Thu Sep 08, 2016 10:46 pm
Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:10 am
Forever Blue wrote:Now its £200million it just gets worse, you've got to laugh otherwise you would breakdown and cry with all the bullshit and spin coming out.
We've received over £120mill in Sky money/Sponsorship/Gate money etc etc
Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:19 am
bluemun wrote:wez1927 wrote:bluemun wrote:Dalman is plainly wrong. To sell your best asset [Marshy] for less than half his actual value in the same bloody week you sell his natural replacement.....what is that except 'asset-stripping'? It cannot benefit the club except in the short-term, to make it more attractive to potential buyers. Of course Tan doesn't want to sell yet, but after the last parachute it will be another matter.
read the other topic the whole interview it says why marshal went ,hull papers reported the fee was 5 million which is good money for hI'm
The actual fee was 2.5 million with add ons. Marshall was worth at least £8 million. The spin from Dalman is now that he wanted to leave. Well, he would say that wouldn't he? If we'd insisted on a proper fee I could understand, but we simply flogged him on the cheap straight after selling his deputy. Classic asset-stripping.
Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:28 am
Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:04 am
caerdydd_78 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Now its £200million it just gets worse, you've got to laugh otherwise you would breakdown and cry with all the bullshit and spin coming out.
We've received over £120mill in Sky money/Sponsorship/Gate money etc etc
Annis, sometimes I actually find it hard reading your posts, the negativity is painfull, and im not sure what your try to suggest at times.
You say the debt is now £200m, yet we had £120m in TV money, that correct but that money does not go straight off the bottom line. You know as well as anyone the club has serious finantial issues with day to day running costs.
the extreme wages we have given players, the pay offs on a lot of players to get them off the books, rightly or wrongly. We have around 10-11k season ticket holders, call an average £300 a ticket, this will give approx even at 11k £3.3m. I'm not being funny but 3 players at £15k a week and that money is gone. upto last season Kenwyn Jones was almost £2m annually on his own.
We have a crazy sized squad who eat into any money the club generates, if Tan has to balance the books, then thats why the money is growing and not being paid off the bottom line.
even if the club was debt free, the club still owe circa £200m to Tan, its in the assets of the club inc the players and stadium.
Do you have a better solution other than wish scam was back in charge? And before you say I'm protecting Tan, or defending his actions your wrong, he is our only hope of staying alive as a football club.
Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:14 am
Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:41 am
Forever Blue wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Now its £200million it just gets worse, you've got to laugh otherwise you would breakdown and cry with all the bullshit and spin coming out.
We've received over £120mill in Sky money/Sponsorship/Gate money etc etc
Annis, sometimes I actually find it hard reading your posts, the negativity is painfull, and im not sure what your try to suggest at times.
You say the debt is now £200m, yet we had £120m in TV money, that correct but that money does not go straight off the bottom line. You know as well as anyone the club has serious finantial issues with day to day running costs.
the extreme wages we have given players, the pay offs on a lot of players to get them off the books, rightly or wrongly. We have around 10-11k season ticket holders, call an average £300 a ticket, this will give approx even at 11k £3.3m. I'm not being funny but 3 players at £15k a week and that money is gone. upto last season Kenwyn Jones was almost £2m annually on his own.
We have a crazy sized squad who eat into any money the club generates, if Tan has to balance the books, then thats why the money is growing and not being paid off the bottom line.
even if the club was debt free, the club still owe circa £200m to Tan, its in the assets of the club inc the players and stadium.
Do you have a better solution other than wish scam was back in charge? And before you say I'm protecting Tan, or defending his actions your wrong, he is our only hope of staying alive as a football club.
First of all I don't ask you to read my posts, I don't force you.
Secondly the negativity comes direct from our club, how can I be positive with so much bullshit and years of it,plus what they've put us through and if I am so wrong where are the fans nowadays?
Dalman has just stated that Tan has put about £200mill in our club, Ive not stated it?
