Sat Sep 17, 2016 8:55 pm
wez1927 wrote:epping blue wrote:RV Casual wrote:davids wrote:wez1927 wrote:he will never score with trollope in charge terrible service to him
But according to Lambert the fact that Trollope was here was a major factor in Lambert deciding to sign for us!
Obviously Trollope's approach has changed since they were at Bristol Rovers together.
I bet it was to be fair, it was a job for an old mate who had done a job for him in the lower leagues.
The only winner in this signing was Ricky Lambert, I bet he is laughing is head of (if the reports we are paying him £32k a week are true)
I'm not necessarily saying its a bad signing although I'm very doubtful at the moment. It is however the worst deal in the recent history of Cardiff City transfers.
If he plays beyond Xmas we'll be contracted to him for 3 years, he'll be 38. I cant envisage any possible scenario for us where Ricky Lambert is of use to us in 3 years. If we limit him to 20 games a season which I expect they'll do so they wont have to extend the contract than he's costing a mere £ 83,000 per game. WHICH f*cking IDIOT at our club negotiated that deal. We don't have a hope if we're run by such imbeciles.
beyond Christmas ? do have you seen his contract ?
Sat Sep 17, 2016 9:37 pm
Sat Sep 17, 2016 9:59 pm
Mike Strinati wrote:Give Lambert a chance. Can't be as bad as Gadonkey surely. Like above worth Harris given a chance up front behind Lambert and try something different. Can't be worse than so far this season.
Sun Sep 18, 2016 8:40 am
epping blue wrote:RV Casual wrote:davids wrote:wez1927 wrote:he will never score with trollope in charge terrible service to him
But according to Lambert the fact that Trollope was here was a major factor in Lambert deciding to sign for us!
Obviously Trollope's approach has changed since they were at Bristol Rovers together.
I bet it was to be fair, it was a job for an old mate who had done a job for him in the lower leagues.
The only winner in this signing was Ricky Lambert, I bet he is laughing is head of (if the reports we are paying him £32k a week are true)
I'm not necessarily saying its a bad signing although I'm very doubtful at the moment. It is however the worst deal in the recent history of Cardiff City transfers.
If he plays beyond Xmas we'll be contracted to him for 3 years, he'll be 38. I cant envisage any possible scenario for us where Ricky Lambert is of use to us in 3 years. If we limit him to 20 games a season which I expect they'll do so they wont have to extend the contract than he's costing a mere £ 83,000 per game. WHICH f*cking IDIOT at our club negotiated that deal. We don't have a hope if we're run by such imbeciles.
Sun Sep 18, 2016 10:04 am
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:epping blue wrote:RV Casual wrote:davids wrote:wez1927 wrote:he will never score with trollope in charge terrible service to him
But according to Lambert the fact that Trollope was here was a major factor in Lambert deciding to sign for us!
Obviously Trollope's approach has changed since they were at Bristol Rovers together.
I bet it was to be fair, it was a job for an old mate who had done a job for him in the lower leagues.
The only winner in this signing was Ricky Lambert, I bet he is laughing is head of (if the reports we are paying him £32k a week are true)
I'm not necessarily saying its a bad signing although I'm very doubtful at the moment. It is however the worst deal in the recent history of Cardiff City transfers.
If he plays beyond Xmas we'll be contracted to him for 3 years, he'll be 38. I cant envisage any possible scenario for us where Ricky Lambert is of use to us in 3 years. If we limit him to 20 games a season which I expect they'll do so they wont have to extend the contract than he's costing a mere £ 83,000 per game. WHICH f*cking IDIOT at our club negotiated that deal. We don't have a hope if we're run by such imbeciles.
I'm absolutely amazed by what you say if it's true!
Not disputing it as I have no idea but I don't think many on here know about it if what you're saying is fact.
