Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:38 am
Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:58 am
Pulisnewport wrote:It's all about opinions and I can see Annis point of view (even if he was wrong on this occasion).
It takes a bigger man to admit he was wrong which Tan has done. I am sure in the future Annis will look upon the opportunity as one he lost but that does not make him any worse for it.
Life is a learning excercise and we all never get it right.
Tan has put his money where his mouth is and just that deserves respect as no one else has in the Clubs history, maybe not to the extent he has. The future looks very bright and I also hope that every supporter pulls together to get the Club going forward. As I have pointed out before we have enough supporters across the bridge who like to see us in disarray without doing it to ourselves.
Hopefully a meeting for Annis will bring more light to his opinion, I hope so
Mon Feb 15, 2016 9:03 am
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:No problem with Annis not shaking Tans hand, I find it bizarre that that's even a point of discussion. I wouldn't have shaken his hand either.
However having said that I fail to see what a private chat between Tan, Annis and Carl would achieve? He's already spoken to elected members of the trust, why individual fans?
Mon Feb 15, 2016 10:16 am
Mon Feb 15, 2016 10:17 am
troobloo3339 wrote:Annis I'm sorry to have to say this to you
But you just said tan hurt you so much you nearly walked away
If you knew then what you know now would you have walked away under Sam as Langston
I know Sam has hurt you big time being Langston
To some Sam being Langston is as bad as some of what tan did to us
Mon Feb 15, 2016 10:52 am
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Of course it's up to Annis himself, but for me Tan has admitted mistakes, shown his commitment and passion for our club so let's move on and get behind him.
Mon Feb 15, 2016 11:54 am
Nuclearblue wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Annis I'm sorry to have to say this to you
But you just said tan hurt you so much you nearly walked away
If you knew then what you know now would you have walked away under Sam as Langston
I know Sam has hurt you big time being Langston
To some Sam being Langston is as bad as some of what tan did to us
Sam said he was Langston to conclude business. Sam was never Langston just there mouthpiece
Mon Feb 15, 2016 12:24 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:polo wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Annis I'm sorry to have to say this to you
But you just said tan hurt you so much you nearly walked away
If you knew then what you know now would you have walked away under Sam as Langston
I know Sam has hurt you big time being Langston
To some Sam being Langston is as bad as some of what tan did to us
You think Annis didn't know Sam was Langston?
Well I believe annis was very hurt by Sam when it came out officially that he was Langston
I know for a fact that Sam promised annis he was not Langston
Right upto the day it came up he was telling annis he wasn't Langston
So yes polo I do think annis didn't know
Mon Feb 15, 2016 1:40 pm
Mon Feb 15, 2016 5:22 pm
BlueMagic wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Annis I'm sorry to have to say this to you
But you just said tan hurt you so much you nearly walked away
If you knew then what you know now would you have walked away under Sam as Langston
I know Sam has hurt you big time being Langston
To some Sam being Langston is as bad as some of what tan did to us
Sam said he was Langston to conclude business. Sam was never Langston just there mouthpiece
Fuckin hell look out the biggest bullshitter on the forum is back with more complete and utter bullshit. When are the muppets gonna take their toungue out of sam hammams arse and finally give vincent tan the credit he deserves and just forget the rebrand which hes correcred and move on.
Mon Feb 15, 2016 6:25 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Vincent Tan, Mehmet Dalman and Ken Choo Yesterday at Charlton v Cardiff City
Yes they were all welcomed yesterday in the away end ,40 minutes before kick -off, Tan had a good welcome from some City fans.
I can see it seems to interest many City fans why I chose not to thank him or shake his hand, but that's my right and my prerogative and my own beliefs and opinions should be respected, I'm not a sheep, I'm my own man and always have been.
As a Ive detailed below, Tan is the only person in 43 years to have hurt me that much regarding my club I love so do dearly and always supported no matter what.
I managed to have another good chat with our chairman Mehmet Dalman(as you can see below in the photo by the press)and he asked if we could have a meeting with myself and Carl and discuss about how we could unite our club, I have said that's all I really want to see happen and I agreed to it.
