Tue Jun 04, 2019 5:31 pm
Man of Harlech wrote:How is it possible that one person, elected with 11,000 votes can alone make such a critical decision impacting so many?
Tue Jun 04, 2019 6:01 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Sven wrote:WelshPatriot wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Hmmmm,some of us remember when the M25 was touted as the answer to London's traffic congestion.Not guaranteed to fix the problem and to date no businesses had signed to help with the cost.That would be left to the WAG to levy the cost on us with their new tax raising powers.Too many glib comments.
You think the M25 was a waste, that's your argument??
I dread to think of London without the M25.
Having used that very road this Monday morning, I tend to agree. It was slow (8am) but still a lot better than the stationery traffic on the roads I could see overhead![]()
Glib comments are ones like snaggy's, who cannot see the bigger picture for Wales as a whole. Newport is an environmental and topographical bottle neck that needs to be remedied
I agree something needs to be done,but not at the environmental cost or without those that will benefit most contributing something.And WP I don't think the M25 was a waste at all.it makes a great car-park.How's that for a glib comment.
What's the environmental cost? Same as they said about Cardiff bay Except that the disaster they predicted didn't happen in fact it's well documented that wildlife as thrived a mile away since it was built? Wildlife got great habit of adapting if care is taken to minimise effects.. pollution wise whats worse thousands of cars stuck in traffic jams every day or thousands of cars moving it's a simple choice but reality! What is not an option is doing nothing Which environmentalists prefer
Its a well documented fact that the more roads you build the more cars you get, that's why I used the M25 example.It solved nothing.The other thing nobody seems to have mentioned is we would, as a nation, have to borrow heavily to fund this project.Who would pay?
Tue Jun 04, 2019 6:08 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:Sven wrote:WelshPatriot wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Hmmmm,some of us remember when the M25 was touted as the answer to London's traffic congestion.Not guaranteed to fix the problem and to date no businesses had signed to help with the cost.That would be left to the WAG to levy the cost on us with their new tax raising powers.Too many glib comments.
You think the M25 was a waste, that's your argument??
I dread to think of London without the M25.
Having used that very road this Monday morning, I tend to agree. It was slow (8am) but still a lot better than the stationery traffic on the roads I could see overhead![]()
Glib comments are ones like snaggy's, who cannot see the bigger picture for Wales as a whole. Newport is an environmental and topographical bottle neck that needs to be remedied
I agree something needs to be done,but not at the environmental cost or without those that will benefit most contributing something.And WP I don't think the M25 was a waste at all.it makes a great car-park.How's that for a glib comment.
Tue Jun 04, 2019 6:25 pm
dogfound wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Sven wrote:WelshPatriot wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Hmmmm,some of us remember when the M25 was touted as the answer to London's traffic congestion.Not guaranteed to fix the problem and to date no businesses had signed to help with the cost.That would be left to the WAG to levy the cost on us with their new tax raising powers.Too many glib comments.
You think the M25 was a waste, that's your argument??
I dread to think of London without the M25.
Having used that very road this Monday morning, I tend to agree. It was slow (8am) but still a lot better than the stationery traffic on the roads I could see overhead![]()
Glib comments are ones like snaggy's, who cannot see the bigger picture for Wales as a whole. Newport is an environmental and topographical bottle neck that needs to be remedied
I agree something needs to be done,but not at the environmental cost or without those that will benefit most contributing something.And WP I don't think the M25 was a waste at all.it makes a great car-park.How's that for a glib comment.
What's the environmental cost? Same as they said about Cardiff bay Except that the disaster they predicted didn't happen in fact it's well documented that wildlife as thrived a mile away since it was built? Wildlife got great habit of adapting if care is taken to minimise effects.. pollution wise whats worse thousands of cars stuck in traffic jams every day or thousands of cars moving it's a simple choice but reality! What is not an option is doing nothing Which environmentalists prefer
Its a well documented fact that the more roads you build the more cars you get, that's why I used the M25 example.It solved nothing.The other thing nobody seems to have mentioned is we would, as a nation, have to borrow heavily to fund this project.Who would pay?
its also pretty well documented by thousands and thousands of drivers that the M4 { the road in question } runs much better where the road has been made 3 lanes either side of this bottleneck....and yep money gets borrowed by every country in the world to build essential infrastructure .
the M25 example has to be a joke..? if it hasn't solved anything why haven't they closed it. all that money pointlessly spent on its upkeep.. infact why not close all the motorways ?
Tue Jun 04, 2019 6:27 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Sven wrote:WelshPatriot wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Hmmmm,some of us remember when the M25 was touted as the answer to London's traffic congestion.Not guaranteed to fix the problem and to date no businesses had signed to help with the cost.That would be left to the WAG to levy the cost on us with their new tax raising powers.Too many glib comments.
