Sat Jun 27, 2015 9:53 am
Sat Jun 27, 2015 9:54 am
Depressed Blue wrote:maccydee wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:No.
We missed the chance with Syria.
Now hundreds of thousands are dead in the space of 4 years.
Muslims have every right to aggreived for what has happened. The west allowed assad to drop barrel bombs in civilian areas without thought. Assad is the modern Hitler and we have allowed him to prosper.
In the grand scheme of things, these attacks are f**k all.
Assad is preferable to ISIS. He was fighting them. I would be tempted to use any weapons at my disposal against them.
Preferable for you. In case ISIS turn up on your doorstep, which isn't going to happen as we've had 3 major terrorist incidents on these isles in over a decade.
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-wo ... ps-3048719
The threat is frankly non existent. Hysteria created by western media that doesn't even begin to show the heartache that is occurring in the middle east.
It is all about protecting your own interests. And the western media and people turn a blind eye to Assad as he killing other Muslims. A muslim killing a muslim is a non story in our world.
I've put this on here so many times now but:
AMMAN The death toll after nearly four years of civil war in Syria has risen to 210,060, nearly half of them civilians, but the real figure is probably much higher, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said on Saturday.7 Feb 2015
We should have executed Assad. We didn't. It could have destroyed the influence of the country that wishes to harm us most, Iran.
Sat Jun 27, 2015 9:55 am
Sat Jun 27, 2015 9:58 am
Cardiffcitymad wrote:This wouldn't be happening if we didn't poke our noses in the Far East in the first place... I sincerely hope everything is going to be ok in the UK with the armed forces marches today...
Sat Jun 27, 2015 10:01 am
Sat Jun 27, 2015 10:04 am
nubbsy wrote:Military Junta wrote:nubbsy wrote:Military Junta wrote:f*cking nuke the Isis held areas. f**k it if it means other casualties too then so be it they should have fought them off instead of allowing them to take over their land
You should be some sort of political leader. Nuke them and kill thousands of innocents, and who are the bad guys then? Tit
Stopped WW2 very quickly
This isn't world war 2 and it's not 1944. And where do you propose we nuke since they are world wide?
To be fair mate you post alot of political views and you seen well versed on a few subjects but when you say something like this it's hard to take you seriously, you sound like alot of people I work with in fact.
Sat Jun 27, 2015 10:04 am
Depressed Blue wrote:You are very much mistaken I'm afraid.
http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/10000 ... -590203858
Sat Jun 27, 2015 10:05 am
Sat Jun 27, 2015 10:05 am
nubbsy wrote:Military Junta wrote:nubbsy wrote:Military Junta wrote:f*cking nuke the Isis held areas. f**k it if it means other casualties too then so be it they should have fought them off instead of allowing them to take over their land
You should be some sort of political leader. Nuke them and kill thousands of innocents, and who are the bad guys then? Tit
Stopped WW2 very quickly
This isn't world war 2 and it's not 1944. And where do you propose we nuke since they are world wide?
To be fair mate you post alot of political views and you seen well versed on a few subjects but when you say something like this it's hard to take you seriously, you sound like alot of people I work with in fact.
Sat Jun 27, 2015 10:09 am
moonboots wrote:nubbsy wrote:Military Junta wrote:nubbsy wrote:Military Junta wrote:f*cking nuke the Isis held areas. f**k it if it means other casualties too then so be it they should have fought them off instead of allowing them to take over their land
You should be some sort of political leader. Nuke them and kill thousands of innocents, and who are the bad guys then? Tit
Stopped WW2 very quickly
This isn't world war 2 and it's not 1944. And where do you propose we nuke since they are world wide?
To be fair mate you post alot of political views and you seen well versed on a few subjects but when you say something like this it's hard to take you seriously, you sound like alot of people I work with in fact.
He cannot be taken seriously. That was a very immature comment, and that is being very kind to him. His politics is right wing, survival of the fittest, blame everything on the foreigners type stuff. That is no way for a civilized society to function. You say that you work with a lot of people who sound like him....isn't it worrying that as a society we are producing so many people like this? Where is it going wrong? I still believe that mankind has the potential for great things, where good will triumph over religious and racial bigotry but we are sadly a long way off.
Sat Jun 27, 2015 10:11 am
Sat Jun 27, 2015 10:12 am
eddiep wrote:World war 2 started after we dismissed the spread of hitler, nazis and their stockpiling of money and arms.
World war 2 could have been stopped
Hitler ordered his forces to pull out of Rhineland (no guns allowed there after treaty from world war 1) if Britain and France played f**k.
They didn't so hitler saw it as a sign of weakness and the rest is history
The question is, do you stop a war that kills millions of innocents by having to act n a way that kills thousands of innocents?
Sat Jun 27, 2015 10:20 am
eddiep wrote:Depressed Blue wrote:You are very much mistaken I'm afraid.
http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/10000 ... -590203858
We could not take out Assad due to Russia.
