Where has this promise gone ?

This promise is filed away with Debt to Equity promise.
Never to be seen again under Emperor Tan. Why do people believe his propaganda?

No rebrand = no debt to equity. At least in my eyes anyway.

You still going down this line Neil.

Tan changed us back to blue because if he did not this club would have died and it would have killed his reputation as as businessman. That is the bottom line here.

The rebrand was a failure and he failed on his promise.

This promise is filed away with Debt to Equity promise.
Never to be seen again under Emperor Tan. Why do people believe his propaganda?

No rebrand = no debt to equity. At least in my eyes anyway.

You still going down this line Neil.

Tan changed us back to blue because if he did not this club would have died and it would have killed his reputation as as businessman. That is the bottom line here.

The rebrand was a failure and he failed on his promise.

That's fine Ian. Whatever the reasons for the return to blue Tan made promises based on being rebranded to his favourite colour. Now we are back to our historical coloured kit Tan's promises are no longer valid.

This promise is filed away with Debt to Equity promise.
Never to be seen again under Emperor Tan. Why do people believe his propaganda?

No rebrand = no debt to equity. At least in my eyes anyway.

You still going down this line Neil.

Tan changed us back to blue because if he did not this club would have died and it would have killed his reputation as as businessman. That is the bottom line here.

The rebrand was a failure and he failed on his promise.

That's fine Ian. Whatever the reasons for the return to blue Tan made promises based on being rebranded to his favourite colour. Now we are back to our historical coloured kit Tan's promises are no longer valid.

And what about the 2 to 3 seasons we were red then Neil?

Does that not count because he decided to go back to blue?

This promise is filed away with Debt to Equity promise.
Never to be seen again under Emperor Tan. Why do people believe his propaganda?

No rebrand = no debt to equity. At least in my eyes anyway.

You still going down this line Neil.

Tan changed us back to blue because if he did not this club would have died and it would have killed his reputation as as businessman. That is the bottom line here.

The rebrand was a failure and he failed on his promise.

That's fine Ian. Whatever the reasons for the return to blue Tan made promises based on being rebranded to his favourite colour. Now we are back to our historical coloured kit Tan's promises are no longer valid.

And what about the 2 to 3 seasons we were red then Neil?

Does that not count because he decided to go back to blue?

Protest after protest might have stopped that. Also (and as reported on here) isn't there one director preventing Tan having full control of the city?

This promise is filed away with Debt to Equity promise.
Never to be seen again under Emperor Tan. Why do people believe his propaganda?

No rebrand = no debt to equity. At least in my eyes anyway.

You still going down this line Neil.

Tan changed us back to blue because if he did not this club would have died and it would have killed his reputation as as businessman. That is the bottom line here.

The rebrand was a failure and he failed on his promise.

That's fine Ian. Whatever the reasons for the return to blue Tan made promises based on being rebranded to his favourite colour. Now we are back to our historical coloured kit Tan's promises are no longer valid.

And what about the 2 to 3 seasons we were red then Neil?

Does that not count because he decided to go back to blue?

Protest after protest might have stopped that. Also (and as reported on here) isn't there one director preventing Tan having full control of the city?

Neil, First of all I protested from day one and never stopped.
Many never protested due to threats/lies said about Red or Dead etc.

Tan has full control of our club, No one can stop him doing anything he wants.

This promise is filed away with Debt to Equity promise.
Never to be seen again under Emperor Tan. Why do people believe his propaganda?

Debt to equity was part of rebrand.

No rebrand = no debt to equity. At least in my eyes anyway.

I also remember such comments as

"Change back to blue and there will be a party like you have never seen / won't be able to buy a ticket / season ticket sales will go through the roof"

Be interested in Annis's comments on this. Maybe he has forgotten too. Selective memory and all that.

This promise is filed away with Debt to Equity promise.
Never to be seen again under Emperor Tan. Why do people believe his propaganda?

No rebrand = no debt to equity. At least in my eyes anyway.

You still going down this line Neil.

Tan changed us back to blue because if he did not this club would have died and it would have killed his reputation as as businessman. That is the bottom line here.

The rebrand was a failure and he failed on his promise.

That's fine Ian. Whatever the reasons for the return to blue Tan made promises based on being rebranded to his favourite colour. Now we are back to our historical coloured kit Tan's promises are no longer valid.

And what about the 2 to 3 seasons we were red then Neil?

Does that not count because he decided to go back to blue?

Protest after protest might have stopped that. Also (and as reported on here) isn't there one director preventing Tan having full control of the city?

Neil, First of all I protested from day one and never stopped.
Many never protested due to threats/lies said about Red or Dead etc.

Tan has full control of our club, No one can stop him doing anything he wants.

Annis, doesn't Isaac still have shares he won't sell?