Sun Nov 29, 2015 7:49 pm
Military Junta wrote:The debt is still raising as the cost cutting hasn't gone towards debt repayments so how can people say that the club is better now than when Slade took over!!!! Some people are absolutely deluded on here and I can really see the club going bust very quickly if it doesn't return to the Premier League before the parachute payments finish
Sun Nov 29, 2015 7:54 pm
Military Junta wrote:The debt is still raising as the cost cutting hasn't gone towards debt repayments so how can people say that the club is better now than when Slade took over!!!! Some people are absolutely deluded on here and I can really see the club going bust very quickly if it doesn't return to the Premier League before the parachute payments finish
Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:07 pm
Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:The debt is still raising as the cost cutting hasn't gone towards debt repayments so how can people say that the club is better now than when Slade took over!!!! Some people are absolutely deluded on here and I can really see the club going bust very quickly if it doesn't return to the Premier League before the parachute payments finish
What makes you think that?
Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:09 pm
Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:The debt is still raising as the cost cutting hasn't gone towards debt repayments so how can people say that the club is better now than when Slade took over!!!! Some people are absolutely deluded on here and I can really see the club going bust very quickly if it doesn't return to the Premier League before the parachute payments finish
What makes you think that?
The state of the accounts make me think that
Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:11 pm
Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:The debt is still raising as the cost cutting hasn't gone towards debt repayments so how can people say that the club is better now than when Slade took over!!!! Some people are absolutely deluded on here and I can really see the club going bust very quickly if it doesn't return to the Premier League before the parachute payments finish
What makes you think that?
The state of the accounts make me think that: Been raising my concerns for a while now: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=164437&hilit=+Keith
Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:11 pm
Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:The debt is still raising as the cost cutting hasn't gone towards debt repayments so how can people say that the club is better now than when Slade took over!!!! Some people are absolutely deluded on here and I can really see the club going bust very quickly if it doesn't return to the Premier League before the parachute payments finish
What makes you think that?
The state of the accounts make me think that
I don't think we will go bust Tan won't let it if he did then that would look bad on him and he said that himself.
Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:13 pm
maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:The debt is still raising as the cost cutting hasn't gone towards debt repayments so how can people say that the club is better now than when Slade took over!!!! Some people are absolutely deluded on here and I can really see the club going bust very quickly if it doesn't return to the Premier League before the parachute payments finish
What makes you think that?
The state of the accounts make me think that: Been raising my concerns for a while now: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=164437&hilit=+Keith
If we did and it's a big if it's only what would have happened to us when he took us over.
Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:15 pm
Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:The debt is still raising as the cost cutting hasn't gone towards debt repayments so how can people say that the club is better now than when Slade took over!!!! Some people are absolutely deluded on here and I can really see the club going bust very quickly if it doesn't return to the Premier League before the parachute payments finish
What makes you think that?
The state of the accounts make me think that
I don't think we will go bust Tan won't let it if he did then that would look bad on him and he said that himself.
Deep down he doesn't give a f**k as if he didn't he wouldn't be letting the club go so stale as he has
Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:16 pm
Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:The debt is still raising as the cost cutting hasn't gone towards debt repayments so how can people say that the club is better now than when Slade took over!!!! Some people are absolutely deluded on here and I can really see the club going bust very quickly if it doesn't return to the Premier League before the parachute payments finish
What makes you think that?
The state of the accounts make me think that
I don't think we will go bust Tan won't let it if he did then that would look bad on him and he said that himself.
Deep down he doesn't give a f**k as if he didn't he wouldn't be letting the club go so stale as he has
Who knows but i think Tan is just recouping what he can while keeping us in the champ on the cheap and maybe sell on for a loss unless we do get promoted.
Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:20 pm
Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:The debt is still raising as the cost cutting hasn't gone towards debt repayments so how can people say that the club is better now than when Slade took over!!!! Some people are absolutely deluded on here and I can really see the club going bust very quickly if it doesn't return to the Premier League before the parachute payments finish
What makes you think that?
The state of the accounts make me think that
I don't think we will go bust Tan won't let it if he did then that would look bad on him and he said that himself.
Deep down he doesn't give a f**k as if he didn't he wouldn't be letting the club go so stale as he has
Who knows but i think Tan is just recouping what he can while keeping us in the champ on the cheap and maybe sell on for a loss unless we do get promoted.
No he's not because he's not recouping as there has been NO loan repayments!!!
Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:23 pm
Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:27 pm
Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:The debt is still raising as the cost cutting hasn't gone towards debt repayments so how can people say that the club is better now than when Slade took over!!!! Some people are absolutely deluded on here and I can really see the club going bust very quickly if it doesn't return to the Premier League before the parachute payments finish
What makes you think that?
The state of the accounts make me think that: Been raising my concerns for a while now: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=164437&hilit=+Keith
If we did and it's a big if it's only what would have happened to us when he took us over.
And you knew that 100% did you ? A club that reaches the FA Cup final just months before the court case had more than one interested party believe me it's just Ridsdale preferred Tans group for his personal benefit
Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:37 pm
Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:The debt is still raising as the cost cutting hasn't gone towards debt repayments so how can people say that the club is better now than when Slade took over!!!! Some people are absolutely deluded on here and I can really see the club going bust very quickly if it doesn't return to the Premier League before the parachute payments finish
What makes you think that?
The state of the accounts make me think that
I don't think we will go bust Tan won't let it if he did then that would look bad on him and he said that himself.
Deep down he doesn't give a f**k as if he didn't he wouldn't be letting the club go so stale as he has
Who knows but i think Tan is just recouping what he can while keeping us in the champ on the cheap and maybe sell on for a loss unless we do get promoted.
No he's not because he's not recouping as there has been NO loan repayments!!!
So is that us certain to go bust then?
Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:40 pm
Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:The debt is still raising as the cost cutting hasn't gone towards debt repayments so how can people say that the club is better now than when Slade took over!!!! Some people are absolutely deluded on here and I can really see the club going bust very quickly if it doesn't return to the Premier League before the parachute payments finish
What makes you think that?
The state of the accounts make me think that
I don't think we will go bust Tan won't let it if he did then that would look bad on him and he said that himself.
Deep down he doesn't give a f**k as if he didn't he wouldn't be letting the club go so stale as he has
Who knows but i think Tan is just recouping what he can while keeping us in the champ on the cheap and maybe sell on for a loss unless we do get promoted.
No he's not because he's not recouping as there has been NO loan repayments!!!
So is that us certain to go bust then?
I can't have an opinion now can I ? There's only so long a business can go on losing money, in my opinion Tan is doing excatly what Sam was doing just on a much larger scale
Sun Nov 29, 2015 8:40 pm
Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:The debt is still raising as the cost cutting hasn't gone towards debt repayments so how can people say that the club is better now than when Slade took over!!!! Some people are absolutely deluded on here and I can really see the club going bust very quickly if it doesn't return to the Premier League before the parachute payments finish
What makes you think that?
The state of the accounts make me think that
I don't think we will go bust Tan won't let it if he did then that would look bad on him and he said that himself.
Deep down he doesn't give a f**k as if he didn't he wouldn't be letting the club go so stale as he has
Who knows but i think Tan is just recouping what he can while keeping us in the champ on the cheap and maybe sell on for a loss unless we do get promoted.
No he's not because he's not recouping as there has been NO loan repayments!!!
So is that us certain to go bust then?
I can't have an opinion now can I ? There's only so long a business can go on losing money, in my opinion Tan is doing excatly what Sam was doing just on a much larger scale
Sun Nov 29, 2015 9:19 pm
maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:Rydogsccfc wrote:Military Junta wrote:The debt is still raising as the cost cutting hasn't gone towards debt repayments so how can people say that the club is better now than when Slade took over!!!! Some people are absolutely deluded on here and I can really see the club going bust very quickly if it doesn't return to the Premier League before the parachute payments finish
What makes you think that?
The state of the accounts make me think that
I don't think we will go bust Tan won't let it if he did then that would look bad on him and he said that himself.
Deep down he doesn't give a f**k as if he didn't he wouldn't be letting the club go so stale as he has
Who knows but i think Tan is just recouping what he can while keeping us in the champ on the cheap and maybe sell on for a loss unless we do get promoted.
No he's not because he's not recouping as there has been NO loan repayments!!!
So is that us certain to go bust then?
I can't have an opinion now can I ? There's only so long a business can go on losing money, in my opinion Tan is doing excatly what Sam was doing just on a much larger scale
He's not taking a wage from the club.
He's using his own money to fund the club.
He is not charging us interest.
Apart from those three things it's similar yes. I suppose, in a roundabout way but not at all.