We also have to stop meddling in the middle east
We are seen as contrbutors and this creates massive backlash.
Muslims kill each other then team up if a non Muslim gets involved.
We've armed them, trained them, funded them, housed them, and protected them.
Our governments think they they are intelkectually superior, when in fact they've been played for years.
We need to sort out our own back yard now.
Sat Jun 27, 2015 10:20 am
Military Junta wrote:eddiep wrote:World war 2 started after we dismissed the spread of hitler, nazis and their stockpiling of money and arms.
World war 2 could have been stopped
Hitler ordered his forces to pull out of Rhineland (no guns allowed there after treaty from world war 1) if Britain and France played f**k.
They didn't so hitler saw it as a sign of weakness and the rest is history
The question is, do you stop a war that kills millions of innocents by having to act n a way that kills thousands of innocents?
The longer it goes on then the more innocents will die. How many more would have died if the bombs weren't dropped in Japan ?
Sat Jun 27, 2015 10:21 am
Cardiffcitymad wrote:This wouldn't be happening if we didn't poke our noses in the Far East in the first place..
Sat Jun 27, 2015 10:26 am
Sat Jun 27, 2015 10:34 am
maccydee wrote:Fundamentally it's Shia v Sunni and we are neither so should leave well alone.
Sat Jun 27, 2015 10:39 am
balkanblue wrote:Cardiffcitymad wrote:This wouldn't be happening if we didn't poke our noses in the Far East in the first place..
What a load of nonsense. This is often spouted by lefty Guardian lovers who have no concept of history and quite frankly, they should all be sent back to school, although that might lead you to spouting more dribble considering how left wing biased the education system is in the UK. Radical Islam has been a problem since around 600AD and since then around 500 million people (around about the population of the EU), or infidels as IS calls them, are estimated to be have been killed. It is complete and utter nonsense to suggest that foreign policy has led to this and its a scapegoat of an excuse used by extremists to try and pass the responsibility of their inhumane actions onto others.
Why did the Spanish Inquisition even exist in the first place? Oh wait, it was due to Islamic invasions and conquests. If it wasn't for the Spanish Inquisition a lot of Spain would have become Islamic controlled and the aims of Islamic State, in establishing Andalusia, would have been achieved a lot sooner in history.
Sat Jun 27, 2015 10:43 am
eddiep wrote:maccydee wrote:Fundamentally it's Shia v Sunni and we are neither so should leave well alone.
Tough fight there for the crazy Shia
Over 90% are Sunni - many of them over last few decades now reading a crazy version of Saudi Arabian war sunni islam.
Massive problem for the Sunni is the ultra bigoted Saudi salafism version of Islam.
The Saudis spread it across the world soon after they bought our guns, planes and bombs in the 60s and 70s
Sat Jun 27, 2015 11:23 am
maccydee wrote:eddiep wrote:maccydee wrote:Fundamentally it's Shia v Sunni and we are neither so should leave well alone.
Tough fight there for the crazy Shia
Over 90% are Sunni - many of them over last few decades now reading a crazy version of Saudi Arabian war sunni islam.
Massive problem for the Sunni is the ultra bigoted Saudi salafism version of Islam.
The Saudis spread it across the world soon after they bought our guns, planes and bombs in the 60s and 70s
Saudi Arabia are a massive problem. However they have bought and paid for many a Western politician.
Sat Jun 27, 2015 11:46 am
Sat Jun 27, 2015 11:54 am
Sat Jun 27, 2015 12:14 pm
cruzer wrote:The whole of Europe needs to close all there boarders for a start to have any chance of dealing with the enemy within ,then turn the internet off between countries ,because that is how there ideology is being spread,look at the IRA before internet ,they were only a stone throw away and they were so hard to track down and stop ,what chance you got when you do not even know who is in your own country and at the click of a button you can contact an IS member in Syria or else where ,then stop the fookers coming back from these places when they leave the UK to go out there and fight ,I find it so mad we let them come back ,then bring back the death penalty for crimes against the UK would stop a lot of people even thinking of doing anything ,you can not fight a war on foreign land when your scared of what might happen in you own country ,the media/internet/mobile phone is the main tool they use think about it .
Sat Jun 27, 2015 8:20 pm
Military Junta wrote:f*cking nuke the Isis held areas. f**k it if it means other casualties too then so be it they should have fought them off instead of allowing them to take over their land
Sat Jun 27, 2015 11:05 pm
Sun Jun 28, 2015 8:55 am
nubbsy wrote:Military Junta wrote:Xcasual wrote:Military Junta wrote:f*cking nuke the Isis held areas. f**k it if it means other casualties too then so be it they should have fought them off instead of allowing them to take over their land
That would mean nuking ourselves,Some parts of Britain are gone.
So where in Britian do Isis control then ?
Not control but have very deep routes in Cardiff for a start. 5 cardiff lads went out this week to fight for isis.