All the current problems are caused by the current Regime a fact end of, you can spin it what ever way you want.
I Would love to post positive stuff on City, but sadly theres not much to write at this current time, maybe a win at Norwich will cheer us all up![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
PLUS Ive just been looking at your posts,plenty of concerns and negativity in them
Postby caerdydd_78 » Thu May 12, 2016 10:45 am
Great news this morning regarding Immers, he wanted it and the fans wanted it!
My ONLY concern is, why are we buying players without our new manager bring at the helm? this tells me that Trollope will be given this job, regardless of all the press and fans demanding someone else.
Otherwise, the new manager may come in and not take to Immers like we all have?
Anyone feel the same?
Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:46 am
Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:53 am
caerdydd_78 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Now its £200million it just gets worse, you've got to laugh otherwise you would breakdown and cry with all the bullshit and spin coming out.
We've received over £120mill in Sky money/Sponsorship/Gate money etc etc
Annis, sometimes I actually find it hard reading your posts, the negativity is painfull, and im not sure what your try to suggest at times.
You say the debt is now £200m, yet we had £120m in TV money, that correct but that money does not go straight off the bottom line. You know as well as anyone the club has serious finantial issues with day to day running costs.
the extreme wages we have given players, the pay offs on a lot of players to get them off the books, rightly or wrongly. We have around 10-11k season ticket holders, call an average £300 a ticket, this will give approx even at 11k £3.3m. I'm not being funny but 3 players at £15k a week and that money is gone. upto last season Kenwyn Jones was almost £2m annually on his own.
We have a crazy sized squad who eat into any money the club generates, if Tan has to balance the books, then thats why the money is growing and not being paid off the bottom line.
even if the club was debt free, the club still owe circa £200m to Tan, its in the assets of the club inc the players and stadium.
Do you have a better solution other than wish scam was back in charge? And before you say I'm protecting Tan, or defending his actions your wrong, he is our only hope of staying alive as a football club.
First of all I don't ask you to read my posts, I don't force you.
Secondly the negativity comes direct from our club, how can I be positive with so much bullshit and years of it,plus what they've put us through and if I am so wrong where are the fans nowadays?
Dalman has just stated that Tan has put about £200mill in our club, Ive not stated it?
All the current problems are caused by the current Regime a fact end of, you can spin it what ever way you want.
I Would love to post positive stuff on City, but sadly theres not much to write at this current time, maybe a win at Norwich will cheer us all up![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
PLUS Ive just been looking at your posts,plenty of concerns and negativity in them
Postby caerdydd_78 » Thu May 12, 2016 10:45 am
Great news this morning regarding Immers, he wanted it and the fans wanted it!
My ONLY concern is, why are we buying players without our new manager bring at the helm? this tells me that Trollope will be given this job, regardless of all the press and fans demanding someone else.
Otherwise, the new manager may come in and not take to Immers like we all have?
Anyone feel the same?
That's not negative, we signed a player before Trollope was appointed, just found it concerning that the manager was not involved.
My point being, the negativity surrounding Tan and the CLUBS decisions, is never being allowed to be in the past. You have to remember, board members like Borley, Isaacs and the rest allowed the decisions by Tan to be approved and accepted, yet people are happy to jump on a man who has put in £200m. Now until things change, he is sticking to his guns and making us more affordable and living within the budget the club can survive on.
The money owed to him, is in the potential sale of the club, the club will be far more attractive being dept free that in its current state, so I don't see why the club or Tan is being held to ransom because they are not spending like he did in his early years, the club simply does not generate the income to allow us to spend like Derby or even Wolves have.
My major points being, we had a far better ave gate when Tan took over, we had better season ticket sales, due to the price freeze and players were not on stupid wages. The FFP system was also not in place so clubs like Chelsea, Man City could throw tens of millions each season, but now clubs cannot run like that unless there books meet the demands of FFP, you know this yet still complain.
