UPDATED ' SKY BREAKING NEWS SOL BAMBA '

history now on with next debate.

Not anti ccfc but always as an opposite view to everyone else, so you always end up in a never ending one sided argument !! Typical MO of roathy .

I think the majority of people in the footballing community will feel that a 2 game ban is a pretty good result for both him and the club, in fact probably most on this thread say the same. How on earth is that the opposite? To say otherwise is the typical MO of a moron, no offence.

Not anti ccfc but always as an opposite view to everyone else, so you always end up in a never ending one sided argument !! Typical MO of roathy .

I think the majority of people in the footballing community will feel that a 2 game ban is a pretty good result for both him and the club, in fact probably most on this thread say the same. How on earth is that the opposite? To say otherwise is the typical MO of a moron, no

Better being a moron than a tw*t "offence meant"

I agree with you, unfortunately you are currently displaying both those traits for no apparent reason. Not everyone is going to agree with you. Have a day off for Gods sake.

Not anti ccfc but always as an opposite view to everyone else, so you always end up in a never ending one sided argument !! Typical MO of roathy .

I think the majority of people in the footballing community will feel that a 2 game ban is a pretty good result for both him and the club, in fact probably most on this thread say the same. How on earth is that the opposite? To say otherwise is the typical MO of a moron, no offence.

Your backtracking and trying to imply the football community would agree with you however, the community would feel he may have got off lightly with a 2 match ban as most expected 3 you however felt a 4 match ban was justified and not one person agreed with you.

To try and say you were not in disagreement with the majority is quite farcical roathie.

Not anti ccfc but always as an opposite view to everyone else, so you always end up in a never ending one sided argument !! Typical MO of roathy .

I think the majority of people in the footballing community will feel that a 2 game ban is a pretty good result for both him and the club, in fact probably most on this thread say the same. How on earth is that the opposite? To say otherwise is the typical MO of a moron, no offence.

Your backtracking and trying to imply the football community would agree with you however, the community would feel he may have got off lightly with a 2 match ban as most expected 3 you however felt a 4 match ban was justified and not one person agreed with you.

To try and say you were not in disagreement with the majority is quite farcical roathie.

So you are blind aswell as stupid and paranoid. Not one agreed hey? At the time of my post it was 3 in agreeance and 1 in disagreement. I think everybody expected a 3/4 game ban to suggest otherwise is ludicrous.

People can say it's harsh but it was a stupid thing to do. Let's hope our defence can hold it together now.

He was stupid and it's probably fair. It was a nasty challenge on him and I am guessing not the first. I understand that you get annoyed with officials when you think they have ignored such obvious fouls.

They were reactions to the 4 game ban. It is only when it was announced it was 2 did the captain hindsights come into play and the paranoid peters.

Not anti ccfc but always as an opposite view to everyone else, so you always end up in a never ending one sided argument !! Typical MO of roathy .

I think the majority of people in the footballing community will feel that a 2 game ban is a pretty good result for both him and the club, in fact probably most on this thread say the same. How on earth is that the opposite? To say otherwise is the typical MO of a moron, no offence.

Your backtracking and trying to imply the football community would agree with you however, the community would feel he may have got off lightly with a 2 match ban as most expected 3 you however felt a 4 match ban was justified and not one person agreed with you.

To try and say you were not in disagreement with the majority is quite farcical roathie.

So you are blind aswell as stupid and paranoid. Not one agreed hey? At the time of my post it was 3 in agreeance and 1 in disagreement. I think everybody expected a 3/4 game ban to suggest otherwise is ludicrous.

People can say it's harsh but it was a stupid thing to do. Let's hope our defence can hold it together now.

He was stupid and it's probably fair. It was a nasty challenge on him and I am guessing not the first. I understand that you get annoyed with officials when you think they have ignored such obvious fouls.

They were reactions to the 4 game ban. It is only when it was announced it was 2 did the captain hindsights come into play and the paranoid peters.

Roathie you said 4 match ban was getting off lightly, not one of those posts you've quoted says that so how do you figure they back you up??

Not anti ccfc but always as an opposite view to everyone else, so you always end up in a never ending one sided argument !! Typical MO of roathy .

I think the majority of people in the footballing community will feel that a 2 game ban is a pretty good result for both him and the club, in fact probably most on this thread say the same. How on earth is that the opposite? To say otherwise is the typical MO of a moron, no offence.

Your backtracking and trying to imply the football community would agree with you however, the community would feel he may have got off lightly with a 2 match ban as most expected 3 you however felt a 4 match ban was justified and not one person agreed with you.

To try and say you were not in disagreement with the majority is quite farcical roathie.

So you are blind aswell as stupid and paranoid. Not one agreed hey? At the time of my post it was 3 in agreeance and 1 in disagreement. I think everybody expected a 3/4 game ban to suggest otherwise is ludicrous.

People can say it's harsh but it was a stupid thing to do. Let's hope our defence can hold it together now.

He was stupid and it's probably fair. It was a nasty challenge on him and I am guessing not the first. I understand that you get annoyed with officials when you think they have ignored such obvious fouls.

They were reactions to the 4 game ban. It is only when it was announced it was 2 did the captain hindsights come into play and the paranoid peters.

Roathie you said 4 match ban was getting off lightly, not one of those posts you've quoted says that so how do you figure they back you up??

And I quote:-

"Your (sic) backtracking and trying to imply the football community would agree with you however, the community would feel he may have got off lightly with a 2 match ban as most expected 3 you however felt a 4 match ban was justified and not one person agreed with you."