You think the M25 was a waste, that's your argument??
I dread to think of London without the M25.
Having used that very road this Monday morning, I tend to agree. It was slow (8am) but still a lot better than the stationery traffic on the roads I could see overhead![]()
Glib comments are ones like snaggy's, who cannot see the bigger picture for Wales as a whole. Newport is an environmental and topographical bottle neck that needs to be remedied
I agree something needs to be done,but not at the environmental cost or without those that will benefit most contributing something.And WP I don't think the M25 was a waste at all.it makes a great car-park.How's that for a glib comment.
What's the environmental cost? Same as they said about Cardiff bay Except that the disaster they predicted didn't happen in fact it's well documented that wildlife as thrived a mile away since it was built? Wildlife got great habit of adapting if care is taken to minimise effects.. pollution wise whats worse thousands of cars stuck in traffic jams every day or thousands of cars moving it's a simple choice but reality! What is not an option is doing nothing Which environmentalists prefer
Tue Jun 04, 2019 6:34 pm
Bluebird For Life wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Sven wrote:WelshPatriot wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Hmmmm,some of us remember when the M25 was touted as the answer to London's traffic congestion.Not guaranteed to fix the problem and to date no businesses had signed to help with the cost.That would be left to the WAG to levy the cost on us with their new tax raising powers.Too many glib comments.
You think the M25 was a waste, that's your argument??
I dread to think of London without the M25.
Having used that very road this Monday morning, I tend to agree. It was slow (8am) but still a lot better than the stationery traffic on the roads I could see overhead![]()
Glib comments are ones like snaggy's, who cannot see the bigger picture for Wales as a whole. Newport is an environmental and topographical bottle neck that needs to be remedied
I agree something needs to be done,but not at the environmental cost or without those that will benefit most contributing something.And WP I don't think the M25 was a waste at all.it makes a great car-park.How's that for a glib comment.
What's the environmental cost? Same as they said about Cardiff bay Except that the disaster they predicted didn't happen in fact it's well documented that wildlife as thrived a mile away since it was built? Wildlife got great habit of adapting if care is taken to minimise effects.. pollution wise whats worse thousands of cars stuck in traffic jams every day or thousands of cars moving it's a simple choice but reality! What is not an option is doing nothing Which environmentalists prefer
Just for the record - the wildlife didn't move one mile away, some of the more adaptable species moved to the Gwent Levels some 15 or so miles away to the very sites which were at threat from this road. One of the big problems with the route proposed was that it would pass through a unique habitat where the effect of it being destroyed could not be minimized. Not passing judgement here but please try and get the facts right...
Tue Jun 04, 2019 6:34 pm
Bluebird For Life wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Sven wrote:WelshPatriot wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Hmmmm,some of us remember when the M25 was touted as the answer to London's traffic congestion.Not guaranteed to fix the problem and to date no businesses had signed to help with the cost.That would be left to the WAG to levy the cost on us with their new tax raising powers.Too many glib comments.
You think the M25 was a waste, that's your argument??
I dread to think of London without the M25.
Having used that very road this Monday morning, I tend to agree. It was slow (8am) but still a lot better than the stationery traffic on the roads I could see overhead![]()
Glib comments are ones like snaggy's, who cannot see the bigger picture for Wales as a whole. Newport is an environmental and topographical bottle neck that needs to be remedied
I agree something needs to be done,but not at the environmental cost or without those that will benefit most contributing something.And WP I don't think the M25 was a waste at all.it makes a great car-park.How's that for a glib comment.
What's the environmental cost? Same as they said about Cardiff bay Except that the disaster they predicted didn't happen in fact it's well documented that wildlife as thrived a mile away since it was built? Wildlife got great habit of adapting if care is taken to minimise effects.. pollution wise whats worse thousands of cars stuck in traffic jams every day or thousands of cars moving it's a simple choice but reality! What is not an option is doing nothing Which environmentalists prefer
Just for the record - the wildlife didn't move one mile away, some of the more adaptable species moved to the Gwent Levels some 15 or so miles away to the very sites which were at threat from this road. One of the big problems with the route proposed was that it would pass through a unique habitat where the effect of it being destroyed could not be minimized. Not passing judgement here but please try and get the facts right...
Tue Jun 04, 2019 6:46 pm
Tue Jun 04, 2019 7:25 pm
Tue Jun 04, 2019 7:57 pm
RV Casual wrote:It took me just aslong to get from Tredegar Park to the Severn Bridge as it did to get from the Severn Bridge to Exeter the other day.
Not right thar and certainly not a one off.