Sun Nov 29, 2015 9:30 pm
Sun Nov 29, 2015 10:05 pm
maccydee wrote:The state of the accounts make me think that
Mon Nov 30, 2015 7:38 am
Mon Nov 30, 2015 8:49 am
Mon Nov 30, 2015 11:53 am
Military Junta wrote:I knew you'd try and pick me up on that hence the reason why I stated 'an example' on not one but two occasions!!! Pmsl
Mon Nov 30, 2015 1:07 pm
maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:I knew you'd try and pick me up on that hence the reason why I stated 'an example' on not one but two occasions!!! Pmsl
But that takes away any impact your post has. You could say To anything "I was just giving an example".
Anyway more important matters. You see post I tagged you about Bollinger?
Mon Nov 30, 2015 2:51 pm
Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:I knew you'd try and pick me up on that hence the reason why I stated 'an example' on not one but two occasions!!! Pmsl
But that takes away any impact your post has. You could say To anything "I was just giving an example".
Anyway more important matters. You see post I tagged you about Bollinger?
Well ring your accountant and ask him to give you some more examples
Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:39 pm
maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:I knew you'd try and pick me up on that hence the reason why I stated 'an example' on not one but two occasions!!! Pmsl
But that takes away any impact your post has. You could say To anything "I was just giving an example".
Anyway more important matters. You see post I tagged you about Bollinger?
Well ring your accountant and ask him to give you some more examples
Accountant? Do it all myself pal.
Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:58 pm
Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:I knew you'd try and pick me up on that hence the reason why I stated 'an example' on not one but two occasions!!! Pmsl
But that takes away any impact your post has. You could say To anything "I was just giving an example".
Anyway more important matters. You see post I tagged you about Bollinger?
Well ring your accountant and ask him to give you some more examples
Accountant? Do it all myself pal.
Well then you would know of more examples of the one I give you how Tan could make the same money using alternative avenues
Mon Nov 30, 2015 5:00 pm
maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:I knew you'd try and pick me up on that hence the reason why I stated 'an example' on not one but two occasions!!! Pmsl
But that takes away any impact your post has. You could say To anything "I was just giving an example".
Anyway more important matters. You see post I tagged you about Bollinger?
Well ring your accountant and ask him to give you some more examples
Accountant? Do it all myself pal.
Well then you would know of more examples of the one I give you how Tan could make the same money using alternative avenues
Not so easy with a football club. They are renowned money drainers.
One way he certainly isn't making dosh is on a wage. He takes nothing from the club.
Mon Nov 30, 2015 6:08 pm
Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:I knew you'd try and pick me up on that hence the reason why I stated 'an example' on not one but two occasions!!! Pmsl
But that takes away any impact your post has. You could say To anything "I was just giving an example".
Anyway more important matters. You see post I tagged you about Bollinger?
Well ring your accountant and ask him to give you some more examples
Accountant? Do it all myself pal.
Well then you would know of more examples of the one I give you how Tan could make the same money using alternative avenues
Not so easy with a football club. They are renowned money drainers.
One way he certainly isn't making dosh is on a wage. He takes nothing from the club.
Wages are calculated as one on the accounts book so you can't be certain of that whatsoever so I very much doubt that you do your own accounts if you don't even know that. Anyway what about the dodgy goings on regarding the Malaysian tourist board etc where they paid shite money for their advertising at the club!! You telling me that he's not making one way or another from that ?
Mon Nov 30, 2015 8:05 pm
maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:maccydee wrote:Military Junta wrote:I knew you'd try and pick me up on that hence the reason why I stated 'an example' on not one but two occasions!!! Pmsl
But that takes away any impact your post has. You could say To anything "I was just giving an example".
Anyway more important matters. You see post I tagged you about Bollinger?
Well ring your accountant and ask him to give you some more examples
Accountant? Do it all myself pal.
Well then you would know of more examples of the one I give you how Tan could make the same money using alternative avenues
Not so easy with a football club. They are renowned money drainers.
One way he certainly isn't making dosh is on a wage. He takes nothing from the club.
Wages are calculated as one on the accounts book so you can't be certain of that whatsoever so I very much doubt that you do your own accounts if you don't even know that. Anyway what about the dodgy goings on regarding the Malaysian tourist board etc where they paid shite money for their advertising at the club!! You telling me that he's not making one way or another from that ?
Sam's wages and Riddlers wages always showed up on the books.
Mon Nov 30, 2015 8:49 pm