I see posts from loads of members relating to the club 'Lying' giving the fans bullshit? Come on Annis even you can see the club has to do the right thing, it saves money, people complain, it spends and people complain, I understand Dalman and his answers, fans can like it or hate it but football is a business, there are no more Jack Walkers in this world who done it for love of the club, and Even if Jack was alive and still owned Blackburn, FFP stops him doing what he did in the 90's.
I for one am sorry to see quality players being sold, but if CCFC has any future, it has to do whats its doing.
Fri Sep 09, 2016 10:21 am
Forever Blue wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Now its £200million it just gets worse, you've got to laugh otherwise you would breakdown and cry with all the bullshit and spin coming out.
We've received over £120mill in Sky money/Sponsorship/Gate money etc etc
Annis, sometimes I actually find it hard reading your posts, the negativity is painfull, and im not sure what your try to suggest at times.
You say the debt is now £200m, yet we had £120m in TV money, that correct but that money does not go straight off the bottom line. You know as well as anyone the club has serious finantial issues with day to day running costs.
the extreme wages we have given players, the pay offs on a lot of players to get them off the books, rightly or wrongly. We have around 10-11k season ticket holders, call an average £300 a ticket, this will give approx even at 11k £3.3m. I'm not being funny but 3 players at £15k a week and that money is gone. upto last season Kenwyn Jones was almost £2m annually on his own.
We have a crazy sized squad who eat into any money the club generates, if Tan has to balance the books, then thats why the money is growing and not being paid off the bottom line.
even if the club was debt free, the club still owe circa £200m to Tan, its in the assets of the club inc the players and stadium.
Do you have a better solution other than wish scam was back in charge? And before you say I'm protecting Tan, or defending his actions your wrong, he is our only hope of staying alive as a football club.
First of all I don't ask you to read my posts, I don't force you.
Secondly the negativity comes direct from our club, how can I be positive with so much bullshit and years of it,plus what they've put us through and if I am so wrong where are the fans nowadays?
Dalman has just stated that Tan has put about £200mill in our club, Ive not stated it?
All the current problems are caused by the current Regime a fact end of, you can spin it what ever way you want.
I Would love to post positive stuff on City, but sadly theres not much to write at this current time, maybe a win at Norwich will cheer us all up![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
PLUS Ive just been looking at your posts,plenty of concerns and negativity in them
Postby caerdydd_78 » Thu May 12, 2016 10:45 am
Great news this morning regarding Immers, he wanted it and the fans wanted it!
My ONLY concern is, why are we buying players without our new manager bring at the helm? this tells me that Trollope will be given this job, regardless of all the press and fans demanding someone else.
Otherwise, the new manager may come in and not take to Immers like we all have?
Anyone feel the same?
That's not negative, we signed a player before Trollope was appointed, just found it concerning that the manager was not involved.
My point being, the negativity surrounding Tan and the CLUBS decisions, is never being allowed to be in the past. You have to remember, board members like Borley, Isaacs and the rest allowed the decisions by Tan to be approved and accepted, yet people are happy to jump on a man who has put in £200m. Now until things change, he is sticking to his guns and making us more affordable and living within the budget the club can survive on.
The money owed to him, is in the potential sale of the club, the club will be far more attractive being dept free that in its current state, so I don't see why the club or Tan is being held to ransom because they are not spending like he did in his early years, the club simply does not generate the income to allow us to spend like Derby or even Wolves have.
My major points being, we had a far better ave gate when Tan took over, we had better season ticket sales, due to the price freeze and players were not on stupid wages. The FFP system was also not in place so clubs like Chelsea, Man City could throw tens of millions each season, but now clubs cannot run like that unless there books meet the demands of FFP, you know this yet still complain.
I see posts from loads of members relating to the club 'Lying' giving the fans bullshit? Come on Annis even you can see the club has to do the right thing, it saves money, people complain, it spends and people complain, I understand Dalman and his answers, fans can like it or hate it but football is a business, there are no more Jack Walkers in this world who done it for love of the club, and Even if Jack was alive and still owned Blackburn, FFP stops him doing what he did in the 90's.
