Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:19 pm
it was 100% on an update when it all came outForever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Carl and you in an update ages ago said he was funding it at his own expense ? Has it changed since then ? Also the fact is there were racist texts,so how is the club or tan wrong ?Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Good & the right decision.
A waste of time & a load of PC bollocks.
TOTALLY AGREEand TAN WASTES over £1MILLION
he would of earned that in a couple of days intrest of his wealth lol
Wez, you will never ever admit when Tan is in the wrong and even proved wrong.
Who said City never paid the bill?
I never ? I can't answer for Carl?
Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:25 pm
Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:25 pm
Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:30 pm
RFMH wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:RFMH wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:Thoughts are about as offensive to people as private conversations.
So both potentially quite offensive then.
No.
As they are private, no one hears them = no one is offended.
All the ways in which this is wrong is unreal.
Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:35 pm
Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:36 pm
Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:41 pm
nubbsy wrote:Good decision, as per the law they wernt intending any harm or offence as it was a private conversation.
Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:42 pm
Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:46 pm
bopman wrote:The part of the statement that is interesting is
"However, the investigation has been lengthened considerably due to serious concerns about the circumstances in which particular evidence provided to The FA had been given and the reliability and completeness of that evidence."
Sums up the whole sorry saga
Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:56 pm
Depressed Blue wrote:RFMH wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:RFMH wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:Thoughts are about as offensive to people as private conversations.
So both potentially quite offensive then.
No.
As they are private, no one hears them = no one is offended.
All the ways in which this is wrong is unreal.
Nope.
Have you ever insulted someone else in private?.
Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:58 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:bopman wrote:The part of the statement that is interesting is
"However, the investigation has been lengthened considerably due to serious concerns about the circumstances in which particular evidence provided to The FA had been given and the reliability and completeness of that evidence."
Sums up the whole sorry saga
Completely agree with this. I bet Tan used his wealth and contacts and pretty much held a gun to peoples heads for them to go forward with some fabricated evidence. That agent also conned Tan out of 50k. Tan scraped the barrel digging up everything he could in his desperate crusade to get one over Malky and he's failed. I also feel sorry for Dave Whelan. Hopefully, Tan will accept it, keep his mouth shut and allow us to move on as a football club now.
Thu Jul 16, 2015 1:58 pm
BlueSince1908 wrote:Malky wasn't cleared Annis, he admitted it himself, just couldn't be punished due to it being private
Thu Jul 16, 2015 2:02 pm
Thu Jul 16, 2015 2:18 pm
Thu Jul 16, 2015 2:26 pm
Thu Jul 16, 2015 2:49 pm
Thu Jul 16, 2015 2:51 pm
pembroke allan wrote:No surprise considering FAs past dealings with such things!time to move on and forget pair of them.
Thu Jul 16, 2015 3:06 pm
Forever Blue wrote:BlueSince1908 wrote:Malky wasn't cleared Annis, he admitted it himself, just couldn't be punished due to it being private
NO Case to answer to
Thu Jul 16, 2015 3:11 pm
Thu Jul 16, 2015 3:12 pm
RFMH wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:RFMH wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:RFMH wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:Thoughts are about as offensive to people as private conversations.
So both potentially quite offensive then.
No.
As they are private, no one hears them = no one is offended.
All the ways in which this is wrong is unreal.
Nope.
Have you ever insulted someone else in private?.
The fact you think this cannot be offensive and cannot be a crime is incredible. Just say you don't mind people being racist to Tan it'd probably be more honest.
they kept it private to not offend.Thu Jul 16, 2015 3:16 pm
Depressed Blue wrote:RFMH wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:RFMH wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:RFMH wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:Thoughts are about as offensive to people as private conversations.
So both potentially quite offensive then.
No.
As they are private, no one hears them = no one is offended.
All the ways in which this is wrong is unreal.
Nope.
Have you ever insulted someone else in private?.
The fact you think this cannot be offensive and cannot be a crime is incredible. Just say you don't mind people being racist to Tan it'd probably be more honest.
Did I say that, no.
It is the differnce between doing something in public and doing something in the private domain.
If you start criminalising people for private conversations, as I said, you might as well start policing thoughts.
Absolutely NO OFFENCE WAS CAUSED apart from when Tan released the texts. If anything Tan is at fault for crossing the barrier between private insults and public ones.
Yes it is a bit slimy to send texts around like this, but the difference isthey kept it private to not offend.
To be completely honest I say what ever I feel like with my friends. I don't really worry. Some of it incredibly offensive. Yet would I say that to the person I'm in insulting and is there any malice in what I'm saying? No. Who is offended? No one.
Thu Jul 16, 2015 3:17 pm
Thu Jul 16, 2015 3:19 pm
Thu Jul 16, 2015 3:23 pm
pembroke allan wrote:nubbsy wrote:Good decision, as per the law they wernt intending any harm or offence as it was a private conversation.
So private nobody knows what was said!
Thu Jul 16, 2015 3:33 pm
castleblue wrote:Sadly there are NO winners in this whole sorry mess but one thing is absolutely certain and that is MM & IM shared these offensive text messages between them and have escaped punishment because " "the communications were sent with a legitimate expectation of privacy".
The question is " How much damage has this done to the reputation of MM?" Well in my opinion MM will find out the next time he applies for a job and then he will find this story being dragged up time and again and it will stay with him for the rest of his life.
If at the outset VT intended to inflict damage to MM reputation then it's game, set and match to VT. I just hope he accepts the FA position on this so we can ALL move on from mess.
![]()
![]()
Thu Jul 16, 2015 3:53 pm
Thu Jul 16, 2015 4:50 pm
Thu Jul 16, 2015 5:07 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Forever Blue wrote:BlueSince1908 wrote:Malky wasn't cleared Annis, he admitted it himself, just couldn't be punished due to it being private
NO Case to answer to
They had case because fa investigated one!! But FA won't except private messages as being wrong!but cannot get away from fact both were guilty of saying offensive things (admitted by themselves)? Or because been cleared that makes them innocent?
Thu Jul 16, 2015 5:09 pm
Thu Jul 16, 2015 5:19 pm