So before you suddenly changed course, you were talking about my comment that most of the footballing community would agree a 2 match ban is getting off lightly (which is obviously correct), you also then touched upon nobody agreeing that a 4 match ban was "justified" (which is nonsense of course as that is what most people were expecting, and many did indeed justify on this very thread), that only changed when the 2 match ban was announced. Which is now why Mr Hindsight and Captain Paranoid has come out to play

I feel Bamba brought the game into disrepute and the wording of the refs report could easily have landed him with a 4 match ban, plus a fine, plus a club fine for failing to control our players. he is undoubtedly thanking his lucky stars and he (and we) got off very lightly indeed. Nobody with any sense can argue otherwise....

Not anti ccfc but always as an opposite view to everyone else, so you always end up in a never ending one sided argument !! Typical MO of roathy .

I think the majority of people in the footballing community will feel that a 2 game ban is a pretty good result for both him and the club, in fact probably most on this thread say the same. How on earth is that the opposite? To say otherwise is the typical MO of a moron, no offence.

Your backtracking and trying to imply the football community would agree with you however, the community would feel he may have got off lightly with a 2 match ban as most expected 3 you however felt a 4 match ban was justified and not one person agreed with you.

To try and say you were not in disagreement with the majority is quite farcical roathie.

So you are blind aswell as stupid and paranoid. Not one agreed hey? At the time of my post it was 3 in agreeance and 1 in disagreement. I think everybody expected a 3/4 game ban to suggest otherwise is ludicrous.

People can say it's harsh but it was a stupid thing to do. Let's hope our defence can hold it together now.

He was stupid and it's probably fair. It was a nasty challenge on him and I am guessing not the first. I understand that you get annoyed with officials when you think they have ignored such obvious fouls.

They were reactions to the 4 game ban. It is only when it was announced it was 2 did the captain hindsights come into play and the paranoid peters.

Roathie you said 4 match ban was getting off lightly, not one of those posts you've quoted says that so how do you figure they back you up??

And I quote:-

"Your (sic) backtracking and trying to imply the football community would agree with you however, the community would feel he may have got off lightly with a 2 match ban as most expected 3 you however felt a 4 match ban was justified and not one person agreed with you."

So before you suddenly changed course, you were talking about my comment that most of the footballing community would agree a 2 match ban is getting off lightly (which is obviously correct), you also then touched upon nobody agreeing that a 4 match ban was "justified" (which is nonsense of course as that is what most people were expecting, and many did indeed justify on this very thread), that only changed when the 2 match ban was announced. Which is now why Mr Hindsight and Captain Paranoid has come out to play

I feel Bamba brought the game into disrepute and the wording of the refs report could easily have landed him with a 4 match ban, plus a fine, plus a club fine for failing to control our players. he is undoubtedly thanking his lucky stars and he (and we) got off very lightly indeed. Nobody with any sense can argue otherwise....

Try reading a post before you go on your circa 100 word rants. Roathie exposed again.

Yep I did, hence the reply. It was not a rant it was a clear explanation to why your obsession with Roathie is making you disagree with the most obvious of statements. I think paranoia is the only exposing trait here. He got off lightly, move on.

Last edited by EalingBluebird on Wed Dec 14, 2016 7:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

Not anti ccfc but always as an opposite view to everyone else, so you always end up in a never ending one sided argument !! Typical MO of roathy .

I think the majority of people in the footballing community will feel that a 2 game ban is a pretty good result for both him and the club, in fact probably most on this thread say the same. How on earth is that the opposite? To say otherwise is the typical MO of a moron, no offence.

Your backtracking and trying to imply the football community would agree with you however, the community would feel he may have got off lightly with a 2 match ban as most expected 3 you however felt a 4 match ban was justified and not one person agreed with you.

To try and say you were not in disagreement with the majority is quite farcical roathie.

So you are blind aswell as stupid and paranoid. Not one agreed hey? At the time of my post it was 3 in agreeance and 1 in disagreement. I think everybody expected a 3/4 game ban to suggest otherwise is ludicrous.

People can say it's harsh but it was a stupid thing to do. Let's hope our defence can hold it together now.

He was stupid and it's probably fair. It was a nasty challenge on him and I am guessing not the first. I understand that you get annoyed with officials when you think they have ignored such obvious fouls.

They were reactions to the 4 game ban. It is only when it was announced it was 2 did the captain hindsights come into play and the paranoid peters.

Roathie you said 4 match ban was getting off lightly, not one of those posts you've quoted says that so how do you figure they back you up??

And I quote:-

"Your (sic) backtracking and trying to imply the football community would agree with you however, the community would feel he may have got off lightly with a 2 match ban as most expected 3 you however felt a 4 match ban was justified and not one person agreed with you."

So before you suddenly changed course, you were talking about my comment that most of the footballing community would agree a 2 match ban is getting off lightly (which is obviously correct), you also then touched upon nobody agreeing that a 4 match ban was "justified" (which is nonsense of course as that is what most people were expecting, and many did indeed justify on this very thread), that only changed when the 2 match ban was announced. Which is now why Mr Hindsight and Captain Paranoid has come out to play

I feel Bamba brought the game into disrepute and the wording of the refs report could easily have landed him with a 4 match ban, plus a fine, plus a club fine for failing to control our players. he is undoubtedly thanking his lucky stars and he (and we) got off very lightly indeed. Nobody with any sense can argue otherwise....

And stop saying "we" Jack.

Grow up a little bit maybe.

Grow up a little bit maybe.

Do you a deal I'll grow up a little bit when you stop posting so negatively and anticardiff.

I have never done either so deal