I for one am sorry to see quality players being sold, but if CCFC has any future, it has to do whats its doing.
Plenty of sense in your post![]()
![]()
But my points are, the Rebrand can't just be forgotten as it teared our club apart and thats why many including myself can not forgive Vincent Tan and many others for it, I'm 100% not the only ones who feel that way.
Tan arrived at our club with crowds of 20,000 plus every week and our away support 3 times bigger than it is nowadays, where are many of these fans now?
Tan has been here Seven years and the current mess his totally his, no one else's, fans are not to blame.
Yes the club has reduced the prices drastically![]()
![]()
But the fans have not returned? ask yourself why?
Also why only single me out on here?
I want to be positive,hopefully the results will improve and we can all be very positive![]()
![]()
![]()
Fri Sep 09, 2016 10:23 am
Forever Blue wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Now its £200million it just gets worse, you've got to laugh otherwise you would breakdown and cry with all the bullshit and spin coming out.
We've received over £120mill in Sky money/Sponsorship/Gate money etc etc
Annis, sometimes I actually find it hard reading your posts, the negativity is painfull, and im not sure what your try to suggest at times.
You say the debt is now £200m, yet we had £120m in TV money, that correct but that money does not go straight off the bottom line. You know as well as anyone the club has serious finantial issues with day to day running costs.
the extreme wages we have given players, the pay offs on a lot of players to get them off the books, rightly or wrongly. We have around 10-11k season ticket holders, call an average £300 a ticket, this will give approx even at 11k £3.3m. I'm not being funny but 3 players at £15k a week and that money is gone. upto last season Kenwyn Jones was almost £2m annually on his own.
We have a crazy sized squad who eat into any money the club generates, if Tan has to balance the books, then thats why the money is growing and not being paid off the bottom line.
even if the club was debt free, the club still owe circa £200m to Tan, its in the assets of the club inc the players and stadium.
Do you have a better solution other than wish scam was back in charge? And before you say I'm protecting Tan, or defending his actions your wrong, he is our only hope of staying alive as a football club.
First of all I don't ask you to read my posts, I don't force you.
Secondly the negativity comes direct from our club, how can I be positive with so much bullshit and years of it,plus what they've put us through and if I am so wrong where are the fans nowadays?
Dalman has just stated that Tan has put about £200mill in our club, Ive not stated it?
All the current problems are caused by the current Regime a fact end of, you can spin it what ever way you want.
I Would love to post positive stuff on City, but sadly theres not much to write at this current time, maybe a win at Norwich will cheer us all up![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
PLUS Ive just been looking at your posts,plenty of concerns and negativity in them
Postby caerdydd_78 » Thu May 12, 2016 10:45 am
Great news this morning regarding Immers, he wanted it and the fans wanted it!
My ONLY concern is, why are we buying players without our new manager bring at the helm? this tells me that Trollope will be given this job, regardless of all the press and fans demanding someone else.
Otherwise, the new manager may come in and not take to Immers like we all have?
Anyone feel the same?
That's not negative, we signed a player before Trollope was appointed, just found it concerning that the manager was not involved.
My point being, the negativity surrounding Tan and the CLUBS decisions, is never being allowed to be in the past. You have to remember, board members like Borley, Isaacs and the rest allowed the decisions by Tan to be approved and accepted, yet people are happy to jump on a man who has put in £200m. Now until things change, he is sticking to his guns and making us more affordable and living within the budget the club can survive on.
The money owed to him, is in the potential sale of the club, the club will be far more attractive being dept free that in its current state, so I don't see why the club or Tan is being held to ransom because they are not spending like he did in his early years, the club simply does not generate the income to allow us to spend like Derby or even Wolves have.
