UPDATED " Hull ruling on name change '

A majority of their fans voted for it.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... our-tigers

Very possibly they will go bust if their owner does pull out.

No they did not Neil because the majority did not even bother voting.

A majority of their fans voted for it.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... our-tigers

Very possibly they will go bust if their owner does pull out.

No they did not Neil because the majority did not even bother voting.

Same as in general elections Ian. Majority of those who voted. If they didn't vote against it probably weren't arsed.

Wonder if their fans can sue the FA if they do go bust.

A majority of their fans voted for it.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... our-tigers

Very possibly they will go bust if their owner does pull out.

No they did not Neil because the majority did not even bother voting.

Same as in general elections Ian. Majority of those who voted. If they didn't vote against it probably weren't arsed.

Wonder if their fans can sue the FA if they do go bust.

Actually Neil certain election carry a no if a person does not vote. Depends what suits who I guess.

Sue the FA......doubt it.

A majority of their fans voted for it.

http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... our-tigers

Very possibly they will go bust if their owner does pull out.

No they did not Neil because the majority did not even bother voting.

Same as in general elections Ian. Majority of those who voted. If they didn't vote against it probably weren't arsed.

Wonder if their fans can sue the FA if they do go bust.

Actually Neil certain election carry a no if a person does not vote. Depends what suits who I guess.

Sue the FA......doubt it.

Which elections are they?

Always regarded Dyke as a double header. Nevertheless I am pleased that the F. A. rejected Hull's proposed name change. This to me would have been far, far worse than the change of colour we had to put up with.