Sun Sep 18, 2016 10:34 am
Mike Strinati wrote:Give Lambert a chance. Can't be as bad as Gadonkey surely. Like above worth Harris given a chance up front behind Lambert and try something different. Can't be worse than so far this season.
Sun Sep 18, 2016 11:57 am
Sven wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:epping blue wrote:RV Casual wrote:davids wrote:wez1927 wrote:he will never score with trollope in charge terrible service to him
But according to Lambert the fact that Trollope was here was a major factor in Lambert deciding to sign for us!
Obviously Trollope's approach has changed since they were at Bristol Rovers together.
I bet it was to be fair, it was a job for an old mate who had done a job for him in the lower leagues.
The only winner in this signing was Ricky Lambert, I bet he is laughing is head of (if the reports we are paying him £32k a week are true)
I'm not necessarily saying its a bad signing although I'm very doubtful at the moment. It is however the worst deal in the recent history of Cardiff City transfers.
If he plays beyond Xmas we'll be contracted to him for 3 years, he'll be 38. I cant envisage any possible scenario for us where Ricky Lambert is of use to us in 3 years. If we limit him to 20 games a season which I expect they'll do so they wont have to extend the contract than he's costing a mere £ 83,000 per game. WHICH f*cking IDIOT at our club negotiated that deal. We don't have a hope if we're run by such imbeciles.
I'm absolutely amazed by what you say if it's true!
Not disputing it as I have no idea but I don't think many on here know about it if what you're saying is fact.
Paul, I just asked the question of someone I trust and they said Lambert's contract is for two years (the least he would accept) and there is no specific 'clause' that triggers a third season as a direct result of the number of appearances![]()
The same person also said "The club are no longer that daft. We've just got rid of several high earning players with one or two happy to sit on their way too comfy contracts, which the club admit was partly their fault"
People will make of that what they want but it does appear to be in line with recent cost-cutting moves and the club's new found financial prudence
Sun Sep 18, 2016 12:09 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Sven wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:epping blue wrote:RV Casual wrote:davids wrote:wez1927 wrote:he will never score with trollope in charge terrible service to him
But according to Lambert the fact that Trollope was here was a major factor in Lambert deciding to sign for us!
Obviously Trollope's approach has changed since they were at Bristol Rovers together.
I bet it was to be fair, it was a job for an old mate who had done a job for him in the lower leagues.
The only winner in this signing was Ricky Lambert, I bet he is laughing is head of (if the reports we are paying him £32k a week are true)
I'm not necessarily saying its a bad signing although I'm very doubtful at the moment. It is however the worst deal in the recent history of Cardiff City transfers.
If he plays beyond Xmas we'll be contracted to him for 3 years, he'll be 38. I cant envisage any possible scenario for us where Ricky Lambert is of use to us in 3 years. If we limit him to 20 games a season which I expect they'll do so they wont have to extend the contract than he's costing a mere £ 83,000 per game. WHICH f*cking IDIOT at our club negotiated that deal. We don't have a hope if we're run by such imbeciles.
I'm absolutely amazed by what you say if it's true!
Not disputing it as I have no idea but I don't think many on here know about it if what you're saying is fact.
Paul, I just asked the question of someone I trust and they said Lambert's contract is for two years (the least he would accept) and there is no specific 'clause' that triggers a third season as a direct result of the number of appearances![]()
The same person also said "The club are no longer that daft. We've just got rid of several high earning players with one or two happy to sit on their way too comfy contracts, which the club admit was partly their fault"
People will make of that what they want but it does appear to be in line with recent cost-cutting moves and the club's new found financial prudence
They were my thoughts exactly! Why would the club go back into that nonsense.
I do wonder how people post on here and seem to know the ins and outs of a players contract and clauses.
Sun Sep 18, 2016 12:22 pm
Sven wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Sven wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:epping blue wrote:RV Casual wrote:davids wrote:wez1927 wrote:he will never score with trollope in charge terrible service to him
But according to Lambert the fact that Trollope was here was a major factor in Lambert deciding to sign for us!