My major points being, we had a far better ave gate when Tan took over, we had better season ticket sales, due to the price freeze and players were not on stupid wages. The FFP system was also not in place so clubs like Chelsea, Man City could throw tens of millions each season, but now clubs cannot run like that unless there books meet the demands of FFP, you know this yet still complain.
I see posts from loads of members relating to the club 'Lying' giving the fans bullshit? Come on Annis even you can see the club has to do the right thing, it saves money, people complain, it spends and people complain, I understand Dalman and his answers, fans can like it or hate it but football is a business, there are no more Jack Walkers in this world who done it for love of the club, and Even if Jack was alive and still owned Blackburn, FFP stops him doing what he did in the 90's.
I for one am sorry to see quality players being sold, but if CCFC has any future, it has to do whats its doing.
Plenty of sense in your post![]()
![]()
But my points are, the Rebrand can't just be forgotten as it teared our club apart and thats why many including myself can not forgive Vincent Tan and many others for it, I'm 100% not the only ones who feel that way.
Tan arrived at our club with crowds of 20,000 plus every week and our away support 3 times bigger than it is nowadays, where are many of these fans now?
Tan has been here Seven years and the current mess his totally his, no one else's, fans are not to blame.
Yes the club has reduced the prices drastically![]()
![]()
But the fans have not returned? ask yourself why?
Also why only single me out on here?
I want to be positive,hopefully the results will improve and we can all be very positive![]()
![]()
![]()
Fri Sep 09, 2016 10:36 am
caerdydd_78 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Now its £200million it just gets worse, you've got to laugh otherwise you would breakdown and cry with all the bullshit and spin coming out.
We've received over £120mill in Sky money/Sponsorship/Gate money etc etc
Annis, sometimes I actually find it hard reading your posts, the negativity is painfull, and im not sure what your try to suggest at times.
You say the debt is now £200m, yet we had £120m in TV money, that correct but that money does not go straight off the bottom line. You know as well as anyone the club has serious finantial issues with day to day running costs.
the extreme wages we have given players, the pay offs on a lot of players to get them off the books, rightly or wrongly. We have around 10-11k season ticket holders, call an average £300 a ticket, this will give approx even at 11k £3.3m. I'm not being funny but 3 players at £15k a week and that money is gone. upto last season Kenwyn Jones was almost £2m annually on his own.
We have a crazy sized squad who eat into any money the club generates, if Tan has to balance the books, then thats why the money is growing and not being paid off the bottom line.
even if the club was debt free, the club still owe circa £200m to Tan, its in the assets of the club inc the players and stadium.
Do you have a better solution other than wish scam was back in charge? And before you say I'm protecting Tan, or defending his actions your wrong, he is our only hope of staying alive as a football club.
First of all I don't ask you to read my posts, I don't force you.
Secondly the negativity comes direct from our club, how can I be positive with so much bullshit and years of it,plus what they've put us through and if I am so wrong where are the fans nowadays?
Dalman has just stated that Tan has put about £200mill in our club, Ive not stated it?
All the current problems are caused by the current Regime a fact end of, you can spin it what ever way you want.
I Would love to post positive stuff on City, but sadly theres not much to write at this current time, maybe a win at Norwich will cheer us all up![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
PLUS Ive just been looking at your posts,plenty of concerns and negativity in them
Postby caerdydd_78 » Thu May 12, 2016 10:45 am
Great news this morning regarding Immers, he wanted it and the fans wanted it!
My ONLY concern is, why are we buying players without our new manager bring at the helm? this tells me that Trollope will be given this job, regardless of all the press and fans demanding someone else.
Otherwise, the new manager may come in and not take to Immers like we all have?
Anyone feel the same?
That's not negative, we signed a player before Trollope was appointed, just found it concerning that the manager was not involved.
My point being, the negativity surrounding Tan and the CLUBS decisions, is never being allowed to be in the past. You have to remember, board members like Borley, Isaacs and the rest allowed the decisions by Tan to be approved and accepted, yet people are happy to jump on a man who has put in £200m. Now until things change, he is sticking to his guns and making us more affordable and living within the budget the club can survive on.