I am hoping that Tan will be present without an audience looking on and it's not a show and we really can sort our differences out for the good of our club.
Dalman and I did discuss next seasons season tickets and that we need to get our lost fans back.
We did discuss Langston and I am happy with what Dalman told me.
What I wrote the other day
‘ VINCENT TAN WAS THE NEAREST IVE EVER COME ‘
By Annis Abraham
I’ve always said this and I have supported my team/club no matter who the owner/manager/chairman is, my love for the name Cardiff City comes way above them.
I’ve never failed to turn up because of bad results/colour etc. I’ve moaned and stood up to owners/managers etc but my team/club has always come first unlike thousands of others who have just stopped going and made every excuse up.
43 consecutive seasons I’ve renewed my season ticket and Ive seen it all, over 2,000 City games from friendlies,reserve games, to cup games I’ve watched Cardiff play. Tan was the nearest I’ve ever come to walking away from my club but I stood strong and stood up for our identity and never walked away or moved on like many said to do, who don’t go nowadays.
We are all allowed to believe how we feel and should be respected, like I respect others beliefs and opinions, that’s all I’ve got to say on the matter.
I will be at Charlton tomorrow and at Middlesbrough on a Tuesday night (my 12th visit) supporting my team, my club.
CHARLTON v CARDIFF CITY YESTERDAY
Mon Feb 15, 2016 7:17 pm
Sven wrote:BlueMagic wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Annis I'm sorry to have to say this to you
But you just said tan hurt you so much you nearly walked away
If you knew then what you know now would you have walked away under Sam as Langston
I know Sam has hurt you big time being Langston
To some Sam being Langston is as bad as some of what tan did to us
Sam said he was Langston to conclude business. Sam was never Langston just there mouthpiece
Fuckin hell look out the biggest bullshitter on the forum is back with more complete and utter bullshit. When are the muppets gonna take their toungue out of sam hammams arse and finally give vincent tan the credit he deserves and just forget the rebrand which hes correcred and move on.
Fella, I learned something recently that made me question 'to what extent' Sam was involved and I am now convinced there is a lot more to come out one day in future, but it won't be anytime soon, as all parties appear somewhat 'happy' with the result![]()
No one doubts that Sam was involved deeply and no one (seriously) can question Tan currently deserves credit for finally getting the Langston Millstone off our backs, no matter how it 'could' have been done earlier!
It is time to move on, but just don't believe everything (positive or negative) that is currently being 'spun' on either side, as each has their own agenda and for massively different reasons
The truth will always out eventually and occasionally humble pie has to be ate!
Mon Feb 15, 2016 7:45 pm
Leytonstoneblue wrote:Sven wrote:BlueMagic wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Annis I'm sorry to have to say this to you
But you just said tan hurt you so much you nearly walked away
If you knew then what you know now would you have walked away under Sam as Langston
I know Sam has hurt you big time being Langston
To some Sam being Langston is as bad as some of what tan did to us
Sam said he was Langston to conclude business. Sam was never Langston just there mouthpiece
Fuckin hell look out the biggest bullshitter on the forum is back with more complete and utter bullshit. When are the muppets gonna take their toungue out of sam hammams arse and finally give vincent tan the credit he deserves and just forget the rebrand which hes correcred and move on.
Fella, I learned something recently that made me question 'to what extent' Sam was involved and I am now convinced there is a lot more to come out one day in future, but it won't be anytime soon, as all parties appear somewhat 'happy' with the result![]()
No one doubts that Sam was involved deeply and no one (seriously) can question Tan currently deserves credit for finally getting the Langston Millstone off our backs, no matter how it 'could' have been done earlier!
It is time to move on, but just don't believe everything (positive or negative) that is currently being 'spun' on either side, as each has their own agenda and for massively different reasons
The truth will always out eventually and occasionally humble pie has to be ate!
