Sat Nov 05, 2016 10:12 pm
Sat Nov 05, 2016 10:14 pm
polo wrote:Tonteg talking about sensible posts
Is this the same guy who said Simon Moore, Steven Caulker, Jordon Mutch and Frazier Campbell were the future spine of the England team?
Jordon Mutch was a better player than Michael Carrick
Malky could go on to manage Man United
Tan was to blame for Wigan getting relegated
Sensible posts be fucked
Stick to alien conspiracies you pleb.
Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:00 pm
polo wrote:Tonteg talking about sensible posts
Is this the same guy who said Simon Moore, Steven Caulker, Jordon Mutch and Frazier Campbell were the future spine of the England team?
Jordon Mutch was a better player than Michael Carrick
Malky could go on to manage Man United
Tan was to blame for Wigan getting relegated
Sensible posts be fucked
Stick to alien conspiracies you pleb.
Sun Nov 06, 2016 5:10 am
City Slicker wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:norms76 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:The OP is spot on. Dropping Whitts was the correct decision for this game in my opinion and the fact he came on as a sub to score doesn't change my opinion. It just goes to show the level of intelligence on this forum that just because a dropped player came on to score, the usual culprits slate the OP for what was a perfectly sensible post. Anyone with footballing knowledge would agree replacing Whitts with Richardson who offers more pace and energy in the middle away from home against a team who are superior to us, resulting in us defending and chasing the ball for the majority of the game was the correct decision from Warnock.
What you mean usual suspects? I pretty much said that he's dropped because we're setting up defensively. The fact he describes Whitts as much use as a chocolate tea pot is sensible is it? If you think that then it's you that needs to look at your level of intelligence because like it or not, Whitts is and always has been a very, very good player and remains a very important player for us.
6 different managers seem to agree with what I say as he keeps getting picked for Cardiff despite you and troobloo constantly knocking him.
You clearly think you're one of the usual suspects to respond. You're one of the worst on here for criticising others opinions. You seem to love having a pop of me for some reason. Whether that's because I tried to sensibly debate with you in the past and was proven correct, I don't know, but you do seem one of several who seem to 'gang up' with the usual culprits (the ones who always seem to be online at the same time to slate someone, perhaps multiple users).
You clearly haven't read the OP properly as you've misinterpreted what he actually said. The OP has clearly said Whitts would be as much use as a chocolate teapot AT NEWCASTLE. I fully agree with this point as Whitts' qualities aren't covering ground and winning the ball back. Whitts' strengths are getting on the ball and creating chances when we are the dominant team against an inferior team.
Today was always going to be a game where we would have to defend and stop Newcastle by fielding a quicker, more mobile team to try to stop Newcastle cutting through us with their superior passing, movement and quality. Therefore I agree with the OP. You obviously disagree and that's fine, but there was no need for anyone to ridicule the OP for his post.
Well done for sticking up to the Whittingham police Tont
Sun Nov 06, 2016 5:14 am
norms76 wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:norms76 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:norms76 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:The OP is spot on. Dropping Whitts was the correct decision for this game in my opinion and the fact he came on as a sub to score doesn't change my opinion. It just goes to show the level of intelligence on this forum that just because a dropped player came on to score, the usual culprits slate the OP for what was a perfectly sensible post. Anyone with footballing knowledge would agree replacing Whitts with Richardson who offers more pace and energy in the middle away from home against a team who are superior to us, resulting in us defending and chasing the ball for the majority of the game was the correct decision from Warnock.
What you mean usual suspects? I pretty much said that he's dropped because we're setting up defensively. The fact he describes Whitts as much use as a chocolate tea pot is sensible is it? If you think that then it's you that needs to look at your level of intelligence because like it or not, Whitts is and always has been a very, very good player and remains a very important player for us.
6 different managers seem to agree with what I say as he keeps getting picked for Cardiff despite you and troobloo constantly knocking him.
You clearly think you're one of the usual suspects to respond. You're one of the worst on here for criticising others opinions. You seem to love having a pop of me for some reason. Whether that's because I tried to sensibly debate with you in the past and was proven correct, I don't know, but you do seem one of several who seem to 'gang up' with the usual culprits (the ones who always seem to be online at the same time to slate someone, perhaps multiple users).
You clearly haven't read the OP properly as you've misinterpreted what he actually said. The OP has clearly said Whitts would be as much use as a chocolate teapot AT NEWCASTLE. I fully agree with this point as Whitts' qualities aren't covering ground and winning the ball back. Whitts' strengths are getting on the ball and creating chances when we are the dominant team against an inferior team.
Today was always going to be a game where we would have to defend and stop Newcastle by fielding a quicker, more mobile team to try to stop Newcastle cutting through us with their superior passing, movement and quality. Therefore I agree with the OP. You obviously disagree and that's fine, but there was no need for anyone to ridicule the OP for his post.