The money owed to him, is in the potential sale of the club, the club will be far more attractive being dept free that in its current state, so I don't see why the club or Tan is being held to ransom because they are not spending like he did in his early years, the club simply does not generate the income to allow us to spend like Derby or even Wolves have.
My major points being, we had a far better ave gate when Tan took over, we had better season ticket sales, due to the price freeze and players were not on stupid wages. The FFP system was also not in place so clubs like Chelsea, Man City could throw tens of millions each season, but now clubs cannot run like that unless there books meet the demands of FFP, you know this yet still complain.
I see posts from loads of members relating to the club 'Lying' giving the fans bullshit? Come on Annis even you can see the club has to do the right thing, it saves money, people complain, it spends and people complain, I understand Dalman and his answers, fans can like it or hate it but football is a business, there are no more Jack Walkers in this world who done it for love of the club, and Even if Jack was alive and still owned Blackburn, FFP stops him doing what he did in the 90's.
I for one am sorry to see quality players being sold, but if CCFC has any future, it has to do whats its doing.
Plenty of sense in your post![]()
![]()
But my points are, the Rebrand can't just be forgotten as it teared our club apart and thats why many including myself can not forgive Vincent Tan and many others for it, I'm 100% not the only ones who feel that way.
Tan arrived at our club with crowds of 20,000 plus every week and our away support 3 times bigger than it is nowadays, where are many of these fans now?
Tan has been here Seven years and the current mess his totally his, no one else's, fans are not to blame.
Yes the club has reduced the prices drastically![]()
![]()
But the fans have not returned? ask yourself why?
Also why only single me out on here?
I want to be positive,hopefully the results will improve and we can all be very positive![]()
![]()
![]()
To me, it seems the club is set on winning awards and backing from the away fans rather than its home fans.
I personally miss the way the club used to work with the fans, say on the Echo/City Junior Bluebirds efforts. I knew 1000s of kids who used to save the vouchers in the echo and go to matches. It seems unless these tickets are FREE, nobody goes.
This is where the club is failing, as a kid I felt part of CCFC, it was my club, my hero's didn't need 20k a week to feel good about himself, it was the fans, the Ayatollah, the feel about the club.
That is whats missing.
Fri Sep 09, 2016 10:39 am
darran1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:caerdydd_78 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Now its £200million it just gets worse, you've got to laugh otherwise you would breakdown and cry with all the bullshit and spin coming out.
We've received over £120mill in Sky money/Sponsorship/Gate money etc etc
Annis, sometimes I actually find it hard reading your posts, the negativity is painfull, and im not sure what your try to suggest at times.
You say the debt is now £200m, yet we had £120m in TV money, that correct but that money does not go straight off the bottom line. You know as well as anyone the club has serious finantial issues with day to day running costs.
the extreme wages we have given players, the pay offs on a lot of players to get them off the books, rightly or wrongly. We have around 10-11k season ticket holders, call an average £300 a ticket, this will give approx even at 11k £3.3m. I'm not being funny but 3 players at £15k a week and that money is gone. upto last season Kenwyn Jones was almost £2m annually on his own.
We have a crazy sized squad who eat into any money the club generates, if Tan has to balance the books, then thats why the money is growing and not being paid off the bottom line.
even if the club was debt free, the club still owe circa £200m to Tan, its in the assets of the club inc the players and stadium.
Do you have a better solution other than wish scam was back in charge? And before you say I'm protecting Tan, or defending his actions your wrong, he is our only hope of staying alive as a football club.
First of all I don't ask you to read my posts, I don't force you.
Secondly the negativity comes direct from our club, how can I be positive with so much bullshit and years of it,plus what they've put us through and if I am so wrong where are the fans nowadays?
Dalman has just stated that Tan has put about £200mill in our club, Ive not stated it?
All the current problems are caused by the current Regime a fact end of, you can spin it what ever way you want.