Obviously Trollope's approach has changed since they were at Bristol Rovers together.
I bet it was to be fair, it was a job for an old mate who had done a job for him in the lower leagues.
The only winner in this signing was Ricky Lambert, I bet he is laughing is head of (if the reports we are paying him £32k a week are true)
I'm not necessarily saying its a bad signing although I'm very doubtful at the moment. It is however the worst deal in the recent history of Cardiff City transfers.
If he plays beyond Xmas we'll be contracted to him for 3 years, he'll be 38. I cant envisage any possible scenario for us where Ricky Lambert is of use to us in 3 years. If we limit him to 20 games a season which I expect they'll do so they wont have to extend the contract than he's costing a mere £ 83,000 per game. WHICH f*cking IDIOT at our club negotiated that deal. We don't have a hope if we're run by such imbeciles.
I'm absolutely amazed by what you say if it's true!
Not disputing it as I have no idea but I don't think many on here know about it if what you're saying is fact.
Paul, I just asked the question of someone I trust and they said Lambert's contract is for two years (the least he would accept) and there is no specific 'clause' that triggers a third season as a direct result of the number of appearances![]()
The same person also said "The club are no longer that daft. We've just got rid of several high earning players with one or two happy to sit on their way too comfy contracts, which the club admit was partly their fault"
People will make of that what they want but it does appear to be in line with recent cost-cutting moves and the club's new found financial prudence
They were my thoughts exactly! Why would the club go back into that nonsense.
I do wonder how people post on here and seem to know the ins and outs of a players contract and clauses.
Sadly, the truth is that quite a few on here make up what they don't know and state it as fact
Sun Sep 18, 2016 2:10 pm
remember that someone is also telling carl and could be wrong or just partly rightAramore wrote:Sven wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Sven wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:epping blue wrote:RV Casual wrote:davids wrote:wez1927 wrote:he will never score with trollope in charge terrible service to him
But according to Lambert the fact that Trollope was here was a major factor in Lambert deciding to sign for us!
Obviously Trollope's approach has changed since they were at Bristol Rovers together.
I bet it was to be fair, it was a job for an old mate who had done a job for him in the lower leagues.
The only winner in this signing was Ricky Lambert, I bet he is laughing is head of (if the reports we are paying him £32k a week are true)
I'm not necessarily saying its a bad signing although I'm very doubtful at the moment. It is however the worst deal in the recent history of Cardiff City transfers.
If he plays beyond Xmas we'll be contracted to him for 3 years, he'll be 38. I cant envisage any possible scenario for us where Ricky Lambert is of use to us in 3 years. If we limit him to 20 games a season which I expect they'll do so they wont have to extend the contract than he's costing a mere £ 83,000 per game. WHICH f*cking IDIOT at our club negotiated that deal. We don't have a hope if we're run by such imbeciles.
I'm absolutely amazed by what you say if it's true!
Not disputing it as I have no idea but I don't think many on here know about it if what you're saying is fact.
Paul, I just asked the question of someone I trust and they said Lambert's contract is for two years (the least he would accept) and there is no specific 'clause' that triggers a third season as a direct result of the number of appearances![]()
The same person also said "The club are no longer that daft. We've just got rid of several high earning players with one or two happy to sit on their way too comfy contracts, which the club admit was partly their fault"
People will make of that what they want but it does appear to be in line with recent cost-cutting moves and the club's new found financial prudence
They were my thoughts exactly! Why would the club go back into that nonsense.
I do wonder how people post on here and seem to know the ins and outs of a players contract and clauses.
Sadly, the truth is that quite a few on here make up what they don't know and state it as fact
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=176841&p=1841458#p1841458
Carl put it out the day after he signed Sven.
Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:04 pm
Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:53 pm
Aramore wrote:Not saying I believe it wez I'm just letting Sven know where people are getting their information.