Tue Jun 04, 2019 7:59 pm
Tue Jun 04, 2019 8:05 pm
Tue Jun 04, 2019 8:19 pm
moonboots wrote:I was long in favour of building the relief road, but on reflection I think Drakeford reached the correct conclusion. Definitely way too much money for just 14 miles of motorway. Also, and I'm not a tree hugger, but I think the environmental costs would be too high a price to pay. We need to find a better, more sustainable solution for the long term.
And for those who say let's get rid of the Welsh government because you don't like the decision or don't like Labour, I say let's get rid of Westminster because they've made bigger f**k ups. Brexit for one.
Tue Jun 04, 2019 8:24 pm
moonboots wrote:I was long in favour of building the relief road, but on reflection I think Drakeford reached the correct conclusion. Definitely way too much money for just 14 miles of motorway. Also, and I'm not a tree hugger, but I think the environmental costs would be too high a price to pay. We need to find a better, more sustainable solution for the long term.
And for those who say let's get rid of the Welsh government because you don't like the decision or don't like Labour, I say let's get rid of Westminster because they've made bigger f**k ups. Brexit for one.
Tue Jun 04, 2019 8:35 pm
dogfound wrote:moonboots wrote:I was long in favour of building the relief road, but on reflection I think Drakeford reached the correct conclusion. Definitely way too much money for just 14 miles of motorway. Also, and I'm not a tree hugger, but I think the environmental costs would be too high a price to pay. We need to find a better, more sustainable solution for the long term.
And for those who say let's get rid of the Welsh government because you don't like the decision or don't like Labour, I say let's get rid of Westminster because they've made bigger f**k ups. Brexit for one.
so you have a public enquiry that finds reasons for having a relief road are compelling. then ignore it..
in that case it should not be no road we need to find another solution ...it should be no road because we have found another solution ..christ they have had enough time to come up with this magical sustainable alternative surely ? or is there none..
Tue Jun 04, 2019 8:38 pm
moonboots wrote:dogfound wrote:moonboots wrote:I was long in favour of building the relief road, but on reflection I think Drakeford reached the correct conclusion. Definitely way too much money for just 14 miles of motorway. Also, and I'm not a tree hugger, but I think the environmental costs would be too high a price to pay. We need to find a better, more sustainable solution for the long term.
And for those who say let's get rid of the Welsh government because you don't like the decision or don't like Labour, I say let's get rid of Westminster because they've made bigger f**k ups. Brexit for one.
so you have a public enquiry that finds reasons for having a relief road are compelling. then ignore it..
in that case it should not be no road we need to find another solution ...it should be no road because we have found another solution ..christ they have had enough time to come up with this magical sustainable alternative surely ? or is there none..
There's always another way bro.
Tue Jun 04, 2019 8:41 pm
moonboots wrote:dogfound wrote:moonboots wrote:I was long in favour of building the relief road, but on reflection I think Drakeford reached the correct conclusion. Definitely way too much money for just 14 miles of motorway. Also, and I'm not a tree hugger, but I think the environmental costs would be too high a price to pay. We need to find a better, more sustainable solution for the long term.
And for those who say let's get rid of the Welsh government because you don't like the decision or don't like Labour, I say let's get rid of Westminster because they've made bigger f**k ups. Brexit for one.
so you have a public enquiry that finds reasons for having a relief road are compelling. then ignore it..
in that case it should not be no road we need to find another solution ...it should be no road because we have found another solution ..christ they have had enough time to come up with this magical sustainable alternative surely ? or is there none..
There's always another way bro.
Tue Jun 04, 2019 8:46 pm
dogfound wrote:moonboots wrote:dogfound wrote:moonboots wrote:I was long in favour of building the relief road, but on reflection I think Drakeford reached the correct conclusion. Definitely way too much money for just 14 miles of motorway. Also, and I'm not a tree hugger, but I think the environmental costs would be too high a price to pay. We need to find a better, more sustainable solution for the long term.
And for those who say let's get rid of the Welsh government because you don't like the decision or don't like Labour, I say let's get rid of Westminster because they've made bigger f**k ups. Brexit for one.
so you have a public enquiry that finds reasons for having a relief road are compelling. then ignore it..
in that case it should not be no road we need to find another solution ...it should be no road because we have found another solution ..christ they have had enough time to come up with this magical sustainable alternative surely ? or is there none..
There's always another way bro.
clearly....the USS enterprise beaming cars from tredegar park to the severn bridge maybe..
Tue Jun 04, 2019 8:47 pm
Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:02 pm
Tue Jun 04, 2019 10:01 pm
rumpo kid wrote:Yep, second referendum for me. This Welsh Govt has been stuffed with cretins from day one.
Drakeford is just the latest of them. Only in Labour Wales can a social worker run the place(or not, as is the case).
They have to go.