I Would love to post positive stuff on City, but sadly theres not much to write at this current time, maybe a win at Norwich will cheer us all up![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
PLUS Ive just been looking at your posts,plenty of concerns and negativity in them
Postby caerdydd_78 » Thu May 12, 2016 10:45 am
Great news this morning regarding Immers, he wanted it and the fans wanted it!
My ONLY concern is, why are we buying players without our new manager bring at the helm? this tells me that Trollope will be given this job, regardless of all the press and fans demanding someone else.
Otherwise, the new manager may come in and not take to Immers like we all have?
Anyone feel the same?
That's not negative, we signed a player before Trollope was appointed, just found it concerning that the manager was not involved.
My point being, the negativity surrounding Tan and the CLUBS decisions, is never being allowed to be in the past. You have to remember, board members like Borley, Isaacs and the rest allowed the decisions by Tan to be approved and accepted, yet people are happy to jump on a man who has put in £200m. Now until things change, he is sticking to his guns and making us more affordable and living within the budget the club can survive on.
The money owed to him, is in the potential sale of the club, the club will be far more attractive being dept free that in its current state, so I don't see why the club or Tan is being held to ransom because they are not spending like he did in his early years, the club simply does not generate the income to allow us to spend like Derby or even Wolves have.
My major points being, we had a far better ave gate when Tan took over, we had better season ticket sales, due to the price freeze and players were not on stupid wages. The FFP system was also not in place so clubs like Chelsea, Man City could throw tens of millions each season, but now clubs cannot run like that unless there books meet the demands of FFP, you know this yet still complain.
I see posts from loads of members relating to the club 'Lying' giving the fans bullshit? Come on Annis even you can see the club has to do the right thing, it saves money, people complain, it spends and people complain, I understand Dalman and his answers, fans can like it or hate it but football is a business, there are no more Jack Walkers in this world who done it for love of the club, and Even if Jack was alive and still owned Blackburn, FFP stops him doing what he did in the 90's.
I for one am sorry to see quality players being sold, but if CCFC has any future, it has to do whats its doing.
Plenty of sense in your post![]()
![]()
But my points are, the Rebrand can't just be forgotten as it teared our club apart and thats why many including myself can not forgive Vincent Tan and many others for it, I'm 100% not the only ones who feel that way.
Tan arrived at our club with crowds of 20,000 plus every week and our away support 3 times bigger than it is nowadays, where are many of these fans now?
Tan has been here Seven years and the current mess his totally his, no one else's, fans are not to blame.
Yes the club has reduced the prices drastically![]()
![]()
But the fans have not returned? ask yourself why?
Also why only single me out on here?
I want to be positive,hopefully the results will improve and we can all be very positive![]()
![]()
![]()
I hated Tan for the rebrand and he did cause all the unrest between supporters ,but playing devils advocate here .Tan was told by the ccfc boardmembers that the rebrand would be accepted , Borley I believe said when we returned back to blue that the board were desperate and the club was hemorrhaging money and they accepted it on the basis that Tan would inject funds which he did. So in the eyes of Tan I think he thought everything was fine he admitted himself that he didn't know much about football and that's probably why he didn't think it would be a big deal in changing to red.
I'm not a Tan lover but we are back in blue now I think he knew he did wrong with the rebrand and at least he did give us our blue back and he is still trying to clear the debt . I think us as supporters just need to try and move on from the red and just support the team
Fri Sep 09, 2016 11:16 am
Fri Sep 09, 2016 11:30 am
darran1927 wrote:Steve Zodiak wrote:According to the statement on here from the trust, Tan is converting £68m debt to equity immediately, with the remaining £40m being converted over the next five years. Mr Dalman mentions £200m now owed to Tan. Sums don't seem to add up to me unless I am overlooking something. Probably me mis-reading the situation. I am sure someone will put me right soon.
