4 weeks in advance, which most professionals can’t.

True subsidised tickets are like those offered for your Cup game where your attendance was around 5000.
Wasn’t it?

I cant see anything else I said that you could mistakenly call a lie...which of course you know.

but yes, its called a membership at our club.. a jack army membership at yours { yours is used loosely here ,artistic license if you like } and yep you pay to be a member.. of course as with all clubs tickets are sold in windows and those who meet the higher criteria ..whatever it might be have to commit first.. bottom line our fans will pay £28 at Barnsley yours paid £20 = subsidised
if your going to imitate someone at least make sure your as smart as he is , even if that is not very smart at all.

I cant see anything else I said that you could mistakenly call a lie...which of course you know.

but yes, its called a membership at our club.. a jack army membership at yours { yours is used loosely here ,artistic license if you like } and yep you pay to be a member.. of course as with all clubs tickets are sold in windows and those who meet the higher criteria ..whatever it might be have to commit first.. bottom line our fans will pay £28 at Barnsley yours paid £20 = subsidised
if your going to imitate someone at least make sure your as smart as he is , even if that is not very smart at all.

I think you are so eager to spew what you are that you aren't even aware of what you are typing. Read it again.

Saying ''bottom line'' doesn't mean it's true. Having a membership is not financially beneficial for those that don't go away multiple times and certainly not viable for those that have careers. What you mean to say is ''some of your fans will have paid 20 quid'', in which my response would be - so you are saying your numbers are affected by 8 quid?

What a sad life this guy must lead........typical jack

Looks to be about 350-450 max there.

No doubt had it been us it would go from good support to awful support

What are you even doing on our forum??? Sad sad man leading a sad sad life like the rest of you jacks who are so obsessed with us. I really dont understand why you are on here

Looks to be about 350-450 max there.

No doubt had it been us it would go from good support to awful support

What are you even doing on our forum??? Sad sad man leading a sad sad life like the rest of you jacks who are so obsessed with us. I really dont understand why you are on here

My sentiments exactly fella,you’d have to be a bit of an oddball wouldn’t you to constantly post on your ‘arch’ rivals forum lol sad sad man

I think you should worry about your own crowds and why a team who were 3rd in the league, having their best start to a season in 40 years and had recently experienced their most successful period in their history cant even get 16,000 for a home match. Obviously that figure would have included tickets sold and not people who actually went so there probably wasn't even 15,000 there.

Do you mean 16,000 exactly? It’s pretty hard to get an exact number, unless you mean over 16,000? In which case we have. Birmingham City 17,277, Nottingham Forest 17,102, Reading 16,036, Stoke City 16,612. We also had double your attendance at our respective home Cup games with the your standard of opposition far higher.

In any case, why would I worry about it? That seems to be our normal Championship attendance. Swansea fans don’t seem be be deluded when it comes to our fanbase, we are perfectly comfortable in our own skin.

What I am pointing out is the reactions to pictures of both crowds when they can be relatively similar. When it’s us “it’s awful”, when it’s you “it’s great” and “must have been taken before everyone arrived” and adding a sneaky 10% on... it’s an accurate and amusing observation, no need to get so het up.

Brentford 15,875 despite the reasons I gave. probably closer to 15,000 as well with people who actually turned up even though You could have potentially gone top of the league. You clearly arnt that comfortably with your attendances as you feel the need to bring ours up whenever you can in what looks like a desperate attempt just to show when our support is similar. Laughable really that it clearly bothers you that much.

I don’t even know what pictures you’re so upset about you tart.

That probably suggests that league position doesn’t matter to our fanbase. We get roughly the same regardless. League matters but not really position, our attendances are fairly solid.

I’m very comfortable with our attendances, why do I care how many go? Do you care how many are in the cinema when you go and watch a movie? Me neither. I am just pointing out the hypocrisy in play here and the “extension of the truth” shall we say.

You don’t have to know what pictures I’m talking about; you joined the conversation and it wasn’t being put to you for review.

Quite funny also that the last sentence in your post mentions the fact one of our posters were not invited to review the conversation when I seem to believe you were never invited to review the conversation in the first place!!!

Get a job pal and do something constructive with your life

Quite funny also that the last sentence in your post mentions the fact one of our posters were not invited to review the conversation when I seem to believe you were never invited to review the conversation in the first place!!!

Get a job pal and do something constructive with your life

I’m not asking for anything to be submitted for review, that’s the difference. I’m perfectly happy with the facts to be able to converse at every level of this discussion.

You want me to get another job? What a strange request

My sentiments exactly fella,you’d have to be a bit of an oddball wouldn’t you to constantly post on your ‘arch’ rivals forum lol sad sad man

You reckon you have to be an oddball to post on a football forum?

You just seem annoyed that I make great points you don’t like.

What a sad life this guy must lead........typical jack

You sound like you are trying to convince yourself there chap.

You can hope I guess.