Instead of talking in mysterious little riddles, if you know something that the rest of us don't then why not spill it and let everyone make their mind up? Otherwise you just come across as a bullshitter, who makes out he's ITK and there is crtainly enough of those on the boards already
Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:06 pm
Leytonstoneblue wrote:Sven wrote:BlueMagic wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Annis I'm sorry to have to say this to you
But you just said tan hurt you so much you nearly walked away
If you knew then what you know now would you have walked away under Sam as Langston
I know Sam has hurt you big time being Langston
To some Sam being Langston is as bad as some of what tan did to us
Sam said he was Langston to conclude business. Sam was never Langston just there mouthpiece
Fuckin hell look out the biggest bullshitter on the forum is back with more complete and utter bullshit. When are the muppets gonna take their toungue out of sam hammams arse and finally give vincent tan the credit he deserves and just forget the rebrand which hes correcred and move on.
Fella, I learned something recently that made me question 'to what extent' Sam was involved and I am now convinced there is a lot more to come out one day in future, but it won't be anytime soon, as all parties appear somewhat 'happy' with the result![]()
No one doubts that Sam was involved deeply and no one (seriously) can question Tan currently deserves credit for finally getting the Langston Millstone off our backs, no matter how it 'could' have been done earlier!
It is time to move on, but just don't believe everything (positive or negative) that is currently being 'spun' on either side, as each has their own agenda and for massively different reasons
The truth will always out eventually and occasionally humble pie has to be ate!
Instead of talking in mysterious little riddles, if you know something that the rest of us don't then why not spill it and let everyone make their mind up? Otherwise you just come across as a bullshitter, who makes out he's ITK and there is crtainly enough of those on the boards already
Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:07 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Leytonstoneblue wrote:Sven wrote:BlueMagic wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Annis I'm sorry to have to say this to you
But you just said tan hurt you so much you nearly walked away
If you knew then what you know now would you have walked away under Sam as Langston
I know Sam has hurt you big time being Langston
To some Sam being Langston is as bad as some of what tan did to us
Sam said he was Langston to conclude business. Sam was never Langston just there mouthpiece
Fuckin hell look out the biggest bullshitter on the forum is back with more complete and utter bullshit. When are the muppets gonna take their toungue out of sam hammams arse and finally give vincent tan the credit he deserves and just forget the rebrand which hes correcred and move on.
Fella, I learned something recently that made me question 'to what extent' Sam was involved and I am now convinced there is a lot more to come out one day in future, but it won't be anytime soon, as all parties appear somewhat 'happy' with the result![]()
No one doubts that Sam was involved deeply and no one (seriously) can question Tan currently deserves credit for finally getting the Langston Millstone off our backs, no matter how it 'could' have been done earlier!
It is time to move on, but just don't believe everything (positive or negative) that is currently being 'spun' on either side, as each has their own agenda and for massively different reasons
The truth will always out eventually and occasionally humble pie has to be ate!
Instead of talking in mysterious little riddles, if you know something that the rest of us don't then why not spill it and let everyone make their mind up? Otherwise you just come across as a bullshitter, who makes out he's ITK and there is crtainly enough of those on the boards already
It was told on a thread on here (and not by myself) that Ron Noades was one who was Langston and there was one other that can't be named.
Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:51 pm
Sven wrote:Leytonstoneblue wrote:Sven wrote:BlueMagic wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Annis I'm sorry to have to say this to you
But you just said tan hurt you so much you nearly walked away
If you knew then what you know now would you have walked away under Sam as Langston
I know Sam has hurt you big time being Langston
To some Sam being Langston is as bad as some of what tan did to us
Sam said he was Langston to conclude business. Sam was never Langston just there mouthpiece
Fuckin hell look out the biggest bullshitter on the forum is back with more complete and utter bullshit. When are the muppets gonna take their toungue out of sam hammams arse and finally give vincent tan the credit he deserves and just forget the rebrand which hes correcred and move on.
Fella, I learned something recently that made me question 'to what extent' Sam was involved and I am now convinced there is a lot more to come out one day in future, but it won't be anytime soon, as all parties appear somewhat 'happy' with the result![]()
No one doubts that Sam was involved deeply and no one (seriously) can question Tan currently deserves credit for finally getting the Langston Millstone off our backs, no matter how it 'could' have been done earlier!
It is time to move on, but just don't believe everything (positive or negative) that is currently being 'spun' on either side, as each has their own agenda and for massively different reasons
The truth will always out eventually and occasionally humble pie has to be ate!