He's not owed 200m what Dalman means is Tan has put approx 200m into the club and if he was asset stripping to get his money back(which some fans are claiming) then he would need to be asset stripping 200m to get what he put in back which what Dalman is saying that it's not going to happen as there isn't 200m of assets. Dalman is merely pointing out Tan isn't asset stripping
Fri Sep 09, 2016 11:51 am
Fri Sep 09, 2016 11:58 am
Charlie Harper wrote:darran1927 wrote:Steve Zodiak wrote:According to the statement on here from the trust, Tan is converting £68m debt to equity immediately, with the remaining £40m being converted over the next five years. Mr Dalman mentions £200m now owed to Tan. Sums don't seem to add up to me unless I am overlooking something. Probably me mis-reading the situation. I am sure someone will put me right soon.
He's not owed 200m what Dalman means is Tan has put approx 200m into the club and if he was asset stripping to get his money back(which some fans are claiming) then he would need to be asset stripping 200m to get what he put in back which what Dalman is saying that it's not going to happen as there isn't 200m of assets. Dalman is merely pointing out Tan isn't asset stripping
This is by far the most sensible post on this matter and that's why I pinched it.
All the haters need to go back to school and learn maths.
I walked away when it went red and Tan took away my passion for the club which has not returned since but you have to stop hating the guy, listen, think and do the maths. He is doing the right things now and if people don't or cant see that then that's their problem.
Fri Sep 09, 2016 12:29 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Charlie Harper wrote:darran1927 wrote:Steve Zodiak wrote:According to the statement on here from the trust, Tan is converting £68m debt to equity immediately, with the remaining £40m being converted over the next five years. Mr Dalman mentions £200m now owed to Tan. Sums don't seem to add up to me unless I am overlooking something. Probably me mis-reading the situation. I am sure someone will put me right soon.
He's not owed 200m what Dalman means is Tan has put approx 200m into the club and if he was asset stripping to get his money back(which some fans are claiming) then he would need to be asset stripping 200m to get what he put in back which what Dalman is saying that it's not going to happen as there isn't 200m of assets. Dalman is merely pointing out Tan isn't asset stripping
This is by far the most sensible post on this matter and that's why I pinched it.
All the haters need to go back to school and learn maths.
I walked away when it went red and Tan took away my passion for the club which has not returned since but you have to stop hating the guy, listen, think and do the maths. He is doing the right things now and if people don't or cant see that then that's their problem.
So if Tan has put in £200mill, then Tan has gone through a staggering £340mill plus if u incl Sky money,sponsorship,Gate money etc etc
Fri Sep 09, 2016 1:00 pm
wez1927 wrote:sorry I don't agree with people saying the clUbuntu need to look after fans more ,our tickets are cheap ,we are signing decent level of players like lambert, we even have a bloody band playing under the stand before matches sometimes I think cardiff supporters want it all and need to start looking at themselves and stop blaming the club , our expectations are too high also if we get 27 k crowds like we did at the end of the season they are all plastics when they don't go like this year everyone is moaning Where's the people gone ,I don't think the club can do alot more than they are doing
Sat Sep 10, 2016 7:45 am
Sat Sep 10, 2016 7:57 am
goats wrote:Amazing the figures just go up and up with no mention of cash in from TV and player sales, merchandise and ST's etc...
Terrible decisions by useless ceo's I guess keep meaning we lose more with woeful players on huge wages who we can never shift on without paying up the contract, whose fault is that Vincent?? Yes, your ceo. Spent 50 million after promotion but got most back selling them again yet no mention. Think I preferred clemo days to this sham, fans didn't just roll over back then either....
Sun Sep 11, 2016 10:36 am
Sun Sep 11, 2016 1:44 pm
welshandproud wrote:swampCCFC is correct in saying Dalman is actually saying if VT could re coup the £200 he's put into the club he would.
Once parachute payments are over then we will see him cut his loses and everything that's not screwed down will be sold.
Sun Sep 11, 2016 11:39 pm