Tue Jun 04, 2019 11:01 pm
dogfound wrote:first proposed in 1991.
are they real.
I wish there was a campaign for a 2nd assembly referendum
Tue Jun 04, 2019 11:08 pm
epping blue wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Look at it logically the arguement against? Wildlife ect would be a destroyed with the bay what happened wildlife moved 1mile away and is thriving ! Gwent levels same will happen nature as habit of adapting.... alternative public transport what planet are people on to think public transport can transport all the goods all the people from south east Wales that use m4 Its cloud cookoo land to think you can use public transport to cut congestion! Wag is a useless waste of money who undoubtedly will now give themselves a pat on back for wasting £44m of our money knowing they would not build rd before they even started public inquiry..![]()
I noted there was a candidate in the Newport West by election who stood on the ticket of Abolish the Welsh Assembly ". He didn't do very well but a pretty crowded Westminster By election probably wasn't the time or place. I know from my in laws in mid wales they'd be right behind that. So are the people pissed off enough to actually vote for them or are those pissed off, too apathetic to vote anyway. Just under 2 years to the next election.
Tue Jun 04, 2019 11:10 pm
tcblue wrote:dogfound wrote:first proposed in 1991.
are they real.
I wish there was a campaign for a 2nd assembly referendum
Why, so England can run us cuck?
As you have pointed out, the decision goes back pre Assembly and to a Tory Gov in Westminster.
Also, you absolute pleb, it was the Welsh Labour Government who made the decision. Had you bothered to watch proceedings in the Assembly, you would have seen the majority of AMs going mad at this decision.
You understand the difference between a legislature and executive? You understand the difference between a country and an English county? Cos that’s what you’d relegate Wales to.
Tue Jun 04, 2019 11:12 pm
rumpo kid wrote:Yep, second referendum for me. This Welsh Govt has been stuffed with cretins from day one.
Drakeford is just the latest of them. Only in Labour Wales can a social worker run the place(or not, as is the case).
They have to go.
Tue Jun 04, 2019 11:42 pm
tcblue wrote:dogfound wrote:first proposed in 1991.
are they real.
I wish there was a campaign for a 2nd assembly referendum
Why, so England can run us cuck?
As you have pointed out, the decision goes back pre Assembly and to a Tory Gov in Westminster.
Also, you absolute pleb, it was the Welsh Labour Government who made the decision. Had you bothered to watch proceedings in the Assembly, you would have seen the majority of AMs going mad at this decision.
You understand the difference between a legislature and executive? You understand the difference between a country and an English county? Cos that’s what you’d relegate Wales to.
Wed Jun 05, 2019 12:10 am
tcblue wrote:rumpo kid wrote:Yep, second referendum for me. This Welsh Govt has been stuffed with cretins from day one.
Drakeford is just the latest of them. Only in Labour Wales can a social worker run the place(or not, as is the case).
They have to go.
I think we should go whole hog tbh. If we are going to abolish our national parliament (because of a decision made by the government![]()
), we should just give up as a nation.
Giving power back to unelected officials in London would, and should, be the death of us.
Let’s just have a referendum on the nation itself. So the National Assembly yes, but also the national sports teams too. How does that sound? We can’t pick and choose as far as I’m concerned. We either have spines, or we cut them out
Wed Jun 05, 2019 8:05 am
tcblue wrote:rumpo kid wrote:Yep, second referendum for me. This Welsh Govt has been stuffed with cretins from day one.
Drakeford is just the latest of them. Only in Labour Wales can a social worker run the place(or not, as is the case).
They have to go.
I think we should go whole hog tbh. If we are going to abolish our national parliament (because of a decision made by the government![]()
), we should just give up as a nation.
Giving power back to unelected officials in London would, and should, be the death of us.
Let’s just have a referendum on the nation itself. So the National Assembly yes, but also the national sports teams too. How does that sound? We can’t pick and choose as far as I’m concerned. We either have spines, or we cut them out
Wed Jun 05, 2019 8:14 am
Jock wrote:tcblue wrote:rumpo kid wrote:Yep, second referendum for me. This Welsh Govt has been stuffed with cretins from day one.
Drakeford is just the latest of them. Only in Labour Wales can a social worker run the place(or not, as is the case).
They have to go.
I think we should go whole hog tbh. If we are going to abolish our national parliament (because of a decision made by the government![]()
), we should just give up as a nation.
Giving power back to unelected officials in London would, and should, be the death of us.
Let’s just have a referendum on the nation itself. So the National Assembly yes, but also the national sports teams too. How does that sound? We can’t pick and choose as far as I’m concerned. We either have spines, or we cut them out
Unelected officials in London ???
Think you’ll find the unelected officials are in Brussels.
Wed Jun 05, 2019 8:14 am