Instead of talking in mysterious little riddles, if you know something that the rest of us don't then why not spill it and let everyone make their mind up? Otherwise you just come across as a bullshitter, who makes out he's ITK and there is crtainly enough of those on the boards already
I couldn't give a flying fig if I come across as (quote you) "a bullshitter" because there are some things that cannot be 100% confirmed at this time, which is why there are so many varied 'opinions' of what has gone on in recent times that whatever is said will not be accepted by some, depending on their entrenched views!![]()
I'm trying to see where exactly I talked in riddles? I simply stated (quote): "don't believe everything (positive or negative) that is currently being 'spun' on either side, as each has their own agenda and for massively different reasons"![]()
As for ITK, I don't claim to be and rarely state things on this Forum that I know are totally untrue. However, as with the Riddler situation, I occasionally get told things (that will remain private) that put a different perspective on certain things and this is one!
Stick to your own beliefs for now, fella. From the aggressive tone of your responses on this thread, I'm guessing little anyone says that differs from your own forged opinions will matter one iota!
Mon Feb 15, 2016 9:18 pm
Leytonstoneblue wrote:Sven wrote:Leytonstoneblue wrote:Sven wrote:BlueMagic wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Annis I'm sorry to have to say this to you
But you just said tan hurt you so much you nearly walked away
If you knew then what you know now would you have walked away under Sam as Langston
I know Sam has hurt you big time being Langston
To some Sam being Langston is as bad as some of what tan did to us
Sam said he was Langston to conclude business. Sam was never Langston just there mouthpiece
Fuckin hell look out the biggest bullshitter on the forum is back with more complete and utter bullshit. When are the muppets gonna take their toungue out of sam hammams arse and finally give vincent tan the credit he deserves and just forget the rebrand which hes correcred and move on.
Fella, I learned something recently that made me question 'to what extent' Sam was involved and I am now convinced there is a lot more to come out one day in future, but it won't be anytime soon, as all parties appear somewhat 'happy' with the result![]()
No one doubts that Sam was involved deeply and no one (seriously) can question Tan currently deserves credit for finally getting the Langston Millstone off our backs, no matter how it 'could' have been done earlier!
It is time to move on, but just don't believe everything (positive or negative) that is currently being 'spun' on either side, as each has their own agenda and for massively different reasons
The truth will always out eventually and occasionally humble pie has to be ate!
Instead of talking in mysterious little riddles, if you know something that the rest of us don't then why not spill it and let everyone make their mind up? Otherwise you just come across as a bullshitter, who makes out he's ITK and there is crtainly enough of those on the boards already
I couldn't give a flying fig if I come across as (quote you) "a bullshitter" because there are some things that cannot be 100% confirmed at this time, which is why there are so many varied 'opinions' of what has gone on in recent times that whatever is said will not be accepted by some, depending on their entrenched views!![]()
I'm trying to see where exactly I talked in riddles? I simply stated (quote): "don't believe everything (positive or negative) that is currently being 'spun' on either side, as each has their own agenda and for massively different reasons"![]()
As for ITK, I don't claim to be and rarely state things on this Forum that I know are totally untrue. However, as with the Riddler situation, I occasionally get told things (that will remain private) that put a different perspective on certain things and this is one!
Stick to your own beliefs for now, fella. From the aggressive tone of your responses on this thread, I'm guessing little anyone says that differs from your own forged opinions will matter one iota!
Your spending so much time saying absolutely nothingI don't even know what point your trying to make??
Mon Feb 15, 2016 10:30 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Vincent Tan, Mehmet Dalman and Ken Choo Yesterday at Charlton v Cardiff City
Yes they were all welcomed yesterday in the away end ,40 minutes before kick -off, Tan had a good welcome from some City fans.
I can see it seems to interest many City fans why I chose not to thank him or shake his hand, but that's my right and my prerogative and my own beliefs and opinions should be respected, I'm not a sheep, I'm my own man and always have been.
As a Ive detailed below, Tan is the only person in 43 years to have hurt me that much regarding my club I love so do dearly and always supported no matter what.