Seem to love having a pop at you?![]()
I responded to your post as you were clearly having a pop at everyone that didn't agree with Troobloos dislike of Whitts. It's not just today's decision(which I thought was correct by the way) not to start Whitts and go more defensive. It's the constant Whitts bashing by you for one and troobloo, means that we're pointing fingers now.
Get your head out your arse ffs I couldn't give a shit what you say and I've never debated anything with you as you seem to like pretending to be the forums football guru. I cannot take anything you say seriously mate.
Can you show me where I'm one of the worst for giving criticism to other posters please? Otherwise you're full of shit. I have an opinion and if it's different to others I'll speak my mind.
Spot on Norms.
I also think it was a good decision tactically to rest Whitts for this game.
As it happens it seems to be the wrong one though as Richardson was pretty useless and didn't perform according to match reports.
He'll be back in for Huddersfield at home mate, he's got 3 goals in 5 for Warnock, people can say what they want as I believe he's a very important player for us and when he's gone perhaps people will actually see what a legend the man is. He's the best midfielder I've ever seen in a City shirt and a fantastic servant to Cardiff, which is rare in football these days.
Sun Nov 06, 2016 9:25 am
Sun Nov 06, 2016 9:34 am
smakerzthebluebird wrote:Never seen such a comical thread
You got people slating the OP for his comments then agreeing with him half way through but still calling him an idiot
Couldn't make it up
Sun Nov 06, 2016 2:48 pm
grange_end1927 wrote:smakerzthebluebird wrote:Never seen such a comical thread
You got people slating the OP for his comments then agreeing with him half way through but still calling him an idiot
Couldn't make it up
![]()
Mate some right f*cking muppets on this thread
Sun Nov 06, 2016 5:11 pm
Steve Zodiak wrote:polo wrote:Tonteg talking about sensible posts
Is this the same guy who said Simon Moore, Steven Caulker, Jordon Mutch and Frazier Campbell were the future spine of the England team?
Jordon Mutch was a better player than Michael Carrick
Malky could go on to manage Man United
Tan was to blame for Wigan getting relegated
Sensible posts be fucked
Stick to alien conspiracies you pleb.
Not often I agree with you but I don't think the words sensible post and Tonteg should be mentioned in the same breath. I remember his ridiculous comments as well. I don't remember many comments on this forum, but some of his are so stupid they are unforgettable.
Sun Nov 06, 2016 5:31 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Steve Zodiak wrote:polo wrote:Tonteg talking about sensible posts
Is this the same guy who said Simon Moore, Steven Caulker, Jordon Mutch and Frazier Campbell were the future spine of the England team?
Jordon Mutch was a better player than Michael Carrick
Malky could go on to manage Man United
Tan was to blame for Wigan getting relegated
Sensible posts be fucked
Stick to alien conspiracies you pleb.
Not often I agree with you but I don't think the words sensible post and Tonteg should be mentioned in the same breath. I remember his ridiculous comments as well. I don't remember many comments on this forum, but some of his are so stupid they are unforgettable.
The first 3 things Polo has accused me of, I didn't actually say. He misinterpreted my post about Moore, Caulker, Mutch and Campbell being our young Premiership spine of English players who I said could have the POTENTIAL to all go on to be future England internationals. It was a positive post about the potential of our team at the beginning our our Premiership season, but Polo somehow transformed that in making out my post was idiotic, despite one of the mods agreeing with me and making the post a sticky (I guess whatever mod made it a sticky is an idiot as well then).
I never reply to Polo directly as I put him on ignore months ago, I don't come on this forum to speak to people like him and it's only when you responded to Polo quoting him in that I noticed his post. He's done yet another abusive post calling me a pleb, but coming from someone who has a gambling and drug addiction and once said Aaron Ramsey would never make it as a top class footballer, his angry, abusive, nonsensical ramblings doesn't surprise me. It's why he's been banned from this forum several times and I fear he was on the drugs again last night with his angry, abusive attitude in that post.
You, Steve Zodiak are one of the several culprits I was referring to who blindly suck up to your friends to slate someone without seemingly being able to think for yourself to make any contribution of value. Do you all gather together in a group and decide what time you all log on, which posts to target and what victim to gang up on all together?
I couldn't care less if someone disagrees with my opinions, I come on this forum to have healthy debates about our football club, but there are several users on this forum who are totally ridiculous with their behaviour, you can't debate anything with certain people in a civil manner without them turning to abuse. It's why the standard of contributions on this forum is going downhill. As others have recently stated, these usual culprits I'm referring to have turned a perfectly sensible OP into a comical thread.
Sun Nov 06, 2016 6:13 pm
Sun Nov 06, 2016 6:27 pm
polo wrote:Misinterpreted
Judge for yourself
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=118938&hilit=Spine
Even talking about Mutch in the same bracket as Gerrard and Lampard ffs
Sun Nov 06, 2016 7:24 pm
polo wrote:Misinterpreted
Judge for yourself
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=118938&hilit=Spine
Even talking about Mutch in the same bracket as Gerrard and Lampard ffs