Sat Dec 24, 2016 9:58 am
ianto13 wrote:Don't see any millionaires wanting to buy us? It's easy to get a new manager or players but a new owner?
Sat Dec 24, 2016 11:35 am
Charlie Harper wrote:Just asking but is the Premier League the be all and end all ?
It's easy for me to say that as I don't go anymore but I'm interested in other views as once there it takes a big percentage of the income on greedy players and agents.
Personally I'd rather the Championship as at least City can compete
Sat Dec 24, 2016 11:36 am
Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:15 pm
blue lagoon wrote:Charlie Harper wrote:Just asking but is the Premier League the be all and end all ?
It's easy for me to say that as I don't go anymore but I'm interested in other views as once there it takes a big percentage of the income on greedy players and agents.
Personally I'd rather the Championship as at least City can compete
We are better off without plastic fans like you
Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:19 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:dogfound wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Not while Vincent Tan is the owner.
you dont want prem football while he is owner?
or
you dont think we will get prem football under him?
He does not deserve to be an owner of a premier club.
Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:35 pm
Charlie Harper wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:dogfound wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Not while Vincent Tan is the owner.
you dont want prem football while he is owner?
or
you dont think we will get prem football under him?
He does not deserve to be an owner of a premier club.
I find that statement amazing. VT made a huge mistake with the rebrand but has reversed it, all be it with baggage, but the guy has done so much good for City. He is here for a long time IMO.
Who else would write off £68M ?
When you have the answer let me know.
Sat Dec 24, 2016 5:27 pm
Charlie Harper wrote:blue lagoon wrote:Charlie Harper wrote:Just asking but is the Premier League the be all and end all ?
It's easy for me to say that as I don't go anymore but I'm interested in other views as once there it takes a big percentage of the income on greedy players and agents.
Personally I'd rather the Championship as at least City can compete
We are better off without plastic fans like you
Payback![]()
Merry Christmas mate
Sat Dec 24, 2016 6:33 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Charlie Harper wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:dogfound wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Not while Vincent Tan is the owner.
you dont want prem football while he is owner?
or
you dont think we will get prem football under him?
He does not deserve to be an owner of a premier club.
I find that statement amazing. VT made a huge mistake with the rebrand but has reversed it, all be it with baggage, but the guy has done so much good for City. He is here for a long time IMO.
Who else would write off £68M ?
When you have the answer let me know.
Answer...until he apologises.
Sat Dec 24, 2016 6:45 pm
Charlie Harper wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Charlie Harper wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:dogfound wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Not while Vincent Tan is the owner.
you dont want prem football while he is owner?
or
you dont think we will get prem football under him?
He does not deserve to be an owner of a premier club.
I find that statement amazing. VT made a huge mistake with the rebrand but has reversed it, all be it with baggage, but the guy has done so much good for City. He is here for a long time IMO.
Who else would write off £68M ?
When you have the answer let me know.
Answer...until he apologises.
I think if you are waiting for an apology then keep waiting. I feel he is doing everything possible to make the club viable, and the rebrand aside, which I never accepted, he is the best chairman this football club has had IMO
Suck it in like I have and move forward
Sat Dec 24, 2016 6:47 pm
Sat Dec 24, 2016 7:04 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Charlie Harper wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Charlie Harper wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:dogfound wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Not while Vincent Tan is the owner.
you dont want prem football while he is owner?
or
you dont think we will get prem football under him?
He does not deserve to be an owner of a premier club.
I find that statement amazing. VT made a huge mistake with the rebrand but has reversed it, all be it with baggage, but the guy has done so much good for City. He is here for a long time IMO.
Who else would write off £68M ?
When you have the answer let me know.
Answer...until he apologises.
I think if you are waiting for an apology then keep waiting. I feel he is doing everything possible to make the club viable, and the rebrand aside, which I never accepted, he is the best chairman this football club has had IMO
Suck it in like I have and move forward
Bollocks to that....Tan Out.
Sat Dec 24, 2016 7:13 pm
phildavies wrote:Anyone that doesn't want Cardiff to be winning the premier league isn't a proper Cardiff fan.
Sat Dec 24, 2016 10:46 pm
Sun Dec 25, 2016 10:02 am
Scandinavianbluebird wrote:The potential for Cardiff is fantastic. Never stop dreaming!
Sun Dec 25, 2016 11:10 am
Scandinavianbluebird wrote:The potential for Cardiff is fantastic. Never stop dreaming!
Sun Dec 25, 2016 11:24 pm
Mon Dec 26, 2016 12:17 am
murphy wrote:phildavies wrote:Anyone that doesn't want Cardiff to be winning the premier league isn't a proper Cardiff fan.
Anyone who thinks we'll ever win the PL is a thick as shit Cardiff fan.
Mon Dec 26, 2016 12:42 am
Mon Dec 26, 2016 9:06 am
Scandinavianbluebird wrote:The potential for Cardiff is fantastic. Never stop dreaming!