I managed to have another good chat with our chairman Mehmet Dalman(as you can see below in the photo by the press)and he asked if we could have a meeting with myself and Carl and discuss about how we could unite our club, I have said that's all I really want to see happen and I agreed to it.
I am hoping that Tan will be present without an audience looking on and it's not a show and we really can sort our differences out for the good of our club.
Dalman and I did discuss next seasons season tickets and that we need to get our lost fans back.
We did discuss Langston and I am happy with what Dalman told me.
What I wrote the other day
‘ VINCENT TAN WAS THE NEAREST IVE EVER COME ‘
By Annis Abraham
I’ve always said this and I have supported my team/club no matter who the owner/manager/chairman is, my love for the name Cardiff City comes way above them.
I’ve never failed to turn up because of bad results/colour etc. I’ve moaned and stood up to owners/managers etc but my team/club has always come first unlike thousands of others who have just stopped going and made every excuse up.
43 consecutive seasons I’ve renewed my season ticket and Ive seen it all, over 2,000 City games from friendlies,reserve games, to cup games I’ve watched Cardiff play. Tan was the nearest I’ve ever come to walking away from my club but I stood strong and stood up for our identity and never walked away or moved on like many said to do, who don’t go nowadays.
We are all allowed to believe how we feel and should be respected, like I respect others beliefs and opinions, that’s all I’ve got to say on the matter.
I will be at Charlton tomorrow and at Middlesbrough on a Tuesday night (my 12th visit) supporting my team, my club.
CHARLTON v CARDIFF CITY YESTERDAY
Mon Feb 15, 2016 10:39 pm
SwampCCFC wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Vincent Tan, Mehmet Dalman and Ken Choo Yesterday at Charlton v Cardiff City
Yes they were all welcomed yesterday in the away end ,40 minutes before kick -off, Tan had a good welcome from some City fans.
I can see it seems to interest many City fans why I chose not to thank him or shake his hand, but that's my right and my prerogative and my own beliefs and opinions should be respected, I'm not a sheep, I'm my own man and always have been.
As a Ive detailed below, Tan is the only person in 43 years to have hurt me that much regarding my club I love so do dearly and always supported no matter what.
I managed to have another good chat with our chairman Mehmet Dalman(as you can see below in the photo by the press)and he asked if we could have a meeting with myself and Carl and discuss about how we could unite our club, I have said that's all I really want to see happen and I agreed to it.
I am hoping that Tan will be present without an audience looking on and it's not a show and we really can sort our differences out for the good of our club.
Dalman and I did discuss next seasons season tickets and that we need to get our lost fans back.
We did discuss Langston and I am happy with what Dalman told me.
What I wrote the other day
‘ VINCENT TAN WAS THE NEAREST IVE EVER COME ‘
By Annis Abraham
I’ve always said this and I have supported my team/club no matter who the owner/manager/chairman is, my love for the name Cardiff City comes way above them.
I’ve never failed to turn up because of bad results/colour etc. I’ve moaned and stood up to owners/managers etc but my team/club has always come first unlike thousands of others who have just stopped going and made every excuse up.
43 consecutive seasons I’ve renewed my season ticket and Ive seen it all, over 2,000 City games from friendlies,reserve games, to cup games I’ve watched Cardiff play. Tan was the nearest I’ve ever come to walking away from my club but I stood strong and stood up for our identity and never walked away or moved on like many said to do, who don’t go nowadays.
We are all allowed to believe how we feel and should be respected, like I respect others beliefs and opinions, that’s all I’ve got to say on the matter.
I will be at Charlton tomorrow and at Middlesbrough on a Tuesday night (my 12th visit) supporting my team, my club.
CHARLTON v CARDIFF CITY YESTERDAY
well done for sticking to your principles, i hope i would do the same in the circumstances.
if tan tried to do the same to a club with a higher proportion of fans who care about the clubs tradition, he wouldn't be able to set foot in the ground, let alone expect fans to shake his hand and pretend everything is ok. my respect for tan has gone, and i see him as a faceless investor who is passing through the club.
Mon Feb 15, 2016 11:47 pm
Wed Apr 07, 2021 7:41 pm